summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/2615
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-06-30 12:34:26 +0000
committerChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-06-30 12:35:44 +0000
commit25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320 (patch)
tree0f056db167683be54ea1e5e72d29d6069af55e7d /results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/2615
parent8e6da29e4ee5fc14bc1cc816a24f21271f14090d (diff)
downloademulator-bug-study-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.tar.gz
emulator-bug-study-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.zip
add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/2615')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/261515
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/2615 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/2615
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bcc3af9e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/2615
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out the category for this bug report. The issue is that QEMU gets blocked when receiving an unexpected response from swtpm after sending a control command.
+
+Looking at the steps provided: QEMU sends a `CMD_GET_TPMESTABLISHED` and expects an 8-byte response. However, if swtpm isn't running, it responds with a 4-byte error message instead. This mismatch causes QEMU to block in `recv_msg`.
+
+The problem seems related to how QEMU handles unexpected responses from the TPM emulator (swtpm). Since this is about handling commands and their expected responses correctly, I'm thinking it's more of an issue with command processing rather than something like a translation error or performance.
+
+Reviewing the possible categories: 'device' might fit because it's related to the TPM device interaction. 'network' isn't relevant here since it's not a networking issue. 'hypervisor' is probably not it either, as this is about the device emulation within QEMU rather than hypervisor-specific functions.
+
+So, considering all that, 'device' seems like the appropriate category because it pertains to how QEMU interacts with the TPM device and handles unexpected responses during command processing.
+</think>
+
+The issue arises from incorrect handling of unexpected command responses in the TPM emulator. Since this relates to device interaction and command processing within QEMU, the most fitting category is **device**.
+
+**Answer:** device
\ No newline at end of file