restructure results

1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/KVM/1914748 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/KVM/1914748
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..259dd75e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/KVM/1914748
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out which category this bug report falls into from the given options. The categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is about a confusing error message when KVM can't start the requested CPU. It mentions using specific CPU types like cortex-a57, a53, or a72 on a Cavium CN8890 with ThunderX cores. The user encountered an error: kvm_init_vcpu failed with "Invalid argument." 
+
+The explanation from Peter Maydell clarifies that using a specific CPU type requires the host to exactly match that CPU; otherwise, using "-cpu host" or "-cpu max" is better. So the issue arises because QEMU is trying to use a CPU model that doesn't match the host's capabilities.
+
+Looking at the categories: KVM is directly mentioned in the error and context, so it's likely the right category. The problem isn't about assembly translation (assembly) or permissions/performance issues. It’s more about how QEMU interacts with the hypervisor (KVM), specifically when setting up the CPU model for virtual machines.
+
+Therefore, this bug report is related to KVM functionality.
+</think>
+
+The issue pertains to the interaction between QEMU and the KVM hypervisor regarding CPU configuration. 
+
+**KVM**
+
+The error occurs because QEMU attempts to use a specific CPU type that doesn't match the host's capabilities when using KVM acceleration. This falls under KVM-related issues as it involves how virtual CPUs are initialized in the KVM environment.
+
+**Answer:**
+KVM
\ No newline at end of file