add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 23 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/network/153 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/network/153
deleted file mode 100644
index 0e432bc2..00000000
--- a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/network/153
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-<think>
-Alright, so I need to classify this bug report: "SLIRP SMB silently fails with MacOS smbd". Let's break it down step by step.
-
-First, understanding what SLIRP is. From what I remember, SLIRP stands for Simple Lightweight Introspection and Redirection Proxy. It's a userspace TCP/IP stack used in QEMU to allow the guest OS to have network access without needing kernel privileges. So it's part of the networking functionality in QEMU.
-
-The bug report mentions that SLIRP SMB is failing silently when used with MacOS smbd. Let's parse this: "SMB" stands for Server Message Block, which is a protocol used for sharing files, printers, and other resources over a network. In this context, it's probably related to how the guest OS accesses SMB shares through QEMU's SLIRP.
-
-Now, considering the possible categories provided:
-
-- **mistranslation**, **assembly**, **other**, **device**, **graphic**, **socket**, **network**, **KVM**, **boot**, **vnc**, **debug**, **files**, **permissions**, **performance**, **kernel**, **peripherals**, **hypervisor**
-
-The bug is related to SLIRP, which I know is part of QEMU's networking. Specifically, it's about the SMB protocol failing silently when interacting with MacOS smbd. Since SMBD is a service on MacOS that provides SMB file sharing, this seems like an issue where the guest OS (via SLIRP) can't properly communicate over SMB to the host's smbd.
-
-Looking at the categories:
-
-- **network**: This would cover any issues related to network communication within QEMU. Since SLIRP is a networking component and the problem is with SMB traffic, which uses sockets and network protocols, this seems like a fit.
-  
-Other possible categories: Could it be a **socket** issue? Well, socket operations are part of network handling, so maybe, but since SMB is a higher-level protocol built on top of TCP/IP, the broader category would likely be **network**.
-
-I don't see any indication that this relates to assembly lowering or translation issues (mistranslation). It's more about communication between guest and host over SMB, which falls under network functionality. So I think the best fit is **network**.
-</think>
-
-network
\ No newline at end of file