summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1917394
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-07-03 07:27:52 +0000
committerChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-07-03 07:27:52 +0000
commitd0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a (patch)
treef8f784b0f04343b90516a338d6df81df3a85dfa2 /results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1917394
parent7f4364274750eb8cb39a3e7493132fca1c01232e (diff)
downloademulator-bug-study-d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a.tar.gz
emulator-bug-study-d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a.zip
add deepseek and gemma results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1917394')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/191739415
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1917394 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1917394
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..26d9a16c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1917394
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that when they use the command `lspci`, the IVSHMEM device isn't showing up. They provided their configuration, which includes setting up an IVSHMEM model in their guest VM's XML file.
+
+Looking at the details, the IVSHMEM device is correctly added as a PCI device with specific parameters. The user also ran `ps aux` and saw that QEMU includes the device option, so it seems like QEMU is aware of the device. However, when they run `lspci`, it doesn't appear.
+
+They did check with `lshw` and found the device listed as unclaimed. This suggests that while the device is present in the system, it's not being properly recognized or claimed by the OS.
+
+Considering the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is related to a device (IVSHMEM) not being detected by `lspci`. This doesn't seem to be an incorrect translation or assembly lowering. It's more about the device not appearing correctly in the system, so "device" seems appropriate. Alternatively, since it's a hardware-related issue within the VM, maybe "peripherals" could fit, but I think "device" is more specific here.
+</think>
+
+The bug report relates to an IVSHMEM device not showing up under `lspci`, which suggests an issue with how the device is being handled or detected by the system. Since the device is present in QEMU's configuration and visible via `lshw` but not through `lspci`, this points towards a problem with device recognition, likely within the device management layer.
+
+**Answer:** device \ No newline at end of file