add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 30 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/173 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/173
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..88f3e4be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/173
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to classify this bug report correctly. The issue is about being unable to read symlinks when mounting a 9P filesystem with the security model set to "mapped". 
+
+First, I need to understand what each category means. Looking at the list:
+
+- **mistranslation** relates to incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target in user-mode.
+- **assembly** is about assembly lowering issues.
+- **other** is a catch-all.
+- **device**, **graphic**, **socket**, **network**, **KVM**, **boot**, **vnc**, **debug**, **files**, **permissions**, **performance**, **kernel**, **peripherals**, **hypervisor** are all specific areas.
+
+The bug report mentions filesystem mounting and symlinks. Filesystem operations often relate to how the filesystem is handled, including permissions, mounts, etc. The security_model parameter suggests it's related to how file permissions or access control is managed in the 9P filesystem within QEMU.
+
+In QEMU, the 9P protocol is used for filesystems, and when a problem arises with mounting or accessing files (like symlinks), it's likely a filesystem issue. Since it's specifically about reading symlinks under certain security settings, this points towards a permissions-related bug. Symlinks might require specific permissions to be read, and the "mapped" security model could affect how these permissions are enforced.
+
+Looking at the categories, "files" seems relevant because it pertains directly to filesystem operations. Alternatively, "permissions" is also a possibility since the issue might be related to access rights. However, given that the problem occurs during mounting with a specific security setting, I think "files" is more appropriate as it's about how the filesystem is being handled, including the way symlinks are accessed.
+
+Wait, but maybe I should consider if this is a permissions issue. If the bug is about not having the right access to read symlinks, then "permissions" would be the category. However, in QEMU, when dealing with 9P filesystems and security models, it's often handled under the broader filesystem operations rather than just permissions.
+
+Alternatively, perhaps "file" or "files" isn't an exact match here. But looking back at the categories, there is no specific "filesystem" category listed, so "files" might be the closest fit. Alternatively, if it's a problem with how QEMU handles the 9P protocol when certain security settings are applied, it could fall under the "hypervisor" or "kernel" categories.
+
+Wait, but hypervisor refers more to the management of virtual machines and their resources, not directly about filesystem handling. The kernel might be involved in how filesystems are mounted, especially with QEMU's emulated environments.
+
+However, considering that this is a bug within QEMU's implementation when using the 9P protocol for filesystems, it's likely categorized under "files" since it's related to file operations and access. Alternatively, if it's about security settings or permissions enforcement in the 9P stack, then maybe "permissions".
+
+I'm a bit torn between "files" and "permissions". Since the issue is about reading symlinks which are files and their metadata, but also about how permissions are enforced with the mapped security model. However, I think the primary aspect here is that it's an inability to read symlinks when mounting, so it's more related to file operations in the filesystem.
+
+Therefore, the category should be "files".
+</think>
+
+files
\ No newline at end of file