add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/293 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/293
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..95e252e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/293
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a list of categories, and I need to pick the right one based on the description.
+
+The bug is about QEMU SPARC64 panicking with "BOP_ALLOC failed" when running on Sun Solaris 5.8. First, I should understand what BOP_ALLOC refers to. From what I recall, BOP stands for Block Output Pages, and in the context of QEMU, it's related to memory management, specifically dealing with page allocation.
+
+Now, looking at the categories: mistranslation is about incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target, which doesn't seem directly relevant here. The bug isn't about user-mode assembly translation errors or similar issues.
+
+Next, considering "device" might relate to hardware devices, but this seems more like a memory issue rather than a device problem. "Graphic" and "network" don't fit either; the panic is about allocation, not display or networking.
+
+The mention of KVM (kernel-based virtual machine) could be relevant since QEMU can use KVM for acceleration. If the issue is within the hypervisor layer, it might fall under that category. Alternatively, "kernel" could be a possibility if it's an issue with the host OS's kernel interacting with QEMU.
+
+However, considering that BOP_ALLOC relates to memory allocation and page management, which in QEMU would typically be handled by the emulator itself or possibly through KVM. Since this is causing a panic during VM operation, it might point towards a hypervisor-level problem where resources are being allocated improperly. Therefore, "hypervisor" seems like the most fitting category here.
+
+Wait, but "KVM" is a specific technology under hypervisors. So if the issue arises when using KVM with QEMU, then perhaps it's more accurately categorized under "hypervisor". Alternatively, it could be an issue within the host kernel's handling of memory for the virtual machine, which would still relate to the hypervisor functions.
+
+I think the best fit is either "hypervisor" or maybe even "kernel", but since KVM is a part of the hypervisor layer in QEMU, I'm leaning towards "hypervisor".
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file