add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/2541 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/2541
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8f6b04c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/2541
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The bug is about a virtio-9p test failing with an assertion error in the v9fs_req_recv function. 
+
+First, let's understand what each category means:
+
+- **mistranslation**: Issues during translation from source architecture to IR/target.
+- **assembly**: Problems during assembly lowering.
+- **other**: Any bug not fitting other categories.
+- **device**: Issues with device handling.
+- **graphic**: Graphics-related bugs.
+- **socket**: Socket communication problems.
+- **network**: Network related issues.
+- **KVM**: KVM hypervisor issues.
+- **boot**: Booting problems.
+- **vnc**: VNC server/client issues.
+- **debug**: Debugging tools or output.
+- **files**: File handling issues.
+- **permissions**: Permission-related bugs.
+- **performance**: Performance issues.
+- **kernel**: Kernel-related problems.
+- **peripherals**: Peripheral device issues.
+- **hypervisor**: Hypervisor-level bugs.
+
+The bug report mentions virtio-9p, which is a VirtIO implementation for 9P protocol. This is used for filesystem sharing between the host and guest. The specific error is in v9fs_req_recv, which suggests it's related to request handling within the VFS (Virtual File System) layer of QEMU.
+
+Virtio-9p falls under the hypervisor or device category because VirtIO devices are typically managed by the hypervisor (like KVM). However, since this is a filesystem-related issue in the context of VirtIO, it's more about how the virtual filesystem is handled. 
+
+Looking at the categories, 'device' could be relevant as it's part of the virtual devices in QEMU. Alternatively, 'hypervisor' might also be considered because virtio-9p interacts with the hypervisor's I/O handling.
+
+But considering that the error is within a specific device driver (v9fs), it's more aligned with 'device' category. So, the bug relates to how the VirtIO device (specifically 9P) handles requests, leading to an assertion failure.
+</think>
+
+The bug report indicates an issue in the handling of VirtIO-9P requests, which is a virtual device used for filesystem sharing in QEMU/KVM. Since this relates directly to the behavior of a virtual device within the hypervisor environment, it falls under the 'hypervisor' category.
+
+**hypervisor**
\ No newline at end of file