add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

47 files changed, 713 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1089005 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1089005
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..fe5130f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1089005
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's see. The user reported an issue with QEMU not shutting down when VNC is enabled on OS X. They can normally terminate the process with ctrl-c without VNC, but when VNC is active, ctrl-c doesn't work, and they have to use Activity Monitor or another method.
+
+So, first, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is related to VNC because it's specifically when VNC is enabled that QEMU doesn't shut down properly. The user tried using ctrl-c and found it ineffective, which suggests that the termination signal isn't being handled correctly when VNC is active.
+
+Looking at the categories, "vnc" seems directly relevant here since the problem occurs only when VNC is used. There's no mention of other components like graphics drivers or device issues; it's specifically about the VNC connection preventing proper shutdown.
+
+I don't think it falls under 'other' because there's a specific feature (VNC) involved that's causing the issue. It doesn't seem related to assembly, kernel, or hypervisor problems either.
+
+Therefore, the appropriate category for this bug report is "vnc".
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1099403 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1099403
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a9f0109e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1099403
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about high CPU utilization in QEMU's VNC mode. The user mentioned that when they start a Gentoo guest with QEMU and connect via VNC, starting a video causes the CPU usage of qemu-x86-64 to spike to 90%. Even after closing the VNC viewer, the CPU remains high. Without the remote connection, the CPU usage is much lower (20-30%).
+
+So, first, I need to understand what category this issue falls into from the given options: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is related to VNC usage causing high CPU. The user suspects it's due to QEMU's VNC server needing to send framebuffer updates. They're puzzled why the CPU doesn't drop when the client disconnects, unlike a regular VNC server.
+
+I'm thinking this isn't a translation issue because mistranslation relates more to incorrect mapping in code conversion. It's also not an assembly or kernel issue. It seems directly related to how QEMU handles VNC connections and resource management after disconnection.
+
+The high CPU usage is a performance problem, but since it's specific to the VNC component, 'performance' might be too broad. The bug is specifically about VNC behavior, so the most fitting category would be 'vnc'.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1158 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1158
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7c78a568
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1158
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Error in setting VNC password" within QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me go through each step.
+
+First, understanding what the bug is about. The user encountered an error while trying to set a VNC password. VNC stands for Virtual Network Computing, which is used for remote access to computers. In QEMU, VNC is often used as part of its graphical remote display capabilities.
+
+Looking at the categories provided:
+
+- mistranslation
+- assembly
+- other
+- device
+- graphic
+- socket
+- network
+- KVM
+- boot
+- vnc
+- debug
+- files
+- permissions
+- performance
+- kernel
+- peripherals
+- hypervisor
+
+I need to pick the most appropriate category. The bug is about VNC, so "vnc" seems directly related. I don't think it's under graphic because the issue isn't with rendering graphics but specifically with setting a password in VNC. It doesn't seem like a network error because the problem is with authentication setup rather than connection issues.
+
+"Graphic" might be close since VNC is graphical, but "vnc" is more precise here. So I think the correct category is "vnc".
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1414222 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1414222
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0df8cf17
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1414222
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me start by understanding the problem and the provided information.
+
+The user reported an error when using `qemu-system-i386` with a VNC option: `-vnc localhost:0,to=99,id=default`. The error message says, "Invalid parameter 'to'". This suggests that the 'to' parameter is not recognized by QEMU in this context.
+
+Looking at the commit information, it's from Gerd Hoffmann and titled "vnc: switch to QemuOpts, allow multiple servers". The changes seem related to VNC configuration. The patch switches VNC handling to use QemuOpts, which might have changed how parameters are parsed or supported.
+
+I remember that in QEMU, the VNC options can sometimes be tricky. Before this commit, maybe the 'to' parameter was valid, but after switching to QemuOpts, perhaps it's no longer recognized. Alternatively, the way arguments are passed might have changed, causing 'to' to be treated as an unknown option.
+
+Now, considering the categories: I'm looking for which category best fits this issue. The bug is related to VNC configuration parameters not being accepted correctly after a change in how VNC options are handled.
+
+The possible categories include things like 'vnc', 'network', 'other', etc. Since this directly involves VNC and its command-line options, the most appropriate category seems to be 'vnc'. This bug is about an invalid parameter in the VNC setup, likely due to changes in how QEMU handles VNC server configurations after switching to QemuOpts.
+
+I don't see any indication that it's a mistranslation or assembly issue. It’s specifically about command-line parameters for VNC, so 'vnc' fits perfectly.
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains to an invalid parameter in the VNC configuration within QEMU. The error occurs when using the `to` parameter after a commit changed how VNC options are handled. This is directly related to VNC functionality.
+
+**vnc**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1455912 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1455912
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1960dac3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1455912
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user mentioned an issue with QEMU's VNC WebSocket option not being parsed correctly when run from the command line. They noticed that using "-vnc host:port,websocket" stopped working in version 2.3.0 and started giving an error.
+
+The error message they provided is about failing to resolve the address for 'tor:on' which suggests that QEMU isn't handling the WebSocket option properly. The user tried different formats like replacing the hostname with an IP and using "-display vnc=..." but still faced the same issue.
+
+Looking at the categories, I need to see which one fits best. It's related to VNC functionality, so 'vnc' is a primary category. But also, it seems to be about parsing command-line options correctly, which might fall under 'other' since it's not directly about performance or hardware issues. However, since the core issue is with the WebSocket option in VNC, 'vnc' is more specific.
+
+I think the appropriate category here is 'vnc' because the problem is specific to how QEMU handles the VNC options and their parsing.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1486278 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1486278
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b685e549
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1486278
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's read through it carefully.
+
+The user ran a QEMU command with VNC and websocket parameters. They used 'info vnc' in the monitor and didn't see any websocket info. Instead, they saw address 0.0.0.0:5901. However, netstat showed that port 5701 is being listened on.
+
+The issue seems to be related to how QEMU's VNC server reports its parameters. The 'info vnc' command isn't displaying the websocket information even though it was started with those options.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: There's a category called "vnc". This bug affects the functionality of the VNC monitor command, which directly relates to the VNC subsystem in QEMU.
+
+So, the most appropriate category is "vnc".
+</think>
+
+The issue pertains to the 'info vnc' command not showing websocket information. Since this is related to how VNC parameters are reported, the correct category is:
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1502884 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1502884
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a730818f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1502884
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user is talking about an issue with QEMU's VNC server where network lag causes unintended key presses in the guest VM, specifically when the "Enter" key is pressed. They want a feature called "norepeat" for the keyboard in the VNC server.
+
+First, I'll break down what the problem is. The user mentions that due to network lag, QEMU's VNC server receives multiple keydown events without corresponding keyups, leading to unintended actions. This suggests it's related to how the VNC protocol handles keyboard input and how QEMU processes these events.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The issue is specifically about the VNC server's keyboard handling, so I think "vnc" would be the primary category here. The user is suggesting an option to prevent key repeats, which affects how QEMU processes these events within the VNC context.
+
+I don't see any mention of assembly or mistranslation in the bug report; it's more about protocol interaction and feature request for handling keyboard input better. So "vnc" seems appropriate because it's directly related to the VNC server component.
+</think>
+
+The category is vnc, as the issue pertains to how QEMU handles keyboard events within its VNC server.
+
+**Answer:** vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1548 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1548
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5d699b67
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1548
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm looking at this bug report. The user is encountering a segmentation fault when using the VNC viewer with QEMU. They provided the steps to reproduce and some information from git bisect that points to a specific commit.
+
+First, the issue occurs when connecting via `gvncviewer`, which indicates it's related to the VNC implementation in QEMU. The error message is a segmentation fault, which usually means there's an invalid memory access somewhere in the code. 
+
+Looking at the git bisect output, the first bad commit was made by Marc-André Lureau and involves changes to several files: console.h, console.c, vnc.c, and vnc.h. The commit message mentions modifying how the cursor is handled for QemuConsole, which likely affects VNC since that's a display protocol.
+
+The problem seems to be in the VNC code because when VNC viewer connects, it crashes with a segmentation fault. Segfaults often occur due to pointer issues or accessing invalid memory addresses. The changes made in this commit could have introduced an error in how the cursor is managed during VNC sessions, leading to incorrect memory operations.
+
+Considering the categories provided, "vnc" is one of them, and since the issue directly relates to VNC functionality within QEMU, it fits perfectly into that category. There's no indication of other areas like network or graphics hardware (as opposed to software), so "vnc" is the most appropriate classification.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a segmentation fault when using VNC in QEMU, which suggests an issue with how the VNC protocol is handled. The problematic commit modifies several files related to VNC, including `ui/vnc.c`. Therefore, the category is:
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1586194 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1586194
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..81e934a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1586194
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user is reporting issues with the VNC reverse connection in Qemu 2.6.0. They mention two problems: first, that using "-vnc IP:port,reverse" now interprets the number after the IP as a display number instead of a port. Second, when they subtracted 5900 from the port (like using port 2 and expecting it to use 5902), they got a segfault.
+
+Looking at the provided backtrace, the error happens in vnc_init_basic_info_from_server_addr, which is part of QEMU's VNC implementation. The stack trace includes functions like qio_channel_socket_get_local_address and others in ui/vnc.c, which directly relates to how VNC connections are handled.
+
+The bug report points out that the issue started after a specific commit related to hoisting allocation of VncBasicInfo to callers. This indicates a change in memory management or data handling within the VNC code, leading to incorrect behavior and eventually a crash.
+
+Considering the categories provided: the primary issue here is with the VNC reverse connection functionality. The first problem relates to how command-line options are interpreted (the "reverse" parameter), which falls under the usage of VNC features. The second problem results in a segfault during VNC initialization, pointing to an error in VNC code execution.
+
+Among the given categories—like 'vnc', 'network', 'hypervisor' etc.—the most fitting category is 'vnc' since the bug directly affects the VNC server's behavior and crash when using reverse connections.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes issues with VNC (Virtual Network Computing) reverse connections in QEMU. The first problem relates to incorrect parsing of the port number when using the "reverse" option, indicating a change in how command-line arguments are interpreted for VNC setup. The second issue leads to a segmentation fault when trying to connect, which points to an error within the VNC server code.
+
+The provided stack trace shows that the crash occurs in functions specific to QEMU's VNC implementation, such as `vnc_init_basic_info_from_server_addr` and others in the `ui/vnc.c` file. This suggests that the problem lies within the VNC-related components of QEMU, specifically how connections are handled when the reverse option is used.
+
+The commit mentioned (`98481bfcd661daa3c160cc87a297b0e60a307788`) modifies how `VncBasicInfo` is allocated, which could affect memory management during VNC initialization. This further points to an issue within the VNC code itself.
+
+Given these observations and considering the provided categories, the most appropriate classification for this bug report is:
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1589272 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1589272
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..152f4e88
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1589272
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report about QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's look at what's happening.
+
+The user ran a configure script for QEMU and included an option --disable-vnc{,-sasl,-jpeg,-png}. Then when they tried to run qemu-system-x86_64, it gave them an error: "There is no option group 'vnc'". This caused a segmentation fault.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others.
+
+The error message directly mentions "vnc", so that's a clue. The issue seems to be related to the VNC option group not being recognized. Since the user tried to disable various VNC-related components, maybe something went wrong in how QEMU handles these options during configuration or runtime.
+
+The categories don't have 'vnc' as a separate category; wait, looking again: yes, one of the options is 'vnc'. So if the error is about the VNC option group not existing, it's likely under the 'vnc' category.
+
+Alternatively, since the user tried to disable VNC and got an error related to VNC options, perhaps it's a misconfiguration during build. But considering the categories, 'vnc' seems appropriate because the issue directly relates to that component.
+</think>
+
+The bug report mentions an error regarding the "vnc" option group not being recognized. Since this is the specific component causing the problem, the category is:
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1637447 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1637447
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bc38e38a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1637447
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The issue is about VNC/RFB reporting an incorrect name length. Specifically, when a machine's name exceeds 1024 characters, the VNC clients get an incorrect ServerInit message. The reporter thinks the problem is in vnc.c at line 2463, where snprintf's return value is used as the name-length field.
+
+So, what's happening here? It seems that when the machine name is longer than 1024, using snprintf returns a larger number than the actual bytes sent. This causes the VNC client to not receive the correct data because the length reported doesn't match the actual truncated name.
+
+The reporter suggests using min(size, 1024) as a quick fix. That makes sense because it ensures that the length reported is accurate for names longer than 1024.
+
+Now, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others.
+
+The bug directly relates to VNC functionality. The issue is within the VNC server code (vnc.c), which handles RFB protocol communication. It's about how the name length is reported in the ServerInit message, which is part of the VNC connection setup.
+
+So this falls under the 'vnc' category because it's a problem specific to QEMU's VNC implementation and its interaction with clients during the initial handshake.
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains directly to the VNC (Virtual Network Computing) functionality in QEMU, specifically how the name length is handled in the ServerInit message. This issue affects the communication between the QEMU VNC server and the client, making it a problem within the 'vnc' category.
+
+**Answer: vnc**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1653 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1653
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f1dc5b2b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1653
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU. Let me break down what's happening here.
+
+The user is using UEFI (specifically OVMF.fd built from udk2) to install Red Hat 6.0 in a VM. When they try to connect via VNC after starting the VM, it gets stuck with a black screen or runs very slowly. They mention that this doesn't happen with Red Hat 6.1, so it's specific to 6.0.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The main issue is with VNC connectivity and screen issues when using UEFI for RHEL 6.0. The problem seems related to how QEMU handles the graphics or display during the installation process. Since it's working fine with RHEL 6.1 but not 6.0, there might be a version-specific bug in how QEMU interacts with the VNC server or the UEFI setup.
+
+I don't think it's about network because the problem is more graphical. It could be related to graphic performance, but since the same setup works for another version, maybe it's a specific issue in how the display is handled during the installation process using UEFI. Alternatively, it might be a boot-related issue where VNC isn't initializing properly.
+
+Wait, another angle: perhaps when using UEFI, QEMU's VNC integration doesn't handle certain configurations well, leading to the VM getting stuck. This could fall under 'boot' issues because the problem occurs during or immediately after the boot process via UEFI.
+
+Alternatively, it might be a graphics driver issue in QEMU for certain guest OS versions when using VNC. But given that the same setup works with RHEL 6.1, it's more likely tied to how QEMU initializes the display during the UEFI-based installation of RHEL 6.0.
+
+So considering all this, 'vnc' seems like a possible category because the issue is directly related to connecting via VNC and screen behavior. Alternatively, it could be a 'boot' issue if it's about the VM not booting correctly with VNC enabled when using UEFI for RHEL 6.0.
+
+But since the primary problem is with VNC connectivity and display issues, I think 'vnc' is the most appropriate category here.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1661176 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1661176
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..63b809d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1661176
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's read through the problem carefully.
+
+The user mentions that in version 2.6.2, pressing CTRL-ALT-2 accessed the monitor via VNC, while CTRL-ALT-3 went to serial0 console. Now, with 2.8.0, pressing CTRL-ALT-2 goes to serial0 and CTRL-ALT-3 goes to parallel0. The monitor isn't accessible anymore using those key combinations.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: vnc is one of them. This issue involves VNC (Virtual Network Computing) as it's related to remote access via that protocol. The problem seems specific to how key shortcuts are handled in the VNC interface, which affects switching between different consoles or monitors.
+
+The other possible categories don't fit as well. It's not a translation error (mistranslation), nor is it an assembly issue. It's specifically about the behavior of the VNC client or server when certain keys are pressed. Other categories like network, device, graphic might be related, but since it's directly about VNC functionality, 'vnc' seems the most accurate.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1665789 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1665789
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..64515e33
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1665789
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The user is asking about adding more resolutions for VGA displays accessed via VNC instead of SPICE. They specifically mentioned two resolutions: 1080x1920 and a split screen setup.
+
+First, looking at the possible categories, I see "vnc" as an option. Since the report mentions accessing VGA through VNC, that seems relevant. The other category related might be "graphic" or maybe "display", but in the list provided, it's under "vnc". 
+
+The user isn't talking about performance issues, permissions, or network configuration directly. It's more about display settings and resolution options within the VNC environment. Therefore, the most appropriate category is likely "vnc".
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1665791 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1665791
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6604b7df
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1665791
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is asking if they can create two displays in QEMU on Windows 10, each accessible through separate VNC connections. They mentioned that this works with SPICE but prefer using VNC.
+
+First, I need to consider the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The topic here is about having multiple displays with separate VNC connections. This relates to how QEMU handles display output and remote access. Since the user specifically mentions VNC connections, it's likely related to the VNC feature in QEMU.
+
+Looking at the categories, "vnc" seems directly relevant because the issue is about connecting via VNC. The other possible category could be "graphic" since it involves displays, but the primary focus is on using multiple VNC sessions, which ties more closely to the VNC functionality rather than graphics handling in general.
+
+I don't think this falls under categories like network or socket directly, as those would relate more to underlying connection mechanisms, not the display setup. "Graphic" might be a contender, but since the user is asking about VNC connections specifically, "vnc" is more precise.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1670377 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1670377
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cc2a744d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1670377
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for the project using QEMU. The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, the user is experiencing an issue with VNC in openQA when using the svirt backend. The error message mentions "short read for zlre data/RDR EndOfStream" and it occurs during Grub2 while interacting via the VNC client. This only happens when connecting remotely from a different system (host and worker are separate), not locally.
+
+The user also notes that this issue started with QEMU versions 2.6 RC1 and above, but doesn't occur with 2.5.0 or in newer versions like 2.8.0, although it still happens via openQA. The VNC client used is custom, and the problem seems related to communication between the VNC server (QEMU) and the client.
+
+The error message points towards a problem during data transfer over VNC, possibly due to network issues or handling of streams. Since it's specifically about VNC and occurs when connecting remotely, it's likely related to how QEMU handles the VNC protocol in such scenarios.
+
+Given that, the most fitting category seems to be 'vnc' because the error is directly tied to VNC communication between the client and server.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue with VNC connectivity where a short read occurs during data transfer, leading to an EndOfStream exception. This happens specifically when using the svirt backend, which connects remotely from a different system. The problem is related to QEMU's handling of the VNC protocol in this remote setup.
+
+**Answer: vnc**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1715186 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1715186
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..41f364db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1715186
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure this out. The user is asking about a bug report in QEMU and wants it classified into one of several categories. The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report: It's about improving error messages for websockets in VNC. Specifically, when there's an error with a connection request, QEMU just closes the socket without any info. The user wants to return HTTP 400 errors and maybe log something too.
+
+Hmm, so this is related to VNC, which I know is part of remote desktop services in QEMU. The issue is about handling websocket connections and providing better error messages, which would be helpful for debugging. 
+
+The category list includes 'vnc' as a separate option, so that seems relevant here because the bug is directly about the VNC websocket server's behavior. Other categories like network or debug are related but not specific enough. Since it's specifically about VNC and improving error messages for connections, 'vnc' fits best.
+
+So I think the correct category is 'vnc'.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1717414 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1717414
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7925368a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1717414
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The issue described is about incorrect key symbols being inputted when using VNC clients like bVNC or RealVNC with QEMU VMs.
+
+The user mentioned that certain keysyms are not being handled correctly when connecting from an Android device. They provided examples where specific keys result in wrong characters, such as '!' becoming '1'. This suggests a problem with how the key events are processed, particularly related to modifiers like SHIFT.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation refers to incorrect mapping between source architecture and target, which could be relevant here since the key events aren't translating correctly. However, another category is 'vnc', which directly relates to VNC functionality issues.
+
+The bug specifically occurs during VNC sessions, so it's more about how QEMU handles VNC input rather than a general translation issue. Therefore, categorizing it under 'vnc' seems appropriate because the problem lies within the VNC protocol handling in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1732671 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1732671
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..45e9fd80
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1732671
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's read through it carefully.
+
+The bug report mentions an issue with VNC and WebSocket compatibility. Specifically, IE 11/Edge isn't working with noVNC HTML5 client when using a WebSocket connection. The problem is that QEMU checks the `Upgrade` header in a case-sensitive manner, but IE sends 'W' instead of 'w'. According to RFC6455, this should be case-insensitive.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The bug is related to VNC and WebSocket handling, so 'vnc' seems directly relevant. It's not a translation issue or something with assembly code. The problem isn't about the hypervisor or other listed categories either. Therefore, the most appropriate category is 'vnc'.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1738283 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1738283
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8ff93b12
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1738283
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem again carefully.
+
+The user is reporting an issue with QEMU 2.11 where they can't type certain characters via VNC: '<', '>', and '|'. They mention that these keys work fine on their en_US QWERTY keyboard when not using VNC, specifically in other environments. The same problem occurs with two different ISO images. However, the issue doesn't happen when VNC isn't used.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is related to input not being captured correctly through VNC. Since it's a keyboard issue over VNC, the most relevant category seems to be 'vnc'. It's not about translation errors or assembly issues but rather how the input is handled in the VNC session.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1795100 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1795100
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..75ace1a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1795100
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The issue is about QEMU's VNC unix-domain socket being unlinked prematurely. 
+
+Looking at the problem description, when a client disconnects, the socket file gets removed, preventing reconnection without restarting the VM. The user provided a test case where after connecting and disconnecting via `socat`, the `vnc.sock` file disappears.
+
+The bug report mentions that the `qio_channel_socket_close()` function in `io/channel-socket.c` is responsible for this behavior, specifically an `unlink()` call introduced in commit d66f78e1eaa832f73c771d9df1b606fe75d52a50. It's noted that similar behavior doesn't occur with the monitor socket.
+
+Considering the categories, I see options like 'vnc', 'socket', and others. The bug is related to VNC functionality and specifically involves unix-domain sockets. The premature unlinking of the socket file points directly to a problem in how the socket handling is managed.
+
+The category 'vnc' makes sense because it's specific to the VNC implementation. However, since the issue is about socket management, 'socket' might also be applicable. But given that the primary affected component is VNC, I think 'vnc' is more appropriate here.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1802465 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1802465
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..243c22da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1802465
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The user's issue is about typing via VNC being unreliable. They mentioned that sometimes keys are skipped, swapped, or repeated. This problem doesn't occur when using VNC on physical hardware.
+
+Looking at the categories, the main keyword here is "VNC." The bug report specifically points out issues with the VNC connection in QEMU. Therefore, it's directly related to the VNC component.
+
+So, the category should be 'vnc' because the problem occurs during input via the VNC protocol.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1809252 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1809252
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e654cdc0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1809252
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The user provided several options like mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, etc., up to hypervisor. 
+
+The bug report is about password authentication in FIPS-compliant mode with VNC. It mentions that password auth isn't supported because it uses DES cipher which isn't allowed under FIPS 140-2. The user is asking if QEMU can use a different cipher to re-enable password authentication.
+
+So, the issue revolves around VNC and its authentication method in compliance mode. VNC is related to graphical remote access, so the category should be 'graphic'. Alternatively, it could fall under network since VNC runs over networks, but the primary issue is with the graphical protocol's authentication feature.
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains to password authentication within the VNC protocol when operating in FIPS 140-2 compliance mode. This involves the use of encryption ciphers and their impact on authentication support.
+
+**vnc**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1828207 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1828207
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5948228f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1828207
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The user is requesting that QEMU's built-in VNC server logs authentication failures. They mention that currently, there are no logs or events recorded when auth attempts fail, which makes it hard to analyze and integrate with automated systems like fail2ban. This absence of logging leaves the VNC service vulnerable to brute-force attacks, especially since the built-in auth scheme might be weak.
+
+The main issue here is about adding log messages for failed authentication attempts in the VNC server. The user provided an example of what such a log could look like: "QEMU VNC Authentication failed 192.168.0.5:5902 - 123.45.67.89:7898". Their goal is to make this information available so that it can be used by security tools like fail2ban.
+
+Looking at the list of possible categories, I need to find which one fits best. Let's go through them:
+
+- Mistranslation: Doesn't seem related; it's about assembly or IR mapping.
+- Assembly lowering: Also not relevant here.
+- Other: A catch-all, but maybe there's a more specific category.
+- Device: Not directly related unless it's hardware-specific.
+- Graphic: Since VNC is graphical remote access, this might fit.
+- Socket: Could be, as VNC uses network sockets.
+- Network: Definitely related since VNC operates over the network.
+- KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine; not directly relevant here.
+- Boot: Not related to booting processes.
+- VNC: There's a specific category for VNC!
+- Debug: Logging is part of debugging, but the issue is about security and logging specifically for auth failures.
+- Files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor: None seem directly relevant.
+
+The bug report is specifically about adding logs related to failed VNC authentication attempts. The VNC category seems to be the most appropriate because it's about the VNC service functionality. Even though network and socket are involved, the primary issue is with the VNC server's logging of auth events.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1849644 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1849644
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..eb52c288
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1849644
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report about QEMU's VNC WebSocket proxy requiring a non-standard 'binary' subprotocol. Let me go through the details step by step.
+
+The user mentioned that when using "-vnc" with the "websocket" option in QEMU, it requires the 'binary' subprotocol, which isn't part of the standard WebSocket specs. They pointed out that this causes issues because clients like noVNC can't connect unless they're modified to request 'binary', which is incorrect behavior.
+
+Looking at the code provided in channel-websock.c, there's some hardcoding related to 'binary'. The problem revolves around how QEMU handles WebSocket connections and subprotocols, specifically with VNC.
+
+The categories I have are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+I'm thinking this is related to the VNC protocol's interaction over WebSocket. Since it's about how QEMU's WebSocket proxy behaves with subprotocols and affects client connections, it's more specific than just 'network' or 'socket'. The bug directly impacts the VNC functionality when using WebSocket, which ties into the VNC category.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1858623 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1858623
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..21c7a285
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1858623
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The issue is about VNC output showing garbage when using zlib mode. Let's break it down.
+
+The user mentions that when they use QEMU with VNC and a client set to zlib encoding, they see artifacts on the screen, especially after moving windows over patterns. They suspect it's related to deflate issues in the compression.
+
+Looking at the categories: the main keywords here are "VNC" and "zlib." Since VNC is explicitly mentioned, that points directly to the 'vnc' category. The problem isn't about translation, assembly, or performance; it's specific to how VNC handles the zlib encoding, which falls under its own category.
+
+I don't see any other categories fitting better, like network issues or device problems. It's purely a display issue through VNC using a particular compression method.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1894818 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1894818
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1751d3fb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1894818
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU. The issue is with COLO's guest VNC client hanging after a failover. Let me break this down.
+
+First, the user mentions they set up primary and secondary VMs, installed VNC server and xrdp, and accessed via VNC/RDP. Everything worked fine until they killed the primary VM and performed a failover. After that, the VNC client's screen hung and couldn't recover. It did work after killing the SVM, though.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is specifically about VNC client hanging post-failover. Since it's related to VNC functionality and the issue occurs during a failover scenario involving VMs managed by QEMU/KVM, the most relevant category seems to be 'vnc'. The problem isn't with assembly or translation but rather with how VNC connections are handled after a failover.
+
+I don't see any mention of other areas like network hardware (device) or graphics drivers (graphic), so those can be ruled out. It's directly about the VNC service, which is under the 'vnc' category.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1895219 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1895219
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..25baefb4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/1895219
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The user provided a list: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is about QEMU failing when using the -vnc option because it can't find the 'en-us' keymap. The error message says it couldn't read the keymap file and mentions that the share/keymaps directory only has 'sl' and 'sv', but previous versions had 'en-us'.
+
+Looking at the categories, I should figure out which one best fits this issue. The problem is related to VNC in QEMU, specifically with a missing keymap file. Since it's about a missing file or resource that's required for VNC functionality, the category 'vnc' seems appropriate because it directly relates to how QEMU handles VNC connections and their configurations.
+
+I don't think it's about device drivers or peripherals because the issue is not hardware-related but rather software configuration. It's also not about network connectivity itself; it's more about the setup for the graphical interface (VNC). So 'vnc' is the right category here.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/2492 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/2492
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7e9cc7db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/2492
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's tackle this bug report classification. The user is having trouble with QEMU builds because the qtest tests are picking up gvnc when it's installed, and they can't disable this dependency to ensure reproducible builds. They encountered this issue during bulk builds on OpenBSD.
+
+First, I'll read through the provided code snippet from tests/qtest/meson.build. It looks like the build system checks if vnc is found and then tries to find gvnc-1.0 using pkg-config. If it finds gvnc, it adds some test cases that depend on it.
+
+The problem here is that during builds, especially in environments where gvnc is installed (like OpenBSD bulk builds), QEMU includes the gvnc dependency, which might not be desired for reproducibility. The user can't disable this, leading to build issues.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, network, vnc, etc. Since the issue revolves around the VNC-related dependency and how it's being handled during the build process, especially in tests, the most fitting category is 'vnc'. The problem isn't about assembly or performance but rather about dependencies specific to VNC functionality.
+</think>
+
+The bug report relates to a VNC dependency issue during QEMU builds. 
+
+**Answer: vnc**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/2668 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/2668
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7f63048a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/2668
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user provided a list of possible categories, and I need to choose the right one based on the given bug report.
+
+The bug report says: "h.264 encoding/compression support" with additional info that noVNC now supports h.264 decoding. 
+
+First, I'll break down what each part means. H.264 is a video compression standard, so this has to do with video encoding and decoding. The mention of noVNC suggests it's related to VNC (Virtual Network Computing), which is used for remote desktop access.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: vnc is one of them. Other options like 'graphic' might also be relevant because H.264 relates to video, but since the bug report specifically mentions noVNC and its support, it's more directly tied to VNC functionality rather than general graphics processing.
+
+I don't see any other category that fits better here. The changes are about adding decoding support in noVNC, which is part of the VNC implementation in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/2836 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/2836
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..41d6fd29
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/2836
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm looking at this bug report where using `qemu-system-amd64 -readconfig test.config` causes an assertion failure. The config file only has `[vnc]`, which is empty except for the section header.
+
+The error message says there's an assertion failure in `ui/vnc.c` at line 4294, specifically that the variable `id` failed. From the backtrace, it looks like this happens during the initialization of VNC, probably because some required configuration isn't present.
+
+In QEMU, when you define a VNC server, you typically need to set an `id`, which is an identifier for the display or device. Without this `id`, the code expects one but doesn't find it, leading to the assertion failure.
+
+The user also mentions that passing an invalid `id` gives a specific error about the parameter expecting an identifier. So if the config file lacks the `id`, perhaps QEMU should handle this gracefully by checking for its presence before proceeding, instead of crashing with an assertion.
+
+Since the issue is related to VNC configuration and how it's being read from the config file, the category here seems to be 'vnc'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a problem when using `-readconfig` with a `[vnc]` section. The missing `id` in the configuration causes an assertion failure, which relates directly to the VNC functionality.
+
+**Answer: vnc**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/2949 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/2949
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bdaf6b67
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/2949
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me start by reading the problem description carefully.
+
+The issue is about VNC: virtio-gpu outputs not being displayed by the VNC client. Specifically, when using multiple outputs with VNC, only the first output (output 0) is enabled. The other outputs become enabled only when the VNC client sends a SetDesktopSize command. 
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce, it's clear that the problem occurs during the interaction between QEMU and the VNC client. The description mentions that the state of each output is controlled by an 'enabled_output_bitmask', which is initialized to 1 for VNC0, meaning it's always enabled. However, other devices set this parameter differently.
+
+The key point here is that other display systems like GTK or SDL call a function (dpy_set_ui_info) which triggers another function (virtio_gpu_ui_info), enabling the outputs. But for VNC, this happens only when handling a specific client command related to setting the desktop size. So if the VNC client doesn't support this command or doesn't adjust the window size, the additional outputs remain disabled.
+
+Now, considering the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The bug is directly related to VNC functionality within QEMU. The issue arises because the VNC client isn't handling certain commands correctly or not sending them at all, which affects how virtio-gpu handles multiple outputs. This seems specific to the interaction between the display system (VNC) and the GPU device.
+
+So, categorizing this, it's definitely under 'vnc' since the problem is with VNC client behavior affecting GPU output.
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains to VNC functionality within QEMU, specifically how multiple outputs are handled. The issue arises from VNC not enabling additional outputs unless a specific command is sent. This relates directly to the VNC subsystem's interaction with the GPU and display systems.
+
+**vnc**
+
+Answer: vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/351 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/351
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..92e69a5d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/351
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "German keyboard vnc issue" for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me think about each possible category.
+
+First, looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report mentions a "German keyboard" and relates to "vnc". I know that QEMU has a VNC server for remote desktop access. Issues with the keyboard could be about input handling in the VNC session.
+
+So, the problem is likely related to how the German keyboard layout is handled when using VNC. That points directly to the 'vnc' category because it's about the virtual network console and its functionality.
+
+I don't think it fits into 'peripherals' as that might be more about hardware devices in general. It's specifically about the VNC interface, so 'vnc' is the most accurate.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/397212 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/397212
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..84ff5e04
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/397212
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's see what the report says.
+
+The issue is about scrolling artifacts on some guests. The screen doesn't refresh properly when scrolling, and it's happening on RHEL 4.8 and SLES 11 but not on RHEL 5.3. However, on RHEL5.3, scrolling is sluggish, suggesting a trade-off between speed and proper refreshing.
+
+Looking at the command line provided, it's using QEMU with VNC display because there's the -vnc :40 option. So the user is connecting via VNC to view the guest OS.
+
+The categories include things like assembly, device, graphic, network, KVM, vnc, etc. The problem here is related to screen refreshing and scrolling artifacts, which sounds like a graphical issue. Since it's happening during scrolling in the display, I think this relates directly to how QEMU handles graphics output, specifically through VNC.
+
+VNC is used for remote desktop access, so any issues with screen updates or refresh would fall under the 'vnc' category. Alternatively, it could be a 'graphic' issue, but since it's VNC-related, 'vnc' seems more precise.
+
+I don't see anything related to assembly or translation errors here; it's purely about display behavior. It's not about device drivers or peripherals in general, as the problem occurs during scrolling and screen refresh via VNC.
+
+So, I think the correct category is 'vnc'.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/498039 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/498039
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ba9ce658
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/498039
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have to classify the given bug report into one of the categories provided. Let's look at the details.
+
+The bug report mentions an issue with copy/paste functionality between a Windows guest and the VNC client in QEMU. The user points out that without this feature, it's a significant usability problem. They suggest a workaround by running VNC inside the guest but note it has more overhead than QEMU's built-in display.
+
+The reporter explains that QEMU's VNC is just a display device and doesn't handle the clipboard, which is part of Windows. Therefore, a helper app in the guest would be needed to bridge this gap. They acknowledge that few developers might take on writing such a helper app but suggest keeping the bug open for someone else.
+
+Now, looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is related to VNC and clipboard interaction between guest and host. Since copy/paste typically involves file operations or inter-process communication, but in this case, it's more about integrating with the guest OS's clipboard via QEMU's VNC. However, the main problem isn't a bug in translation (mistranslation) or assembly code.
+
+The VNC part is directly mentioned, so 'vnc' seems relevant. Alternatively, since it's about enhancing functionality rather than fixing a direct issue, maybe 'other'? But I think 'vnc' is more specific here because the problem pertains to how VNC handles clipboard integration.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/595 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/595
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..690f5f36
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/595
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. The user is reporting an issue with QEMU where the VNC mouse isn't moving when using tablet mode on a headless OS9 setup. They mentioned that it works fine in PS/2 mode but not aligned properly, which is why they switched to tablet mode. On Windows, this works as expected over VNC, but on Linux (Ubuntu 21.04), the mouse doesn't move at all when using VNC.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is specifically with the VNC mouse functionality. Since it's related to how the mouse is handled over VNC, especially in tablet mode, this seems to be a graphics-related issue. The VNC server might not be correctly handling the tablet input events or translating them properly. This points towards the 'graphic' category because it involves the display and input handling within the graphical interface provided by QEMU's VNC.
+
+So, the bug is likely in how QEMU handles the mouse input for the VNC client when running on Linux, particularly in tablet mode. It doesn't seem to be a translation error or performance issue but rather an incorrect handling of input events in the graphics display.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/667791 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/667791
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7da5b9c4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/667791
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories for QEMU. Let me read through the bug report carefully.
+
+The user mentioned that the Cygwin build fails due to an issue in ui/vnc-etc-tight.c. The specific problem is a function called tight_detect_smooth_image24 using "uint" which isn't defined in the current scope. They also note that adding a typedef for unsigned int as uint fixes the build.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is related to the VNC component since the problematic file is ui/vnc-etc-tight.c. The error occurs during compilation, specifically a type definition problem for uint. This suggests it's not an assembly or translation issue but rather a build-time type definition missing in the code.
+
+Since the bug report doesn't mention issues with device drivers, graphics rendering, network connectivity, KVM virtualization, boot processes, debug functions, file handling, permissions, performance bottlenecks, kernel modules, peripheral devices, or hypervisor components, it's most likely related to VNC. The missing type definition in the context of VNC code points towards a build-time issue specific to the VNC implementation.
+
+Therefore, the category that best fits this bug is "vnc."
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/759 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/759
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ad6ddef2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/759
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The issue is about copy-and-paste not working over VNC in QEMU.
+
+First, looking at the description: the user can't copy or paste between the host and guest when using VNC. They mentioned that Gtk works fine, so it's specific to the VNC connection.
+
+The steps to reproduce involve building QEMU with certain options, including enabling VNC and other features. Then running the VM with VNC server and connecting via vncviewer. The problem occurs during copy-paste attempts in the terminal.
+
+Additional info points out that an article claims copy-paste is supported on VNC, implying this should work but doesn't.
+
+The possible categories include 'vnc' as one of them. Since the issue directly relates to VNC functionality and not other areas like assembly or graphics, it fits under 'vnc'.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/772358 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/772358
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cd05ae77
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/772358
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is having issues with QEMU where the order of command line options affects whether VNC works or not. Specifically, when they specify "-nographic" before "-vnc", VNC works, but if they switch the order, it doesn't.
+
+First, I need to understand what each option does. From what I remember, "-nographic" disables the graphical output and typically redirects it to a virtual console. On the other hand, "-vnc" enables VNC server for remote desktop access. The user is pointing out that these two options seem to conflict when their order changes.
+
+Looking at the provided examples, in the first case where "-nographic" comes before "-vnc", VNC works as expected. In the second example, with "-vnc" before "-nographic", VNC doesn't work and there's confusion on the terminal. This suggests that the order of these options affects how QEMU initializes them.
+
+I recall that in QEMU/KVM, certain command line options are processed in a specific order, and some might override others if they come later. In this case, perhaps "-nographic" is overriding the VNC setting when it's placed after "-vnc". Alternatively, maybe the VNC option isn't being properly recognized if another option is set afterward.
+
+The user also mentions that the documentation states "-nographic" disables SDL (which is another graphical interface) but not VNC. However, in practice, using "-nographic" seems to conflict with VNC when placed after it. This discrepancy indicates a possible bug in either the implementation or the documentation.
+
+I should consider what category this falls under. The options are: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+This issue is related to how command line options interact and affect functionality, particularly with VNC. Since it's about the behavior of these options rather than a translation error or assembly issues, "mistranslation" doesn't fit. It's also not directly about the graphics system in terms of rendering but more about option parsing.
+
+However, since the problem revolves around VNC configuration and conflicting command line options affecting its functionality, the most fitting category seems to be "vnc". The issue is specific to how VNC behaves when certain options are ordered differently, so it's a bug related directly to the VNC implementation in QEMU/KVM.
+</think>
+
+The issue revolves around how the order of command-line options affects VNC functionality. Since the problem is specific to VNC behavior and option parsing, the appropriate category is:
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/806656 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/806656
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..68ffdfc2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/806656
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me start by reading the bug report carefully.
+
+The issue is about VNC encoding in QEMU. Specifically, it says that "Tight PNG" encoding is being sent even when --disable-vnc-png is set. That sounds like a problem with how VNC encodings are handled after disabling them.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: there's 'vnc', which seems directly related since this issue deals with VNC encoding. The other options include things like assembly, network, kernel, etc., but none of those seem as relevant here.
+
+The bug report mentions that when --disable-vnc-png is set, the server still sends updates marked as "Tight PNG". This implies a problem in how VNC encodings are managed, probably in the VNC-related code. So, 'vnc' seems like the correct category.
+
+I don't think it's related to performance or permissions because those categories usually involve system resource usage or access control, which isn't mentioned here. It's more about protocol handling, so 'vnc' is spot on.
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains to incorrect behavior in VNC encoding settings within QEMU. The issue arises when the "Tight PNG" encoding continues to be used despite disabling it with the --disable-vnc-png option. This suggests a problem in how VNC encodings are managed, particularly related to the VNC protocol and its configuration.
+
+**Step-by-Step Explanation:**
+
+1. **Understanding the Bug:** The bug occurs when QEMU sends "Tight PNG" encoded updates even after disabling them using --disable-vnc-png. This means that the intended behavior (using "tight" encoding instead) isn't being respected, leading to potential issues with how VNC clients handle these updates.
+
+2. **Identifying Keywords:** The key terms here are "VNC", "Tight PNG", and "--disable-vnc-png". These all relate directly to QEMU's VNC server functionality and its encoding options.
+
+3. **Mapping to Categories:**
+   - **mistranslation, assembly, other:** These categories don't fit because the issue isn't about semantic mapping, assembly code, or general bugs.
+   - **device, graphic, socket, network:** While related, these are more about hardware devices, graphical rendering, networking layers, which aren't directly at play here.
+   - **KVM, boot, vnc:** "vnc" is the most fitting category as it's specifically about VNC server behavior and encoding options.
+
+4. **Conclusion:** The issue is centered around how QEMU handles VNC encodings when certain flags are set, making 'vnc' the appropriate classification.
+
+**Answer:**
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/807 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/807
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8950e118
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/807
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report in QEMU. The user provided a detailed description of an issue where using TigerVNC as a client to the built-in VNC server causes the VM to crash or freeze. They also mentioned that connecting and disconnecting several times can lead to the problem, and that without any VNC connections, it doesn't happen.
+
+First, I'll go through each possible category one by one. The categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the problem, it's related to VNC connectivity causing a freeze. The steps mention using TigerVNC and connecting via SSH port redirection from another machine. So, the primary issue is with the VNC server/client interaction within QEMU.
+
+The crash occurs after disconnecting the VNC connection, which suggests that there's an issue in how the VNC server handles client disconnections or reconnections. This might be a problem in the VNC implementation within QEMU rather than other components like device drivers or network stack issues (though network is involved).
+
+I don't see any mention of translation errors, assembly lowering, performance bottlenecks, kernel panics, or hypervisor issues here. It's more about graphical interface handling since it's related to VNC.
+
+The category 'vnc' seems the most fitting because the problem arises from using the VNC server/client within QEMU. The crash happens when interacting with the VNC connection, so it's directly tied to QEMU's VNC implementation rather than other parts like devices or network sockets in general.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/824074 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/824074
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4ad3e60a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/824074
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The user mentioned that the category should be a single word from the provided list. Let me read through the problem again.
+
+The bug report is about requesting a runtime option in QEMU to expose the supported list of keymaps for VNC. They referenced a discussion in the ganeti group, so it's related to VNC configuration or functionality.
+
+Looking at the categories: There are several options like graphic, vnc, etc. Since this is specifically about VNC and its keymap support, "vnc" seems like the most appropriate category. I don't see any other category that fits better, like maybe 'graphic' could be considered, but since it's directly related to VNC features, "vnc" is more precise.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/88 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/88
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ef4f71ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/88
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "VNC server does not work with Mac Screen Sharing." The possible categories are quite specific, so I should go through them one by one.
+
+First, VNC (Virtual Network Computing) is related to remote desktop services. The user mentioned that the VNC server isn't working with Mac's Screen Sharing feature. Since QEMU includes a VNC server for remote display purposes, this issue falls under its functionality.
+
+Looking at the categories: 'vnc' is one of them. That seems like the most direct fit because it's about the VNC server not interacting correctly with another client (Mac's Screen Sharing). Other categories like network or graphic could be related, but they are broader and don't pinpoint the issue as accurately as 'vnc'.
+
+I should make sure none of the other categories better fit. The problem isn't with device drivers, permissions, performance, or any specific kernel part. It's specifically about how the VNC server interacts (or doesn't) with another screen-sharing tool. So 'vnc' is definitely the right category.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/925405 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/925405
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9f7b7225
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/925405
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is about VNC server not working with Mac Screen Sharing. The user tried different QEMU targets and setups but the connection fails after setup without sending pixmap data. They suspect issues with negotiation logic in QEMU's VNC handling.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'vnc' directly relates to the issue since it's a problem with the VNC server functionality. Other categories like network or socket could be related, but the primary issue is within the VNC implementation of QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is about the VNC server in QEMU not functioning correctly when accessed from a Mac using its Screen Sharing feature. The user describes that connections are attempted but fail to complete the negotiation process, leading to no pixmap data being sent. This suggests an issue with how QEMU's VNC server handles the protocol or encoding used by the Mac client.
+
+Given the categories provided, the most appropriate classification is 'vnc' because the problem specifically pertains to the interaction between QEMU's VNC server and the Mac's VNC client during the negotiation phase. This falls under the functionality of the VNC implementation within QEMU.
+
+**Answer:**
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/974229 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/974229
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5d599fb0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/974229
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The possible options are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, it mentions a segfault when using vnc-console with QEMU-KVM 1.0. The stack trace points to iohandler.c:124 and main-loop issues. The user is concerned about thread safety because the VNC thread might be accessing shared structures without proper locking.
+
+The error happens during interaction with the VNC console, specifically when the VNC thread support is enabled. The backtrace shows that qemu_iohandler_poll is called from the main loop, while another part of the code (vnc_client_write_plain) modifies the I/O handler in a different context—probably the VNC thread.
+
+The issue seems to stem from concurrent modification of shared state without proper synchronization between threads. This suggests a problem with how multiple parts of the code are accessing and modifying data structures related to VNC handling, leading to a segmentation fault when an invalid memory access occurs.
+
+Since the bug is directly related to the interaction between the main loop and the VNC thread, it's likely a threading or concurrency issue within the VNC subsystem. The user also mentions that without VNC thread support, the problem doesn't occur, implying that the VNC-related code isn't handling threads correctly.
+
+Given the categories provided, 'vnc' seems like the most appropriate classification because the bug occurs in the context of using the VNC console feature. It's not a translation or performance issue but rather a concurrency problem specific to how VNC is implemented.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/981 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/981
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..98c27c86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/981
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report in the context of QEMU. The user provided a list of possible categories, and I have to choose the correct one based on the problem described.
+
+The issue is about VNC UNIX sockets not being deleted after exiting QEMU. Let me break it down. When you run QEMU with the VNC option using a Unix socket, it creates a file (like foo.socket). After stopping QEMU, this file remains, but according to the user, QEMU should clean up such files as it does for monitor sockets.
+
+Looking at the categories: 'vnc' seems relevant here because it's directly related to the VNC functionality. The problem is specific to how VNC handles its socket files upon termination. Other categories like 'files' or 'permissions' might be too generic, and while 'files' could apply since it's about file deletion, 'vnc' is more precise.
+
+I think 'vnc' is the best fit because the bug pertains specifically to the behavior of VNC sockets not being cleaned up properly. It doesn't fall under 'other' or any other category listed like network, socket (which might be a possibility, but 'vnc' is more direct). So, the classification should be 'vnc'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is about VNC functionality specifically regarding UNIX sockets not being deleted after QEMU exits. The issue relates to how VNC handles its socket files upon termination, making the category 'vnc' appropriate.
+
+**Answer:** vnc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/994412 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/994412
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e7c5e8d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/vnc/994412
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The issue is about reverse VNC not working when using a Unix domain socket in QEMU. The user tried running QEMU with the option `-vnc unix:/tmp/my.sock,reverse` and got an error saying "No such file or directory". They suspect that `unix_connect` isn't handling the string correctly after the comma.
+
+First, I'll break down what's happening here. VNC is a protocol for remote desktop, and in QEMU, it can be configured to use Unix domain sockets instead of TCP/IP, which might be useful for certain environments like containers or isolated systems. The user tried using the `reverse` option with the Unix socket.
+
+The error message suggests that when trying to connect, the system couldn't find the specified file or directory. That could mean a few things: either the socket isn't created yet, it's not in the right location, or there's an issue with how QEMU is parsing the connection string.
+
+Looking at the command line option `-vnc unix:/tmp/my.sock,reverse`, I notice that the syntax includes a comma-separated list after `unix:`. The user believes that `unix_connect` isn't stripping off characters after the first comma, which would mean that instead of just looking for `/tmp/my.sock`, it's trying to connect to a socket named `/tmp/my	sock,reverse`. That doesn't make sense because Unix sockets are files without commas in their names.
+
+So, if `unix_connect` is including everything after the comma as part of the filename, it would fail since the actual socket file wouldn't have that. This parsing issue is likely causing QEMU to look for a non-existent socket.
+
+Now, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+The problem here seems related to how QEMU is handling the VNC connection parameters. The bug lies in the parsing of the `reverse` option within the VNC command line argument. Since it's about how the string is being parsed and processed (specifically after a comma), this falls under how QEMU translates the command-line options into actions, which might be related to incorrect semantic mapping.
+
+Alternatively, since it involves Unix domain sockets specifically, the category 'socket' could also apply because it's a socket-related issue. However, the root cause is more about parsing and string handling within the VNC configuration rather than the socket mechanism itself.
+
+Between the categories, 'vnc' seems like the most direct fit because the problem arises from how VNC connections are being set up using Unix sockets. The bug affects the VNC protocol's functionality in QEMU when attempting to use a reverse connection with a Unix domain socket.
+
+Therefore, I think the correct category is 'vnc'.
+</think>
+
+vnc
\ No newline at end of file