diff options
| author | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-03 07:27:52 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-03 07:27:52 +0000 |
| commit | d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a (patch) | |
| tree | f8f784b0f04343b90516a338d6df81df3a85dfa2 /results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1652011 | |
| parent | 7f4364274750eb8cb39a3e7493132fca1c01232e (diff) | |
| download | emulator-bug-study-d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a.tar.gz emulator-bug-study-d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a.zip | |
add deepseek and gemma results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1652011')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1652011 | 17 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1652011 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1652011 deleted file mode 100644 index d889cb68..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1652011 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU. Let's see what information is given. - -The user mentioned that a VM shut down due to an error in block.c of QEMU. They provided details from their log files, including the specific line in block.c where the assertion failed: bdrv_error_action with the condition 'error >= 0' not being met. - -Looking at the possible categories, I see options like device, network, kernel, hypervisor, etc. Since the error is happening in block.c, which deals with block devices and storage, it's likely related to disk operations. However, the failure is an assertion that 'error >= 0', which suggests something went wrong during a device operation. - -I should consider if this falls under 'device' since block devices are part of the hardware emulated by QEMU. Alternatively, maybe it's a kernel issue because KVM involves the hypervisor layer, but the error message points more directly to the block driver in QEMU itself. - -Wait, the error is in qemu's block.c, which handles storage for VMs. This could be related to device management or storage issues, so 'device' might be appropriate. However, since it's part of the hypervisor's handling (KVM) of the guest's storage devices, maybe 'hypervisor' is more accurate. - -But looking back at the categories provided: hypervisor is a separate category. The failure in block.c seems like a QEMU issue, which is part of the hypervisor layer. So perhaps 'hypervisor' is the right classification here. -</think> - -The bug report involves an error within block.c of QEMU, specifically related to an assertion failure during storage device handling, which falls under the hypervisor's responsibilities. - -**Answer:** hypervisor \ No newline at end of file |