add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1799768 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1799768
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..76b4dd25
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1799768
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's figure out the category for this bug report. The user mentioned that the documentation for "-nodefaults" is unclear. From their context, they believe it should clarify that it doesn't apply to devices created by a machine model.
+
+First, I'll consider what each category means:
+
+- **mistranslation**: Incorrect mapping from source to IR/target in user-mode.
+- **assembly**: Issues during assembly lowering.
+- **device**: Problems with hardware devices in the emulator.
+- **graphic**: Graphics-related issues.
+- **socket**, **network**: Networking or socket problems.
+- **KVM**: Kernel-based Virtual Machine issues.
+- **boot**: Booting problems.
+- **vnc**: VNC-related bugs.
+- **debug**: Debugging tools issues.
+- **files**, **permissions**: File handling and permissions.
+- **performance**: Performance issues.
+- **kernel**, **hypervisor**: Kernel or hypervisor-level bugs.
+
+The bug is about documentation clarity, specifically for the "-nodefaults" option. Since this isn't a performance issue, device problem, or anything related to networking or graphics, it doesn't fit into those categories. The confusion is about how the option works with machine models and devices, which might relate to device handling but isn't a direct bug in device functionality itself.
+
+Looking at the options again, "device" could be a possibility if the documentation affects device behavior, but the user's main issue is unclear documentation rather than device malfunction. The problem seems more about how the feature is described rather than the feature itself not working as intended.
+
+Since none of the other categories like kernel or hypervisor seem relevant, and it's specifically about documentation, maybe "other" is the best fit. Alternatively, if "-nodefaults" relates to machine model devices, perhaps "device" could still apply. However, the primary issue is with the documentation's clarity, not the functionality of devices themselves.
+
+I think the most appropriate category here is **other**, as it doesn't fall neatly into any of the specific technical categories listed.
+</think>
+
+other
\ No newline at end of file