add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/network/1388735 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/network/1388735
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4ef3e433
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/network/1388735
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU. The user mentioned that after upgrading to QEMU 2.1.0, they can't use certain TCP ports for VNC anymore. Specifically, when they tried using port 443 with the command `-vnc :-5457`, it failed because QEMU couldn't convert `-5457` to a number.
+
+From what I know, VNC typically uses ports starting from 5900 onwards. So, if you have display number `n`, the port is usually `5900 + n`. For example, display `1` would use port `5901`. However, in this case, the user wants to use a lower port like 443, which is outside the usual range.
+
+Looking at the bug report, it seems that QEMU isn't handling negative offsets correctly. The command `-vnc :-5457` was working before but now fails because the code expects `display_num + 5900`, and a negative number might be causing an invalid port calculation. So, when they tried using `-5457`, it resulted in `5900 - 5457 = 443`, which is correct, but QEMU isn't allowing that anymore.
+
+The user's main issue is that they can't use the full TCP port range for VNC. They were able to do this before with a specific setup, and now it doesn't work. So, the problem lies in how QEMU converts the display number into a TCP port.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: assembly, device, graphic, hypervisor, kernel, network, etc. The issue is related to VNC configuration and port handling, which falls under networking because VNC uses TCP/UDP ports for communication. Therefore, this bug should be classified under the 'network' category.
+</think>
+
+network
\ No newline at end of file