add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 22 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2153 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2153
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2a8f6efa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2153
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm looking at this bug report: "ubuntu-20.04-s390x-all CI job is very flaky." I need to classify it into one of the given categories.
+
+First, let's break down what the report says. It mentions a CI (Continuous Integration) job for Ubuntu 20.04 on s390x architecture that's failing frequently—flaky means unstable or unreliable. The possible categories include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, network, KVM, etc.
+
+The s390x architecture refers to IBM Z Systems mainframes, which are big-endian and have unique characteristics. Since the CI job is related to this architecture, it might involve issues specific to how QEMU handles s390x.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- **Mistranslation** relates to incorrect semantic mapping from source to target, maybe in user-mode. Not sure if that's the case here.
+- **Assembly lowering** involves converting high-level code to assembly, which might be part of the build process but not directly related to CI flakiness.
+- **Device**, **graphic**, and others don't seem relevant unless the issue is with hardware interaction or UI issues in QEMU, which isn't mentioned.
+- **Network** could be a possibility if the CI job relies on network resources that are unstable, causing test failures. However, "flaky" might refer more to instability rather than specific network errors.
+- **KVM**, **boot**, **vnc**, **debug**, etc., are all potential areas but not directly pointing to the root cause here.
+- The issue is about CI flakiness which could be due to various factors like environment setup, test suite issues, or build problems. Since it's specifically an Ubuntu s390x job, maybe there's something in QEMU's handling of this architecture causing inconsistent builds or tests.
+
+I'm leaning towards 'other' because the issue doesn't fit neatly into any specific category provided, especially if it's a general instability rather than a hardware, network, or kernel-specific problem. Alternatively, if the flakiness is due to issues in translating code for s390x, then maybe 'mistranslation' could be considered.
+
+But since the report doesn't specify that it's related to translation errors but rather the CI job being flaky, I think 'other' is more appropriate.
+</think>
+
+other
\ No newline at end of file