add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 28 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/kernel/1007 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/kernel/1007
deleted file mode 100644
index c20966ac..00000000
--- a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/kernel/1007
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
-<think>
-Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "qemu-user: add execveat syscall support". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
-
-First, I'll break down the bug report. It's about adding support for the execveat syscall in qemu-user. QEMU is an emulator and a virtualization tool that can run different operating systems under other environments.
-
-The term "syscall" usually refers to system calls, which are functions provided by the operating system kernel. So this seems related to how the user-mode QEMU handles system calls when running guest programs.
-
-Looking at the categories:
-
-- Mistranslation: This is about incorrect mapping from source architecture to target or IR. It's more of a translation issue rather than adding new features.
-- Assembly: Lowering assembly code, but here it's about adding a syscall, not about assembly lowering.
-- Device: Not directly related unless execveat interacts with devices, which I don't think is the case.
-- Graphic: Unrelated to graphics.
-- Socket/network: Maybe if execveat deals with sockets or network calls, but in this context, it's about the syscall itself.
-- KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine. Adding a syscall support doesn't directly relate to KVM unless QEMU is integrating more tightly with the hypervisor, which isn't indicated here.
-- Boot: Not related to booting processes.
-- VNC: Unrelated.
-- Debug: Probably not related to debugging features.
-- Files/permissions: Possibly, but again, it's about syscall support.
-- Performance: Could be, but adding a feature isn't necessarily about performance optimization.
-- Kernel: This seems relevant because execveat is a system call that interacts with the kernel. QEMU might need to handle this in its emulation of user-mode processes.
-- Peripherals: Not directly unless it's hardware-related, which it's not.
-- Hypervisor: KVM is a hypervisor, but adding syscall support is more about the guest OS interaction rather than hypervisior functions.
-
-So, considering all categories, "kernel" seems to be the most appropriate because it relates to how QEMU handles system calls that interact with the underlying operating system's kernel.
-</think>
-
-kernel
\ No newline at end of file