add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/362 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/362
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b0976bf9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/362
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "check of PMR capability is missing for PMRCTL register write." The categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I should understand what the bug is about. PMR probably stands for "Platform Memory Thermal Protection" or something similar in QEMU's context. PMRCTL would be a control register related to that feature. The issue says there's a missing check of the PMR capability before writing to this register.
+
+So, the problem occurs during a write operation on PMRCTL without ensuring that the PMR capability is present. This could lead to incorrect behavior or errors when the capability isn't supported by the target hardware.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- Mistranslation: Not sure if it's about semantic mapping; maybe not directly related.
+- Assembly: Lowering might be involved, but this seems more about register access.
+- Device: Could be related to device emulation.
+- Graphic, socket, network: Probably unrelated.
+- KVM: QEMU uses KVM for virtualization, so if PMR is part of the hypervisor, maybe.
+- Boot: Not directly unless it's during boot.
+- VNC, debug: Unrelated.
+- Files, permissions: Doesn't seem to fit.
+- Performance: Maybe, but not directly.
+- Kernel, peripherals: Could be, as PMR might be a hardware peripheral.
+- Hypervisor: Since PMR is part of the virtualization layer.
+
+PMRCTL register operations are likely handled by QEMU's device emulation or hypervisor components. If it's related to how the hypervisor (like KVM) interacts with hardware features, then 'hypervisor' makes sense. Alternatively, if it's a device-specific issue, maybe 'device' or 'peripherals'. But since PMR is more about memory management in virtualization, 'hypervisor' seems appropriate.
+
+Wait, but QEMU's hypervisor part is KVM. So perhaps the bug is within KVM's handling of PMRCTL writes. Therefore, the category should be 'KVM'. Alternatively, if it's a missing capability check that affects device emulation under KVM, maybe 'peripherals'.
+
+But given the categories listed, and considering that PMR is part of the hypervisor's handling, I think 'hypervisor' might be more accurate. However, looking at the list again, 'KVM' is a separate category. Since the issue relates to KVM's handling, perhaps 'KVM' is better.
+
+Wait, but the categories include 'hypervisor' as well. So which one fits? The bug report is about QEMU, specifically in KVM mode. The PMR capability check is likely part of the hypervisor layer. Therefore, it should be under 'hypervisor'. Alternatively, since KVM is a specific hypervisor implementation within QEMU, maybe 'KVM' is more precise.
+
+But the categories are separate: 'hypervisor' and 'KVM' as two options. Hmm. The bug report mentions that the check is missing when writing PMRCTL. If this is part of how QEMU/KVM emulates or handles certain hardware features, then it's a hypervisor issue.
+
+Alternatively, if PMR is handled by a specific device emulator in QEMU, then 'device' might be correct. But without more context, I think the best fit is 'hypervisor', as it relates to the virtualization layer handling of hardware capabilities.
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file