summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2613
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-06-30 12:34:26 +0000
committerChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-06-30 12:35:44 +0000
commit25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320 (patch)
tree0f056db167683be54ea1e5e72d29d6069af55e7d /results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2613
parent8e6da29e4ee5fc14bc1cc816a24f21271f14090d (diff)
downloademulator-bug-study-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.tar.gz
emulator-bug-study-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.zip
add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2613')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/261321
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2613 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2613
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b925fa34
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2613
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided an error message when building QEMU on Ubuntu 24.04 in a Docker container using debian commands. The error says: cc1: error: ‘-fcf-protection’ is not compatible with this target.
+
+First, let's understand what this error means. 'cc1' is the GCC compiler driver. The option '-fcf-protection' is related to control flow protection, a security feature introduced in some versions of GCC. If the target system (the CPU architecture or version) doesn't support this option, GCC will throw an error.
+
+The user was building QEMU from source, so it's likely during the compilation step that this error occurred. Since they're using Ubuntu 24.04 in a Docker container based on Debian commands, perhaps their build environment is not fully compatible with the compiler flags being used, or maybe the target architecture isn't supporting '-fcf-protection'.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+I need to determine which category fits best. The error is related to the compiler not recognizing a flag, so it's about the build process rather than runtime issues. The '-fcf-protection' flag isn't supported by their target, which might be an older GCC version or a different architecture that doesn't implement this feature.
+
+None of the categories directly relate to compiler flags or build errors except possibly 'other', since it's not fitting into any specific category like device or network issues. Alternatively, if the bug is about the build process in general, maybe 'build' could be a category, but I don't see that as an option here.
+
+Wait, let me check the categories again: the available ones are mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, and others listed. Since this isn't about incorrect translation or assembly issues, it's more of a build configuration problem with GCC flags not being compatible. So 'other' seems appropriate because none of the specific categories directly address compiler incompatibilities.
+
+Alternatively, could it be related to kernel? Maybe, but the error is during compilation, which might not directly involve the kernel unless QEMU relies on a specific kernel feature that's not supported. But I think 'other' is still the safest choice here.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a build-time error due to an incompatible compiler flag. The error message indicates that the '-fcf-protection' option isn't recognized, likely because of an older GCC version or target architecture incompatibility.
+
+**Answer: other**
\ No newline at end of file