add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1897568 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1897568
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ecd352cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1897568
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The bug is about strange keyboard behavior in Vim when using QEMU. Let me break it down step by step.
+
+First, the user reports that arrow keys and Page Up/Down are acting weird in Vim under QEMU. They mention that other applications aren't affected unless you shell out from Vim. That suggests it's something specific to how Vim interacts with the keyboard in this environment.
+
+They're using MS-DOS 7.10 in a QEMU VM, running version 5.0.0 with "-k sv" option, but it doesn't matter if they don't use it. Also, this issue doesn't occur under VMware Player or Bochs. So the problem is likely related to how QEMU handles keyboard input specifically.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+This issue seems to be about input handling, which in a VM context is typically managed by the hypervisor or the device emulation. The keyboard behavior is misaligned, so it's probably related to how QEMU (as the hypervisor) translates keyboard events into the guest OS. 
+
+"Device" might cover hardware emulations, including keyboard, but "peripherals" could also be a fit since the keyboard is an input device. However, considering that the issue is with key handling and mapping, it's more about how QEMU processes the input events, which falls under hypervisor functions.
+
+Wait, but sometimes such issues are categorized as device-related. Or maybe "other" if none of the specific categories fit. But given that it's a keyboard problem, which is a hardware peripheral, "device" might be more accurate. Alternatively, since it's about how QEMU handles the input, perhaps under "hypervisor".
+
+But I'm a bit unsure. The user mentioned it's only in Vim and when using QEMU. So maybe it's an issue with how QEMU translates or passes keyboard events to the guest OS, which could be a hypervisor problem.
+
+Alternatively, it might be a device emulation bug because the keyboard is being emulated by QEMU as a device. But I think "hypervisor" is more about the management of the VM itself, while device emulation falls under "device". However, the symptoms point towards input handling during the translation of key presses into the guest OS, which could be part of the hypervisor's responsibilities.
+
+Hmm. Maybe I should check if there are any known issues related to QEMU keyboard handling in this context. But without that info, I have to go with what makes the most sense based on the categories. Since it's about input behavior specific to the VM and not other environments, it's likely a hypervisor issue.
+
+Wait, but looking again at the categories: "peripherals" is also an option. Maybe it's better to classify under "device" since the problem relates to the keyboard device emulation in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes strange keyboard behavior specifically within the Vim editor running on QEMU. This suggests that the issue lies in how QEMU handles input events for the keyboard, which is a hardware peripheral. Therefore, the most appropriate category is:
+
+**device**
+
+However, upon further reflection, since this relates to how the hypervisor (QEMU) translates keyboard input into the guest OS, the correct classification should be under the broader handling of input by the hypervisor itself.
+
+But considering the options given and that it's about a hardware device's behavior in the VM, "device" is more fitting.
+
+**device**
\ No newline at end of file