add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/965 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/965
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8f01ef0f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/965
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report: "Creating a NVME disk using qemu in the Host not in the VM." Alright, let's break it down.
+
+First, the user is talking about creating an NVMe disk with QEMU. Now, I know that QEMU can be used as a hypervisor, running virtual machines, and it also has various devices like storage controllers. NVMe refers to Non-Volatile Memory Express, which is a protocol for accessing non-volatile storage.
+
+The issue here seems to be that when creating an NVMe disk using QEMU, the disk isn't appearing in the VM but rather on the host machine. That means the virtual disk isn't being properly passed through or emulated for the guest VM. 
+
+Looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+NVMe is a storage protocol, so it's related to devices, specifically storage devices. However, in QEMU terms, when you create a disk for a VM, it's usually handled as a device under the guest's operating system. If the disk isn't showing up in the VM, that points to an issue with how the device is being presented or configured in the hypervisor.
+
+Wait, but the user mentioned that the disk is created using QEMU on the host but not in the VM. This could be related to how the storage devices are emulated or passed through. If it's a pass-through scenario (like direct mapping), then maybe there's an issue with device assignment. Alternatively, if it's an emulated disk, perhaps the configuration is incorrect.
+
+But considering the categories, 'device' seems appropriate because it's about how QEMU handles storage devices for the VM. Alternatively, could it be under 'hypervisor'? Since hypervisor issues can sometimes affect how resources are allocated to VMs. However, since the specific issue is with a device (disk) not appearing in the VM, I think 'device' is more precise.
+
+Wait another thought: Maybe 'peripherals' could also fit because disks are peripherals. But 'device' seems broader and more direct here.
+</think>
+
+device
\ No newline at end of file