restructure results

189 files changed, 3592 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1012023 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1012023
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6ac96703
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1012023
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's start by reading the bug report carefully. The user mentions that when using Windows 7 on QEMU, they encounter a blue screen with the error code 00000005D right after seeing the first Windows logo. They also mentioned having tried both installing Windows and booting from an install CD, but both times it results in this crash.
+
+First, I should think about what each category represents to determine which one fits best. The categories provided are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The error message the user received is a STOP code 00000005D. I remember that in Windows, blue screen of death (BSOD) errors often correspond to specific codes indicating hardware or software issues. The code 00000005D corresponds to "CRITICAL_SYSTEM_COMPONENT_MISSING". This usually happens when the system can't find a critical driver or component at boot time.
+
+In the context of QEMU, which is an emulator and hypervisor, this could relate to how virtual hardware components are presented to the guest OS. If QEMU fails to correctly emulate certain hardware, Windows might not find necessary drivers, leading to such errors.
+
+Looking through the categories: 'boot' seems relevant because the issue occurs during the boot process of the guest OS. The error happens right after seeing the first logo, which is a clear sign that it's happening early in the boot sequence. Other possibilities like 'network' or 'graphic' could be considered if the BSOD was related to those areas, but 05D specifically points more towards missing system components.
+
+Considering QEMU's role as a hypervisor and emulator, issues with virtual hardware configuration can cause such problems during guest OS boot. However, since the issue is directly about the boot process failing due to a missing component, 'boot' seems like the most appropriate category.
+
+Other categories like 'kernel' or 'hypervisor' might be involved in how QEMU handles the emulation, but the immediate problem described is at the boot stage of Windows. Therefore, categorizing this under 'boot' would make it clear that the issue arises during the initial stages of the OS startup within QEMU.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1013888 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1013888
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b2cc483b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1013888
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The user provided a list: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is about running Windows XP SP3 setup in QEMU resulting in a blank screen after a certain point. Let me break this down.
+
+First, the issue happens during the setup process of Windows XP within QEMU on a Lubuntu host. The problem occurs when the setup doesn't proceed past a blank screen after inspecting hardware configuration.
+
+I need to figure out which category best fits this scenario. Let's look at each possible category:
+
+- **mistranslation**: This relates to incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target, user-mode assembly. Doesn't seem relevant here as it's about OS setup.
+- **assembly**: Lowering issues in assembly code. Not directly related unless there's a specific code problem, but the report doesn't mention that.
+- **device**: Could be hardware-related issues, like devices not working correctly in VMs.
+- **graphic**: If it's a display issue, this might fit. A blank screen could be graphics-related, such as incorrect drivers or rendering problems.
+- **socket**, **network**: These relate to networking issues, which don't seem applicable here since the problem is at boot/setup time, not network communication.
+- **KVM**: KVM is a hypervisor; maybe if QEMU/KVM is misbehaving. But the issue is with Windows setup, so unless it's specific to KVM virtualization, this might not fit.
+- **boot**: This seems relevant because the problem occurs during the boot or setup phase of Windows XP in QEMU.
+- **vnc**, **debug**, **files**, **permissions**, **performance**, **kernel**, **peripherals**: These don't seem directly related unless there's a specific issue with VNC access, debugging features, file handling, permissions, performance issues, kernel bugs, or peripheral devices.
+
+So, the most fitting categories are either **graphic** or **boot**. The blank screen during setup could be due to graphical issues (like incorrect video drivers in the VM) or an issue with the boot process itself not initializing properly.
+
+Since the problem occurs right after a specific message about hardware inspection, it's likely related to how QEMU is handling the emulated hardware during the boot process. This makes **boot** a more precise category than **graphic**, which would be more about display rendering rather than the initial setup and hardware detection.
+</think>
+
+The issue occurs during the boot/setup phase of Windows XP in QEMU, pointing towards a problem with the boot process itself.
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1042084 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1042084
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..718dfbd8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1042084
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report based on the given categories. Let's see what the problem is.
+
+The user mentioned that after updating seabios to the latest master, their Windows 7 guest can't boot anymore. They get a BSOD with an ACPI compliance error. Reverting the commit fixes it.
+
+First, let's think about what each category means. The options are things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+The issue is related to the BIOS because the user updated seabios. Seabios is part of QEMU's BIOS implementation for x86 guests. When they update it, their guest OS starts having issues during boot.
+
+The error message mentions ACPI compliance. That suggests that after the seabios update, Windows isn't seeing a fully compliant BIOS in terms of ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface). This could be due to changes in how the BIOS is emulated or implemented in the latest seabios version.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems relevant here because the issue occurs during the boot process. The guest OS can't complete the boot successfully after the update, leading to a BSOD. It's not related to network, graphics, sockets, or permissions directly, but rather the system's initialization and BIOS settings which affect hardware-level interactions.
+
+Another category that comes to mind is "hypervisor," since QEMU acts as a hypervisor when running virtual machines. However, in this case, the issue seems more specific to the BIOS/ACPI interaction during boot rather than the hypervisor itself.
+
+"Device" could also be a possibility if it's related to hardware emulation, but again, since it's a boot issue tied specifically to BIOS and ACPI, "boot" feels more accurate. The update in seabios affects how the virtual BIOS is presented to the guest OS, which impacts the boot process.
+
+I don't think it's about performance or kernel because the problem is manifesting at the initial boot stage, not with system slowdowns or kernel crashes. It's also not a debug issue; it's a functional failure during boot.
+
+So, putting it all together, the bug affects the guest OS's ability to boot correctly after an update in seabios. The category that best fits this scenario is "boot" because it directly relates to the boot process failing due to BIOS changes.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue where updating seabios prevents a Windows 7 guest from booting, leading to a BSOD about ACPI compliance. Since this problem occurs during the boot process and relates to the BIOS/ACPI interaction, the most appropriate category is "boot."
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1054 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1054
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..fb9da912
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1054
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's see what the problem is.
+
+The user reported that they can't start CirrOS 0.5.1 on QEMU 7.0 when using the -M virt and -cpu max options. They provided steps to reproduce, including fetching the image and running the command with various parameters. 
+
+When they run it, GRUB appears briefly, then the kernel/initramfs are loaded, but no kernel output is shown. Instead, the system just stops there. This doesn't happen when not using -M virt and -cpu max.
+
+Looking at the additional information, the kernel usually outputs some messages, but with QEMU 7.0 under these conditions, nothing shows up. So something's wrong when using thevirt machine type and the max CPU configuration.
+
+The categories I have to choose from are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Hmm. The issue is related to starting an OS on QEMU with specific machine type and CPU settings. It's about the boot process failing, so 'boot' seems relevant here. The other categories like network or device might be related if it were a hardware component, but this is more about the boot process not completing as expected.
+
+The user mentions that without these flags, it works fine, which suggests it's an issue with how QEMU handles the virt machine type and max CPU in version 7.0. Since the problem occurs during the boot phase, 'boot' category fits best.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1063 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1063
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..242eff4f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1063
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me look at the details provided.
+
+The user mentioned that when they run QEMU to start a VM, it says "could not load PC BIOS 'bios-256k.bin'". They followed these steps: cloned the latest QEMU, built it in Ubuntu 18.04, and tried starting with libvirt.
+
+First, I should think about what each category means. The options are mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The error is about not being able to load a BIOS file. BIOS issues in QEMU typically relate to the firmware or initialization of the virtual machine. Since the problem occurs during VM startup, it's likely related to the boot process. The 'boot' category seems appropriate here because it's about failing to initialize necessary components like the BIOS.
+
+I don't think it's a mistranslation issue because that would involve incorrect mapping from source to target, which doesn't seem relevant here. It's not an assembly lowering problem either. The other categories like device or peripherals might be related, but since it's specifically about the BIOS not loading, 'boot' is more precise.
+
+So, I'm leaning towards classifying this under the 'boot' category because it's a failure during the VM boot process.
+</think>
+
+The bug report indicates an issue with loading the PC BIOS file 'bios-256k.bin'. Since this occurs when starting a virtual machine, it relates to the initialization and boot process of the VM. Therefore, the appropriate category is:
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1077806 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1077806
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cccbb172
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1077806
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's read through the report carefully. The user is talking about integrating Virtualbox/Qemu Guest booting as a desktop environment listing. They mention using LightDM's session select menu to boot Chromium OS and then extend that idea to virtual machines.
+
+They suggest that users should be able to easily access a Windows VM without needing a reboot, which would simplify things for new Ubuntu users coming from Windows. The key points here are about booting virtual machines as part of the desktop environment and making it easier for users.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The main focus is on integrating VMs into the boot process through a session selector. This doesn't seem to be about semantic mapping or assembly lowering (so not mistranslation or assembly). It's more about how the system boots and presents VM options to the user.
+
+"Boot" category seems relevant because it's about the process of starting up the system and selecting different environments, including VMs. While KVM is a hypervisor, the report isn't directly about the hypervisor itself but rather the integration into the boot process.
+
+So the most appropriate category here would be "boot."
+</think>
+
+The bug report focuses on integrating virtual machine booting into the desktop environment's session selection menu during system startup. This relates to how the system boots and presents VM options, not the hypervisor itself.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1115 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1115
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5645fb2e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1115
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let me see what the problem is.
+
+The user mentioned that when using QEMU 7.0.0 with SeaBIOS and an MBR disk, the VM gets stuck at the Windows boot logo. They tried switching vGPU but it didn't help; the system just freezes with low CPU usage. Even after rebooting the host multiple times, the issue persists. The user had to switch to UEFI (TianoCore) and convert the disk from MBR to GPT using proprietary software to get it working.
+
+The bug report is about boot issues when using SeaBIOS and an MBR disk. So, I need to figure out which category this falls into from the given list: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The main issue here is with the boot process. The VM isn't booting correctly when using SeaBIOS and an MBR disk. It's getting stuck at the Windows logo, so it's a problem related to the boot sequence.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems directly relevant because the issue occurs during the boot of the guest OS. The user had to change to UEFI and convert the disk, which suggests that the problem is with how QEMU handles MBR disks under SeaBIOS for booting.
+
+I don't think it's related to graphics (vGPU changes didn't help) or network because there's no mention of connectivity issues. It's not about performance either since the CPU load is low and it's frozen. Boot-related issues fit best here.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1120 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1120
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c17040ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1120
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user says that their multiboot direct loading is broken. They mention that their kernel and multiboot loader passed the `grub-file` check, which probably means it's correctly set up as a multiboot image. However, when they try to run it in QEMU, they get an error: `qemu-system-i386: Error loading uncompressed kernel without PVH ELF Note`.
+
+Then, when they add `-machine type=pc-i440fx-3.1`, QEMU shows either `qemu: linux kernel too old to load a ram disk` or `qemu: invalid kernel header`. They've linked their multiboot file with `ld.lld -s -o`.
+
+Looking at the categories, I see options like 'mistranslation', 'assembly', 'other', and others related to devices, graphics, sockets, etc. But I think this is about how QEMU handles kernels during boot.
+
+The error messages suggest that QEMU isn't recognizing the kernel correctly. The first error mentions PVH ELF Note, which relates to how the kernel's headers are structured, especially for multiboot. If the kernel lacks certain notes or has incorrect headers, QEMU can't load it properly.
+
+When using the pc-i440fx machine type, older kernels might not have the necessary support for newer features, hence the 'too old' message. Alternatively, an invalid kernel header could mean that the multiboot setup is missing something required by QEMU's emulator.
+
+This seems related to how QEMU initializes and loads the kernel during boot. Since it's about kernel loading issues in a VM environment, the category might be 'boot'. Other possible categories were considered like 'mistranslation' or 'assembly', but those seem less likely because the issue is with the overall boot process rather than specific code translation steps.
+
+So, I think the best fit here is 'boot' because it's about the kernel not loading correctly during the VM's startup.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes issues with QEMU failing to load a multiboot kernel, resulting in errors related to kernel headers and PVH ELF Notes. These errors occur during the boot process of the virtual machine, indicating problems with how QEMU handles kernel initialization.
+
+**Answer:**  
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1122492 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1122492
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..15c13187
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1122492
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report regarding QEMU and GRUB2 not getting along when using a floppy image. Let me start by reading the problem description carefully.
+
+The user reports that when they use `grub2-mkrescue` to create an image and then boot it with QEMU, they end up in a rescue mode instead of getting a normal GRUB prompt. The logs show issues like "could not read the boot disk" and errors about reading/writing outside the disk 'fd0'.
+
+Looking at the provided information, there are a few key points:
+
+1. **Image Size Issue**: The test image is 2281472 bytes, which doesn't align with standard floppy sizes (like 1440 KB or 2880 KB). When the user padded it to 2949120 bytes (exactly 2880 KB), it worked as expected.
+
+2. **Possible Causes**: The user is unsure whether this is a QEMU issue, a GRUB issue, or both. They're considering if QEMU should handle non-standard sizes by padding them to 2880 KB, or if GRUB should do so when creating images.
+
+3. **Boot Issues**: Booting from the floppy fails, leading to the GRUB rescue mode where basic commands like `insmod normal` fail due to the same read/write errors.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: 
+
+- **mistranslation**: Involves incorrect mapping between source and target architecture, but this seems more about image handling than semantic translation.
+- **assembly**: Lowering assembly code—doesn't fit here.
+- **device**: Could relate to device emulation, like floppy drives.
+- **graphic**, **socket**, **network**, etc.: These don't seem relevant here as the issue is with floppy booting and GRUB.
+- **KVM**, **hypervisor**: Not directly related; it's more about the boot process.
+- **boot**: This seems promising because the problem occurs during the boot process, specifically when trying to read from the floppy image.
+
+Considering all this, the main issue revolves around how QEMU handles the floppy image size and whether GRUB can correctly interpret it. Since the problem arises during the booting phase with a non-standard image size leading to GRUB errors, the most appropriate category is likely **boot**.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves issues during the boot process when using a non-standard floppy image size, leading to GRUB rescue mode instead of a normal prompt. The key issue is how QEMU and/or GRUB handle such images. Since the problem occurs at boot time with a specific hardware component (floppy), the category that best fits is **boot**.
+
+Answer: boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1131757 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1131757
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4dc044cf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1131757
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so the user is reporting an issue with QEMU where they can't boot a Sparc64 Linux image. Let me break this down. 
+
+First, the user is using QEMU 1.4.0 and trying to boot a specific kernel image. They ran the command `qemu-system-sparc64 -nographic -kernel ...` which suggests they're attempting to launch a Sparc64 machine with networking disabled and specifying a kernel directly.
+
+The error message they received is about an "Unhandled Exception 0x0000000000000020" with the PC at a specific address. This seems like a hardware or emulation issue since it's during the boot process. 
+
+Looking at the possible categories, I need to figure out which one fits best. The options are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about failing to boot an OS image with QEMU. The error occurs when trying to load the kernel, and it's a general exception during execution. Since it's related to the boot process of the guest operating system within QEMU, I'm leaning towards 'boot' as the category. 
+
+Other possibilities could be 'kernel', but that might refer more to the host OS or QEMU's own kernel aspects. Alternatively, if it were a device issue like hardware emulation, 'device' might fit, but the problem is about booting the OS, not a specific peripheral.
+
+So, putting it together, the bug report is primarily about the failure during the boot process of the guest OS in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1135 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1135
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ec2b08e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1135
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out the category for this bug report. The user is having an issue with QEMU related to the Multiboot specification. They mentioned that when they hit a breakpoint at 0x85d4, which is the entrypoint of their Multiboot loader, the EAX register should point to the Multiboot information block (MBI). However, instead of getting a valid pointer, it's showing 0x9500, and when they dump memory, that area is all zeros. Despite this issue with MBI, modules are loaded correctly.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem seems to be related to how the Multiboot information block is being handled. Since this relates to the entrypoint and register values during the boot process, it's likely a boot issue. The other possibilities don't fit as well because it's not about translation errors (mistranslation), nor does it seem to involve graphics or network components. It's more specific to the booting phase where Multiboot is initialized.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1160 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1160
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..93e5a068
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1160
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "hw/riscv reset vector improvement". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+First, let me understand what the bug is about. It's under hw/riscv, which suggests it's related to hardware or more specifically, the RISC-V architecture in QEMU. The term "reset vector" refers to the starting address where the CPU jumps after a reset, usually pointing to the initial instructions for booting up.
+
+So this isn't about translating code incorrectly (mistranslation) or assembly lowering (assembly). It's also not related to networking, sockets, graphics, or KVM as far as I can tell. 
+
+Looking at the categories provided, "boot" seems relevant because a reset vector is crucial for the boot process—it determines where the system starts executing code after resetting. Alternatively, it could be under "peripherals" since reset vectors are part of hardware initialization, but "boot" feels more specific here.
+
+I don't think it's any of the others like performance or kernel. So I'm leaning towards either "boot" or maybe "device". But considering that the reset vector is directly involved in the boot sequence, "boot" seems like the most appropriate category.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1177 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1177
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8bcccb9f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1177
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report from QEMU. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user reported that when they use `-cpu max` or `-cpu max,lpa2=off`, booting Linux hangs. But when they switch to `-cpu cortex-a57`, it works fine. They followed specific steps to set up their environment, including using a mini.iso from Ubuntu, creating images with dd commands, and modifying flash0.img with an EDK2 binary.
+
+From the description, the problem occurs during booting, specifically after selecting install when running QEMU. The kernel hangs, which suggests something goes wrong during the initialization process. They mentioned that pm215 suggested it might be an old EDK2 version not handling newer CPU features properly, so updating EDK2 could fix it.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: boot, graphic, network, etc. Since the issue is about QEMU's CPU configuration causing a hang during installation and booting, "boot" seems like the most relevant category. The problem isn't related to graphics, networking, or other areas listed.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves issues with booting Linux under specific CPU configurations in QEMU. Since the problem occurs during the boot process and is related to CPU options, the appropriate category is **boot**.
+
+Answer: boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1246 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1246
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..31744421
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1246
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Win11_22H2_English_x64.iso won't boot". The possible categories are quite a list. Let me think through each one.
+
+First, the issue is about an ISO not booting in QEMU. That suggests it's related to how QEMU handles the virtual machine setup. Since it's a Windows 11 ISO, maybe there's something wrong with the way QEMU emulates hardware or boots the OS.
+
+Looking at the categories: 'boot' seems directly relevant because the problem is about the system not starting up correctly. Other options like 'network', 'graphic', or 'kernel' could be involved if the issue was specific to those areas, but the report doesn't mention any of those. The user just said it won't boot, which points more towards a general booting problem.
+
+So, I think the correct category here is 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report indicates that the ISO isn't booting in QEMU, pointing to an issue with the VM's startup process.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1252 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1252
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a6f79e59
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1252
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The issue is about Debian Raspberry Pi images not booting with QEMU versions 7 and higher but working fine with version 6.2.0. 
+
+First, looking at the problem description, it's related to booting an image in QEMU. The user provided steps to reproduce, which involve setting up a disk image and running it with qemu-system-aarch64.
+
+The categories include "boot" among others. Since the main issue is that the images aren't booting correctly with newer QEMU versions, this seems directly related to the boot process within the emulator.
+
+I don't see any mention of issues with translation (like mistranslation), assembly lowering, or other specific components like device drivers or networking problems in the details provided. The focus is on whether the image boots successfully, which points to a boot-related issue.
+
+Therefore, the most appropriate category for this bug report is "boot".
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1260555 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1260555
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ebab8989
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1260555
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let's read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The user mentioned that SS-5 emulation doesn't work with the Sun boot ROM. They specified that while the TCX emulation works with OpenBIOS, it fails when using a SparcStation ROM on Cocoa. The issue occurs across multiple versions of QEMU and different macOS versions, specifically 10.9 and earlier.
+
+Looking at their command line, they're using `-M SS-5` which specifies the machine type as SS-5. They also use `-bios` to point to a specific ROM file. The failure is when booting from this particular ROM image, indicating a problem related to how QEMU handles certain BIOS or firmware files.
+
+Possible categories include 'boot', which relates to issues during system startup, and 'device' which might be about hardware emulation. Since the problem arises when using a specific ROM for booting, it's likely tied to the boot process rather than device emulation in general.
+
+I don't see any mention of translation or assembly issues here, so 'mistranslation' or 'assembly' can be ruled out. The problem isn't about graphics, network setup (though they have some `-net` options), KVM, VNC, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, or socket-related.
+
+The key issue is the boot ROM not working correctly with SS-5, so it's more related to the boot process. Therefore, the category should be 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1268279 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1268279
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d764755e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1268279
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user is having trouble starting Windows 7 x86 on QEMU version 1.7.50 built from Git. They followed the installation steps correctly and everything seems set up properly.
+
+They mention that when they start the VM, it hangs at "Starting windows" with 100% CPU load after rebooting to install. Other Windows versions like XP work fine, so the issue might be specific to Windows 7 x86. 
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+The problem occurs after rebooting into installation mode, which is part of the boot process. The VM hangs during this phase. Since it's related to the boot process, I think the category should be "boot". Alternatively, it might relate to how QEMU handles KVM or hypervisor functions, but the main issue here seems to be with the boot process itself.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where Windows 7 x86 hangs during the boot process after installation. Since the problem occurs specifically during the boot phase of the virtual machine, the appropriate category is:
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1269 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1269
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..30067edb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1269
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's see what the problem is.
+
+The user reports that since commit e3a79e0..., NetBSD no longer boots under qemu-system-i386. They mention that the system either hangs during boot or panics with a kernel trap. The issue is critical because their automated testing relies on QEMU for i386.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem occurs during booting, which makes me think it's related to how the guest OS initializes. The error messages point to issues with module loading and a kernel trap. These seem like they could be related to how QEMU emulates hardware or handles certain system calls.
+
+NetBSD is trying to load modules from CD-ROM (cd9660.kmod), so maybe it's an issue with the emulated CD drive or the filesystem handling. Alternatively, the panic during boot suggests a deeper kernel issue in the emulation.
+
+Considering QEMU components, 'device' might relate to hardware emulation issues like IDE/SCSI devices. Since the problem occurs when using -cdrom, perhaps it's related to how the CD-ROM is being emulated. However, if the issue is within the kernel of NetBSD during boot, maybe it's a hypervisor or system call handling.
+
+But since the bug affects the boot process specifically, 'boot' seems like the most direct category. The problem occurs when starting the guest OS, so categorizing it under 'boot' makes sense.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1273944 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1273944
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3db713aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1273944
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report from QEMU. Let's break it down.
+
+The user mentioned that when booting a multiboot image, the mem_upper field is always zero. They also provided steps to reproduce using run_test.sh and pointed out the specific commit causing the issue.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation relates to incorrect mapping in user-mode assembly, which doesn't seem right here. Assembly lowering (assembly) is about converting code to assembly, which might not fit either. Other category is for things that don't fit elsewhere. 
+
+The bug seems related to how QEMU handles booting multiboot images. Since it's about the mem_upper field during the boot process, this falls under the 'boot' category. That makes sense because it's an issue occurring when initializing or configuring the system during the boot phase.
+
+So the classification should be 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1280 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1280
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8fc267ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1280
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user mentioned that they're having trouble booting a Cortex-M55 image with qemu-system-arm version 7.1. Let me break down the information given.
+
+First, the steps to reproduce involve running qemu-system-arm with specific parameters like -cpu cortex-m55 and -machine mps3-an547. They also mention using gdb for debugging. The issue seems related to booting an image, which makes me think about how QEMU handles machine types or CPUs.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: there's 'boot' as one of them. Boot issues in QEMU often relate to problems during initialization, whether it's with the CPU type, machine setup, or kernel loading. Since the user specified a Cortex-M55 and mps3-an547 machine, which is an Arm development board, the problem could be with how QEMU initializes this configuration.
+
+Other categories like 'device' or 'graphic' don't seem to fit because the issue isn't about hardware devices or graphical output. The user isn't mentioning any problems with peripherals or network issues either. Since it's a boot failure, it's more likely related to the initial setup rather than something else.
+
+I also consider 'hypervisor' but that usually relates to virtualization management, which doesn't seem relevant here. The problem is about booting an image, so 'boot' seems the most appropriate category.
+</think>
+
+The issue is about not being able to boot a Cortex-M55 image with QEMU, specifically related to initialization and kernel loading during the boot process.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1293 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1293
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d5dbb048
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1293
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report about Trusted Firmware stopping booting on an SBSA reference platform. Let's see, the possible categories include hypervisor, kernel, peripherals, etc.
+
+Trusted Firmware is often related to the initial boot process of a system, especially in embedded environments. It usually interacts with hardware components and initializes them. The SBSA (Server Base System Architecture) refers to server platforms, so this is likely a hardware or firmware issue during the boot phase.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems directly relevant because the problem occurs during the boot process. Other options like hypervisor might be related if it's about virtualization, but here it's more about the system not starting up correctly. So I think the best fit is "boot."
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves Trusted Firmware failing to boot on an SBSA reference platform. Since the issue occurs during the boot process, the appropriate category is:
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1314667 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1314667
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f004fbc6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1314667
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so the user is having an issue where QEMU crashes on their Windows 7 machine when they try to boot a USB rescue drive using RMPrepUSB. They're not sure if it's a bug in QEMU or something related to Windows. The error message mentions "qemu funktioniert nicht mehr" which translates to "QEMU is no longer working." 
+
+Looking at the problem signature, it's an APPCRASH with qemu.exe version 0.15.1.0. The exception code is 40000015 and offset 00053b06. I'm not exactly sure what those mean, but they point to a crash in the application itself.
+
+The user mentioned using QEMU for testing USB boot drives, specifically a rescue drive set up with RMPrepUSB. They're trying to see if it boots correctly. The setup includes a FAT32 partition and uses an ISO file (Hiren’sBootCD.iso). 
+
+I need to classify this bug report into one of the categories provided. Let me review the possible categories again: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The crash occurs when trying to boot from a USB drive, so it's related to the boot process. They're using QEMU to emulate the hardware and test the USB device. Since the issue is about QEMU crashing during the boot phase of an emulated machine, it likely points to a problem in how QEMU handles the booting process or the devices involved.
+
+"Boot" seems like the most fitting category here because the crash happens when initiating the VM with the specified drive and ISO. It's not related to translation issues or graphics/networking unless those are part of the boot process, but the primary issue is during boot-up.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1320 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1320
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..97a31b62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1320
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The user provided a detailed bug report where they're unable to load a specific RISC-V firmware file when using qemu-system-riscv64. The steps include downloading the kernel, installing cross tools, configuring and compiling, creating a rootfs image, setting up QEMU with certain parameters.
+
+Looking at the error message: "Unable to load the RISC-V firmware 'opensbi-riscv64-virt-fw_jump.bin'". This seems related to the boot process because it's about loading firmware during system initialization. The command used is qemu-system-riscv64, which is part of QEMU, and in this case, it's failing when trying to load a specific BIOS file.
+
+The categories that might fit here include 'boot' since it's about the system startup process. Alternatively, could it be related to the hypervisor or kernel? But since it's specifically about firmware loading during boot, 'boot' seems more appropriate.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1328 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1328
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..81b281b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1328
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I've got this bug report about QEMU where after updating EDK2-OVMF, the user can't boot any UEFI systems. The affected guests are Windows and Arch Linux, using Virtual Manager and virt-viewer with virsh.
+
+First, I need to classify this bug into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is about not being able to boot UEFI systems after an upgrade. The key here is that it's related to the boot process using UEFI firmware. EDK2-OVMF is a project that provides UEFI compliant firmware for virtual machines, so this seems directly tied to the booting mechanism in QEMU.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'boot' seems the most relevant because the issue is about VMs failing to start after an upgrade. Other possible categories could be 'hypervisor' since QEMU acts as a hypervisor when using KVM, but the problem specifically relates to the boot process which is more tied to the firmware and the initial stages of starting the VM.
+
+So, putting it all together, the category should be 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue with UEFI systems failing to boot after updating EDK2-OVMF. This directly impacts the booting process of virtual machines, making 'boot' the appropriate category.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1331859 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1331859
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3d28c6da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1331859
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is about QEMU crashing with a kernel panic on Windows when using a specific command. It works fine on Linux but causes issues on Windows, even though the Windows version works with arm-test images from qemu.org.
+
+Looking at the details: it's related to bringing up 64-bit ARM support and the issue occurs during boot because of an arithmetic syntax error in the kernel. The user tried both custom-built QEMU and a pre-installed one, so it's not isolated to any specific build process.
+
+The categories include 'boot' which seems relevant since it happens when trying to start the system. Other possibilities might be 'kernel' because it's a panic related to the kernel. But since the problem occurs during boot-up on Windows specifically, I think 'boot' is more precise.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1358722 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1358722
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9ccfd724
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1358722
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have this bug report about QEMU causing a memory allocation fault on macOS X after some ACPI commits. Let me think through how to classify this.
+
+First, the user mentioned that merging two specific commits caused issues with the Mac OS X guest. The commits are related to future-proofing migration compatibility of ACPI tables and tweaking migration limits for ACPI build. 
+
+The error is a memory allocation fault in the Chameleon bootloader, which is generating an error at address 0xdeadbeef. The user provided a link to the source file where this happens, specifically line 899.
+
+I need to figure out which category from the list applies here. Let's look at the categories again: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug occurs during boot because it involves the bootloader (Chameleon) on macOS. The error is a memory allocation issue during the boot process. So this seems related to the boot category rather than something like network or graphic issues. It's not about device drivers or hypervisors directly but more about the initial boot phase.
+
+I don't think it's a mistranslation because that would be more about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture, which doesn't seem to be the case here. It also isn't related to assembly lowering since the issue is with memory during boot, not the translation of code.
+
+So putting it together, the bug occurs during the boot process and affects how the bootloader handles ACPI tables, leading to a memory allocation error. Therefore, the most appropriate category seems to be "boot".
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue occurring during the boot process of a macOS X guest after merging specific commits related to ACPI handling. The problem arises in the Chameleon bootloader with a memory allocation fault, pointing to issues during the boot phase rather than any other component.
+
+**Category: boot**
+
+Answer: boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1363467 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1363467
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8af5d364
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1363467
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU. The user mentioned that when they run `qemu-system-i386 slackware-14.1-install-dvd.iso`, nothing shows up on the screen after 10 minutes. They also tried `-enable-kvm` and `-m 1000`, but it still doesn't work.
+
+First, I need to look at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other. 
+
+The issue is that the QEMU system isn't starting correctly—no display output and the installer doesn't show up. They're using `-enable-kvm`, which suggests they're trying to use KVM acceleration. But since it's not working, maybe there's a problem with how KVM is handling this.
+
+Possible causes could be related to hardware support (like kvm-nested being disabled or insufficient resources), configuration issues in QEMU, or problems with the ISO image itself. Alternatively, the display setup might have an issue—maybe the graphic drivers aren't correctly initialized.
+
+The user mentioned it's not working whether they use KVM or not, but including `-enable-kvm` points towards a hypervisor-related problem because that's what KVM is: a hypervisor for x86 systems. So if enabling KVM causes issues, but in this case, the bug persists without it as well, maybe it's more about the boot process or graphics.
+
+Wait, no—the user said they also tested with `-enable-kvm`, so perhaps the issue occurs both with and without KVM. If QEMU isn't starting at all, it might be a boot problem where the VM doesn't initialize properly. Alternatively, if the display is black, it could be a graphic driver or VNC issue.
+
+Another angle: since nothing shows up on the screen after 10 minutes, maybe the QEMU process crashes but isn't showing any error messages. Could this be a kernel issue within QEMU? Or perhaps permissions are wrong—maybe user doesn't have access to certain devices needed for graphics.
+
+But considering the primary issue is that the VM doesn't display anything and doesn't boot, it's likely related to either the boot process or the graphical setup. However, since they're using KVM, which is a hypervisor, maybe the problem lies there. Or perhaps it's a device issue—like no GPU passthrough being set up correctly.
+
+Wait, but the user didn't mention any specific hardware issues beyond what's provided in the bug report. So I'm leaning towards it being related to the hypervisor (KVM) because they're using that option and the VM isn't starting as expected. Alternatively, if the boot process fails, maybe it's a kernel issue within QEMU.
+
+I think the best fit here is 'boot' since the VM isn't displaying anything, which suggests the boot process isn't completing successfully.
+</think>
+
+The bug report indicates that when running `qemu-system-i386`, nothing appears on the screen after 10 minutes. The user tested with `-enable-kvm` and `-m 1000`, but QEMU didn't work. Since the issue relates to the VM not starting or displaying, it's likely a boot problem.
+
+**boot**
+
+The category that best fits this bug report is **boot**.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1435101 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1435101
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..00f078ae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1435101
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify the given bug report from QEMU into one of the provided categories. The user mentioned that they're using Windows XP SP3 as a host with QEMU 2.2.50 and are having trouble booting an XP CD. It gets stuck at "Setup is starting Windows" when trying to boot from the CD. They tried various older versions like 1.5.1-win32 and 0.9.1 but faced the same issue.
+
+They also mentioned disabling floppy drives with different switches, such as -global isa-fdc.driveA=c or -no-fd-bootchk, but it didn't resolve the problem. The user noted that others have had similar issues without solutions, though some reported success when turning off floppy support.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. The issue is about QEMU failing to boot a CD, which relates to the boot process itself.
+
+The key here is that the problem occurs during the booting phase of Windows XP within QEMU. The user tried different configurations related to floppy drives but couldn't fix it. So this seems to be an issue with how QEMU handles the booting process, specifically when starting a guest operating system from a CD.
+
+The category "boot" directly relates to issues during the startup process of the virtual machine. Since the problem is about failing to complete the boot sequence, this falls under the boot category.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1437 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1437
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ec4aa3bf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1437
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report where the user mentioned that Nitrux doesn't finish the boot process. The possible categories are things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, etc.
+
+First, the problem is about the boot process not completing. That immediately makes me think it's related to how the system starts up. Since this is part of QEMU, which is a hypervisor, any boot issues might be due to problems in the hypervisor or how virtual machines are handled.
+
+Looking at the categories: 'boot' seems like the most direct fit here because the issue is specifically about the system not completing its boot sequence. Other options like 'hypervisor' could also be relevant, but 'boot' is more specific to the process of starting up.
+
+I don't see any mention of translations or assembly issues, so 'mistranslation' and 'assembly' are probably not it. It's not a graphics problem either since there's no mention of display issues. The steps to reproduce only involve loading an ISO, which is straightforward booting.
+
+Therefore, the category should be 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1447 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1447
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..845f0041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1447
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's start by reading the bug report carefully.
+
+The title is: "riscv: reset_vec uses CSR even when disabled causing inability to boot". So it's related to RISC-V and something about using a CSR (which stands for Control and Status Registers) even when they're supposed to be disabled, leading to a boot failure.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce, the user runs a rv32 binary with specific CPU flags: `-cpu rv32,d=off,f=off,Zicsr=off`. The 'd' and 'f' probably stand for some features being turned off, and 'Zicsr=off' specifically disables the ZICSR extension, which is related to the use of CSRs in RISC-V.
+
+The issue arises when QEMU's reset_vec (which I assume is part of the initialization or reset vector handling) tries to access a CSR even though it's supposed to be disabled. This causes the system to fail to boot correctly. The user also provides instructions on how to debug this using GDB, but that's more about the debugging process rather than the category.
+
+Now, looking at the categories provided:
+
+- mistranslation: Incorrect mapping from source to target.
+- assembly: Lowering of assembly code.
+- device
+- graphic
+- socket
+- network
+- KVM
+- boot
+- vnc
+- debug
+- files
+- permissions
+- performance
+- kernel
+- peripherals
+- hypervisor
+
+The problem is that the reset vector (reset_vec) uses a CSR even when it's disabled. Since the issue occurs during boot, the category might be 'boot'. Alternatively, since it's related to the RISC-V CPU configuration and specific CSRs being accessed incorrectly, it could also relate to how QEMU handles CPUs or devices.
+
+But considering that the failure happens at reset time, which is part of the boot process, I think 'boot' is the most appropriate category here. The issue prevents the system from successfully initializing, which directly impacts the booting phase.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue during the boot process where QEMU's reset_vec incorrectly accesses a CSR that's supposed to be disabled. This affects the ability to boot correctly.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1473451 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1473451
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1478b062
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1473451
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The user is asking QEMU to support the native BIOS format for DEC Alpha. Currently, QEMU's alpha system uses an ELF image for the bios parameter. They mention that HP provides firmware updates, and using these could allow things like SRM firmware or ARC firmware, which would help in building and testing Windows applications on that platform without hardware.
+
+So, looking at the categories: The issue is about supporting a specific BIOS format, which relates to the system's boot process. QEMU handles different types of firmware for various architectures, so this seems related to how the system initializes or boots. 
+
+Looking at the options, "boot" seems appropriate because it's about the initial startup and firmware support. It's not a mistranslation issue, nor is it directly related to assembly or performance. The other categories like network or kernel don't fit as well here.
+
+Therefore, I think the correct category for this bug report is "boot".
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1476800 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1476800
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..057fcb11
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1476800
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's break this down. The user is having an issue with QEMU on their Windows 8.1 laptop. They're trying to run a WinXP ISO using QEMU Manager and a blank disk image. As soon as they open it, they get a runtime error.
+
+First, I need to figure out what category this bug falls into from the given list: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The user mentioned a runtime error when trying to start the VM. The fact that it's an instant error upon opening suggests something went wrong during initialization or setup rather than during execution. Since they're using QEMU Manager and a blank disk image, potential issues could be related to how the virtual machine is configured or started.
+
+Looking at the possible categories:
+
+- Mistranslation: This usually relates to incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target in user-mode. Not sure if that's the case here.
+- Assembly lowering: Relates to assembly code generation; probably not unless it's a compilation issue.
+- Other: A catch-all category, but perhaps too broad.
+- Device: Could be related to hardware devices or drivers within the VM.
+- Graphic: If the error is display-related, this might apply.
+- Network: If the network setup fails, but user didn't mention that.
+- KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine; QEMU often uses KVM for hypervisor functions on Linux. On Windows, though, it's more about Hyper-V or other emulators.
+- Boot: This seems relevant since the VM is failing to start (booting). The error occurs immediately when trying to open it, which could be during the boot process of the VM.
+- VNC: Not related unless remote access was involved.
+- Debug: Unlikely unless the user is using debug features.
+- Files/Permissions: Could be if there's an issue accessing files or permissions on the host OS.
+- Performance: If the system doesn't meet requirements, but the error is immediate, so probably not performance-related.
+- Kernel: Related to the hypervisor's kernel; possible but let's see other options.
+- Peripherals: Devices attached to VM; maybe if disk image isn't properly recognized.
+- Hypervisor: The core of virtualization; issues here could prevent VM from starting.
+
+The error occurs when opening the VM, so it's likely during the boot process. Alternatively, it might be related to how QEMU Manager handles the setup or configuration files (like permissions on the host), or perhaps a problem with the disk image being read correctly (files category). But since the user is getting an immediate runtime error upon trying to open, it could also point towards a boot issue where the VM can't start at all.
+
+Considering that QEMU uses KVM for virtualization on Linux but on Windows, it's more about other hypervisors or emulators. However, the main problem here is the failure to start the VM with a runtime error. The most fitting category from the list would be 'boot' because it's about the VM failing to initialize properly when starting up.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1496712 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1496712
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1a246292
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1496712
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories. Let's read through the problem again.
+
+The user converted a Parallels Windows 2012 R2 image to raw and qcow2 using qemu-img convert. After creating a new VM entry with Virtual Machine Manager and trying to boot, they get "no Bootable device." 
+
+In Test 1, they tried overwriting the target disk by mounting both source and target images and copying files. However, after rebooting, there was a blue screen error related to prl_strg.sys.
+
+Test 2 worked fine with an Ubuntu image, so the issue seems specific to Windows 2012 R2 conversion.
+
+Possible categories: boot, device, graphic, network, etc. The main issue is that after conversion, the VM doesn't boot properly. Since it's about not finding a bootable device after converting and setting up the VM, the primary category would be 'boot'. Alternatively, it could relate to devices or disk issues, but since the problem occurs during boot, 'boot' seems most fitting.
+
+Wait, but the issue might also be related to how the image is converted. Maybe there's a problem with the translation from Parallels format to raw/qcow2, which affects the device setup for booting. So perhaps it's a device or storage issue. However, the immediate error during boot points more towards 'boot'.
+
+But considering that the conversion process might have altered how the disk is recognized by QEMU, leading to no bootable device detected, it could also be under 'device'. Alternatively, if the problem lies in the translation step, maybe 'mistranslation' or 'assembly' but those don't seem right here.
+
+Another angle: when they tried overwriting with another Windows image, it caused a blue screen. This suggests that the issue is related to how the disk is set up post-conversion, possibly affecting boot components. But since the primary error is about no bootable device upon first attempt, 'boot' seems appropriate.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1512134 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1512134
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..34161b8e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1512134
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's tackle this bug report classification. The user provided a detailed issue about the Multiboot v1 memory map offset being wrong in QEMU. They're developing a kernel and noticed that when using QEMU, the mmap_addr points to the start of the structure instead of the 'addr' field as specified.
+
+First, I'll break down the problem. The user mentions that according to the Multiboot specification, mmap_addr should point to the "addr" field within the structure, but in their case, it's pointing to the start. This suggests a misalignment or incorrect offset applied by QEMU when handling the memory map.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation involves incorrect semantic mapping from source to target, which might be relevant if the issue is about how data structures are handled during translation. However, in this case, it's more about the structure layout than a direct translation error.
+
+The bug seems related to how QEMU constructs or reports the memory map. The user provided a workaround by checking the bootloader name and adjusting the offset only when not using QEMU. This indicates that the problem lies within QEMU's handling of the Multiboot protocol, specifically in how it sets up the mmap_addr variable.
+
+Considering the categories again: 'other' is a catch-all, but I'm looking for more specific ones. 'boot' seems relevant because it pertains to the boot process and kernel initialization. The issue occurs during the multiboot phase, which is part of the booting procedure. Alternatively, 'hypervisor' could be considered since QEMU acts as a hypervisor, but the problem directly affects the memory layout provided to the guest OS.
+
+However, the primary issue here is that the mmap_addr is incorrectly set by QEMU when using Multiboot v1. This misconfiguration occurs during the boot process, making 'boot' the most fitting category. It's about how the hypervisor (QEMU) sets up the environment for the kernel to run, specifically in terms of memory mapping.
+</think>
+
+The bug report relates to incorrect handling of the memory map address by QEMU during the Multiboot v1 initialization process. The issue is within the boot sequence where the mmap_addr is miscalculated, causing it to point to the start of the structure instead of the 'addr' field as per specifications. Since this problem occurs during the booting phase, the most appropriate category is:
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1551 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1551
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8ba46d5d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1551
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify a bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me start by understanding the problem.
+
+The user reported an assertion failure in `cpu_loop_exec_tb` where `icount_enabled()` is not met. The error happens when starting a guest, but it works with QEMU 7.2.0. They provided some logging output and mentioned that their OS uses `mvn pc, #0xff` to switch from EL1 to EL2 for system calls.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The error is in `cpu-exec.c`, which relates to CPU execution. The function `icount_enabled()` probably checks if instruction counting is enabled. If this assertion fails, it might be due to an issue with how the CPU or instruction counting is handled during booting.
+
+Since the user mentioned that their OS uses a specific assembly instruction for system calls and the problem occurs when starting the guest (boot process), it's likely related to the boot phase. The error occurs in QEMU's code, not necessarily in the guest OS, so it might be a bug in how QEMU handles certain instructions or states during execution.
+
+The categories that stand out are 'boot' because the issue happens early on when starting the guest, and maybe 'hypervisor' since QEMU acts as a hypervisor for ARM targets. However, considering the error message is about CPU loop execution and instruction counting, it's more directly related to the boot process of the guest OS within QEMU.
+
+So I think the category should be 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+The bug occurs during the boot process of the guest, indicating an issue with how QEMU initializes or handles certain instructions related to system calls. 
+
+Answer: boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1586229 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1586229
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..fff20735
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1586229
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me start by reading through the report carefully.
+
+The user mentions "seabios hell," which suggests they're having trouble with SEABIOS in QEMU. They talk about how the BIOS loads after the hard drive wants to boot, which is unusual because typically the BIOS should load before the OS. They also mention issues with booting Yosemite and problems when trying to access the BIOS setup. It seems like the BIOS isn't appearing correctly or at the right time.
+
+Looking at their description, they're struggling to get into the BIOS setup (they found it by mistake). They tried mashing keys but couldn't get it to work as expected. The BIOS only loads when booting a hard disk, which might indicate that QEMU is not properly emulating the BIOS behavior or there's an issue with how SEABIOS is integrated.
+
+The user also mentions that changing anything in the BIOS setup affects their ability to boot from a CD, implying that there's some misconfiguration or bug in how SEABIOS handles different boot sources. They're experiencing a black screen when trying to boot, which they believe relates to SEABIOS and not the VGA driver, so it's more about the firmware than hardware drivers.
+
+Considering the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is primarily with how SEABIOS is functioning in QEMU. Since SEABIOS is related to the BIOS setup and booting process, the problem seems to be more about the boot ROM or firmware handling rather than direct device emulation or graphics. However, none of the categories directly mention BIOS specifically. 
+
+Looking at the options again: "boot" category makes sense because the user's main issue is with the boot process—how SEABIOS loads and how it interacts with the booting hardware. The problem isn't about performance, network issues, or graphical drivers; it's about the BIOS not behaving correctly during the boot sequence.
+
+So, I think the correct classification here is "boot" because the user's issue revolves around the BIOS loading incorrectly and affecting the boot process.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1589 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1589
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b2f6e101
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1589
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report mentions that when using QEMU version 8.0.0 in TCG mode, there's a crash on the booting screen. The user can't proceed past this point—the window closes and becomes unresponsive. They also note that this happens across all versions of 8.0.0 on Windows.
+
+First, I should think about what TCG stands for. TCG is short for Translation-Cache Guest, which is a mode where QEMU uses a dynamic translator to run the guest code directly on the host CPU without requiring full virtualization extensions like KVM. So it's related to how QEMU translates the guest instructions into something the host can execute.
+
+The issue occurs during booting, so that points towards something happening when the guest OS is starting up. The crash happens at the boot screen, which suggests it might be a problem with how the emulator handles certain instructions or processes during this initial phase.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'boot' seems directly relevant here because the problem occurs during the boot process of the virtual machine. Other categories like 'graphic' could be considered if the issue was with rendering, but since the window closes and becomes unresponsive, it's more about the booting process itself failing rather than graphical issues.
+
+I don't see any mention of networking or sockets in the report, so those can be ruled out. The problem isn't with user-mode assembly lowering (assembly category) or permissions, files, etc. It's not a performance issue since the crash happens quickly after entering the boot screen. Kernel or hypervisor might be involved, but 'boot' is more specific here.
+
+So, considering all this, the most appropriate category for this bug would be 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where QEMU crashes when using TCG mode during the booting process of a virtual machine. The crash occurs on the boot screen and results in the window becoming unresponsive and closing. This problem is consistent across all versions of 8.0.0 for Windows.
+
+Given the categories provided, 'boot' is the most appropriate classification as the issue directly relates to the failure during the boot process of the guest operating system within QEMU.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1589257 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1589257
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ceeb46f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1589257
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let's read through the problem carefully.
+
+The user reports that when using OVMF with Ubuntu as the host and Windows 10 as the guest, the boot process is extremely slow—about 10 times slower than before. Previously, they used Arch Linux with the same setup without issues. Now, every CPU core is maxed out during boot until Windows starts, after which everything works normally.
+
+Looking at their settings: Host is Ubuntu 16.04 with QEMU 2.5.0; guest is Windows 10 using VirtIO raw disk and network, with typical VGA passthrough.
+
+The issue seems to occur during the boot process, specifically when loading OVMF. Since it's related to the time taken to boot and high CPU usage, I'm considering possible categories.
+
+Mistranslation usually relates to incorrect semantic mapping in user-mode, which doesn't seem to fit here. The bug is about performance during boot, not assembly or other lower-level issues.
+
+The category 'boot' seems appropriate because it directly relates to the time taken for the system to start up, especially with OVMF involved. High CPU usage suggests something is inefficiently handled during the boot process by QEMU.
+
+Other categories like network, device, or kernel might be possible, but the primary issue here is the slow boot-up, so 'boot' is the most fitting category.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1590796 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1590796
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..28376bbf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1590796
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The user reports that when using QEMU 2.6.0 to install Windows 7, it hangs on the splash screen. However, it works fine with version 2.5.1. They provided two scripts: one that uses VirtIO drives and another simpler script using IDE drives. Both result in the same issue.
+
+Looking at the possible categories, I need to figure out which one fits this bug. The problem occurs during installation (boot process), so 'boot' seems relevant. However, let me check other possibilities.
+
+The user mentioned KVM is enabled, but the issue isn't specific to KVM; it's more about the install process failing. So 'KVM' might not be the best fit unless it's a hypervisor-related issue.
+
+They're using VirtIO devices and network configurations, but the problem is with the installation hanging, which points more towards booting rather than device or network issues.
+
+The other categories like 'graphic', 'network', 'socket' don't seem to apply here. It's not about assembly lowering or mistranslation. The issue isn't related to files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, debug, vnc, or sound.
+
+So the most fitting category is 'boot' because it's during the boot process that the installation hangs.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where installing Windows 7 using QEMU hangs at the splash screen in version 2.6.0 but works in 2.5.1. The problem occurs regardless of whether VirtIO or IDE drives are used, pointing to a regression related to booting the installation process.
+
+**Category: boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1598029 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1598029
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a5bfcaae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1598029
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out the category for this bug report. The user is having trouble booting a customized kernel when emulating Broadwell or Skylake CPUs in QEMU. They provided details about their hardware setup, including using an Intel Core i7-6500U (Skylake) processor and running QEMU version 2.5.0 on Linux Mint.
+
+Looking at the reproduction steps, they tried two different CPU configurations: Broadwell and host (which is Skylake). Both resulted in a kernel panic or inability to log in. The workaround was using Haswell instead, which worked fine. So the issue seems specific to these CPU emulations.
+
+The possible categories include 'boot', 'hypervisor', 'kernel', etc. Since the problem occurs during boot with a customized kernel and is tied to the CPU type being emulated, it likely relates to how QEMU handles the hardware emulation for those CPUs. This could be an issue in the hypervisor or perhaps the way the kernel interacts with the emulated hardware.
+
+I'm leaning towards 'hypervisor' because the problem occurs when using KVM (since '-enable-kvm' is used) and the CPU type might not be properly handled, causing boot issues.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1599214 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1599214
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4060c797
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1599214
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU. The issue is that virtlogd isn't logging the boot messages when using QEMU 2.6.0. Let me break down what's happening here.
+
+The user mentioned that OpenStack Nova uses the "virtlogd" feature of QEMU for capturing stdout and stderr from a char device. They followed steps to reproduce: launching a guest with virtlogd, checking the log file, but found it empty. However, when connected directly via the terminal during a reboot, they saw the messages in both the terminal and the backing log file.
+
+Looking at the possible categories:
+
+- **mistranslation**: This usually refers to incorrect mapping from source to target architecture or IR, which doesn't seem relevant here.
+- **assembly**: Lowering assembly code—doesn't fit this issue about logging.
+- **device**: Could relate if it's a hardware device problem, but virtlogd is more of a service for logging.
+- **graphic**: Not related to display issues.
+- **socket** or **network**: The bug isn't about networking or socket communication directly.
+- **KVM**: KVM is part of QEMU, but this issue is specific to logging via virtlogd, not the hypervisor itself.
+- **boot**: This seems relevant because it's about boot messages not being logged during the guest OS boot process.
+- **vnc**: Not related to VNC server or display issues.
+- **debug**, **files**, **permissions**, **performance**, **kernel**, **peripherals**, **hypervisor**: None of these seem directly related to the logging issue described.
+
+The key here is that the problem occurs during the guest's boot process, where the expected log messages aren't being captured. Since virtlogd is supposed to handle logging for char devices used by QEMU, and it's failing during the boot phase, the most appropriate category is "boot".
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1614348 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1614348
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..20896d45
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1614348
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The user provided a hello.c program that they compiled for ARM using arm-linux-gnu-gcc. They tried linking without using the standard libraries and got a warning about not finding the entry symbol _start. When running under qemu-arm, it dumped a core due to an illegal instruction.
+
+But when they included crt1.o, crti.o, and crtn.o in their linker command, QEMU ran successfully without issues. So the problem seems related to the presence or absence of these start files.
+
+Looking at the categories given: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue here is about the entry symbol. The user didn't have _start in their linked binary when they first tried. The linker defaulted to 0x101fc, but QEMU threw an illegal instruction error. Adding the crt files fixed it because those files likely provide the proper startup code, including the _start symbol.
+
+This seems related to how the binary is set up for execution on ARM. Since the user was using -nostdlib and didn't include the start files, the generated binary might not have the necessary entry point or setup functions that QEMU expects. The problem isn't with the translation of code from one architecture to another but rather with the presence of required runtime startup code.
+
+Looking at the categories again, 'boot' seems appropriate because it's about how the program starts and initializes, especially in an environment like QEMU which emulates a target system. Without the proper entry point setup, the emulation can't proceed correctly.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is related to the lack of necessary startup code (crt files) leading to an illegal instruction error. This affects the program's ability to boot properly on the target system.
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1629282 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1629282
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4b52bd3e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1629282
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories for QEMU. The user mentioned that QEMU hangs when installing Windows 7 as a guest using OVMF BIOS. They also referenced another bug but believe this is a different issue.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem occurs during installation with OVMF BIOS. Since it's related to the BIOS and the machine hanging, this might be a boot issue or related to the hypervisor (since KVM is involved). The user tried using different displays as a workaround but it didn't help, so it's not just a display issue.
+
+I think "boot" would be appropriate here because it relates to the system failing during the boot process of the guest OS. Alternatively, since KVM is enabled, maybe "hypervisor," but "boot" seems more specific to the installation hang.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves QEMU hanging during Windows 7 installation using OVMF BIOS. This issue likely occurs during the boot process of the guest OS. 
+
+**Answer:**
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1638 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1638
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..62537917
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1638
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's figure out how to classify this bug report. The user mentioned a segmentation fault when using certain parameters in QEMU: `-object memory-backend-file`, with `readonly=on` and `prealloc=on`. 
+
+So, from what I know, QEMU uses various backends for memory management. In this case, the problem occurs when these two options are used together. The user explained that when `readonly` is set, it mmap's the file with PROT_READ, making it read-only. But when `prealloc=on`, it tries to touch_pages on that memory, which might cause a segfault because the memory isn't writable.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+This issue seems related to how memory is being managed and mmap'd. It's not directly about a device, graphics, or networking. The problem arises during the allocation of memory, specifically when trying to preallocate it while making it read-only. This falls under memory management in QEMU.
+
+Considering the possible categories, "files" might relate because it's dealing with file-backed memory, but more precisely, this is about how the memory backend is being handled. Alternatively, "permissions" could be relevant since the issue stems from mmap permissions (PROT_READ vs needing PROT_WRITE for touch_pages). 
+
+But wait, the primary issue is that when both `readonly` and `prealloc` are used together, it causes a segfault due to incorrect mmap handling. This seems more like an issue with how QEMU translates or handles these parameters, possibly in user-mode assembly or memory management.
+
+Looking back at the categories given, "mistranslation" refers to incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target. However, this bug is about incorrect handling of mmap flags leading to a segfault during preallocation. It might not be directly related to translation but more about how QEMU manages memory for the VM.
+
+Another category could be "files" since it's dealing with file-backed memory, but I'm not sure if that's the best fit. Alternatively, perhaps it falls under "hypervisor" as it's part of KVM/QEMU's memory management during VM booting.
+
+Wait, in QEMU, the memory-backend-file is part of the machine's memory configuration. The segfault happens when initializing this backend with certain options. This seems like a bug in how QEMU initializes memory backends, which could be under "other" if none of the specific categories fit.
+
+But looking at the categories again: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The issue occurs during VM booting, so "boot" might be a relevant category. Alternatively, it's about memory management in QEMU, which could relate to the "hypervisor" or "kernel" categories.
+
+However, considering that the problem is with how mmap is handled when readonly and prealloc are used together, it might be more of an assembly-level issue during the lowering phase. But I'm not entirely sure if that's accurate.
+
+Wait, the user mentioned that the bug report is part of QEMU, so perhaps the category should reflect the subsystem affected. The problem arises with the memory backend file object, which relates to how QEMU handles memory in general. Since it's causing a segfault during VM boot, "boot" could be the category.
+
+Alternatively, since the issue is about permissions (PROT_READ vs needing write access), "permissions" might also fit. But I'm not sure if that's the best fit either.
+
+In the end, I think this bug is related to how QEMU initializes and manages memory during booting when using specific parameters. So the most appropriate category would be "boot".
+</think>
+
+The issue occurs during VM booting due to conflicting mmap flags in memory backend configuration, affecting boot process.
+
+**Category: boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1639394 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1639394
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..16f0d861
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1639394
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem carefully.
+
+The user is reporting an issue where they cannot boot Solaris 8/9 x86 under Fedora 24 using QEMU. They provided details about trying different approaches without success and mentioned that it might be a regression related to certain fixes in version 0.6.0, specifically mentioning int13 CDROM BIOS fix and int15, ah=86 BIOS fix.
+
+They also noted that Solaris 10/11 works fine, which suggests the problem is specific to older versions of Solaris. Additionally, using "scsi" instead circumvents the initial issue but leads to problems with not finding the IDE disk device. The command used was qemu-system-i386 with specific parameters pointing to a raw drive and an ISO file.
+
+Looking at the error message: "prom_panic: Could not mount filesystem." This indicates that during the boot process, QEMU's emulation isn't correctly handling some part of the BIOS or hardware initialization required for Solaris 8/9. 
+
+The user mentioned that this might be a regression because of fixes applied in version 0.6.0. So it's possible that those fixes broke compatibility with older Solaris versions when using IDE for booting.
+
+Now, considering the categories: 
+
+- **mistranslation**: This relates to incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target, usually user-mode assembly. Not sure if this applies here.
+- **assembly**: Lowering issues in assembly code. Maybe, but not directly clear.
+- **device**: Could relate to hardware device emulation problems.
+- **graphic**: Probably not related as the issue is about booting and filesystem mounting.
+- **socket**, **network**: Unrelated unless network drivers are involved, which doesn't seem to be the case here.
+- **KVM**, **hypervisor**: KVM is part of QEMU, but the problem seems more about BIOS emulation rather than hypervisor issues.
+- **boot**: This seems relevant because the issue is about failing to boot Solaris. The error occurs during the boot process.
+- **vnc**, **debug**, **files**, **permissions**, **performance**, **kernel**, **peripherals**: None of these seem directly applicable.
+  
+The user specifically mentions problems with the IDE CDROM and disk devices, which are part of hardware emulation under QEMU's device handling. However, since the core issue is about booting failing due to filesystem mounting, "boot" seems like a more accurate category.
+
+But wait, let me think again. The problem could also be tied to how the BIOS is handled during boot. Since Solaris uses specific BIOS calls (int13 for CDROM and int15 for hardware probe), any issues in QEMU's emulation of these would fall under the device or perhaps the hypervisor category if it's related to how virtualization handles certain instructions.
+
+However, since the main issue is that the system can't boot past a certain point due to filesystem mounting failure, which happens during the boot process itself, I think "boot" is the most appropriate category. It indicates that the problem occurs when trying to start up the OS within QEMU, which points towards issues in the boot ROM or BIOS emulation.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1653063 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1653063
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b7de0413
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1653063
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU hanging when using the "-icount" and "-nodefaults" options. Let me try to figure out what's going on here.
+
+First, the user mentioned that they're using the latest commit of QEMU, which is good because it rules out very old issues. They've configured QEMU with a bunch of disable flags, including SDL, pie, various cryptographic libraries, and more. The target list includes AArch64 and ARM softmmu, so they're compiling for those architectures on an x86_64 host.
+
+The problem occurs when running the integratorcp machine type with specific kernel and initrd files. When "-icount" is used along with "-nodefaults", QEMU hangs after printing "Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel." Without either of these options, it works fine. 
+
+Now, I need to classify this bug into one of the given categories. The possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The user's issue is that QEMU isn't proceeding past a certain point when those two options are enabled. "-icount" stands for "inaccurate cycle counting," which is used to simulate CPU cycles without precise timing. Using it can sometimes cause issues because the timing model changes, potentially leading to hangs if some part of the code relies on accurate timing.
+
+"-nodefaults" means that QEMU doesn't automatically add default devices, like serial ports or IDE controllers, which might affect how the guest OS initializes hardware. If a device is expected but not present due to "-nodefaults", it could cause the boot process to fail or hang.
+
+The test image they're using is from arm-test-0.2.tar.gz, which is likely a minimal test case that's supposed to work without extra devices. So when "-icount" is used, perhaps the timing issues are causing some part of the initialization to stall, especially since the OS might be expecting certain hardware at specific times.
+
+Looking at the categories again: "boot" seems relevant because it's about the kernel booting and initializing, which isn't happening correctly in this case. The system hangs during the boot process when these options are enabled. It doesn't seem related to device or network issues specifically because without "-nodefaults", those devices aren't added, but the problem occurs with both options on.
+
+Alternatively, "hypervisor" could be a category if it's related to how KVM interacts with QEMU, but in this case, the issue is more about the timing and device setup during boot. Since the hang happens right after the kernel starts booting, it's likely an issue with how the hypervisor (QEMU) is handling the initialization under these specific configuration options.
+
+However, considering that "-icount" affects cycle counting, which might influence hardware emulation, but since the user isn't using KVM, the problem is more about QEMU itself. The boot process relies on accurate timing for certain operations, so when "-icount" is enabled, it's possible that some part of the initialization sequence doesn't proceed as expected.
+
+But wait, another angle: "-nodefaults" disables default devices, which might include things like a serial port or other essential devices. If the kernel expects certain devices to be present for booting (like a serial console), and they're not added because of "-nodefaults", that could cause the hang. In this case, the user is adding their own chardev and serial device, but maybe it's not being recognized properly when combined with "-icount".
+
+So putting it together: The issue occurs during the boot process, which suggests it's a "boot" category bug. Alternatively, if it's related to how devices are handled during boot, it might fall under "peripherals". However, since the primary issue is the system hanging at the point where the kernel starts, I think "boot" is more accurate.
+
+Wait, but looking back, the user said that without "-icount", it works fine, and without "-nodefaults", it also works. So both options are contributing to the hang when used together. Since "-icount" affects cycle counting and could interfere with the timing of certain operations, maybe this is a bug in how QEMU's hypervisor handles the CPU timing under specific configurations.
+
+But I'm still torn between "boot" and "hypervisor". If it's a problem related to how the hypervisor (QEMU) emulates hardware during boot when "-icount" is used, then perhaps "hypervisor" would be more appropriate. But since the primary symptom is that the system isn't booting correctly, maybe it's better categorized under "boot".
+
+Alternatively, considering that QEMU hangs and doesn't proceed past a certain point in the boot process, it could also be a kernel issue within QEMU's code, which might fall under "kernel". But I'm not sure if that's the right category.
+
+Wait, looking at the categories again: hypervisor is about KVM specifically. Since the user didn't mention using KVM, perhaps it's more of a QEMU-specific bug in its emulation rather than related to the hypervisor.
+
+So considering all this, I think "boot" is the most appropriate category because the issue occurs during the kernel boot process when certain options are set.
+</think>
+
+The bug report indicates that QEMU hangs during the boot process when using both "-icount" and "-nodefaults". Since the hang occurs after the kernel starts but fails to proceed, this points to an issue related to the boot process itself rather than specific hardware devices or other categories.
+
+**Answer:** The bug should be classified under **boot**.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1695286 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1695286
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8fe400d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1695286
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report about adding multiboot2 support in QEMU. Let me read the categories again: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The user is asking for multiboot2 support to run OS using the '-kernel' option. Multiboot2 is a specification related to how the bootloader interacts with the kernel and QEMU as the hypervisor or emulator. Since this involves booting an operating system, it's probably under 'boot'. I don't think it's 'hypervisor' because that refers more to the management of virtual machines rather than boot processes. So the category is 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses adding support for multiboot2, which is related to how QEMU handles kernel loading and booting operating systems. This falls under the 'boot' category.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1698574 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1698574
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cd8ff3e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1698574
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report in QEMU. The user is experiencing a slow boot time when using their setup with GPU passthrough for Windows 7. They mention that without the "-vga none" switch, the boot takes about three minutes, but it's much faster—around one minute—when they remove that switch.
+
+First, I'll read through the bug report carefully. The user has a working QEMU environment with GPU passthrough using an NVIDIA GTX 880M. When they don't use "-vga none", the boot is slow, and the HD light flickers for about three minutes. They want to know why this happens and if it can be fixed.
+
+Looking at their script, they're using several QEMU options, including -vga none, which makes sense because without a VGA device, the GPU passthrough might work better. But when they remove that option, allowing QEMU to create a VGA adapter, the boot is faster but causes issues with resource allocation for the NVIDIA card.
+
+Now, considering the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue seems to be related to boot time when using GPU passthrough. The problem occurs during the boot process, which suggests it's tied to how QEMU initializes devices or resources at startup. Since removing "-vga none" changes the behavior and affects resource allocation, it might involve device initialization or management.
+
+GPU passthrough is handled by the vfio-pci device in QEMU, and without "-vga none", the VGA device is added, which might be causing a conflict or additional overhead during boot. This could relate to how devices are managed during the boot process, possibly under the 'boot' category since it affects startup time.
+
+Alternatively, it could be related to the 'graphic' category because it involves VGA and GPU handling. However, the primary issue seems to be the delay in the boot process when certain devices are present, which points more towards device management or initialization during the boot phase.
+
+So, considering all this, I think the most appropriate category is 'boot' because the problem directly affects how quickly the system boots up under different configurations involving GPU passthrough and VGA handling.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses an issue with slow boot times when using GPU passthrough in QEMU. The problem occurs during the boot process when certain devices (like the NVIDIA card) are involved, which suggests it's related to device initialization or management during boot. Therefore, the category is:
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1701 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1701
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..217108a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1701
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that the VM hangs when the boot menu is enabled. So the issue occurs during the boot process because the virtual machine stops and waits at the ESC press for the boot menu.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: boot seems directly related here since it's about the VM hanging during the boot sequence. Other options like 'kernel' or 'hypervisor' might be involved, but the immediate problem is with the boot menu behavior causing a hang. So 'boot' fits best.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves the VM hanging when the boot menu is enabled, which directly relates to the boot process.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1716510 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1716510
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..90abec8f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1716510
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that QEMU 2.10.0 can't boot Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016; it hangs during the boot process. Downgrading to version 2.9 fixes the issue. 
+
+Looking at the setup details, they're using various QEMU options like accel=kvm, pc-q35-2.8 machine type, and multiple devices such as VirtIO network, USB, VGA, etc. The problem seems related to booting a specific OS version.
+
+The categories provided include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, VNC, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Since the issue occurs during boot and is resolved by downgrading QEMU, it's likely a problem with how QEMU handles the boot process for newer Windows versions. It could be related to KVM acceleration or the machine configuration (like pc-q35-2.8). Alternatively, perhaps there's an issue with device emulation.
+
+The mention of KVM in the setup suggests that the hypervisor is involved, but since it's hanging during boot, maybe it's a problem with the initialization process. Alternatively, it could be related to network or display settings, but I'm not sure.
+
+Another thought: The pc-q35-2.8 machine type might not fully support newer Windows versions in QEMU 2.10.0. Or perhaps there's a regression in how certain devices are handled. Since the user is using VirtIO and other modern device models, maybe that's where the issue lies.
+
+Wait, the category "boot" seems relevant here because the problem occurs during the boot process of the guest OS. So this would fall under the "boot" category.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1717708 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1717708
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..633cb6fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1717708
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's figure out the category for this bug report. The user is having trouble running a Windows ARM64 ISO using QEMU aarch64. They tried different machine types but didn't get video output, and some options resulted in errors about the guest not initializing.
+
+First, looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other.
+
+The issue seems related to running an ARM64 OS on QEMU. The user mentioned that a Windows x64 ISO works without specifying CPU and machine type, but the ARM64 version doesn't. This suggests it's about how QEMU handles different architectures or machine types.
+
+They tried various machine options like "virt" and "versatilepb", which didn't work. So it might not be an issue with device drivers or hardware emulation per se, but more about whether the machine type is correctly supported for ARM64 Windows.
+
+Since the user is trying to boot a specific OS variant, this could fall under the 'boot' category because it's related to starting up the guest OS and initializing properly. Alternatively, it might relate to the CPU or machine model configuration.
+
+However, since they're getting errors about the guest not initializing, it's more likely a boot issue rather than something else like graphics or networking. The lack of video output could be a symptom but might be secondary to the boot failure.
+
+So, considering all this, I think the most appropriate category is 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes issues with running Windows ARM64 ISOs using QEMU aarch64. The user encounters problems such as no video output and errors when trying different machine types. This seems related to how QEMU initializes and boots the guest OS for ARM64 systems.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1723927 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1723927
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..94180d73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1723927
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's break down this bug report to classify it properly. The user mentioned that both Windows Server 2012 DC and RedHat7.0 guests are failing to boot using UEFI on an Intel Xeon X5675 CPU. They provided the command line with various QEMU options and specified the use of OVMF as the BIOS.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The issue occurs during the boot process with UEFI, specifically mentioning TianoCore and VNCviewer. The problem seems to be related to how QEMU is handling the boot process with UEFI firmware. Since the user tried a different EDK2 version but still faced issues, it points towards a configuration or compatibility problem in the boot setup rather than hardware or performance.
+
+Considering the categories, 'boot' fits because the failure occurs during the guest OS boot phase. It's not related to translation errors (mistranslation), assembly code lowering (assembly), or other peripheral devices (peripherals) directly, but more about the boot process itself.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes a failure in the guest operating system's boot process using UEFI on an Intel Xeon CPU. The issue is related to how QEMU handles the boot with UEFI firmware.
+
+**Step-by-step Explanation:**
+1. **Issue Identification:** The problem occurs during the boot of the guest OS, specifically when using UEFI.
+2. **Relevant Details:** The user provided details about QEMU and EDK2 versions, indicating a possible compatibility or configuration issue.
+3. **Category Analysis:** The failure is in the boot process, aligning with the 'boot' category.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1732679 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1732679
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5ed64712
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1732679
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's figure out the category for this bug report. The user is encountering a crash during boot with Cisco NX-OSv 9k using QEMU 2.10.1 and OVMF. They mention that it worked fine with QEMU 2.8.x, so something changed between these versions.
+
+Looking at the provided configuration, they're using `-nographic -enable-kvm -cpu host -machine q35 -smp cpus=2 -bios /usr/share/ovmf/OVMF.fd`. The OVMF file seems okay based on its checksum and permissions. 
+
+They tried other Cisco images with QEMU 2.10.1, like IOSv and CSR, which worked fine. The issue is specific to NX-OSv 9k, so maybe it's related to how the BIOS interacts with that particular OS image.
+
+The logs aren't provided here, but based on their description, they're getting a crash during boot when using OVMF with QEMU 2.10.1. Since they've confirmed that GNS3 isn't the issue and the problem arises with a newer QEMU version, it's likely a change in how QEMU handles certain parameters or BIOS settings.
+
+The key point is the use of `-bios` parameter pointing to OVMF.fd. In older versions, this might have worked differently. Maybe there was a change in how QEMU 2.10.1 initializes or loads the BIOS compared to 2.8.x. Alternatively, perhaps the way certain machine types (like q35) interact with the BIOS has changed.
+
+The user is pointing out that NX-OSv might be more sensitive to these changes than other Cisco images. So it's possible that there's an issue in how QEMU's newer version is handling the BIOS or the machine setup, leading to a crash during boot.
+
+Given all this, the category should be 'boot' because the issue occurs during the boot process of the virtual machine.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1735653 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1735653
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f98d5ebd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1735653
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user is reporting that QEMU's aarch64 cannot boot Linux kernels starting from version 4.6+. They've provided details about their environment, build commands, and the specific error they're encountering.
+
+From the information given, the issue seems related to the kernel not booting properly with QEMU. The user did a git bisect and found that a specific commit in the Linux kernel caused the problem. This commit adds support for ARMv8.2 features, specifically id_aa64mmfr2. They suspect this might be due to changes in struct definitions not being handled correctly by QEMU.
+
+I need to categorize this bug report based on the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about QEMU failing to boot a kernel after a certain version. This seems related to how QEMU handles the machine's architecture and the features it supports. Since the problem arises from changes in the CPU feature handling (specifically ARMv8.2), it's likely that QEMU isn't correctly emulating these new features or the way they're detected.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'boot' seems appropriate because the issue is about the kernel not starting up properly. However, another possibility could be under 'hypervisor' since QEMU acts as a hypervisor for AArch64 machines, but 'boot' might be more specific here. Alternatively, it could fall under 'kernel' if the problem is with how QEMU interacts with the Linux kernel's features.
+
+But considering that the issue arises from changes in the CPU identification and feature handling, which are part of the machine setup during boot, 'boot' seems like the most fitting category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is about a failure to boot a Linux kernel using QEMU. The issue relates to specific changes in the kernel's ARMv8.2 features not being properly handled by QEMU, causing the kernel to fail during the boot process. Since the problem occurs during the boot phase, the appropriate category is:
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1737194 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1737194
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..05a9b22a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1737194
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that Windows NT 4.0 fails to boot from a qcow2 image after installation but works with qcow format. Let me break down the details.
+
+First, the problem occurs during booting from a virtual hard disk created using qcow2. When installed once, it boots correctly, but upon subsequent reboots, it doesn't work anymore. The error messages vary depending on whether FAT or NTFS is used: for NTFS, there's a disk read error, and for FAT, no bootable device.
+
+The steps to reproduce are clear. They create the qcow2 image, install Windows from a CD, which works once, but fails when trying to reboot. The user suggests using qcow instead of qcow2 as a quick fix.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about booting an OS from a virtual disk. The problem arises during the boot process after installation. It's not related to user-mode assembly or translation issues because it's more about how QEMU handles the storage format and the boot process.
+
+QEMU uses different image formats, and qcow2 has features like snapshots which might interfere with the boot process if not handled correctly. The fact that switching to qcow fixes the issue suggests it's a problem specific to qcow2 handling.
+
+The error occurs during the boot phase, indicating an issue with how QEMU reads the disk or presents it to the virtual machine. This seems related to device emulation, specifically storage devices (like hard drives). However, since the problem is more about image file format and booting rather than hardware emulation per se, maybe 'files' isn't the right category.
+
+Wait, but under 'other', there's a possibility that it's an issue with how QEMU handles certain image formats during the boot process. Alternatively, if the bug is related to how the virtual machine starts up and reads the disk, perhaps it's more about the boot process itself.
+
+But looking at the categories, 'boot' is one of them. The problem occurs when trying to boot from the image after installation. So maybe this falls under the 'boot' category because it's directly affecting the ability of the VM to start up properly.
+
+Alternatively, if it's a problem with how QEMU reads qcow2 images, perhaps that relates more to 'files', but the primary issue is during booting, so 'boot' seems more appropriate.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves issues during the boot process from a qcow2 image. Since the error occurs when attempting to start the VM and relates directly to how QEMU handles the boot sequence from the virtual disk, it falls under the 'boot' category.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1737882 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1737882
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..358d3193
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1737882
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's tackle this bug report classification task. The user has provided a query where they're trying to classify a specific bug related to QEMU and the booting of certain kernels. 
+
+First, I need to read the bug report carefully. The issue is that when using the QEMU Zaurus machine on akita or spitz, 2.4.x kernels cause QEMU to crash with an error message about executing code outside RAM or ROM at a specific address.
+
+Next, I should consider each possible category: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The key here is the error message pointing to an issue during the boot process of a specific kernel version. The machine types (akita/spitz) are part of QEMU's device emulation, but the problem occurs at boot time and relates to code execution outside RAM/ROM. This suggests it's not about translation or assembly lowering but rather how the boot process handles different kernels.
+
+Looking deeper, 2.4.x is an older kernel series, so there might be compatibility issues with QEMU's current setup for these machines. The error indicates a problem during the initial stages of the OS startup, which falls under boot issues. 
+
+I don't see any mention related to network, socket, or graphic problems here. It's specifically about the kernel version causing a crash at boot time, so 'boot' seems like the most appropriate category.
+
+Therefore, after evaluating all possibilities, the bug report fits best under the 'boot' category.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1737883 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1737883
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2cbad270
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1737883
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user is having trouble booting FreeBSD on the versatilepb machine and gets a black screen with no output. They mentioned that it worked before, so something has changed or perhaps there's an issue with the setup.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, network, etc. Boot issues usually fall under 'boot' category. The user tried adding a specific global option related to IRQ mapping but it didn't help. This suggests the problem might be related to how devices are being handled or hardware emulation, which could tie into the boot process.
+
+I don't see any mention of graphics specifically, so 'graphic' might not apply. It's more about the system not starting up correctly rather than display issues. Also, no network details provided, so that category is probably not relevant here. The issue isn't with KVM or VNC, as far as I can tell.
+
+So, considering all this, it seems like a boot problem. Therefore, the category should be 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is about being unable to boot FreeBSD on the versatilepb machine in QEMU. This relates to issues encountered during the boot process of an operating system within QEMU, which falls under the category of boot problems.
+
+**Step-by-step Explanation:**
+1. The user reports a failure to boot FreeBSD.
+2. They mention that it used to work but now results in a black screen with no output.
+3. Attempts to fix using specific options haven't worked.
+4. This indicates an issue during the boot process, which is categorized under 'boot'.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1743441 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1743441
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..852cdb32
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1743441
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. The bug involves OS/2 Warp 4.52 and eCS failing with an exception in OS2LVM (TRAP 000E). 
+
+First, I'll look at what each category means. "mistranslation" relates to incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target, usually in user-mode assembly. This doesn't seem directly related here since the issue is during booting an OS.
+
+"assembly lowering" refers to issues in the process of converting high-level code to assembly. The problem described is more about the operating system failing during boot, not about code translation.
+
+The other categories include device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+Since the issue occurs when trying to boot OS/2 Warp and eCS, the key aspect is that it's during the boot process. The exception in OS2LVM suggests a problem with virtualization or hardware emulation related to the booting of these operating systems.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems the most fitting because the failure occurs when the system attempts to start (boot) these OSes. It doesn't seem to be a network, graphic, or device issue specifically; rather, it's about the initial boot process failing.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1756080 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1756080
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a5da6802
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1756080
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report regarding QEMU's missing ATAGS support on ARM targets for non-Linux kernels. 
+
+First, the issue is about providing an ATAGS structure, which is used during the boot process. Since it's related to how the kernel starts and receives information, it falls under the boot category. The other categories like device or network don't fit here because it's specifically about boot parameters.
+</think>
+
+The bug report concerns the lack of ATAGS support during the boot process on ARM targets for non-Linux kernels in QEMU. This directly relates to how the kernel is booted and receives information, so the appropriate category is **boot**.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1776486 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1776486
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e33160e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1776486
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user had an issue where their VM wasn't booting when they added a "-initrd" image. They noticed that the initrd was 270 MB but didn't set enough RAM for QEMU. The default seemed to be around 120 MB, which caused the problem.
+
+The user suggests that QEMU's pseudo-bootloader should detect this issue and display an error message about the total boot images exceeding the allocated memory.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other.
+
+The bug is related to the boot process because it's about the VM not starting correctly. The issue arises from the sum of kernel and initrd images exceeding the RAM size, which affects the booting phase. The user mentions the pseudo-bootloader, which is part of the boot process in QEMU. So this seems directly tied to the boot category.
+
+I don't see it fitting into other categories like network or graphic because those are unrelated here. It's not a performance issue or kernel problem per se, but rather an error during the initial boot setup.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1781463 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1781463
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..28630546
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1781463
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I've got this bug report to classify for QEMU. Let me read through it carefully and figure out which category it falls into.
+
+The user is reporting that QEMU doesn't start *.abs firmware files on Windows 64-bit. They're using a firmware intended for STB Receivers based on the Linux Kernel. The user tried extracting the files with binwalk and other tools, but when they attempt to run it in QEMU, nothing happens. They provided terminal outputs showing that the extracted files aren't ELF binaries, so they can't be executed as kernels.
+
+Looking at their command line, they're using `qemu-system-mips.exe` with various configurations, including specifying a MIPS CPU and drive. The error message mentions that it couldn't load the MIPS BIOS 'mips_bios.bin'. They've tried different QEMU commands without success.
+
+The user's main issue seems to be that QEMU isn't handling the *.abs firmware correctly on Windows, particularly because these files aren't standard ELF binaries and require specific handling or extraction steps before they can be run as kernels.
+
+Now, considering the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other. 
+
+The user is trying to run a firmware file that's not an ELF binary, which suggests it might be a raw image or requires specific setup before execution. Since QEMU couldn't load the BIOS and they're dealing with a non-ELF file, this seems related to how the kernel or firmware is loaded during boot.
+
+The category 'boot' makes sense here because the issue revolves around starting up (booting) the firmware in QEMU. The user's problem isn't about translation errors, assembly issues, or other listed categories but rather about successfully initiating the firmware as a kernel in the emulator.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1801 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1801
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a865417c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1801
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The issue is that when someone tries to boot Ubuntu 23.04 (armhf) using UEFI in QEMU, the system hangs after printing "EFI stub: Exiting boot services...". They were able to reproduce it by running `qemu-system-arm` with certain parameters, including specifying a BIOS file and an HDD image.
+
+First, I look at the problem description. The user mentions that Ubuntu doesn't boot with UEFI and hangs after a specific message. When they directly specify the kernel and initrd, it works fine. So, the issue seems to be related to how QEMU handles the UEFI setup when using cloud images versus manually specifying the kernel and initramfs.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug occurs during the boot process with UEFI, so it's likely related to how QEMU initializes or interacts with the firmware. The fact that specifying kernel and initrd directly works suggests that the problem isn't with those files but rather with how QEMU is invoking them via UEFI.
+
+Possible causes could include issues in the UEFI firmware itself (maybe not correctly handling the boot process), problems with device initialization, or perhaps a misconfiguration in how the virtual machine is set up. Since it's related to booting, categories like 'boot' or 'hypervisor' might be relevant.
+
+But looking deeper, since the issue occurs when using UEFI and involves the EFI stub, which is part of the firmware's interaction with the kernel, I think the problem might be in the way QEMU's UEFI implementation (edk2) handles certain boot parameters. Alternatively, it could be a hardware emulation issue where some device isn't properly emulated, causing the hang.
+
+Wait, another angle: the user is using the 'virt' machine type. Maybe there are issues with how virtualization components like KVM interact with UEFI in this setup. However, KVM is more about CPU and platform emulation rather than the boot process itself.
+
+The fact that it works when specifying kernel and initrd directly points to a problem in the UEFI handover or initialization. This might fall under 'boot' category because it's related to the booting process of the OS using UEFI.
+
+Alternatively, since UEFI is part of the firmware layer, perhaps it's more related to 'hypervisor', but I'm not sure if QEMU's hypervisor aspects are involved here. The error messages mention EFI stubs and issues with TPM and TCG, which might be hardware-related in the virtual setup.
+
+Considering all this, the most fitting category seems to be 'boot' because the issue is directly related to how the OS boots using UEFI within QEMU.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1804961 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1804961
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8544fdbf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1804961
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user mentioned that when using QEMU version 3.0.0 with the virt-3.0 machine type, Windows 10 on ARM64 is experiencing a Blue Screen of Death (BSoD) during boot. The error code given is ACPI_BIOS_ERROR (0x000000A5). They also noted that using virt-2.12 works fine.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about Windows 10 crashing on boot with an ACPI error. Since it's related to the boot process and involves a specific hardware configuration (ARM64), I'm thinking it might be a boot-related problem. The fact that changing the machine type from virt-3.0 to virt-2.12 fixes it suggests something changed in how QEMU handles the boot process or the ACPI tables.
+
+The user also mentioned a patch related to adding a DBG2 table, which is part of the BIOS/ACPI setup. This indicates that the problem might be with how QEMU generates or provides these tables, leading to issues during Windows' boot process.
+
+Given all this, the most fitting category seems to be 'boot' since the issue occurs at boot time and relates to the configuration provided by QEMU's firmware (like the EFI file) which is crucial for the initial setup of the virtual machine.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1810956 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1810956
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1f636702
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1810956
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The bug occurs when running a malicious bootloader in QEMU-2.12.1, leading to a crash with SIGABRT in tcg/tcg.c on line 2684. 
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about a bootloader causing a crash. Bootloaders are typically part of the boot process in an emulated environment. Since QEMU handles booting and loading of kernels, this seems related to the boot category. 
+
+I don't think it's mistranslation or assembly lowering because those relate more to code translation issues during compilation. The error is happening at runtime when executing the bootloader, which suggests a problem during the boot process rather than in the code generation phase.
+
+It could be 'other' if none of the specific categories fit better, but since there's a specific boot process involved, 'boot' seems like the most appropriate category.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1811782 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1811782
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7556b8b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1811782
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user mentioned that when using QEMU on Windows, it fails to mount the rootfs from an ISO that works fine on Linux. So, the issue occurs in the Windows version but not the Linux one.
+
+First, I need to look at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. The user's problem is related to mounting a rootfs during boot, which points towards issues in the boot process.
+
+I remember that when QEMU boots an ISO, it emulates hardware and the guest OS (in this case, Linux) interacts with that emulation. If it works on Linux but not Windows, there might be differences in how QEMU is configured or behaves between the two operating systems.
+
+The user mentioned kernel panic when trying to mount the rootfs, which suggests a problem during the boot process—perhaps related to how the virtual CD-ROM is presented or handled differently on Windows. This could point towards issues with device emulation.
+
+Looking at the categories again, 'boot' seems relevant because it's about the initial stages of the guest OS starting up. Alternatively, 'device' might also fit if the problem is with hardware emulation during boot. However, since the issue specifically occurs when mounting the rootfs, which is part of the boot process, I think 'boot' is more appropriate.
+
+I don't see any mention of assembly lowering or translation issues, so 'mistranslation' doesn't seem right. It's not about graphics, sockets, or network specifically unless those are involved in device emulation. But given the context, focusing on the boot process makes sense.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1811888 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1811888
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4afde958
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1811888
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The user provided a list: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is about QEMU refusing to multiboot Elf64 kernels when emulating x86_64 systems. The user explains that this issue makes the `-kernel` option less useful because a bootloader like GRUB or Syslinux can load 64-bit ELF kernels fine now, but QEMU doesn't support it anymore.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'boot' seems to fit here because multibooting is related to how the system starts up and loads the kernel. The issue isn't about translation between architectures (mistranslation), nor assembly lowering. It's more about the boot process not working as intended with 64-bit kernels.
+
+I also considered other categories like 'kernel' or 'hypervisor,' but 'boot' is more specific to the initial loading phase, which this bug directly affects.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to how QEMU handles the booting process of 64-bit kernels, so the most appropriate category is:
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1814343 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1814343
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2d40b6ae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1814343
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is about the initrd not loading on RISC-V32. The user ran QEMU with a ram disk but only got zeros when accessing it from within the VM. They traced the issue to line 93 of hw/riscv/virt.c where there's a sign extension problem in kernel_entry for 32-bit mode.
+
+Looking at the code change they suggested, they modified *start by adding (kernel_entry & 0xffffffff), which suggests that kernel_entry was being treated as a signed value but needs to be unsigned. This indicates an issue with how addresses are handled when switching from 32-bit to 64-bit context, possibly related to how the hypervisor or machine handles the memory mappings.
+
+Since this is about loading the initrd and the problem lies in address handling during VM setup, it's likely a boot-related issue. The kernel_entry might be sign-extended incorrectly when passed to load_image_targphys, causing the initrd to be placed at an incorrect location or not loaded at all.
+
+Therefore, the category should be 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+The bug relates to how the initial RAM disk (initrd) is loaded during the boot process of a RISC-V32 VM. The issue arises from improper handling of the kernel_entry address, which affects where the initrd is placed in memory. This points to an error occurring during the boot phase rather than other areas like networking or graphics.
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1815371 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1815371
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b7ceea68
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1815371
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about SPICE sessions having non-unique client_ids. The problem arises because the RNG isn't seeded properly in QEMU, leading to the same IDs being generated for multiple VMs. 
+
+Looking at the cause: it's related to how the random number generator (RNG) is initialized. The code uses `rand()` without setting a proper seed, causing the same sequence of numbers each time. Adding `srand(time(NULL))` fixes this.
+
+The bug affects SPICE connections, which are part of the graphical interface and remote access. However, the underlying problem is with how QEMU initializes its RNG. Since this isn't directly tied to user-mode translation or assembly lowering, it's not 'mistranslation' or 'assembly'. It also doesn't fall under network, socket, or VNC specifically, though VNC has had similar issues.
+
+The issue pertains more to the initialization of QEMU components and ensuring proper state for features like RNG. This seems related to how QEMU sets up its environment when starting, which is part of its boot process or initial setup rather than a specific component like network or graphics drivers.
+
+So, considering all this, 'boot' seems appropriate as it's about the initial setup where RNG isn't properly seeded during QEMU startup.
+</think>
+
+The issue stems from QEMU not initializing the RNG seed correctly during its startup process. Since the problem occurs at the bootstrapping phase of QEMU, affecting how the SPICE sessions are initialized.
+
+**boot**
+
+The bug is related to improper initialization during QEMU's startup, hence the 'boot' category.
+
+Answer: boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1819289 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1819289
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c263f742
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1819289
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so the user provided a bug report about QEMU where Windows 95 and 98 won't install or run on recent versions beyond 2.7/2.8. The task is to classify this bug into one of several categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I need to understand the issue. The user mentions that Windows 95/98 installation or runtime fails on newer QEMU versions but worked in 2.7/2.8. They've tried various options like isapc/noisapc and different CPUs/memory configurations without success.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems relevant because the issue is about installing and running an OS, which typically involves booting. The problem might be related to how QEMU handles the boot process for older OSes, maybe changes in the emulation or hardware support causing the failure.
+
+Other possible categories could be device or peripherals if it's a hardware emulation issue, but since the user tried different configurations without fixing it, "boot" seems more direct as it relates to the OS startup phase. So I think the correct category is "boot."
+</think>
+
+The bug report mentions issues with installing and running Windows 95/98 on QEMU, which points to problems during the boot process of the operating system within the emulator. The user has tried various configurations without success, suggesting a potential issue in how QEMU handles the booting phase for these older OS versions. Therefore, the appropriate category is:
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1823152 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1823152
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8951ded4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1823152
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user is having trouble booting Ubuntu 18.04 as a guest machine using QEMU. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The host system is running Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, which is the same version as the guest they're trying to install. They used QEMU version 2.11.1 with KVM enabled. The installation process goes smoothly, but after rebooting, the guest just hangs with a black screen and a blinking pointer.
+
+They mentioned that when they tried installing Ubuntu 16.04 instead, it worked fine. Also, both attempts resulted in similar issues—hang on boot, specific error messages like "removed slice user slice of gdm" for the default Ubuntu install.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The main issue is that QEMU can't boot Ubuntu 18.04 as a guest. Since it's related to the boot process failing after installation, "boot" seems like the most relevant category. They're encountering problems during the boot sequence, not with translation issues or hardware devices specifically mentioned. The fact that older versions work suggests it might be a compatibility issue with newer OS versions and QEMU.
+
+So, considering all this, the appropriate category for this bug report is likely "boot".
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where QEMU fails to boot Ubuntu 18.04 as a guest machine. The problem occurs during the boot process after installation, which suggests it's related to how QEMU handles the boot sequence. Since both attempts (with default Ubuntu and Xubuntu) result in similar issues, the primary issue seems to be with the booting process itself rather than any specific hardware or device configuration.
+
+Analyzing the possible categories:
+
+- **Boot**: This category fits because the problem occurs during the guest OS's boot process.
+- Other categories like "device," "graphic," or "network" don't seem relevant here as the issue isn't related to hardware devices, graphics rendering, or network setup. The error message mentions issues with system services (gdm), which are part of the boot sequence.
+
+Therefore, the most appropriate category for this bug report is **boot**.
+
+Answer: boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1823998 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1823998
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..06909bc0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1823998
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report related to QEMU. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The issue is about qemu-system-aarch64 supporting kernels larger than 128MiB. Right now, QEMU reserves up to 128MiB for the arm64 Linux kernel. The problem arises when the kernel is bigger than that because then the initrd or dtb might overlap with the kernel's space, leading to boot failures.
+
+The user mentions that starting from v3.17, the kernel Image header has an image_size field which indicates the total size of the kernel. For older kernels, this field is zero. They suggest that QEMU should use this image_size to properly place initrd and dtb without overlapping.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is about how QEMU handles the placement of kernel, initrd, and dtb during the boot process. It's related to the booting mechanism and ensuring that these components don't interfere with each other. The category 'boot' seems appropriate because it directly affects the boot process and kernel initialization.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1825207 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1825207
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8ba5debe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1825207
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The issue is about fw_cfg_machine_reset destroying the user bootorder setting. Let me go through it step by step.
+
+First, the problem occurs when using the -fw_cfg option with a specific string for boot order. The expected behavior was that the bootorder would be set correctly and appear in the sys/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg directory. However, instead of working as intended, the bootorder is empty, leading to the same default search-based boot order.
+
+Looking at the code provided, there's a function fw_cfg_machine_reset which is responsible for resetting the firmware configuration. The original code calls fw_cfg_modify_file to set the bootorder. But in the modified version, this call is commented out with #if 0. So when that code runs, it doesn't actually write anything to the bootorder file anymore.
+
+The user mentions that their workaround involved uncommenting that block, which allowed the bootorder to be written correctly and appear in the sys directory. This suggests that without that line, the bootorder isn't being set at all during machine reset.
+
+Now, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is related to how the bootorder setting is handled. It seems like a configuration issue during the boot process, where the expected settings aren't being properly applied. The function in question is part of the firmware configuration (fw_cfg), which relates to the boot process and hardware setup.
+
+So, considering all categories, 'boot' seems the most appropriate because it's directly affecting how QEMU handles the boot order for the virtual machine. It's not a translation issue, nor does it relate to graphics or networking specifically. It's more about the initialization and configuration at boot time.
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains to an issue where the fw_cfg_machine_reset function fails to correctly set the user-defined bootorder in QEMU. This affects how the virtual machine initializes its boot order during startup, which falls under the 'boot' category.
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1829576 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1829576
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ec660842
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1829576
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The user mentioned they were using QEMU-SYSTEM-PPC64 version 3.1.0 and it worked fine with CentOS7. But when they upgraded to QEMU-4.0.0, the system stopped booting. They had to downgrade back to 3.1.0 for it to work again. So the issue is that the image boots under an older version but not a newer one.
+
+They provided the command line arguments they're using, including specifying the CPU as POWER7 and machine type pseries. The network setup seems standard with e1000 and bridge. The host system is Manjaro Linux on an Intel i7 machine.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other.
+
+The problem occurs during booting, so that makes me think of the 'boot' category. They can't get past the boot process with QEMU-4.0.0 but could before. It's likely something related to how QEMU handles the boot process now compared to the previous version.
+
+I don't see any mention of network issues, so probably not a networking problem. Similarly, no graphics or device-specific errors were reported. The issue is specifically about the system failing to start up, which points towards a boot-related bug in QEMU's code when handling PPC64 systems.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1831477 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1831477
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0bf9aa93
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1831477
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's read the report carefully.
+
+The user is talking about updating the edk2 submodule and binaries in QEMU to a new version, edk2-stable201905. They provided links related to the release planning and the upcoming tag on GitHub.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other.
+
+EDK2 is related to UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface), which is part of the firmware that runs on x86 platforms during the boot process. QEMU uses EDK2 for certain emulated hardware and booting processes.
+
+So, updating the EDK2 submodule would affect how QEMU handles the boot process or the firmware initialization. The category 'boot' seems appropriate here because it's directly related to the system startup phase.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1836136 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1836136
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c8e7f7e7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1836136
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is asking if there are plans to update U-Boot to version 2019.07. So, first, what's U-Boot? From what I remember, U-Boot is a firmware used during the boot process of many embedded systems and some PCs. It's separate from QEMU itself but often interacts with it.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others like other or maybe I missed some.
+
+The question is about updating U-Boot. Since U-Boot is part of the boot process, the category related to boot makes sense here. The user is inquiring about an update that affects the booting phase, so 'boot' seems appropriate. Other categories like 'network' or 'kernel' don't fit as well because this isn't about network issues or kernel problems specifically.
+
+So, I think the correct classification here is 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1837347 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1837347
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f2837213
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1837347
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let's see what information I have here.
+
+The user is running QEMU on an x86-64 host with Ubuntu 18.04 and QEMU version 4.0.0. The guest is an ARM7l system using Raspbian OS. They're using the raspi2 machine type, which is a Raspberry Pi 2 model.
+
+The issue they're facing is that a guest userspace process core dumps after the Raspi2 kernel boots up. They've provided some command-line arguments and outputs, including a link to pastebin for more details. They also mentioned that this can happen both before and after logging in, giving an example after login where initial processes are running.
+
+Looking at the categories given: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. I need to pick one that best fits this bug.
+
+The error is occurring after the kernel boots, so it's related to the boot process itself. The user mentioned core dump from a userspace process, which suggests it's not just a kernel issue but something in the guest OS environment. However, since the problem occurs during or right after booting the kernel, it might be tied to how QEMU initializes the machine.
+
+The command line includes specifying the kernel and device tree binary, drive as an SD card image, appending various parameters, serial output, etc. The user is also asking about potential incorrect kernel flags, so perhaps there's something wrong with how they're setting up the kernel arguments or hardware emulation.
+
+Possible categories could be 'boot' because it's related to the booting process of the guest OS in QEMU. Alternatively, 'kernel' since it involves the kernel execution, but the issue seems more about the environment setup during boot rather than the kernel itself.
+
+Alternatively, maybe 'device' if there's a problem with how devices are emulated, causing the userspace process to crash. But considering that the core dump is happening after the kernel starts but before or after login, it might be related to device initialization issues in QEMU, leading to a faulty environment for the guest OS processes.
+
+Wait, but 'boot' seems more accurate because the issue occurs right after booting the kernel. So it's likely an issue with how QEMU sets up the machine during the boot process, perhaps incorrect parameters or missing devices causing the userspace processes to fail.
+
+I should also consider if there are any other possibilities. The user mentioned they're using 'guestfish' to extract the kernel and device tree, which is part of setting up the image correctly. Maybe something went wrong in that extraction? But the issue is occurring after booting, so perhaps it's more about QEMU's configuration.
+
+In the output link, I can't see the exact error message, but core dumps usually indicate a crash due to issues like null pointers or invalid memory accesses. This could be due to incorrect emulation of hardware, leading to userspace processes having an invalid environment.
+
+So considering all this, the most fitting category would probably be 'boot' because it's about the boot process causing the issue in the guest OS.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes a core dump occurring after the Raspi2 kernel boots up. This suggests an issue during or immediately following the boot process within QEMU. The problem might stem from how QEMU initializes the machine, including device emulation or kernel parameters, leading to an unstable environment for the guest OS processes.
+
+**boot**
+
+The bug report involves a core dump occurring after the Raspi2 kernel has booted up. This points towards an issue during the boot process within QEMU, potentially related to how the machine is initialized or configured. Therefore, the most appropriate category is **boot**.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1840719 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1840719
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3e1e7d8d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1840719
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me start by reading through the problem carefully.
+
+The user is reporting that when using QEMU version 4.1.50 with the 'isapc' machine type and a floppy image of Windows 98 SE, they're encountering a boot failure. The error message says "could not read the boot disk."
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is with booting from a floppy image. The error occurs during the boot process when trying to read the disk. So this seems related to how QEMU handles booting, particularly from a specific type of storage medium (floppy).
+
+I don't think it's mistranslation because that usually involves incorrect mapping between architectures or IR/target, which doesn't seem to be the case here. It's not an assembly lowering issue either.
+
+Looking at the other categories: 'boot' is directly related since the failure happens during the boot process. Other possible candidates could be 'files' if it's a problem with how the image is read, but 'boot' seems more specific. 'Device' might also be considered, but that's broader and usually refers to hardware devices rather than the boot process itself.
+
+Therefore, the most appropriate category here would be 'boot' because the failure occurs when trying to boot from the floppy disk.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to the boot process failing when attempting to read a floppy image. The error message indicates a problem during booting, making the 'boot' category the most fitting.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1844635 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1844635
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e9a6080c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1844635
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report from QEMU. The user provided the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, the user says they found a QEMU bug when starting and parsing the kernel file. They mention that it's a vulnerability that can be exploited. Then there's a GDB backtrace showing a segmentation fault in __memmove_avx_unaligned_erms, which is part of the memory handling code.
+
+The stack trace shows that the issue happens during rom_copy(), load_multiboot(), and pc_memory_init(). These functions are related to initializing the machine's memory and loading the kernel. The fact that it's happening when starting QEMU and parsing the kernel suggests it's an initialization issue.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems appropriate because the problem occurs during the boot process of the virtual machine. It's not a translation issue (mistranslation) or related to assembly lowering. It also doesn't fit into other specific areas like network, socket, or KVM directly, even though KVM is used as an accelerator.
+
+The segmentation fault in memory handling could be due to incorrect memory management during the boot process, which falls under "boot" category.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1849234 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1849234
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6b65441f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1849234
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report about QEMU. The user is experiencing an issue where when they try to boot anything using QEMU on macOS Catalina, the system just stops responding. 
+
+First, let me recall the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report mentions that QEMU stops responding when trying to boot something. The key term here is "boot." Since the problem occurs during the boot process, it's likely related to how QEMU handles the booting of an operating system. 
+
+I should consider what category aligns with the boot process in QEMU. There's a specific category listed as "boot," which seems directly relevant. Other categories like kernel or hypervisor might be involved, but since the issue is about the failure to proceed past the boot stage, "boot" is more precise.
+
+Additionally, I don't see any mention of other symptoms that would point to graphic issues, network problems, or device-related failures. The problem is specifically with the boot process halting, so "boot" fits best.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1852196 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1852196
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ce6eb1ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1852196
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The bug report is about updating the edk2 submodule and binaries in QEMU to a newer version, edk2-stable202008. It mentions that edk2-stable201911 is upcoming and will be tagged soon. The user points out that after the v4.2.0 release of QEMU, this update should be picked up.
+
+Looking at the changes since the last version (edk2-stable201905), they've enabled UEFI HTTPS Boot on ArmVirtQemu platforms, fixed a CVE related to an invalid server certificate in HTTPS Boot, and updated OpenSSL to 1.1.1d to address several other CVEs.
+
+Now, I need to match this to one of the categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, or other.
+
+The updates are related to UEFI HTTPS Boot and OpenSSL vulnerabilities. UEFI is part of the firmware for x86 systems and affects the boot process. The mention of enabling HTTPS Boot suggests this is about how QEMU handles the booting process, specifically secure boot aspects. Additionally, fixing a CVE in HTTPS Boot ties into security during the boot phase.
+
+Considering the categories, "boot" seems appropriate because it's directly related to the boot process improvements and security fixes. Other possible areas like network or kernel could be involved, but the primary focus here is on the booting mechanism.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses updates to EDK2 in QEMU, focusing on enabling HTTPS Boot for ArmVirtQemu platforms and fixing security vulnerabilities related to OpenSSL. These changes primarily affect the boot process, making "boot" the most fitting category.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1853083 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1853083
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5f6355d6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1853083
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report says that when trying to boot AIX5.1 from a CDROM using QEMU PPC64 version 4.0, the emulator hangs and shows high CPU usage. The user didn't get any further information.
+
+First, I should consider what each category means. "Boot" would relate to issues during the initial startup of the virtual machine. Since the problem occurs when booting from a CDROM, it's likely related to the boot process itself rather than other aspects like network or graphics.
+
+Looking at the possible categories, "boot" seems the most relevant because the issue happens specifically when initiating the VM with an AIX5.1 ISO. There might be a problem in how QEMU handles the booting process for this specific OS on PPC64 architecture.
+
+I don't see any signs pointing to other categories like network or kernel issues since the report doesn't mention connectivity problems or kernel panics. The high CPU usage could indicate a performance issue, but that's more of an symptom than the root cause. Since it's happening during boot, "boot" is still more appropriate.
+
+So, I think the category for this bug should be "boot".
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1853781 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1853781
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d159eb35
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1853781
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out what category this bug report falls into. The user is having an issue where their ARM assembly program isn't behaving as expected when run under QEMU. They're seeing multiple stripes appearing instead of one, which they suspect is due to the code running on all four cores of the emulated Raspberry Pi 2.
+
+First, I need to understand the possible categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. The task is to choose the correct one.
+
+The user's program runs correctly when they comment out the line that writes back to memory, implying a concurrency issue where multiple instances are causing interference. Since it's an ARM assembly program running on QEMU, which emulates a machine including its CPU cores, the problem might be related to how QEMU handles multi-core emulation.
+
+But looking at the categories, "mistranslation" is about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture, which doesn't seem directly relevant here. The issue isn't about the translation but about execution across multiple cores. "Assembly lowering" refers to converting high-level assembly to low-level, not related here either.
+
+The problem seems more like a QEMU configuration or hypervisor issue where it's allowing multiple instances of the program to run on all cores without proper isolation. Alternatively, perhaps the way the kernel is loaded affects each core differently.
+
+Wait, but in this case, the user is providing their own baremetal kernel, not using an OS that would handle multi-threading. So QEMU might be causing the code to execute on multiple virtual CPUs (vCPUs) without proper synchronization.
+
+The category "hypervisor" relates to issues with the hypervisor layer managing virtual machines or emulated hardware. Since QEMU acts as a hypervisor when running baremetal, maybe the bug is in how it handles multi-core setups. Alternatively, if it's about multiple instances of the program running on each core, that could be under "boot" or "kernel."
+
+But considering that QEMU is setting up the machine with four vCPUs by default for the Raspberry Pi 2 model, perhaps the issue arises because the code isn't designed to handle concurrent execution. The problem is more about how QEMU schedules or boots multiple instances of the kernel on each core.
+
+Wait, but the user's program is a single binary that's supposed to run once. If it's running four times, that suggests QEMU is allowing each vCPU to load and execute the same kernel, leading to concurrent writes to memory and thus the visual artifacts.
+
+So, this might be related to how QEMU boots the kernel on multiple CPUs or whether it's properly initializing only one instance. The issue could be in the boot process where the kernel isn't being handled correctly across cores.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems relevant here because it involves how the kernel is loaded and executed during the startup of the emulated machine. Alternatively, if the problem is due to QEMU's hypervisor not properly isolating or managing the vCPUs, then "hypervisor" might be more accurate.
+
+But the user suspects that their code is running on all four cores, which suggests a configuration issue in how many CPUs are being used or how the kernel is loaded. This could tie into the boot process or the hypervisor's CPU management.
+
+Alternatively, perhaps it's an issue with device emulation, but I don't see any specific mention of devices causing this behavior except for the screen output via VNC.
+
+Considering all this, "boot" seems more likely because the problem occurs during the initial execution and is related to how the kernel (or program) is loaded across multiple CPUs. However, if it's about QEMU's handling of virtual CPUs in the hypervisor mode, then "hypervisor" might be the better fit.
+
+But since the user's issue is that their single program is running on all cores, which isn't intended, and they're using a baremetal setup without an OS, this points to how QEMU boots the kernel on multiple vCPUs. Therefore, it's likely a boot-related issue.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1854577 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1854577
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cbf9d25d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1854577
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify the bug report about QEMU where the user can't boot an arm64 image. The categories given are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report says that when trying to boot a Linux 5.3 arm64 image using QEMU on Ubuntu 18.04, the system just hangs without any logs. The user provided the host details and the command they used. They're asking for help debugging.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'boot' seems directly related since the issue is about the system not booting properly. Other possibilities like kernel or hypervisor could be involved, but the primary problem here is that the image isn't starting up as expected. So I think the best category is 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1855002 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1855002
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b81a4e6a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1855002
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The user is reporting that they cannot boot arm kernel images on s390x using QEMU. They provided details about the tests failing and specific kernels that don't work except for one case with u-boot. The issue occurs when running acceptance tests which involve booting these kernels. On x86, it works fine but hangs on s390x.
+
+The problem seems to be related to the ability of QEMU to properly boot an arm kernel on a s390x host. Since it's about booting, that points towards the 'boot' category. The issue doesn't mention anything about assembly translation or performance directly; instead, it's more about the boot process failing on a specific architecture combination.
+
+Looking at other categories: device might relate to hardware devices not working, but this is about kernel booting. Graphic issues would involve display problems, which aren't mentioned here. Similarly, network and socket issues are unrelated. KVM and hypervisor are related to virtualization management, which isn't the direct issue here. Debugging attempts didn't resolve it either.
+
+The core problem is that the kernel fails to boot on s390x, so the category should be 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1857143 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1857143
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f00e294c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1857143
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The user reported that VMs won't boot from external snapshots after upgrading to QEMU 4.2. They mentioned that downgrading back to 4.1 fixed the issue, so it's definitely a regression introduced in 4.2. The problem occurs when using an external snapshot as the disk for the VM.
+
+Looking at the categories, I should focus on what aspect of QEMU is failing. Since the VM isn't booting correctly, that points to issues during the boot process. They tried different guest OS and settings, but it consistently fails with 4.2. The problem seems related to how the disk image is being handled, particularly external snapshots.
+
+The categories relevant here could be 'boot' since the issue is about VMs failing to boot correctly. Alternatively, it might relate to disk handling or snapshots, which could fall under 'files' if it's a file-related issue or 'kernel' if it's a lower-level problem. But given that the primary symptom is the failure during the boot process, I think 'boot' is the most appropriate category.
+
+I don't see any mention of translation issues (like 'mistranslation'), assembly problems ('assembly'), or graphical issues ('graphic'). It doesn't seem to be related to networking ('network') or KVM hypervisor directly. The issue is more about the boot process itself, so I'll classify it under 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report indicates an issue with VMs failing to boot from external snapshots after upgrading to QEMU 4.2. This points to a problem during the boot process, making 'boot' the appropriate category.
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1859 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1859
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..be188933
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1859
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report based on the provided categories. The user is trying to boot Windows Server 2008 R2 on QEMU using Windows 10 as the host. They're encountering issues where it gets stuck at "Starting Windows" or results in a BSOD with error 0x0000007F.
+
+First, I'll go through each category:
+
+- **Mistranslation**: Involves incorrect mapping from source to target architecture, likely user-mode. This doesn't seem related here.
+- **Assembly Lowering**: Issues during the assembly translation phase. The problem seems more about booting rather than code generation.
+- **Device**: Relates to device emulation. Since it's a BSOD during boot, perhaps hardware-related in the VM, but I'm not sure yet.
+- **Graphic**: Graphics driver issues might cause such problems, but the error is 0x7F, which typically points elsewhere.
+- **Socket**, **Network**: These are about network functionality, not relevant here since it's a boot issue.
+- **KVM**: Kernel-based Virtual Machine; but QEMU uses KVM for acceleration on Linux. The user is on Windows 10, so maybe not applicable unless running under Linux with KVM.
+- **Boot**: This seems directly related as the problem occurs during the boot process.
+- **VNC**, **Debug**, **Files**, **Permissions**, **Performance**, **Kernel**, **Peripherals**, **Hypervisor**: These categories don't seem to fit. The issue is about the VM not starting properly, which points more towards a boot failure.
+
+The error code 0x7F in Windows typically relates to hardware or system initialization issues. In this case, since it's within QEMU, it could be due to incorrect emulation of hardware components necessary for booting. Therefore, the most fitting category is **boot**.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1859106 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1859106
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..935a9c0f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1859106
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report from QEMU. The issue is that ReactOS crashes on boot starting with version 4.2, but worked fine in earlier versions like 4.1.x. The error message mentioned is about the video driver failing to initialize.
+
+First, I'll look at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug occurs during boot time, which makes me think it's related to how QEMU initializes the VM or the hardware components. The user mentioned that bisecting QEMU points to a commit that updates the seabios version as the culprit. Seabios is part of QEMU and handles BIOS initialization for PC machines.
+
+The error message mentions a video driver issue, but since it's during boot, maybe it's not just about the graphics but more about how the hardware is set up. The fact that ReactOS worked before suggests it's an environment change in QEMU causing this failure.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'boot' seems relevant because the problem occurs during the boot process of ReactOS within QEMU. However, 'graphic' could also be a possibility since the error mentions a video driver. But the primary issue is that ReactOS isn't booting correctly, so it's more about the overall boot process rather than just graphics.
+
+I think 'boot' is the most appropriate category here because the failure happens early in the boot sequence, and the root cause might be related to changes in how QEMU initializes components during the boot phase, possibly due to the updated seabios. It's not a translation issue or an assembly problem but rather a runtime initialization error.
+
+So, I'll go with 'boot' as the category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves ReactOS failing to boot with a video driver error after updating QEMU to version 4.2. The root cause is identified in a commit that updates seabios. Since the issue occurs during the boot process and relates to hardware initialization, the most appropriate category is:
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1859656 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1859656
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b2fa3e6e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1859656
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The bug is about not being able to reboot an s390x KVM machine after initial deployment. From the description, it seems that MAAS can't find the bootloader when trying to reboot.
+
+Looking at the log, the TFTP server tries to fetch 'boots390x.bin' and various other files but fails because they aren't found. The user mentioned that it worked in the past but now doesn't. They tried deploying on S390x KVM and rebooting, leading to the error.
+
+The categories provided include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, etc. Since the issue is with the machine not being able to boot after deployment, especially related to the bootloader file not found during a reboot attempt, this seems directly tied to the boot process.
+
+The error occurs when trying to load the OS from the network via TFTP, which suggests it's an issue with how MAAS or QEMU handles booting on s390x architecture. Since KVM is involved and the problem happens after deployment but during reboot, the category should relate to the boot process rather than something like performance or kernel issues.
+
+Therefore, the most appropriate category here would be 'boot' because it's specifically about the machine failing to start up properly after an initial successful deployment.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue with the KVM machine unable to reboot, specifically related to MAAS not finding the bootloader. This pertains directly to the boot process of the virtual machine.
+
+Answer: boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1860914 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1860914
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..249256da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1860914
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user mentioned that QEMU prepends pathnames to command lines of Multiboot kernels and modules, which is contrary to the specification. 
+
+First, I need to understand what each category means. Looking at the options: mistranslation refers to incorrect semantic mapping from source to target, usually in user-mode assembly. Assembly lowering is about translating code into assembly. The other categories are pretty specific like device, network, KVM, etc.
+
+The issue here is related to how command lines are handled when using -kernel and -initrd options. It's causing QEMU to prepend the kernel image path to the command line. According to the Multiboot spec, this shouldn't happen because it gives the user complete control over the command line. 
+
+I don't think this is about assembly lowering or mistranslation since it's more about how command-line arguments are being passed incorrectly rather than translation issues. It also doesn't fit into categories like device, graphic, socket, network, etc., which are related to specific hardware or system features.
+
+The problem seems to be with how QEMU processes and passes the command lines for kernels and modules. This might involve some part of the hypervisor or bootloader functionality within QEMU. However, considering that it's about command-line arguments passed during booting, it might relate more to the boot process itself.
+
+Looking at the categories again, "boot" seems like a possible fit because it's directly affecting how the kernel is loaded and the command line parameters are set up. The issue arises when QEMU boots a Multiboot image with certain options, so it's definitely during the boot process.
+
+I don't think it's about permissions or performance because those categories would relate to access rights or speed issues, which aren't mentioned here. Similarly, kernel or peripherals seem unrelated as well. 
+
+So, after considering all the points, I'm leaning towards "boot" as the correct category for this bug report.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to how QEMU handles command-line arguments during the boot process of a Multiboot image, specifically with the -kernel and -initrd options. The problem arises from QEMU prepending kernel and module paths to the command line, which contradicts the Multiboot specification and causes potential issues with spaces in paths.
+
+**Step-by-Step Explanation:**
+1. **Understanding the Bug:** The bug involves QEMU incorrectly modifying command lines for kernels and modules by adding their pathnames, which isn't allowed per the Multiboot spec.
+2. **Identifying Relevant Categories:** We need to determine if this issue falls under a specific category like boot, hypervisor, or another.
+3. **Analyzing Functionality:** The problem occurs during the boot process when using -kernel and -initrd options, which are part of how QEMU handles kernel loading.
+4. **Conclusion:** Since it's related to the command-line processing during kernel initialization, it fits under the "boot" category.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/187 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/187
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8332b28a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/187
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Cannot boot arm kernel images on s390x". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, the issue is about not being able to boot an ARM kernel image on s390x. s390x refers to IBM's mainframe architecture, which QEMU supports for emulation. The user is trying to run an ARM kernel under s390x, but it's failing.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems relevant because the problem is about the kernel not booting correctly. Alternatively, could it be related to the hypervisor or KVM? Well, QEMU can act as a hypervisor when using KVM for virtualization, but the issue here is about the kernel not booting on a specific target architecture.
+
+The "boot" category directly relates to the process of starting up an operating system kernel. Since the problem is that the kernel isn't booting on s390x, which might involve issues with how the emulation handles the boot process for different architectures, the appropriate category would be "boot".
+
+I don't think it's about translation or assembly because the issue is more about the boot process rather than the code generation. It's also not a performance issue or permissions problem. So, "boot" fits best.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue with booting a kernel on a specific architecture, which falls under the category of booting processes.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1870911 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1870911
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5afe246c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1870911
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is encountering a crash when launching QEMU on Windows after updating from v5.0.0-rc0 to rc1. They can't even run the --version command; it just exits without any output.
+
+First, I'll look at what the categories are: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The bug happens on Windows when trying to run QEMU. The problem started after an update, so it's likely a regression introduced in rc1. Since the command is as simple as checking the version, it doesn't involve any device or network setup, so those categories might not fit.
+
+I'll consider if this relates to booting. If QEMU crashes on launch, that's during the startup phase, which could be part of the boot process. The fact that a basic command like --version isn't working suggests something fundamental is wrong when initializing QEMU.
+
+Other possibilities include issues with KVM or hypervisor setup, but those usually have more specific symptoms. Since it's Windows and not Linux, the hypervisor aspect might not apply here unless there's a Hyper-V interaction.
+
+Performance seems unlikely because the problem occurs immediately upon launch, not after some time. Permissions could be an issue, but that would likely show up in error messages, which they didn't mention.
+
+Graphic issues are possible, but again, without any output or specific errors related to graphics, it doesn't seem to fit. The same goes for socket or network issues since there's no indication of connectivity problems.
+
+So, the most fitting category seems to be 'boot' because the crash is happening when trying to run QEMU at all, not during device usage or other operations.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1881249 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1881249
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8962e2bf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1881249
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem again to understand it better.
+
+The issue is about the CPU fetch from unpopulated ROM on reset. When certain architectures reset, they try to fetch vectors (like PC and SP) from memory, which is usually ROM. However, this happens before the ROM code has been populated. That means when the CPU's reset() handler is called, it's trying to access a part of memory that hasn't been set up yet. This leads to incorrect values for PC/SP.
+
+The architectures affected are M68K, RX, and ARM M-profile. These all seem to be different processor types supported by QEMU. So the problem arises during the initialization phase when resetting the CPU.
+
+Looking at the categories provided:
+
+- mistranslation
+- assembly: lowering
+- other
+- device
+- graphic
+- socket
+- network
+- KVM
+- boot
+- vnc
+- debug
+- files
+- permissions
+- performance
+- kernel
+- peripherals
+- hypervisor
+
+Hmm, I need to figure out which category this falls under. Let's think about each.
+
+Mistranslation is related to incorrect mapping between source architecture and target IR or the hardware. This seems more like a timing issue during boot rather than a translation error.
+
+Assembly lowering is about converting high-level code to assembly. Doesn't seem relevant here.
+
+Other is a catch-all, but maybe there's a better fit.
+
+Device: This could relate to devices not being properly initialized, but ROM is more about memory space.
+
+Graphic: No relation.
+
+Socket: Not applicable.
+
+Network: No, unless it's related to network drivers, which I don't think so.
+
+KVM: KVM is part of the hypervisor; this issue seems hardware-related during boot.
+
+Boot: This sounds relevant. The problem occurs during reset(), which is part of the boot process. The CPU is trying to fetch vectors before ROM is populated, causing incorrect PC/SP.
+
+VNC: Not related.
+
+Debug: Maybe if it's about debugging features, but not here.
+
+Files, permissions: Doesn't seem right.
+
+Performance: It's a functional bug, not a performance issue.
+
+Kernel: Part of the operating system, perhaps, but QEMU is more about emulation.
+
+Peripherals: Could be, as ROM might be considered a peripheral in some contexts. But it's more about memory mapping and initialization.
+
+Hypervisor: Only if it's related to KVM or other hypervisors, which I don't think applies here.
+
+So the most fitting category is 'boot' because the issue happens during the CPU reset process, which is part of the system's booting phase. The ROM isn't ready when the reset handler runs, leading to incorrect fetches.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1882671 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1882671
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..30424ccf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1882671
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the provided categories for QEMU. Let's go through it step by step.
+
+The user is reporting that when using qemu-system-x86_64 with OVMF BIOS and DOWNLOAD_PROTO_HTTPS enabled in iPXE, QEMU hangs indefinitely at boot. They mention that this only happens with x86_64 and not i386, and the same OVMF works fine on QEMU 2.x.
+
+Looking at the notes, they tried various troubleshooting steps like using KVM or without it, but the issue persists. The problem seems to occur during the very early stages of booting, specifically with UEFI TPL manipulations. They also noticed that adding `-d int` shows an endless loop of interrupts, which could point towards some kind of kernel or hypervisor-level issue.
+
+The provided categories include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, etc.
+
+Since the bug occurs during the boot process and involves UEFI which is part of the firmware initialization, it's related to how QEMU handles the early stages. The issue with TPL (Thunk Pointer List) manipulations in iPXE suggests a problem in the device or firmware initialization path. However, considering that the OVMF is a hypervisor/firmware component and the problem arises during boot, it might be more related to how the hypervisor interacts with QEMU.
+
+But another angle is that this could also be an issue within the kernel part of QEMU's emulation. Since the system hangs early on, before any OS is loaded, it's likely in the device or hypervisor initialization. However, the key here is that UEFI is involved, which might tie into how QEMU emulates certain firmware interfaces.
+
+Alternatively, considering the endless loop of interrupts without triple faults, it could be a problem with how QEMU handles CPU resets or interrupt handling within the hypervisor. This might point more towards a kernel issue rather than something purely in device emulation.
+
+But looking at the categories, 'hypervisor' is an option, and since UEFI is part of the firmware which can sometimes be considered as running under the hypervisor's management, this could fit there. However, another possibility is that it's a boot-related issue because the problem occurs during the boot process with UEFI.
+
+I think the most fitting category would be 'hypervisor' because the bug involves UEFI and how QEMU emulates or interacts with the firmware, which falls under hypervisor responsibilities. Alternatively, if it's an issue within the device emulation causing the hang, it could be 'device', but since UEFI is more about the firmware/hypervisor part, I'm leaning towards 'hypervisor'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where QEMU hangs during boot when using OVMF BIOS with x86_64. The problem occurs early in the boot process, involving UEFI and iPXE. The endless loop of interrupts without triple faults suggests a kernel-level issue, but given that UEFI is part of the hypervisor/firmware interaction, the most appropriate category is:
+
+**hypervisor**
+
+This classification aligns with the role of UEFI within the hypervisor context and the nature of the problem during boot.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1892540 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1892540
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cdfca0c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1892540
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me start by understanding what's being reported here.
+
+The user is saying that they can't boot NetBSD/sparc in QEMU anymore. The issue started between versions 5.0.0 and 5.1.0, with a specific commit identified as problematic: [5d971f9e672507210e77d020d89e0e89165c8fc9]. This commit is related to memory handling in QEMU.
+
+The user provided steps to reproduce the issue, which involves downloading a specific ISO and running it with certain flags. The expected behavior is that the guest OS (NetBSD) would boot correctly, but instead, there's a panic with a data fault during the kernel initialization.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other.
+
+The issue seems related to the boot process of the guest OS. The error occurs during the initial stages of the system starting up, which points towards a problem with how QEMU handles the booting process for SPARC systems. Since it's a data fault in the kernel, it might be due to incorrect memory management or initialization steps.
+
+The specific commit mentioned is about handling memory regions and accepting mismatching sizes. This likely affects how the emulated hardware (like the CPU and memory) interacts with the guest OS during boot. Therefore, this is related to the boot process rather than other components like network or graphics.
+
+So, putting it all together, the bug report pertains to the booting functionality of QEMU when running a SPARC-based NetBSD system. The issue arises from changes in how memory regions are handled, which directly impacts the boot process.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1899 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1899
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f9b04960
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1899
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I've got this bug report related to QEMU and an issue with AArch64 systems. The problem is about the SCR_EL3 register being incorrectly set after enabling secondary cores via PSCI. Let me try to understand what's going on here.
+
+First, the user describes that when using direct kernel boot with EL3 enabled, turning on secondary cores through PSCI leads to incorrect SCR_EL3 setup. This causes an endless loop of "Undefined Instruction" exceptions on CPU 1. Looking at the logs, it seems like the system is failing to handle certain exceptions correctly after the secondary cores are activated.
+
+The user mentions that when only one CPU is used (-smp 1), it works fine, but with two CPUs (-smp 2), it fails. This points towards an issue related to how multiple CPUs are handled, specifically during their initialization or reset process.
+
+They also explain that SCR_EL3 setup is done by do_cpu_reset in hw/arm/boot.c, which only runs on full system resets. However, when PSCI enables secondary cores, it calls arm_set_cpu_on_async_work in target/arm/arm-powerctl.c, which then calls cpu_reset. This seems to reset the CPU but doesn't handle all the necessary flags that do_cpu_reset does.
+
+The problem arises because when using PSCI to bring up additional CPUs asynchronously, the current code doesn't correctly set up SCR_EL3 as it would during a full system reset. The user suggests making do_cpu_reset public so that arm_set_cpu_on_async_work can call it, but they're unsure if that's the best approach.
+
+Now, I need to classify this bug into one of the provided categories. Let's look at the possible options: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, or other.
+
+The issue is related to how CPUs are being reset and their registers set up after enabling secondary cores. This seems more about the system's behavior during boot and CPU initialization rather than something specific like network or graphic issues. The mention of PSCI and EL3 suggests it's dealing with exception levels in the kernel, which ties into system-level operations.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems relevant because the problem occurs when bringing up secondary CPUs during the boot process. However, the issue is more about how the CPUs are being reset after being turned on, which might fall under "kernel." Alternatively, since it's related to CPU setup and exception handling in EL3, maybe "hypervisor" could be a fit.
+
+But considering that the primary failure point is during the boot process when enabling secondary cores, I think the most appropriate category is "boot." It directly relates to how the system initializes after certain components are added post-boot.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where enabling secondary cores via PSCI leads to incorrect setup of SCR_EL3, causing a boot failure. The problem occurs during the system's initialization process when additional CPUs are brought up, leading to undefined instruction exceptions.
+
+**Step-by-Step Explanation:**
+
+1. **Understanding the Problem:** The system fails to boot correctly when using direct kernel boot with EL3 enabled and multiple CPUs. Secondary cores, when activated via PSCI, have an incorrect SCR_EL3 value, causing trapped instructions in EL3 and an infinite loop of exceptions on CPU 1.
+
+2. **Identifying Keywords:** Keywords include "PSCI," "SCR_EL3," "secondary cores," "boot failure," and exception handling in AArch64 (EL3). These indicate issues during system initialization and CPU management.
+
+3. **Analyzing Affected Components:** The problem arises from how CPUs are reset after being enabled, particularly regarding register setup. The function `do_cpu_reset` correctly initializes SCR_EL3 on full resets but isn't called when PSCI brings up additional cores asynchronously.
+
+4. **Determining the Category:** Since the issue occurs during the boot process and involves CPU initialization and exception handling crucial for system stability, it fits under "boot." It's about how the system initializes components post-reset, especially with multiple CPUs.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1906156 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1906156
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b56dccdb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1906156
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report is about a macOS guest on a Linux host. The issue occurs when loading a kext (kernel extension) in the guest. It works after a full host reboot but fails if only the guest reboots, requiring another host reboot to fix. 
+
+Looking at the possible categories: 
+- 'boot' relates to startup issues, which seems relevant here since the problem happens post-reboot.
+- The failure is related to loading a driver in the guest OS, which might tie into how QEMU handles device drivers or kernel modules.
+
+Other categories like 'device' or 'kernel' could also be considered, but 'boot' specifically addresses issues during startup or after rebooting. Since the problem arises after reboots and involves kernel extensions (kext), it's more about the boot process of the guest OS within QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to how the guest OS boots up and loads its components, particularly the kext. The failure occurs when the guest reboots but not the host, indicating a problem with the boot process in the VM context.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1906905 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1906905
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..166add98
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1906905
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem again.
+
+The user is having trouble booting using qemu-system-sparc with a specific ROM file. They mention that it gets stuck at "Power-ON reset" when using QEMU version 5.1, but it works fine with an older version from 2015. The command they're running includes specifying the machine type SS-20 and the BIOS file.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about QEMU not successfully booting an OBP image. The problem occurs during the boot process, specifically when trying to load the BIOS. Since the user can't get past the Power-ON reset and it hangs, this points towards a boot-related issue.
+
+I don't see anything related to translation errors or assembly lowering, so mistranslation or assembly are unlikely. It's not about graphics, sockets, network performance, etc. The boot process is directly involved here, which fits under the 'boot' category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where QEMU's SPARC emulator (qemu-system-sparc) hangs during the boot process when using a specific BIOS file. The user successfully boots with an older version but not with the current 5.1 version.
+
+**Reasoning:** The problem occurs specifically during the boot phase, indicating an issue related to how QEMU handles the initialization and loading of the operating system or firmware (OBP). Since it's about the boot process failing, the appropriate category is 'boot'.
+
+Answer: boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1907953 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1907953
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4da4d60a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1907953
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report related to QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read the problem again carefully.
+
+The user says that after updating to QEMU 5.2.0, they can't start Windows; it just shows a black screen. They mention that it worked before the update and now they want to go back but can't. 
+
+Looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Hmm, since QEMU is a hypervisor, but in this case, it's not starting Windows properly, which might be related to how the virtual machine boots. The issue seems to be with the boot process after an update. So maybe 'boot' is the category here because it's about the VM failing to start.
+
+Alternatively, could it be something else? Let me think—'graphic' if there was a display problem, but the user mentions a black screen, which might relate to boot issues rather than graphics. 'network' doesn't seem relevant unless Windows relies on network drivers during boot. But the main issue is that Windows isn't starting at all.
+
+Yes, I think 'boot' is the most appropriate category here because it's about the VM not booting correctly after an update.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1908416 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1908416
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..84f91116
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1908416
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU not being able to run Windows 10 for ARM version 2004. Let me break it down step by step.
+
+First, the user is using QEMU's qemu-system-aarch64 on a Windows 10 host with an Intel Pentium CPU that doesn't support VT-x. The QEMU version is 5.1.0. They're trying to run a newer version of Windows 10 for ARM (20H2), and it fails, getting stuck at the boot screen. However, older versions like 19H2 work fine.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others.
+
+The issue is related to running a specific OS version in QEMU. The problem occurs during boot, so it's likely something with the initialization process or hardware emulation. The user mentioned that when using newer versions, the VM freezes but still shows as running with frozen registers. This suggests an issue with how the virtual machine initializes or handles certain components.
+
+Since the host doesn't have VT-x, QEMU is probably using TCG for translation. If the newer Windows version requires more advanced features or specific hardware emulations that aren't properly handled by QEMU 5.1.0, that could be the cause. Alternatively, there might be a bug in how QEMU handles certain aspects of the boot process for ARM64 guests.
+
+Possible categories to consider: 
+
+- **boot**: Since the issue occurs during boot.
+- **hypervisor**: As QEMU acts as a hypervisor here, maybe there's an issue with how it emulates the hardware leading to the VM freezing.
+- **device/peripheral**: Maybe some device emulation isn't working correctly for newer Windows versions.
+
+The user mentioned that older versions work, implying that this is a regression or specific to newer OS features. So, if QEMU doesn't handle certain virtual devices or kernel changes in newer Windows builds, it could cause the freeze.
+
+I think the most fitting category here would be **boot** since the problem occurs during the boot process and causes the VM to freeze at that stage.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where running a newer version of Windows 10 for ARM using QEMU's qemu-system-aarch64 results in the system freezing at the boot screen. This problem doesn't occur with older versions like 19H2, suggesting a regression or incompatibility with newer OS features. The failure is during the boot process, indicating an issue related to how QEMU initializes or emulates hardware for the guest OS.
+
+The key point here is that the VM gets stuck at the boot screen, which points directly to issues occurring during the boot phase of the virtual machine. Therefore, the most appropriate category for this bug report is **boot**.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1915794 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1915794
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..20ab3c3a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1915794
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that when they run their Windows CI job using Scoop, it's failing with an error: "could not load PC BIOS 'bios-256k.bin'". They provided details about the versions causing the issue and the previous working version.
+
+First, looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The error is related to loading a BIOS file, which suggests it's an issue with the boot process. BIOS files are crucial for initializing hardware during the boot phase. Since QEMU emulates hardware, including BIOS, this points towards a boot-related problem.
+
+I don't think it's a translation or assembly issue because those relate more to how code is converted or lowered. It's not directly about device drivers either unless the BIOS is part of that, but usually, BIOS issues fall under booting. KVM and hypervisor are related but this seems more about the initial boot setup.
+
+So, the most fitting category here is 'boot' because the error occurs during the attempt to load the PC BIOS, which is essential for the boot process.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1919 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1919
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..785b4980
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1919
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's read through it carefully.
+
+The problem is with UEFI SecureCode hanging on MacOS Ventura. The user can't load edk2 secure boot UEFI code; non-secure works fine, but secure hangs during load. They mentioned that both with and without swtpm, it doesn't matter, but TPM access happens when swtpm is enabled.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+UEFI SecureCode issues are related to the boot process. The problem occurs during loading, so it's likely a boot issue. UEFI is part of the initial boot setup, and if secure code doesn't load correctly, that affects the boot sequence.
+
+They tried edk2-x86_64-secure-code.fd but it hangs, while non-secure works. This points to an issue in the Secure Boot process during the boot phase. The mention of TPM might be related, as Secure Boot uses TPM for measurements, but since it's hanging and TPM access is observed, maybe there's a problem with how the hypervisor or UEFI interacts with the hardware during this process.
+
+The other categories don't seem to fit: it's not about translations or assembly lowering. It's also not directly related to networking, sockets, or graphics. KVM is more about virtualization which might be part of the setup but the issue seems specific to UEFI and Secure Boot.
+
+So, considering all this, the most appropriate category would likely be 'boot' since it's directly affecting the boot process with UEFI.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue with the UEFI SecureCode not loading correctly on MacOS Ventura, specifically hanging during the load. The non-secure version works fine, indicating a problem with the secure boot process. This affects the boot sequence, making 'boot' the most fitting category.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/192 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/192
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6744060c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/192
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report: "xv6 Bootloop". Let me think through it step by step.
+
+First, I know that xv6 is an educational operating system based on Sixth Edition Unix. It's often used in courses and projects related to OS development. So when a user reports an issue with "xv6 Bootloop," they're likely experiencing a problem where the system keeps rebooting or looping during the boot process.
+
+Looking at the possible categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The term "Bootloop" clearly points to an issue related to the boot process. So I should consider the category "boot." 
+
+I don't see any indication that this is a translation error (mistranslation), nor does it seem to involve assembly lowering or other low-level code issues beyond what's necessary for booting. It's not directly related to graphic, socket, network, KVM, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, or hypervisor functions.
+
+The boot process is handled by the kernel and initialization routines. If something goes wrong during this phase, it could be due to issues in how the OS initializes hardware, loads necessary drivers, or sets up essential services. A bootloop suggests that after attempting to boot, the system either crashes or restarts, possibly due to a hang or an error condition.
+
+I don't think "other" is appropriate here because there's a specific category that fits better. "Boot" seems like the most accurate and direct category for this issue.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1923497 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1923497
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..99fcb6b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1923497
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The user mentioned an error when trying to boot a Windows 10 VM on Fedora 33 using qemu-kvm version 5.1.0. The error message is:
+
+"bios_linker_loader_add_checksum: Assertion `start_offset < file->blob->len' failed."
+
+Looking at the provided information, the error occurs in the QEMU source code file hw/acpi/bios-linker-loader.c at line 239. The assertion failure suggests that during some operation related to adding a checksum, the start offset is not less than the length of the blob, which indicates an issue with how data is being handled.
+
+The user also noted that this was referenced in a patch from before and thought it was fixed, implying that perhaps this error reoccurred or wasn't completely resolved.
+
+Now, considering the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The error occurs during the process of starting a VM. The function in question is part of the BIOS linker loader, which relates to how QEMU handles the firmware for virtual machines. Since this is related to the boot process and involves an assertion failure in a specific component, it's likely not directly tied to user-mode or assembly lowering.
+
+The error message specifically mentions 'bios_linker_loader_add_checksum', which seems more related to the initialization phase of the VM rather than other categories like network or socket. It doesn't pertain to graphics or KVM hypervisor directly, but perhaps more to how QEMU is setting up the VM's environment.
+
+Given that it's an assertion during a checksum addition and relates to file handling (blob length), it might be categorized under 'files' as the issue is with file operations within QEMU. Alternatively, considering the error happens during the boot process, 'boot' could also be relevant.
+
+However, looking at the possible categories again, 'mistranslation' refers to incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target, which doesn't seem to fit here. The other possibilities like 'device' or 'hypervisor' don't directly apply. Since this is a failure in the BIOS linker loader during VM startup, it's more about how QEMU initializes the VM's firmware, so 'boot' seems appropriate.
+
+But wait, another thought: this might be a kernel issue since it's part of the qemu-system-x86_64 process, which involves the hypervisor. However, the exact error is in hw/acpi/bios-linker-loader.c, which suggests hardware simulation aspects rather than the hypervisor itself.
+
+Alternatively, considering that 'hypervisor' covers QEMU's role as a VM manager, but this specific issue is more about the boot setup, perhaps it's better classified under 'boot'. However, another angle: since this error is in the process of adding a checksum during the BIOS linking, which could be part of device initialization. Maybe 'device' is more fitting.
+
+Wait, looking back at the categories, 'hypervisor' might not directly apply because the issue isn't about the hypervisor's core functions but rather a component used by it (BIOS linker). So perhaps 'other' would be the safest category since it doesn't fit neatly into the others, or maybe 'files' as it relates to file blob handling.
+
+Alternatively, considering that this is an assertion failure during VM startup, it might be part of the boot process. So 'boot' could make sense.
+
+But I'm a bit uncertain because while it's related to starting the VM, the specific error is in the BIOS linker which is more about hardware emulation. Perhaps 'device' is a better fit as this pertains to how devices (like the virtual machine's firmware) are being handled by QEMU.
+
+Alternatively, since the issue was referenced in a patch and the user suggests it might have been fixed before but reoccurred, perhaps it's an edge case that doesn't neatly fit into other categories. So 'other' might be the category if none of the others apply precisely.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is related to an assertion failure during the VM boot process, specifically in the BIOS linker loader. This suggests a problem with file handling or initialization, which fits under the 'boot' category as it's occurring when starting the VM.
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1925417 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1925417
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d389357f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1925417
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU. The user mentioned they can't boot from an EFI image on aarch64 using QEMU. They provided details about their setup, including the version of QEMU and the command line arguments they're using.
+
+First, looking at the error messages, it seems like the UEFI boot is failing. The system tries to load Boot0001 and Boot0002 but can't find them. This makes me think it's related to how the EFI image is being handled by QEMU.
+
+The user is using "-M virt" with KVM enabled, which suggests they're trying to use a virtualized environment. The device configuration includes USB, GPU, network, and storage devices. They've specified an EFI BIOS file ("edk2-aarch64-code.fd") as the bios option.
+
+Since the issue is specifically about booting from an EFI image and the error messages point towards UEFI-related issues, I'm considering possible categories. The options include 'boot', which seems relevant here because the problem occurs during the boot process. Alternatively, it could be related to device handling or hypervisor setup, but those are more about hardware devices rather than the booting mechanism itself.
+
+I don't see any issues with assembly translation or performance mentioned, so 'mistranslation' or 'performance' aren't likely. The error isn't about network communication or graphical rendering specifically, so those categories probably don't apply either.
+
+The core issue seems to be that the UEFI setup in QEMU isn't correctly identifying or loading the EFI image, which is a boot-related problem. Therefore, the most appropriate category would be 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1926052 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1926052
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cd966f77
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1926052
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report in QEMU. Let's read through the details again.
+
+The user reported that when they use the Arch Linux cloud image and set the `-nographic` option, QEMU freezes during the GRUB bootloader. They tested this with versions 5.1 and 5.2 of QEMU. Without the `-nographic` flag, it boots fine without any keyboard interaction.
+
+Hmm, so the issue is happening when using a specific configuration. The key point here is that it's freezing during GRUB. GRUB is the bootloader, which runs before the actual OS starts. Since it's related to booting and happens in QEMU, I need to see which category fits this best.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: there's 'boot', which seems relevant because the problem occurs during the boot process. Other options like 'network' or 'graphic' don't seem directly applicable here. The issue isn't about networking or graphics; it's specifically when GRUB is trying to load, and the system freezes.
+
+The fact that omitting `-nographic` allows it to continue suggests that the problem might be related to how QEMU handles the graphical interface or perhaps input handling during boot. But since the main issue is with the boot process itself getting stuck, 'boot' seems like the most appropriate category.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1962 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1962
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f77a8274
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1962
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report related to QEMU. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user is reporting that when using systemd-nspawn within a QEMU emulated container, specifically with a debootstrap-ed Debian rootfs on a foreign architecture (using qemu-user-static via systemd-binfmt), the service `systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev-early.service` fails. This leads to `/dev` not being properly set up, causing other system components to fail as well.
+
+The steps to reproduce involve installing necessary packages, setting up the rootfs with debootstrap, and then running systemd-nspawn. The user notes that this works fine on Bookworm guests or without QEMU, suggesting a compatibility issue between newer systemd versions and QEMU's emulation environment.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The error message mentions "Failed to set up credentials: Invalid argument" and relates to systemd services failing during boot. The issue seems to be with how the service is handling credentials in an emulated environment. Since this affects device nodes creation (as /dev isn't setup), it's related to device management within the container.
+
+Systemd-tmpfiles is responsible for creating static device nodes, so if that's failing due to QEMU issues, it points towards a problem with how QEMU handles certain syscalls or system calls required by systemd in this context. The user suggests it might be similar to a known issue PR #28954 where a syscall usage change broke compatibility.
+
+Given the failure is during boot and involves device node creation credentials, the most fitting category seems to be 'boot', as it's affecting the boot process of the guest system within QEMU. Alternatively, 'device' could also be considered since it's about /dev setup. However, since the issue arises at boot time and impacts service startup, I think 'boot' is more appropriate.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where a systemd service fails during the boot process of a containerized environment using QEMU. The failure occurs when setting up device nodes in `/dev`, which suggests that it's related to device management during the boot phase. 
+
+Given the context of the problem and the categories provided, the most fitting category is **boot**, as the issue affects the system's ability to start services properly during the initial boot sequence.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1966 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1966
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..74104432
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1966
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's tackle this bug report classification. The user provided a detailed scenario where some Windows XP VMs under QEMU exhibit strange behavior—specifically, Explorer.exe is unresponsive for about half an hour after starting the VM. Interestingly, not all instances behave this way; some work normally. They also mentioned that under QEMU 8.0.4, all VMs function correctly.
+
+First, I need to identify the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+The issue revolves around a regression where some XP instances hang. The problem occurs after starting the VM but eventually recovers. Since it's a regression, something changed between QEMU versions causing this behavior in newer ones but not 8.0.4.
+
+Considering possible causes: It might be related to how QEMU handles certain operations post-update. Could it be a timing issue during boot? Or perhaps an interaction with the graphical environment or VNC? Alternatively, maybe there's a problem with device emulation or peripherals.
+
+Wait, the user didn't mention any network issues specifically, so maybe that's not it. They also didn't point out graphics problems, but since XP is old, maybe QEMU's handling of certain hardware emulations has changed. Another thought: could this be related to KVM? But if it's a regression, perhaps something in the hypervisor layer is causing instability.
+
+Alternatively, it might be a boot-related issue where some services aren't starting correctly, leading to delays or hangs. Or maybe there's a problem with how files are being handled post-boot, causing Explorer.exe to misbehave.
+
+Another angle: performance issues could cause responsiveness problems. If QEMU isn't handling resources efficiently, it might lead to delays in processing, making the VM appear unresponsive. However, since some instances work fine, it suggests an inconsistency in how QEMU is emulating something on those affected machines.
+
+Looking at the categories again, 'boot' seems relevant because the problem occurs after starting the VM but during the initial phase. Alternatively, if it's related to device emulation or peripherals, that could also be a fit.
+
+Wait, the user didn't mention any specific devices acting up, so maybe it's more about how the system initializes. Perhaps there's a delay in certain drivers loading or services starting, leading to the unresponsiveness. This might fall under boot-related issues since it's happening right after startup.
+
+So, considering all this, I'm leaning towards 'boot' as the category because the problem occurs early on and is a regression that was fixed by using an older QEMU version.
+</think>
+
+The issue described is related to problems occurring during the startup phase of the VM, which suggests it might be linked to how the system initializes or boots. The behavior is inconsistent across instances, but since all worked under QEMU 8.0.4, it indicates a regression introduced in a newer version. The symptoms (Explorer.exe unresponsive) could stem from issues during the boot process.
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1995 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1995
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a5e62dac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/1995
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "No equivalent of `-boot once` for `bootindex`" in QEMU. The categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I'll break down the bug report. It's saying there's no equivalent option for `-boot once` when dealing with `bootindex`. So it's about how QEMU handles booting, specifically regarding the order or selection of devices to boot from.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems directly related. The issue is about a missing feature in the booting process, so it falls under the category that deals with boot-related functionalities. 
+
+Other options like device or peripherals might be considered since bootindex relates to which device is used for booting, but the main focus here is on the absence of an option, not necessarily the devices themselves. Therefore, "boot" is the most appropriate category because it's about how QEMU manages the boot process.
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains to a missing feature in the boot configuration of QEMU, specifically regarding the `bootindex` and `-boot once` options. This directly relates to how QEMU handles the booting process.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2015 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2015
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8c5a40a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2015
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user provided a detailed description of an issue where qemu-system-sparc fails to boot Solaris 8 on an emulated SS-5, resulting in a trap 0x29 error.
+
+First, looking at the problem: when attempting to boot from the CDROM after interrupting the network boot, QEMU exits with a fatal error. The key here is the error message "Trap 0x29 (Data Access Error)". 
+
+I remember that trap numbers in SPARC architecture correspond to specific exceptions. Trap 0x29 typically indicates a data access exception, which could be due to an invalid memory access. This might happen during the boot process when the kernel or some other component is trying to access memory it shouldn't.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: there's 'mistranslation' related to incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target, usually in user-mode assembly lowering. But this seems more about a hardware-level issue rather than an assembly translation problem.
+
+Other options include 'boot', which relates to issues during system booting. Since the failure occurs specifically when Solaris 8 is trying to boot and results in a trap during that process, it seems directly related to the booting phase.
+
+I don't think it's 'network' because the network part was handled by stopping it with sendkey stop-a, and the issue arose after switching to CDROM boot. It's more about the system's ability to load the OS correctly rather than a network configuration problem.
+
+The error message points towards a hardware emulation issue, possibly in how QEMU emulates the SPARC architecture during the boot process. But without more details on the exact cause (like specific hardware components), 'boot' seems like the most fitting category as it's about the system not starting up correctly.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2044 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2044
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..785261aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2044
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report according to the given categories. The user provided a list of possible categories like mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, etc. The bug report is about HP-UX 10.20 not booting on QEMU 8.2.0-rc4.
+
+First, I'll read through the problem description again. The user updated QEMU to version 8.2.0-rc4 and now their existing HP-UX installation isn't working. They also tried booting from the installation media but SeaBIOS is stuck in a loop.
+
+I need to figure out which category this falls into. Let's go through each possibility:
+
+1. **mistranslation**: This relates to incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target, usually in user-mode. The problem here is about booting an OS, not user-mode issues, so probably not.
+2. **assembly**: Assembly lowering issues would be more about code generation during compilation. Again, this doesn't seem relevant to the boot process.
+3. **device**: This could relate to hardware device emulation issues in QEMU. Since the problem is with HP-UX not booting and SeaBIOS looping, it's possible there's an issue with how devices are emulated or recognized.
+4. **graphic**: If it were a graphics-related issue, like display problems, this would fit here, but the user didn't mention any graphical issues.
+5. **socket** or **network**: These relate to networking aspects. The problem is about booting, not network connectivity, so probably not these.
+6. **KVM**: Kernel-based Virtual Machine; since QEMU often uses KVM for virtualization, this could be relevant if the issue is with hypervisor functions.
+7. **boot**: This seems directly related. The user can't boot HP-UX after updating QEMU, which points to a boot-related problem.
+8. **vnc**, **debug**, **files**, **permissions**, etc.: These are more specific and don't seem to apply here.
+
+Considering that the issue is about the OS not booting correctly after an update, it's likely related to how QEMU handles the boot process for HP-UX. "Boot" seems like the most fitting category because the problem centers around the system failing to start up properly.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/206 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/206
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9ecb3972
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/206
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report: "Dos on the fly CD image replacement is not Working with DOS". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, let's break down the bug report. It mentions "Dos" which probably refers to DOS (Disk Operating System). The issue is about replacing a CD image on the fly not working with DOS. So it's related to how QEMU handles disk images during a DOS session.
+
+Looking at the categories: boot relates to starting up the OS, and since DOS is an operating system, this could be part of the booting process. Alternatively, device might refer to hardware devices, but here it's more about the software handling of disk images.
+
+The key term is "on the fly CD image replacement", which suggests a runtime issue with how QEMU handles replacing or switching disk images without rebooting. This sounds like an issue during the OS's runtime rather than during bootup. However, since DOS relies heavily on its boot process and hardware interaction, it might still fall under boot-related issues.
+
+Other possibilities: peripherals could be about devices connected to the VM, but this is more about image replacement which is a management feature rather than device handling. Hypervisor would relate to the management of virtual machines at a higher level, but again, the issue seems specific to how DOS interacts with its disks.
+
+Given that, boot seems like the most fitting category because it's about the interaction during the OS's runtime when attempting to replace a CD image. It might involve how QEMU handles disk changes in a running VM, which could tie into boot-related processes or configurations.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2070 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2070
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..81f0e4db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2070
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's start by reading through the problem description carefully.
+
+The issue is with QEMU hanging on boot when using TCG acceleration along with EDK2-OVMF UEFI Secure Boot firmware, starting from version 8.2. It freezes and uses a full CPU core at 100%. The user mentions that this doesn't happen when they use KVM acceleration or without the Secure Boot firmware.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is related to QEMU's behavior during boot. The mention of EDK2-OVMF and Secure Boot suggests it's about UEFI initialization. TCG (Translation-Caching Guest) acceleration is part of QEMU's execution model, not KVM, which uses the hardware virtualization extensions (VMX on Intel).
+
+Since the issue occurs specifically with TCG and Secure Boot, and it's related to booting, "boot" seems like the most appropriate category. The other options don't fit as well because the problem isn't about translation issues or performance in general, but rather the boot process failing when certain components are used together.
+</think>
+
+The issue is specifically about QEMU hanging during the boot process when using TCG acceleration and EDK2-OVMF UEFI Secure Boot. This relates to the boot category as it's about the system not starting correctly.
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2090 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2090
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2d27e94b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2090
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The user mentioned that when starting a VM through Virtual Machine Manager, there's a black screen that hangs for about a minute before booting proceeds normally. They've tried changing kernels and rebuilding Qemu without success.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue seems related to the VM startup process. The delay occurs during the initialisation phase before the VM actually boots. Since it's a hang during this period, it might be due to some part of QEMU taking too long to initialise or set up resources needed for the VM.
+
+Let me consider each category:
+
+- Mistranslation and assembly lowering relate more to how code is translated from one architecture to another or into machine code, which doesn't seem directly related here.
+- Device/peripherals could be a possibility if it's hardware-related, but the problem occurs during initialisation, not necessarily with device interaction post-boot.
+- Graphic issues might cause display problems, but this seems like a delay rather than a visual issue. VNC is more about remote access and doesn't explain the hang.
+- Network issues might slow things down, but again, this is during the boot process before network services start.
+- KVM is part of QEMU's hypervisor component, which manages virtual machines. If there's a delay in setting up KVM, that could cause a hang.
+- Boot category seems directly relevant because it's about the VM starting up and taking too long to begin the boot process.
+
+The problem occurs during the initialisation phase before the VM actually starts booting, so it's likely related to how QEMU initializes the VM. This makes "boot" the most appropriate category because the issue is with the startup process rather than other components like device drivers or network setup.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes a delay during the VM initialization phase before the actual boot process begins. The key factor here is that the problem occurs when starting the VM, which relates directly to the boot process in QEMU.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2091 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2091
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..54b11c43
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2091
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm looking at this bug report for QEMU. The title says "m68k: virt: Pass the configured cpu type via bootinfo instead of the default 68040." 
+
+First, the m68k part refers to the Motorola 68000 series CPU, so it's related to the M68K processor model in QEMU. The term "virt" probably stands for virtualization or something similar, indicating this is about how QEMU handles virtual machines.
+
+The bug report mentions that instead of passing the configured CPU type via bootinfo, QEMU is using a default of 68040. Bootinfo likely refers to the information passed during the boot process, which could include details like CPU type, configuration, etc. So, the issue here is that the current setup uses a hardcoded default (68040) instead of whatever was configured.
+
+Looking at the possible categories, I see "boot," which seems relevant because this is about the information passed during the boot process. Other options like "cpu" aren't listed, but since bootinfo relates to the boot stage, "boot" fits here.
+
+I don't think it's a mistranslation issue or assembly-related since the problem isn't with code translation or lowering. It's more about configuration at runtime. None of the other categories like network, device, or graphic seem applicable here. So, the most appropriate category is "boot."
+</think>
+
+The bug report deals with passing CPU type during boot using bootinfo instead of a hardcoded default. This relates to the boot process in QEMU.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2109 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2109
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d4416c94
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2109
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's tackle this bug classification. The issue is about a NetBSD VM failing to install because it's missing the 'py311-expat' package. I'm new to this, so I'll need to think carefully.
+
+First, I should understand what each category means. Let's go through them one by one:
+
+- **mistranslation**: This has to do with incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR or target, usually in user-mode.
+- **assembly**: Issues during assembly lowering.
+- **other**: Any issues that don't fit into the other categories.
+- **device**, **graphic**, **socket**, **network**, **KVM**, **boot**, **vnc**, **debug**, **files**, **permissions**, **performance**, **kernel**, **peripherals**, **hypervisor**.
+
+The problem here is about a missing package during VM installation. NetBSD is the guest OS, and it's unable to install because 'py311-expat' isn't available. So, this seems related to the software packages within the VM environment.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- It's not about the CPU or translation (so not mistranslation).
+- It doesn't involve assembly code directly.
+- The missing package is a dependency for the installation process, which suggests it's an issue with the software setup in the VM.
+
+Now, considering the possible categories, 'boot' seems relevant because the VM fails during the installation phase, which is part of the booting process. Alternatively, it could be a 'files' or 'permissions' issue if the package isn't present due to missing files or access rights. However, the main problem is that the package isn't available when the VM tries to install, which directly impacts the installation (boot) process.
+
+So, I think 'boot' is the most fitting category here because it's about the failure during the setup phase of the VM.
+</think>
+
+The issue relates to a missing package causing a failure during the VM installation. The appropriate category is **boot**.
+
+Answer: boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2135 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2135
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a080e586
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2135
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user is having trouble booting an MPS3-AN547 machine with images larger than 512KiB. They tried moving symbols to other memory areas but ended up with discontinuous memory, causing a large image that doesn't boot. They also mentioned the QSPI ROM area but noted it can't be used as bootram due to remapping limitations.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce, they generated an image beyond 512K and tried using it as the kernel. The error was about not being able to load the kernel.
+
+The additional info shows their linker script with flash starting at 0x00000000 for 512K, sram1 at 0x01000000 for 2M, and sram2 at 0x21000000 for 4M. The problem is that the flash overflows when trying to fit a larger image.
+
+The main issue here seems to be related to how memory is being managed during boot. Specifically, it's about the kernel image size exceeding the allocated flash area and not being able to load properly. Since they're using QEMU's MPS3-AN547 machine and dealing with bootram limitations, this falls under the boot category because it's directly affecting the system's ability to boot from the kernel image.
+
+I don't think it's related to translations or assembly since the problem is about memory allocation during boot. It's more about hardware configuration and how QEMU handles booting on specific devices.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2204 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2204
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..07e7cd6e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2204
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify the bug report provided about QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the problem description, the user is trying to convert an OVA image to VHDX using QEMU's `qemu-img` and then attempting to load it into a Hyper-V VM on Windows Server 2022. The conversion seems successful, but when they try to start the VM, there are boot failures. 
+
+The error messages mention issues with virtual disk system limitations—specifically, that the file must be uncompressed, unencrypted, and not sparse. After applying a workaround to remove the sparse flag, the error changes to a generic "Boot failure," indicating that the VM isn't starting properly.
+
+Additionally, when using Generation 2 VMs, there's a different error about the boot loader not finding an operating system on the SCSI Disk and no boot image on the network adapter. However, converting the same OVA with VirtualBox worked fine, suggesting that QEMU might be handling the VHDX conversion incorrectly in some way.
+
+I need to figure out which category this falls under. The issue seems related to how the virtual disk is being converted, but more importantly, it's about booting the VM after conversion. Since the problem arises during the VM startup with boot-related errors, "boot" seems like a likely candidate. However, another possible category could be "hypervisor," since QEMU's target might be running as a hypervisor (like KVM), but in this case, the user is using Hyper-V on Windows.
+
+But the primary issue here is that after conversion, the image isn't bootable for the VM. The problem occurs during the boot process, pointing to an issue with how the image was prepared or recognized by the hypervisor. Since the error messages are about not finding a proper boot device and failing to load the OS from the disk, it's more related to the boot process rather than the conversion itself.
+
+Therefore, I think the most appropriate category here is "boot." The problem lies in how the virtual machine starts up, which points directly to a boot issue.
+</think>
+
+The bug report indicates issues with VMs failing to start after converting an OVA image to VHDX using QEMU. Errors suggest problems during the boot process, pointing to "boot" as the category.
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2234 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2234
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7d9f45d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2234
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out the category for this bug report. The user provided a detailed description of an issue they're facing with QEMU when pressing F2 to load the EDK2 BIOS interface app. They mentioned that sometimes it fails and shows a message about BdDxe loading, while other times it works correctly.
+
+First, I'll look at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others.
+
+The bug is about pressing F2 to bring up a BIOS interface in QEMU. This sounds like it's related to how the virtual machine handles input or specific keys. When they press F2, sometimes it works, and other times it doesn't. They also mentioned that this has been an issue since version 8.0.0.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems relevant because it's about loading a BIOS interface which is part of the boot process. Alternatively, it could be related to device or peripherals if it's an input handling issue, but "boot" feels more specific here because the problem occurs during the attempt to access the BIOS setup.
+
+I don't think it's mistranslation since that usually relates to incorrect mapping in code translation, which doesn't seem to fit here. Similarly, performance issues weren't mentioned, so I can rule that out. It's not a graphic issue per se, but more about the boot process failing to load the interface.
+
+So, considering all this, the most fitting category is "boot" because it pertains to problems during the boot sequence when trying to access the BIOS.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where pressing F2 in QEMU sometimes fails to load the EDK2 BIOS interface. This is related to the boot process as it involves accessing the BIOS during startup.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2235 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2235
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7a420e30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2235
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's break down this bug report to classify it correctly. The user is having trouble getting Hiren's Bootcd PE LiveCD to boot in QEMU on Windows. They've tried different approaches but haven't been able to figure out the issue.
+
+First, I notice that they mentioned using Windows as both the host and guest OS with QEMU. However, when they tried VirtualBox, it worked without EFI but not with it enabled. This suggests there might be something specific about how QEMU handles EFI compared to other hypervisors like VirtualBox.
+
+The problem seems related to booting a LiveCD, which involves unpacking the contents into a ramdrive. The user observed that the memory usage increases as expected, but the boot process halts before displaying any OS-specific logos or animations. This could point to issues with how QEMU initializes or handles certain components during the boot process.
+
+They've also provided information about the ISO files and their SHA256 hashes, which confirms the integrity of the images isn't the issue since they match the expected values. Additionally, the fact that it works in native Windows but not in QEMU suggests a configuration or emulation problem within QEMU itself.
+
+Looking at the possible categories, I need to determine which one fits best. The user's main issue is related to booting an operating system image, specifically a PE (Pre-Execution Environment) LiveCD. Since they're using QEMU on Windows, it's likely tied to how the hypervisor handles EFI or BIOS settings, which are part of the boot process.
+
+The categories include 'boot' and others like 'network', 'graphic', etc. Given that the problem is about the OS not starting up after the initial unpacking phase, the primary issue falls under the 'boot' category. It doesn't seem to be a translation error or assembly issue, but rather an issue with the boot process itself.
+
+Therefore, the appropriate classification for this bug report is 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2280 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2280
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..87d6eb96
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2280
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Not Installing Properly" in the context of QEMU. Let's see... The possible categories are things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Hmm, "Not Installing Properly" sounds like it might be related to installation issues. But wait, QEMU isn't an installer itself; it's a machine emulator and virtualizer. Maybe the bug is about how QEMU handles installation images or maybe something related to the target machine not booting correctly.
+
+Looking at the categories: 'boot' seems relevant because if it's not installing properly, perhaps the issue occurs during the boot process of the virtual machine. Alternatively, 'files' could be a possibility if it's an issue with how files are being handled during installation.
+
+Wait, but "Not Installing Properly" might refer to the way QEMU handles the installation media or the target system's setup. It could also relate to permissions if there's an issue with access rights when installing something within the VM.
+
+But considering the most likely category, 'boot' seems more fitting because installation typically involves booting into a new OS. If QEMU isn't handling the boot process correctly for the installation media, that would fall under the 'boot' category.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2361 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2361
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bd194568
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2361
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out what category this bug report falls into. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The user is running QEMU on an AMD Ryzen CPU and using a Debian Bookworm image with GRUB as the bootloader. When they use the flags `-cpu host` or `-cpu max`, GRUB throws an "out of memory" error while loading a large initrd (400MB). However, it works fine when using `-cpu kvm64` or no `-cpu` flag at all. They also mention that it works on Intel hosts and with `-cpu EPYC`.
+
+First, I need to understand the problem. It seems related to how QEMU emulates the CPU because changing the CPU type affects GRUB's behavior. The issue occurs specifically when using host or max CPU configurations on AMD hardware.
+
+The possible categories given are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+So, the bug is about GRUB failing when a certain CPU configuration is used. GRUB is part of the boot process in QEMU, so it's related to booting. However, the problem arises because of how the CPU is configured, which might affect resources like memory allocation during the boot process.
+
+Looking at the categories: 'boot' seems relevant here because it directly affects the boot loader (GRUB). But since the issue is tied to the CPU configuration, maybe another category applies. The user suspects that a specific CPU feature enabled by `-cpu host` or `-cpu max` on AMD might be causing this.
+
+Wait, but the bug occurs during the GRUB stage, which is part of the boot process in QEMU. So it's more about how QEMU emulates the hardware for the guest OS, particularly during booting. Therefore, 'boot' seems appropriate because it's about the boot loader not functioning correctly under certain CPU configurations.
+
+Alternatively, since the problem might be related to how QEMU configures the CPU features and how that affects memory usage in the guest, maybe 'hypervisor' or 'kernel' could also be considered. But I think 'boot' is more specific here because it's directly about GRUB failing during boot.
+
+I'm leaning towards 'boot' as the category because the issue occurs when using GRUB to load the initrd and kernel, and it's tied to how QEMU configures the CPU for the guest OS.
+</think>
+
+The bug report relates to GRUB failing during the boot process when specific CPU configurations are used. Since this directly impacts the boot loader's functionality within QEMU, the appropriate category is:
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2365 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2365
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8f17f77f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2365
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's tackle this classification problem step by step. The user provided a bug report from QEMU and wants it categorized into one of several predefined categories. First, I need to understand what each category means.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report describes an issue where VMs are getting stuck at SeaBIOS for a long time after updating to QEMU versions 8.2 or higher. This delay causes a significant CPU load (100% on one core) and takes about 30-60 seconds before proceeding. The user mentions that downgrading to version 8.1 fixes the issue, so it's a regression introduced in v8.2.
+
+SeaBIOS is related to the firmware used by QEMU for virtual machines. Stuck here suggests that there might be a problem during the boot process, possibly with how QEMU interacts with the virtual hardware or the way SeaBIOS is being initialized or executed.
+
+I should consider each category:
+
+- **Mistranslation**: This relates to incorrect mapping between source architecture and target IR, which would affect user-mode. Not directly related here since the issue seems to be during boot.
+  
+- **Assembly Lowering (assembly)**: If it's about how code is translated into machine assembly, but again, not the primary issue here.
+
+- **Boot**: This category seems relevant because the problem occurs during the VM's boot process. The delay at SeaBIOS points towards an issue with the boot procedure or initialization.
+
+Other categories like network, device, etc., might be considered if the issue was related to those components, but the key point is that it's happening during the boot phase, causing a significant delay.
+
+So, putting it all together, the bug report indicates a problem occurring during the VM's boot process with SeaBIOS. Therefore, the most appropriate category would be **boot**.
+</think>
+
+The issue described involves VMs getting stuck at SeaBIOS after updating to QEMU versions 8.2 or higher, which is related to the boot process.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2382 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2382
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..75c25cdf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2382
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user provided a detailed description of an issue they encountered while testing their DIY UEFI aarch64 kernel. The error message is a "Synchronous Exception at 0x00000000E46CCEAC," and the program halts.
+
+First, I need to understand what each category means. The options are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, the user is using a UEFI-based kernel on aarch64 architecture. They're encountering an exception when trying to log in or create accounts. The error occurs during the execution of their custom UEFI setup, which suggests it's related to how QEMU handles the guest operating system's initialization.
+
+Since this happens during the boot process—when entering account details and after creating two accounts—the issue is likely occurring early in the system startup phase. Synchronous exceptions in kernels often point to kernel panics or hardware issues detected by the OS. In this case, it's happening when interacting with the UEFI setup, which is part of the boot process.
+
+The user mentioned that changing memory in virt-machine affects the exception address, implying that the issue might be related to memory management, possibly a misallocation or access violation. However, without logs or stack traces, it's hard to pinpoint exactly where the problem lies.
+
+Considering QEMU's components, when running a UEFI kernel, issues could arise from how QEMU emulates hardware (like the CPU, MMIO, etc.) or how it translates instructions. Since this is an aarch64 system, any errors in the translation layer might cause exceptions during execution.
+
+The error occurs during user interaction with the installer, which isn't part of the traditional boot process but rather an application running on top of UEFI. However, since the exception halts the program and occurs during the OS setup phase, it's still within the boot category as it's related to system initialization.
+
+Looking at other categories: 'assembly' relates to lowering assembly code; this might be a factor if the error is due to incorrect translation. But without more context on the QEMU translation layers being faulty, I'm not certain. 'Kernel' seems more appropriate because it's an OS-level issue happening during boot.
+
+Wait, but UEFI isn't the kernel—it's a firmware interface. So maybe 'boot' is more accurate here, as it relates to the process of setting up and initializing the system. The exception occurs when running the UEFI-based kernel, so it's part of the boot sequence.
+
+The user didn't mention network or graphics issues, so those can be ruled out. Similarly, no sockets involved. KVM refers to hardware acceleration; if they're using it, but without specific info, I'll focus on what's given.
+
+In summary, since the problem occurs during system startup and interaction with the UEFI setup, which is part of the boot process, the category 'boot' seems most appropriate.
+</think>
+
+The error occurs during the execution of a UEFI-based kernel within QEMU, specifically when interacting with user input during system initialization. This suggests an issue related to the boot process or how QEMU handles the guest OS's startup.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2393 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2393
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..af6de7da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2393
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I'm looking at this bug report where the user is experiencing a hang during boot with QEMU when using `-machine q35`. The issue doesn't occur when they switch to `-machine pc`, and adding a CD-ROM image seems to fix it. 
+
+First, I need to classify the bug into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is happening at boot time, so it's related to the initial setup of the virtual machine. The user mentions that SeaBIOS hangs for 10-15 seconds with `-machine q35`, which suggests an issue specific to how QEMU emulates hardware when using the Q35 machine type.
+
+When they add a CD-ROM image, the VM boots immediately. This makes me think that perhaps without the CD-ROM, there's something missing in the initialization process of the Q35 machine that causes a delay or hang. Maybe the absence of a bootable medium is causing QEMU to wait for some component to be present.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems directly relevant here because the issue occurs during the boot process and adding a CD-ROM affects the boot flow. Alternatively, it could be related to "device" if it's an issue with how devices are emulated in the machine type.
+
+But since the problem is specific to the machine configuration and happens at the very beginning of the boot process (SeaBIOS hang), I think "boot" is the most appropriate category. It doesn't seem to involve mis-translations or assembly issues but rather the overall boot sequence.
+</think>
+
+The issue occurs during the boot process with a specific machine type, pointing towards a problem in how the system initializes when using `-machine q35`. The fix involves adding a CD-ROM, indicating an emulation or initialization step related to devices. However, since the primary concern is the boot process delay, the most fitting category is:
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2464 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2464
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bffad435
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2464
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user mentioned that when they tried to boot a Windows NT 4 VM using QEMU, they got an "INACCESSIBLE_BOOT_DEVICE" error and the message "rc4030: invalid read at 0xf0-0xf8". 
+
+First, I need to look at the possible categories provided. The options are things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem seems related to booting because they're getting a boot device error. The message mentions "rc4030" which I'm not immediately familiar with, but the context is about an invalid read during booting. So it's likely something wrong with the boot process.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce, they involve setting up a VM and launching the installer. The issue occurs when trying to install or access the hard drive, pointing towards a problem in how QEMU handles the boot process or the hardware emulation.
+
+The error message mentions "INACCESSIBLE_BOOT_DEVICE", which is a Windows blue screen code (0x7B), often related to problems with the boot sector or disk drivers. This suggests that there might be an issue with how QEMU emulates certain hardware components, like storage devices, during the boot process.
+
+Considering all this, the most fitting category seems to be "boot" because the error is directly related to the VM failing to boot properly.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes issues occurring during the boot process of a Windows NT 4 VM in QEMU. The error message and steps to reproduce point towards problems with hardware emulation, specifically related to storage or boot device handling. Given that the problem occurs when launching the installer and involves an "INACCESSIBLE_BOOT_DEVICE" error, it is categorized under boot issues.
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2486 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2486
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..77c7b7c0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2486
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The user is reporting an issue with RISC-V in QEMU. They mention that when they set QEMU_CPU=rv64,j=false, it throws an error saying the property isn't found. So, first off, this seems related to CPU configuration in QEMU.
+
+They tried setting f=false and zfinx=true but got a misleading error message about the 'j' extension not being found. The key point here is that specifying certain options doesn't work as expected—it either causes an incorrect error or doesn't apply the settings properly.
+
+Looking at the categories, I see "device", "graphic", "network", etc., but none seem to fit directly. Then there's "boot" which relates to how QEMU starts and configures the machine. Since this is about CPU options not being applied correctly during startup, it might fall under "boot".
+
+Alternatively, considering that the issue arises from command-line arguments affecting the CPU configuration, maybe it's more related to how QEMU handles these parameters. But since booting involves setting up the CPU, I think "boot" is still a reasonable category.
+
+Wait, another thought: the bug is about incorrect behavior when using specific CPU flags. This could also relate to how QEMU processes the CPU models and their features. Maybe it's a configuration issue during runtime rather than at startup. But without more context, it's hard to say.
+
+I'm leaning towards "boot" because it involves setting up the CPU parameters when starting the emulator, leading to an error during that process.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is about incorrect behavior when specifying CPU features, which affects how QEMU configures the virtual CPU during startup. Therefore, it falls under the category where issues related to the configuration and setup of the emulation environment are classified.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2502 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2502
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..832fc3a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2502
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is having trouble booting old amd64 Ubuntu ISOs in QEMU. Specifically, versions up to 6.06 don't work when using the amd64 version, but i386 works fine. It started breaking between QEMU 7.0.0 and 7.1.0.
+
+First, I need to consider what categories are available: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about the OS not starting, so it's related to the boot process. The user tried different QEMU versions and saw that older ones worked but newer didn't. They also noticed it works on an Intel machine but not AMD/Ryzen, which suggests a hardware or CPU-related problem.
+
+Since the problem occurs during the early stages of the OS boot (early exception rip), this points to issues in how the virtualization handles certain instructions or the setup before the OS takes over. The fact that QEMU was working for older versions and broke in 7.1.0 suggests a regression in the code, possibly related to changes in how the hypervisor interacts with the CPU or the way it translates instructions.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems directly relevant because the issue is about the system not starting up correctly. However, since this is happening on AMD hardware and might relate to KVM (which QEMU uses for virtualization), "hypervisor" could also be a category. But the primary problem is that the OS isn't booting, so I think "boot" is more appropriate.
+
+Another angle: if it's an issue with how QEMU handles certain CPU instructions or translations, maybe "mistranslation," but the user mentioned it works on Intel machines, which suggests it's not a general translation issue but perhaps specific to AMD CPUs. That could fall under "hypervisor" as KVM might handle AMD and Intel differently.
+
+But since the main symptom is that the OS doesn't boot, I think "boot" is the best fit here.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2558 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2558
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ceb10685
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2558
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The issue is that Ubuntu doesn't boot with EDK2 but works fine with u-boot. Let me break down what's happening here.
+
+First, the user provided two commands. In the first one, they're using `edk2-riscv-code.fd` as a pflash drive alongside the Ubuntu image. But the system hangs during the UEFI setup. The second command uses `uboot.elf` as the kernel and boots successfully.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem occurs during the boot process when using EDK2. Since it's related to how QEMU handles the boot loader (EDK2 vs u-boot), I think this might be an issue with how QEMU is setting up the firmware or booting the OS. 
+
+EDK2 is a UEFI implementation, and if it's not working correctly, perhaps there's a problem in QEMU's handling of the firmware or initialization process for RISC-V. The fact that u-boot works suggests that the hardware setup (like devices) is correct when using u-boot but fails with EDK2.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'boot' seems relevant because it's about the booting process failing. Alternatively, 'hypervisor' could be a category if QEMU as a hypervisor isn't correctly initializing the firmware environment for EDK2. But since the issue is more specific to the boot loader and UEFI setup, 'boot' might be more appropriate.
+
+Another angle: if it's an assembly lowering issue or mistranslation, that would relate more to how code is translated from RISC-V to another format within QEMU. But here, the problem is with loading the firmware image, not with instruction translation.
+
+So I think the most fitting category is 'boot' because it's directly related to the boot process failing when using EDK2.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/260 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/260
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4b2bb690
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/260
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. The bug is that when using `qemu-system-sparc64` with the machine type `sun4v`, it aborts when trying to boot from `tribblix-sparc-0m16.iso`. 
+
+First, I should figure out what aspect of QEMU this issue relates to. The command line suggests that the problem occurs during system initialization or when attempting to boot an ISO image on a SPARC64 machine type.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others. 
+
+The issue seems related to the boot process because it's happening when trying to boot an ISO image. The error occurs specifically in QEMU during the system startup phase. So "boot" would be a likely category.
+
+Other possibilities could include device or peripherals if the problem is with hardware emulation, but since it's about booting from an ISO, that points more towards the boot process itself rather than a specific peripheral device.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves QEMU aborting during the boot process when attempting to run an ISO image. This relates directly to the boot category.
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2686 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2686
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7ecea267
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2686
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. The problem is that after adding rng-seed functionality, the test_loongarch64_virt.py starts hanging during EFI startup. 
+
+Let me look at what the commit message says. Jason Donenfeld added code to pass the random seed through FDT for LoongArch systems. He references several similar commits in other architectures where they do the same thing, and mentions that those were later amended to handle RNG seed changes on snapshot load.
+
+The bug report states that after this change, the test hangs periodically. The issue occurs during EFI startup, before any significant output, so it's probably happening early in the boot process. The test is waiting for serial console output but gets nothing, indicating a hang at or before EDK initialization.
+
+I need to figure out which category this falls into. The categories are: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the commit, it's about passing a random seed to the FDT (Flattened Device Tree), which is part of the hardware setup for the virtual machine. The test is failing during the boot process, specifically in the EFI startup phase. 
+
+The issue might be related to how the RNG seed affects the initialization or the interaction with other components during boot. Since it's a QEMU bug, and the problem occurs when using a specific target (loongarch64), I should consider categories that relate to system booting.
+
+"Boot" seems like the most relevant category because the test hangs during the startup phase of the guest OS. It's not related directly to user-mode translation errors or assembly code lowering. While RNG could be tied to other areas, in this context, it's causing a problem during the boot process, so "boot" is the best fit.
+
+I don't think it's a hardware device issue because the test environment is virtualized, and the RNG seed addition is part of the QEMU setup for the VM. It's more about how the boot process initializes with this new parameter.
+
+So, the category should be "boot".
+</think>
+
+The bug occurs during the guest OS boot process when adding rng-seed functionality, making "boot" the appropriate category.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/269 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/269
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..90bc91f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/269
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "AIX 7.2 TL4 SP1 cannot IPL with QEMU >2.11.2 ppc64-softmmu". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I'll break down the bug report. It's about AIX 7.2 TL4 SP1 not being able to IPL (Install/Loading Program) with QEMU versions greater than 2.11.2 on ppc64-softmmu architecture. 
+
+IPL typically refers to the process of booting an operating system from a hardware device, like a hard disk or tape. In this context, it's about booting AIX using QEMU. So the issue is related to the boot process within the emulator.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- Boot seems directly relevant because IPL is part of the booting process.
+- Other possibilities: KVM (which is another hypervisor) but since QEMU can be a hypervisor itself, maybe that's possible too. But "hypervisor" is more about the management of virtual machines rather than the boot issue.
+
+I think "boot" fits best because the problem occurs during the IPL phase, which is about starting up the OS with QEMU. It doesn't seem to involve any device-specific issues or network problems; it's purely about the inability to start the OS correctly.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue with booting AIX using QEMU, specifically related to the IPL process failing in versions greater than 2.11.2 for ppc64-softmmu. The key term here is "boot," as it pertains to the failure during the installation or loading phase of the operating system.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2700 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2700
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bccbab10
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2700
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The problem is that Windows 11 fails to boot and just restarts. Let's look at the details.
+
+The user mentioned they're using an M4 Pro Mac with TCG (which stands for Type 1 Hypervisor in KVM terms) and also others have reported similar issues on M3 and Intel i9 systems using HVF (Type 2 Hypervisor). 
+
+Since the issue occurs during booting, that points towards a problem related to how QEMU handles the boot process. The failure is happening consistently across different hardware setups, which suggests it's not specific to user-mode but more likely in the hypervisor or kernel part of QEMU.
+
+Looking at the categories: there's 'boot' which seems relevant here. Other possible categories like 'hypervisor' could be a contender because TCG and HVF are part of KVM (a hypervisor), but since the primary issue is booting, 'boot' might be more specific. 
+
+I don't see any mention of network, graphics, or other peripherals specifically causing the problem. It's purely about the OS not booting correctly, so 'boot' seems appropriate.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2729 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2729
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b59a2e0a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2729
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that when they run `qemu-system-aarch64 -M raspi4b`, there's no valid DTB provided in x0 register. Let me break down the problem and see which category it fits into.
+
+First, understanding what a DTB is: DTB stands for Device Tree Blob. It's used by some architectures (like ARM) to describe hardware details at boot time. The error suggests that when QEMU starts, it doesn't have a valid DTB loaded into register x0, which is supposed to point to the device tree.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce: They create a simple loop binary and run QEMU with `-kernel loop.bin`. Then they start GDB and monitor x0 register. From the GDB session, it looks like x0 isn't pointing to a valid DTB; instead, it has some other values.
+
+So the issue is that QEMU isn't providing a proper DTB when starting with the Raspi4b machine type. This likely affects device initialization because the kernel or boot process expects a valid DTB for hardware configuration.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: The options are mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. 
+
+I think "device" might be relevant because it's about hardware setup (DTB) during the boot process. But another possibility is "boot", since the issue occurs when starting QEMU. However, the problem seems more related to device initialization rather than the boot process itself.
+
+Wait, perhaps "hypervisor" isn't right because this is about the guest OS setup, not the hypervisor's operation. It could be "peripherals" if it's about hardware devices in the VM, but I'm not entirely sure.
+
+Alternatively, since the DTB is part of the initial boot information for the machine, maybe it's a "boot" issue. But given that the DTB is supposed to be provided during the setup, perhaps under the "device" category because it pertains to hardware configuration.
+
+But then again, when you start QEMU, if the machine type (Raspi4b) requires a specific device tree and isn't providing it correctly, that's more of a boot issue. So maybe "boot" is the correct category.
+
+Wait, but in this case, the user didn't specify a DTB explicitly with `-dtb` option, so perhaps QEMU should provide one automatically for Raspi4b. If it doesn't, then it's an issue with how QEMU handles the machine setup during boot.
+
+I'm torn between "boot" and "device". Since the problem is about the absence of a necessary device tree blob at startup, which is part of the initial hardware configuration provided to the guest, I think "device" might be more accurate. Alternatively, it could be "peripherals" if it's about the devices attached.
+
+Hmm. Another angle: The error occurs during the setup, specifically related to the machine type (Raspi4b), which suggests that the issue is with how QEMU initializes the machine, including its hardware description via DTB. Therefore, this seems like a boot-time configuration problem.
+
+But looking back at possible categories, "boot" is one of them, so maybe that's where it fits.
+</think>
+
+The bug report indicates an issue during the boot process where QEMU fails to provide a valid DTB for the Raspi4b machine type. This points to a problem in how QEMU initializes the machine configuration.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2739 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2739
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b2150094
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2739
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user provided a list of possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, it's about emulating GRUB2's initrd16 newc feature for dynamic initrd generation. The goal is to allow testing and debugging setups where GRUB uses `initrd16` with `newc:` to load `wimboot`. This seems related to booting a Windows PE environment from a WIM image.
+
+The key here is that this is about the boot process in QEMU, specifically how it emulates certain features for GRUB. So, the category should relate to the boot functionality within QEMU. The possible categories include 'boot' which directly relates to the system's startup process and boot loaders.
+
+I don't see any mention of translation issues (mistranslation), assembly code lowering (assembly), or network-related problems here. It doesn't seem to be a performance issue either, nor does it relate to files, permissions, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, etc. The main focus is on improving the boot environment simulation.
+
+Therefore, the most appropriate category for this bug report is 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2810 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2810
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1ea32ee2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2810
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is asking about a bug when booting zboot images on RISC-V64 and LoongArch64. First, I need to understand what each category means.
+
+Looking at the categories: 'mistranslation' relates to incorrect mapping from source to target during compilation. 'assembly' is about assembly lowering issues. 'other' is a catch-all. Then there are specific hardware-related categories like device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc.
+
+The bug report mentions booting zboot images on two architectures. Booting typically relates to the initial stages of system startup, which often involves the kernel or hypervisor. Since zboot is used for booting in certain environments, this suggests it's related to how the system starts up.
+
+I recall that KVM is a hypervisor, but if the issue isn't directly about virtualization, maybe it's more about the general boot process. 'Boot' as a category seems appropriate here because it's specifically about the booting mechanism. It might involve issues with the kernel or the way instructions are handled during startup.
+
+I don't think this falls under 'mistranslation' or 'assembly' because those relate to compilation steps, not runtime issues like booting. Also, it's not a hardware peripheral issue unless it's specifically about device drivers, which isn't mentioned here.
+
+So, 'boot' is the most fitting category for this bug report.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2840 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2840
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..21d693eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2840
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have this bug report to classify. The user provided a detailed description of an issue they're having with QEMU after converting a qcow2 image to LUKS format. Let me try to break it down.
+
+First, they created a LUKS image using qemu-img create with some encryption parameters and preallocation set to full. That seems straightforward. Then, when they tried converting the existing Windows 10 qcow2 image into this LUKS format, they used the --target-is-zero parameter, which I think is meant to zero out the target before conversion.
+
+But after doing that, when they tried booting the VM using the converted LUKS file via QEMU, they saw a black screen and couldn't get past the VNC login. That's not good because without this step, it worked fine. So the issue is specifically happening when --target-is-zero is used during conversion.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem occurs during booting after a specific conversion step. The key here is that without --target-is-zero, the system boots fine, but with it, it fails. This suggests an issue related to how the image was converted and how QEMU handles encrypted images, especially concerning LUKS.
+
+When you use --target-is-zero, it might be zeroing out the target image in a way that's causing QEMU or the VM to misbehave during boot. Since the problem occurs at boot time when using VNC, it's likely related to how the encryption is handled or maybe some initialization issue with the disk.
+
+The categories I'm considering are 'boot' and possibly 'encryption' but that's not one of the options. Alternatively, since it's about handling images and conversion, maybe 'files', but the failure point is during boot. However, the issue arises from a specific command-line parameter in qemu-img convert, which relates more to image processing than runtime.
+
+Wait, another angle: when using --target-is-zero, perhaps the LUKS header isn't properly written or the key is not correctly set up for QEMU to decrypt the image at boot. This could be an issue with how the encryption keys are handled during conversion, leading to the VM failing to read the disk upon startup.
+
+So it's a problem that occurs when converting images with certain parameters and then trying to boot them. The bug report mentions that without --target-is-zero, everything works fine. Therefore, it's related to the way QEMU handles image conversion when using encryption (LUKS) and zeroing out the target.
+
+Considering the categories again: 'files' could be relevant because it's about how the image file is being handled. Alternatively, 'encryption' isn't a category here. Maybe 'boot' since that's where the failure occurs, but the root cause is in the conversion step.
+
+Wait, perhaps it's more related to how QEMU initializes the disk at boot time when encryption is involved. So maybe it falls under 'hypervisor' because it's about the VM's boot process with encrypted disks managed by QEMU/KVM.
+
+Alternatively, since the issue arises from a qemu-img command, which deals with image processing rather than runtime behavior, but the effect is during boot, perhaps it's best categorized under 'boot' or 'files'.
+
+But looking at the list again, there isn't an encryption category. The closest might be 'hypervisor', as QEMU acts as a hypervisor when using KVM.
+
+Alternatively, maybe it's related to device handling since it's about storage devices (LUKS is a disk encryption format). So perhaps 'device' would be appropriate because the issue involves how the virtual block device is set up after conversion.
+
+Wait, let me think: The problem occurs during boot time with VNC showing a black screen. That suggests that the VM isn't starting properly, possibly due to issues in initializing hardware devices like storage or the display. But since it's specifically when using --target-is-zero in the conversion, which affects how the LUKS image is prepared.
+
+I think the key here is that the bug is manifesting during boot, but the root cause is in the conversion process. However, the categories provided are about what kind of issue it is. So if I'm forced to choose from the given options, 'boot' seems relevant because the system fails to start up correctly after the conversion.
+
+Alternatively, since the problem occurs when using QEMU's image conversion with certain encryption parameters, perhaps it's a bug in how the image is being processed, which would fall under 'files'. But I'm not sure if that's precise.
+
+Wait, another angle: The user mentions that without --target-is-zero, it works. So maybe --target-is-zero causes some issue in the way QEMU writes or structures the LUKS image, leading to a boot failure. This might be an issue with how the encryption is applied during conversion, making the image incompatible with QEMU's expectations for booting.
+
+Given that, I'm considering whether it's related to hypervisor functions because it's about VM setup and encryption, which could tie into how KVM initializes devices or handles encrypted disks.
+
+But perhaps 'hypervisor' isn't the right category here. It might be more of a 'boot' issue since the failure occurs during the boot process.
+
+Alternatively, looking at the possible categories again, maybe 'device' is better because it's about storage device setup and encryption, which affects how the VM interacts with the virtual disk.
+
+I'm a bit torn between 'boot', 'files', or 'device'. The bug report mentions that without --target-is-zero, the system boots fine. So the issue is specific to using that parameter during conversion, which affects how the LUKS image is structured. This might impact the VM's ability to read the disk at boot time.
+
+Therefore, I think the most fitting category would be 'boot' because it's about the VM failing to start correctly after a particular setup step.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where converting a qcow2 image to LUKS format with --target-is-zero causes the VM to fail booting via VNC. The problem arises during the conversion, affecting how QEMU handles encrypted disks at boot time.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2842 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2842
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c910cc46
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2842
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "RX System emulator boot, kernel images and device tree blob are missing." Let's break it down.
+
+First, RX System likely refers to a specific architecture or system being emulated by QEMU. The issue is about the emulator failing to boot because certain files—kernel images and device tree blobs—are missing. 
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The key here is "emulator boot" which directly relates to the boot process of the virtual machine. The missing kernel images and device tree blob are essential for this boot process. So it's related to the boot category because without these files, the system can't start up properly.
+
+I don't think it falls under 'files' specifically because that category is more about file handling issues rather than absence of necessary files required for operation. 'Kernel' might be a contender since kernel images are missing, but the broader issue is the boot process failing due to these missing components.
+
+So the most accurate category seems to be 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2847 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2847
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..fcad65fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2847
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The user's bug report is "Provide short option for UEFI firmware." So they're asking about a feature related to UEFI. UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) is part of the firmware used during the boot process. In QEMU, this would typically be handled by the firmware-specific components or emulators.
+
+Looking at the categories: 'boot' seems relevant because UEFI relates to the boot process. Other options like 'hypervisor' might not fit since UEFI is more about the firmware than the hypervisor layer. 'Kernel' isn't exactly right either, as this is pre-kernel during boot. So the best category here would be 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2893 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2893
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..072aa207
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2893
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report in QEMU based on the given categories. Let's start by reading through the problem description carefully.
+
+The user is using an M4 Mac Mini and attempting to boot a Windows 11 ARM64 ISO for installation. The issue they're facing is that the ISO fails to boot. They tried accessing the EFI shell, but it just hangs without any error message. When attaching the serial output, they see "convertprogress failed to find range errors."
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce: they downloaded the Windows 11 ARM64 ISO and ran it on their M4 Mac Mini with QEMU.
+
+Now, I need to map this issue to one of the provided categories. The possible options are:
+
+mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is related to booting an ISO in QEMU. The user tried the EFI shell and got no error, but when using serial output, they saw some errors about convertprogress failing to find a range.
+
+Booting issues in QEMU typically fall under the 'boot' category because it's about whether the system can start up correctly from a given media or configuration. The fact that the ISO isn't booting and there are errors during the process points towards a boot-related issue rather than something else like network connectivity, graphics rendering, etc.
+
+I don't see any mention of translation issues, assembly problems, or anything related to kernel modules or hypervisors specifically. It's more about the initial boot process failing, so 'boot' seems the most appropriate category.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2918 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2918
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3cd9970a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2918
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "qemu-system-hppa hangs on 64bit installations (machine -C3700)". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, let's break down the bug report. It mentions that QEMU hangs when running a 64-bit installation on the C3700 machine. The command used is qemu-system-hppa, which suggests it's related to the HPPA architecture emulation.
+
+The issue is about hanging during boot or execution, not necessarily about translation errors or assembly issues. It's more likely a problem with how QEMU handles the specific hardware configuration or the initialization process of the machine. Since it's related to running on 64-bit systems and a particular machine type (-C3700), I'm thinking this might be an issue with the boot process or how QEMU initializes certain components during boot.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems like the most fitting because it's about the system not completing the boot process successfully. The other options like network or kernel are possible but less specific. Boot issues often manifest when the emulator can't properly initialize the target machine's environment.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2930 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2930
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8cbe9ba0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2930
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Versions after QEMU9.0 cannot boot vxworks on sifive_u". Let me think about each possible category.
+
+First, the user is reporting an issue with QEMU versions post 9.0 where they can't boot VxWorks on a Sifive U device. So, the problem relates to booting an operating system on a specific hardware model supported by QEMU.
+
+Looking at the categories: boot seems relevant because it's about failing to start an OS. The other options like 'hypervisor' or 'kernel' might be related but more focused on different aspects. Since VxWorks is an RTOS and Sifive U is likely a board, the issue is directly tied to the boot process not functioning correctly in newer QEMU versions.
+
+I don't think it's a translation issue (mistranslation) because that would relate more to code conversion. It's not about assembly or performance issues either. So 'boot' seems like the most accurate category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is related to an inability to boot VxWorks on the Sifive U device after QEMU 9.0, which directly ties to the booting process.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2940 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2940
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..74d8d296
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2940
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user wrote: "Fix i can't boot nextstep os in qemu m68k using next-cube". Hmm, let me break this down.
+
+First, the issue is about not being able to boot the NextStep OS on QEMU's M68K architecture with the next-cube. The key here is that it's a problem related to starting an operating system within QEMU. 
+
+Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+"Boot" seems directly relevant because the user can't get the OS to start up properly in the emulator. The other options like 'device' or 'network' don't fit as well here since the problem is about the boot process itself rather than specific hardware devices or network issues.
+
+So, I think the correct category for this bug report is "boot".
+</think>
+
+The bug report mentions an issue with not being able to boot NextStep OS in QEMU M68K using next-cube. The main concern here is related to the booting process failing, which directly points to an issue during the system startup phase within QEMU.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2957 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2957
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..25aaa6e1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2957
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem carefully.
+
+The user is encountering an issue when using `qemu-system-riscv32`. The error message says that some ROM regions are overlapping. Specifically, there's a conflict between two regions: one from `fw_jump.elf` and another from `mrom.reset`.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce, they're compiling for RISC-V 32-bit using a Virt board configuration. They've set up the BIOS as `fw_jump.elf`, included a kernel image, and added some devices like virtio-blk-device and virtio-net-device.
+
+The error suggests that two files are being loaded into overlapping memory regions. The user found that changing the BIOS from `.elf` to `.bin` or `.dynamic.bin` fixes the problem. This indicates that using different BIOS types might resolve the overlap, possibly because one is not as large or starts at a different address.
+
+Now, considering the categories: It's related to loading and overlapping regions in memory during boot. The error occurs when setting up the VM with `-bios`, which loads the firmware. So this isn't about user-mode translation errors (mistranslation), nor is it assembly lowering. It's more about how QEMU handles the different components being loaded into memory.
+
+Looking at the list, categories like 'boot' and 'files' seem relevant because it's during boot setup where files are being loaded. But the issue arises from overlapping regions in memory, which might be a configuration or setup problem related to how these images are handled.
+
+I think 'boot' is more specific here because it pertains to the initial stages of the guest OS, involving BIOS and kernel loading. Alternatively, 'files' could relate, but since it's about conflicting loads during boot, 'boot' seems more appropriate.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2987 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2987
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..dcbf0379
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/2987
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The user mentioned that QEMU TCG failed to boot Windows 98 Second Edition. They provided a commit hash and an image as additional information. The main issue is during the boot process, which suggests it's related to how the virtual machine starts up.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: 'boot' seems like the most relevant one here because the problem occurs when trying to start Windows 98. Other categories like 'network', 'device', or 'graphic' don't seem directly applicable since the issue is specifically about booting, not network connectivity or graphical rendering issues.
+
+So, the classification should be 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/366 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/366
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..478c120c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/366
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm looking at this bug report that says "How to make OVMF." The user wants me to classify it into one of several categories provided. First, I need to understand what each category means.
+
+The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. 
+
+I know that OVMF stands for Open Virtual Machine Firmware. It's related to the firmware used by virtual machines, specifically under QEMU. Since the user is asking about how to make OVMF, it's likely they're dealing with setting up or configuring the firmware for their VMs.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'boot' seems relevant because OVMF is involved in the boot process of a virtual machine. The hypervisor category also comes to mind since OVMF runs on top of a hypervisor like QEMU/KVM. However, the main focus here is about making or setting up OVMF, which probably relates more to how it's integrated into the booting process rather than the hypervisor itself.
+
+So, considering all this, 'boot' seems like the most appropriate category for this bug report.
+</think>
+
+The bug report mentions "How to make OVMF," which is related to setting up or configuring OVMF. Since OVMF is part of the firmware used during VM booting under QEMU, the appropriate category is:
+
+**boot**
+
+Answer: boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/367 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/367
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..da9400fb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/367
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "qemu-system-aarch64 crash on qemu 6.0 - Windows 10". The possible categories are a bunch of things like mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, the bug is about QEMU crashing when using qemu-system-aarch64 on version 6.0 under Windows 10. So I'm thinking about what this tool does. QEMU is a versatile emulator and virtualizer, supporting various architectures including AArch64. The "system" part probably refers to emulating a system with specific hardware configurations.
+
+The crash could be due to several reasons. Maybe it's related to the emulation of AArch64 architecture itself, perhaps there's an issue in how QEMU translates instructions or handles certain operations when running under Windows 10.
+
+Looking at the categories: 
+
+- Mistranslation would involve incorrect mapping from source to target instruction sets. That could cause crashes if the translated code doesn't behave as expected.
+- If it's about system-level emulation, maybe there's an issue with how devices are emulated or how the hypervisor interacts with Windows 10.
+
+But considering qemu-system-aarch64 is a specific emulator for AArch64 systems, a crash during its execution might not be related to device drivers or graphics, but more likely to how QEMU handles the architecture translation or system setup.
+
+Since the user mentioned it's under Windows 10, which isn't the target OS typically used with QEMU (since QEMU usually emulates Linux-based targets), there could be issues with booting or initializing the AArch64 environment on Windows. Alternatively, maybe there's a problem with how KVM is being utilized, as KVM is part of QEMU for hardware virtualization.
+
+Wait, but KVM is more about virtual machines, whereas qemu-system-aarch64 might not rely heavily on KVM unless it's in a virtualized setup. So perhaps the crash isn't under KVM but during the normal execution.
+
+Another angle: could this be related to booting? If QEMU crashes when trying to boot an AArch64 system image, that would fall under the "boot" category. Alternatively, if it's a problem with how Windows 10 interacts with QEMU's virtual devices or network setup, maybe "network" or "device".
+
+But I'm not sure about device-related issues because the report is specific to the qemu-system-aarch64 crash without mentioning any particular device.
+
+Alternatively, could this be performance-related? Maybe under certain loads, but the bug report doesn't mention performance metrics.
+
+Another thought: Perhaps it's an issue with how QEMU handles system calls or interacts with the host OS (Windows 10). But that might fall under "hypervisor" if it's related to virtualization issues.
+
+Wait, hypervisor is more about managing VMs. Since this is a system emulator for AArch64, maybe not directly related.
+
+Looking back at the categories: The options are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+If the crash occurs during system initialization or when trying to boot an AArch64 image on Windows 10, it might be a "boot" issue. Alternatively, if the problem is in how QEMU translates the AArch64 instructions, then "mistranslation".
+
+But I'm not sure if this specific crash has been reported before. Without more details, I have to infer.
+
+Alternatively, considering that the user mentioned using Windows 10 as the host OS for an AArch64 emulator, which might be non-standard and could cause issues in how QEMU initializes or handles certain system calls or resources, leading to a crash during boot.
+
+So perhaps it's best categorized under "boot" because the issue occurs when trying to launch the AArch64 system.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes a crash of `qemu-system-aarch64` on Windows 10. Since this tool emulates an AArch64 system, the crash likely occurs during the initialization or boot process of the virtual machine. The most fitting category is "boot" as it pertains to issues arising when launching the target system.
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/389 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/389
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f3eecca9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/389
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Add multiboot2 support". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+First, what is Multiboot 2? I remember it's a specification for booting multiple operating systems from a single firmware environment, like GRUB or UEFI. So, in the context of QEMU, which emulates hardware and allows running different OSes, adding multiboot2 support would relate to how QEMU handles the boot process.
+
+Looking at the categories: boot seems directly related because it's about the booting process. The other options don't fit as well—network is more about connectivity, KVM is virtualization, which might be involved but isn't the main point here. Hypervisor is part of what QEMU does, but again, the focus is on the booting mechanism.
+
+So, the most appropriate category is "boot".
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/393569 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/393569
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9cf92c86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/393569
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report about QEMU. The issue is that QEMU can't load multiple initramfs archives. Let me think about what each category means.
+
+The categories given are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report mentions that according to documentation, initramfs can be populated from multiple cpio archives. But QEMU doesn't support loading multiple into the initrd space. So it's about booting with an initramfs that consists of multiple files or archives.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'boot' seems relevant because it relates to how the system boots and initializes. The problem is during the boot process when trying to load these archives. It's not related to assembly translation (mistranslation), nor is it about network, sockets, etc. It's more specific to the booting mechanism.
+
+So I think the correct category here is 'boot' because it directly affects how QEMU handles the initial ramdisk during the boot process.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is about the inability of QEMU to load multiple initramfs archives, which relates to the boot process. The issue occurs when trying to initialize the system with multiple cpio archives for the initrd space.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/425 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/425
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bb81fc73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/425
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The bug is about QEMU prepending pathnames to command lines of Multiboot kernels and modules, which isn't according to the spec.
+
+First, let me think about what each category means. 
+
+- Mistranslation: This would be if there's an issue in how instructions are translated from one architecture to another.
+- Assembly lowering: That's about converting higher-level IR to assembly code incorrectly.
+- Device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor—these seem like specific areas.
+
+The bug is related to the Multiboot specification. Multiboot is typically used in boot loaders and involves how the kernel is loaded and executed. QEMU's behavior here affects the command line arguments passed during boot.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems relevant because it's about the process of starting the system or kernel. Prepending pathnames incorrectly would happen when setting up the environment for the kernel to run, which is part of the booting process.
+
+I don't think it's related to network, socket, or graphic issues here. It doesn't seem like a performance problem either. Since it's about how command lines are handled during boot, "boot" category fits best.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where QEMU incorrectly modifies the command line arguments for Multiboot kernels and modules by prepending pathnames, which violates the specification. This affects the correctness of the boot process.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/436 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/436
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7152fe54
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/436
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "window 8 stuck during boot on Qemu". Let's see.
+
+The user is using QEMU, which is an emulator and hypervisor. The issue is that Windows 8 gets stuck during the boot process when run under QEMU. 
+
+Looking at the categories provided:
+
+- Mistranslation, assembly, etc., seem more related to lower-level issues in emulation or translation layers.
+- Boot seems directly relevant because it's about the system failing to start up properly.
+
+Since the problem is occurring during the boot of Windows 8 on QEMU, the most appropriate category would be "boot". It's not a performance issue, nor is it about networking or graphics specifically. It's more about the system's initial startup process failing.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where Windows 8 gets stuck during the boot process when using QEMU. Since this is related to the system's inability to complete the boot sequence correctly under the emulator, the category that best fits this issue is **boot**.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/45 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/45
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d6fd1784
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/45
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report where it says "qemu-system-aarch64: no function defined to set boot device list for this architecture." The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I'll break down the bug report. It mentions "qemu-system-aarch64," which is QEMU for the AArch64 architecture. The issue is that there's no function to set the boot device list for this architecture. Boot devices usually refer to the devices from which a system can boot, like hard drives or USB drives.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems relevant because it's directly about setting up the boot process. However, another category could be "device" since it's related to devices used during booting. But "boot" is more specific here—specifically, the problem is that the function to set the boot device list isn't implemented for AArch64.
+
+I think "boot" is the most appropriate category because the bug is about the inability to configure the boot device list in QEMU's AArch64 system. It's not a translation issue or related to performance; it's more about the lack of functionality in setting up boot devices.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/452 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/452
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a0a940e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/452
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to classify this bug report into the correct category. The issue is about QEMU not loading a BIOS binary when using the "akita" target. So, the user provided steps where they run QEMU with the "-bios c750.rom" argument, but the address 0x0000 ends up being zeros instead of containing the BIOS.
+
+First, I need to understand what's happening here. The BIOS is supposed to be loaded into memory at a specific location when starting an emulated machine. In this case, it's not loading, causing the system to behave incorrectly.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: 
+
+- **mistranslation**: This relates to incorrect mapping from source architecture to target during compilation or execution. It might cause issues in user-mode but doesn't directly relate to BIOS loading.
+- **assembly**: Lowering assembly code could be a part of the issue, but again, it's more about how code is generated rather than binary loading.
+- **device**: This relates to hardware devices and their emulation. Maybe if the device initialization isn't handling the BIOS correctly.
+- **graphic**, **socket**, **network**, **KVM**, **boot**, etc., each have specific scopes.
+
+The problem seems to be with the boot process because the BIOS is not being loaded, which affects how the system boots up. The expected behavior is that the BIOS is at 0x0000, but it's zeroed out. This directly impacts the booting phase of QEMU.
+
+Other categories like **kernel**, **hypervisor**, or **peripherals** might be involved in device initialization or memory management, but the core issue here is about the BIOS not being loaded during boot, so **boot** seems most fitting.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where the BIOS binary isn't loaded into memory when using the "akita" target. This directly impacts the boot process since the BIOS is essential for starting the system. Therefore, the correct category is:
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/475 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/475
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1258c01e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/475
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm looking at this bug report: "4.2 regression: ReactOS crashes on boot." The user wants me to classify it into one of several categories related to QEMU.
+
+First, I'll break down the components of the bug report. The version mentioned is 4.2, which indicates a regression—meaning this issue didn't exist in previous versions and has been introduced recently. ReactOS is an operating system that aims to be compatible with Windows NT, so it's likely being used as a guest OS within QEMU.
+
+The key part here is "crashes on boot." This suggests that when ReactOS starts up (the boot process), the system becomes unstable or crashes. Since this happens during the boot phase, I'm thinking about what parts of QEMU are involved in emulating hardware for an OS to start.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. "Boot" directly relates to the process of starting up a guest operating system. Other possibilities like "device" or "kernel" might be related, but they are more general. The specific mention of crashing during the boot phase points directly to issues in the boot category.
+
+I don't see any indication that this is related to translation errors (mistranslation), assembly lowering (assembly), or other less relevant categories like graphics or network since the issue isn't about visual performance or connectivity. It's purely about the system failing to start up properly, which points to a problem during the boot process.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/499 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/499
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..85d340b6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/499
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "booting a Linux guest with qemu-system-sparc with icount enabled hangs". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, let's understand the bug. The user is using QEMU to run a Linux guest on SPARC architecture and has enabled icount, which I think stands for instruction counting. When they do this, the system hangs during booting.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- Mistranslation relates to incorrect semantic mapping from source to target, possibly in user-mode assembly. This could cause issues during execution but might not necessarily hang on boot.
+- Assembly lowering is about converting high-level IR to machine code; maybe if there's a bug here, it could cause hangs, but the context is more specific.
+- The 'boot' category seems relevant because the issue happens during the boot process of the guest OS. It's directly related to starting up the system with certain parameters (icount enabled).
+- Other categories like device, network, etc., don't seem as fitting here since the problem occurs at boot time without specific mention of hardware or networking issues.
+
+The icount option in QEMU is used for debugging and might interact with the boot process. If enabling it causes a hang, it's likely an issue during the initial stages of the guest OS starting up, which points towards a 'boot' category bug.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/512 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/512
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..13cfa90e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/512
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a list of possible categories and the bug report itself.
+
+The bug is about QEMU freezing when using UEFI firmware without acceleration in version 6.1.0-rc1 but not in rc0. So, it's a regression introduced between these versions.
+
+Looking at the categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+UEFI is related to firmware and booting. Since QEMU is used for virtualization, UEFI in this context might be part of the hypervisor's handling of the guest OS during boot. Alternatively, it could relate to device emulation or hardware acceleration.
+
+The issue occurs without acceleration, so maybe it's a problem with how certain devices are emulated when not using acceleration. But since UEFI is involved, which is more about the firmware and boot process, I'm leaning towards 'boot' as the category. It affects the ability to successfully boot the guest OS, leading to freezing.
+
+Alternatively, considering that QEMU uses KVM for virtualization, but the issue here isn't directly about acceleration (since it's without), so maybe not KVM. The problem is more about the boot process failing with UEFI, which points to 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves QEMU freezing when using UEFI firmware without acceleration. This relates to issues during the boot process of a virtual machine, making the appropriate category:
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/55 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/55
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bf367ee0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/55
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "Can't install Windows 7 with q35 (SATA)". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I'll break down the issue. The user is trying to install Windows 7 using QEMU with a q35 machine type and an SATA controller. The problem is that the installation isn't working.
+
+QEMU uses different machine types like q35, which is designed for newer systems and includes features like PCIe. The SATA controller might be involved here, as it's related to how storage devices are connected.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems relevant because the issue occurs during the installation process, which is part of the booting phase. Alternatively, it could be a hardware configuration problem, so maybe "peripherals" or "device".
+
+But since it's about installing an OS using QEMU, and the machine type (q35) and SATA are involved in how the system initializes and recognizes hardware during boot, "boot" seems like the most fitting category. It's about the initial setup and hardware detection during the boot process.
+
+So I'll go with "boot".
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/551545 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/551545
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e59f1eed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/551545
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let's read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The user is trying to boot a guest using PXE netboot and virtio-disk. They're starting the guest with various parameters including -net nic,model=virtio and -drive with boot=on. The issue is that when they try to boot, it doesn't proceed as expected; instead, it loops back to the boot menu after some time.
+
+Looking at the symptoms: the PXE menu appears correctly, but upon choosing 'local' or waiting for timeout, the guest fails to boot and reloads the menu. This suggests an issue with the boot process from the virtio-disk.
+
+The categories provided include things like network, KVM, hypervisor, etc. Since the problem is related to PXE and booting, I'm thinking it might be a network-related issue. However, since the boot option is set in the drive (boot=on), maybe it's about how the disk is being handled.
+
+Wait, but PXE is involved here as well. The setup uses both PXE for netboot and a virtio-disk as the local boot device. So perhaps there's an interaction between network booting and local disk handling.
+
+Another angle: the -net vde parameter indicates they're using VDE for networking, which is a switch. But maybe there's a problem with how VirtIO devices are handled during the boot process.
+
+The fact that it loops suggests that the system isn't finding the kernel or rootfs properly on the virtio-disk. Maybe QEMU isn't correctly setting up the VirtIO block device so that the guest can access it for booting.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'network' could be a possible fit if it's related to PXE handling. But since the issue is more about localboot not working as expected with the virtio-disk, perhaps it's under 'hypervisor' or 'KVM'.
+
+Wait, KVM is part of QEMU, but maybe this isn't specific enough. Alternatively, 'peripherals' could be relevant because VirtIO devices are a type of peripheral in the VM.
+
+But looking back at the options, there's also 'boot'. The problem directly relates to the boot process not functioning correctly, so that might be the most accurate category.
+
+So, considering all this, the bug report is about the guest not booting from the virtio-disk as intended. It's related to how QEMU handles the boot order or device setup during the boot process. Therefore, 'boot' seems like the appropriate category.
+</think>
+
+The issue revolves around the guest VM failing to boot from the specified VirtIO disk, indicating a problem with the boot process configuration in QEMU.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/586175 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/586175
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e6c82357
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/586175
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The user mentioned that Windows XP/2003 isn't booting with their QEMU setup. They tried using the install CD first, and it boots automatically after a countdown, which they find odd. 
+
+They're using libvirt but also tested without it via the command line: qemu-kvm -drive ... etc., but still no luck. The system hangs at "Booting from Hard Disk...". Their setup includes SeaBIOS 0.5.1 on Gentoo with AMD64, and they mention VNC as the primary graphics output.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: graphic is one of them. Since the issue is related to booting and display, and considering that the user mentioned using VNC but it's not working correctly, this might fall under the 'graphic' category. Alternatively, it could be a device or kernel issue, but since the primary problem seems to occur during the boot process with the graphics output, I think 'graphic' is the most fitting.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/588735 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/588735
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d2bb3153
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/588735
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is reporting an issue where the "Quit" command isn't working in QEMU. They provided some strace output and mentioned that removing the "-m 4096" option fixes the problem.
+
+First, I'll look at what each part of the bug report tells me. The user starts QEMU with several arguments, including networking options, chardev for serial and monitor, disk images, and hardware configurations. They also mention using KVM by specifying x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64.
+
+The problem occurs when the "Quit" command doesn't work. Strace shows some signals being handled, like SIGPROF and SIGCHLD, but nothing immediately obvious about why the quit isn't working.
+
+When they remove "-m 4096", which sets the machine's RAM size to 4GB, the issue goes away. This suggests that the bug is related to how QEMU handles memory configuration or maybe how certain options interact when setting up the virtual machine.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+The quit command is likely handled through some form of input/output or signal handling. Since removing "-m 4096" fixes it, maybe the memory configuration affects how QEMU initializes certain components. Perhaps without the RAM setting, QEMU starts correctly and handles signals properly, allowing the quit to work.
+
+I don't think it's a mistranslation because that usually relates to incorrect mapping between source and target architectures. It doesn't seem like an assembly lowering issue either. The problem isn't directly about networking or sockets, but maybe about how options are parsed during boot.
+
+Wait, considering that when "-m 4096" is removed, it works, perhaps the bug lies in how QEMU handles the combination of certain command-line arguments. Maybe with "-M pc -m 4096", there's an issue in initializing the machine or handling signals properly, which affects the quit functionality.
+
+But looking at the categories, none directly mention command-line argument parsing. The closest might be "boot" since it relates to starting QEMU correctly. Alternatively, it could be a performance issue if the memory allocation causes some resource problem that prevents the quit command from working.
+
+Alternatively, perhaps the issue is with how signals are handled when memory is set, leading to the quit not being processed correctly. Since SIGPROF and SIGCHLD are involved, maybe it's related to the way QEMU handles profiling or child processes when a certain amount of RAM is allocated.
+
+Considering all this, I think the most fitting category would be "boot" because the issue arises during the initialization of QEMU with specific arguments, particularly involving memory configuration. The problem occurs at startup, and changing the "-m 4096" option affects whether the bug appears.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves the "Quit" command not functioning in QEMU when certain options are used, specifically the "-m 4096" argument. Since the issue is related to how QEMU initializes with specific configurations and removing that argument fixes it, the problem likely stems from the boot process or initialization of the virtual machine. Therefore, the category is **boot**.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/588748 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/588748
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..99bcc4bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/588748
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU failing to boot DR DOS Plus after a certain commit. The user provided possible categories like 'mistranslation', 'assembly', and others including 'boot'. 
+
+First, the issue is that QEMU can't boot an operating system called DR DOS Plus since version 0.6.1. They mentioned that a specific commit (r1049) caused this problem, which fixed a serial interrupt issue but broke the boot process for this particular DOS.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'boot' seems directly relevant here because the problem is about QEMU failing to successfully boot an OS. Other categories like 'kernel' or 'hypervisor' might be related, but the primary issue is with the booting process itself. The commit in question fixed a serial interrupt, which could be hardware emulation, but since it's causing a boot failure, it falls under boot-related issues.
+
+I don't think this is about translation errors (mistranslation) or assembly lowering because those would affect code execution after booting, not the boot process itself. Similarly, other categories like 'network' or 'graphic' don't seem to apply here unless the bug specifically affected graphics or network drivers during boot, which isn't mentioned.
+
+So, the most appropriate category is 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+The issue relates to QEMU's ability to boot an operating system, specifically DR DOS Plus. The problem arises due to a commit that introduced a bug preventing successful booting. 
+
+**Step-by-step explanation:**
+1. **Identify the Problem:** The user reports that QEMU fails to boot DR DOS Plus after version 0.6.1.
+2. **Determine Relevant Categories:** Among the given options, 'boot' directly relates to the inability to start an operating system in QEMU.
+3. **Consider Other Possibilities:** While other categories like 'kernel' or 'hypervisor' are related, they don't precisely address the booting issue here.
+4. **Conclusion:** The primary category that fits is 'boot', as it pertains to the failure of the initial startup process.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/598 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/598
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cd347f67
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/598
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "QEMU boot kernel for ppc e300c3 problem". The categories given are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, the bug is about QEMU having a problem with booting the kernel for ppc e300c3. The key part here is "boot". Since it's related to the boot process in QEMU, which is the initialization phase when starting an emulated machine, the most appropriate category seems to be 'boot'. 
+
+I don't think it falls under hypervisor or kernel because the issue is about the booting mechanism within QEMU itself, not necessarily the underlying OS kernel. It's specifically during the boot phase of the virtual machine.
+
+So, the correct category should be 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report mentions a problem with QEMU's ability to boot a kernel for the ppc e300c3 architecture. The key here is that it relates directly to the boot process within QEMU. Therefore, the appropriate category is:
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/599 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/599
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..723b2e3f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/599
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's tackle this classification problem step by step. The user has provided a bug report related to QEMU and is asking me to categorize it into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, or other.
+
+First, I'll read through the bug report carefully. The issue is that starting with QEMU 6.1.0, Windows no longer boots when using the Q35 machine type. Users are encountering a BSOD (Blue Screen of Death) with error code 0x0000007B, which typically indicates an INACCESSIBLE_BOOT_DEVICE. This problem occurs both during boot and when trying to install Windows from an ISO.
+
+The report mentions that this issue started in QEMU 6.1.0 and was not present in version 6.0.0. It also affects different versions of Windows, including 7, 10, and XP. The user provided a screenshot link, but since I can't view images, I'll focus on the text description.
+
+Now, considering the categories:
+
+- **Mistranslation**: This relates to incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target in user-mode. Since this is about booting an OS, it might not be directly related unless there's a translation issue during setup.
+  
+- **Assembly**: This would involve issues during assembly lowering, which doesn't seem relevant here as the problem occurs at the higher level of OS booting.
+
+- **Device/Peripherals**: These categories relate to hardware devices or peripherals. The BSOD error 0x7B is often related to hardware or driver issues, so this could be a possibility. However, since it's within QEMU, which emulates hardware, perhaps it's more about the virtual device setup.
+
+- **Network/Graphic/Socket**: These don't seem directly relevant unless the issue is with network drivers or graphical interfaces, but the problem occurs during boot, which is earlier in the process.
+
+- **KVM/Hypervisor**: KVM is part of QEMU, and hypervisor issues could relate to VM management. However, the BSOD suggests a hardware-level issue rather than hypervisor-specific problems.
+
+- **Boot/Kernel**: These are directly related to the booting process and kernel initialization. The error 0x7B points towards a boot device problem, which is crucial during the initial stages of OS startup. Therefore, this seems like the most fitting category.
+
+Considering all this, the bug report pertains to issues occurring during the boot process, making the "boot" category the appropriate classification.
+</think>
+
+The issue described involves problems during the boot process of Windows on QEMU, leading to a BSOD with error 0x7B. This is indicative of a boot device problem and relates directly to the booting mechanism in QEMU.
+
+**Category: boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/622367 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/622367
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..583fb9ef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/622367
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let me try to figure out the category for this bug report. The user is reporting an issue with QEMU where when using smp=92 or more, there's no BIOS MPFP structure present in the 1 Mb area. They mentioned that in older versions of QEMU (0.10.5), it worked up to smp=128 and even 255 without hanging.
+
+So, first, I need to understand what an MPFP structure is. From what I recall, MP stands for Multiple Processors, and FP might be Floating Point or something related. The MP structure in BIOS is used to describe the system's processor topology, which is important for proper functioning of multiprocessing systems. If this structure isn't present when smp is set high like 92 or more, it could cause issues with how QEMU emulates multiple CPUs.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. 
+
+The issue seems related to how the BIOS or firmware is handling SMP (Symmetric Multi-Processing) configurations in QEMU. The problem arises when a high number of CPUs are configured. This might be a bug in the way SeaBIOS (the BIOS used by QEMU) constructs the MP tables. Since it's about the BIOS not generating the necessary structure, it's likely related to the firmware or how it interacts with the virtual hardware.
+
+The categories that come to mind are 'boot' because it's related to system startup and configuration during boot, especially concerning SMP support. Alternatively, it might be under 'device' if it's a problem with how devices (like CPUs) are being emulated or reported. But since it's about BIOS structures specifically for multiprocessing, 'boot' seems more appropriate.
+
+I don't think it's related to network, socket, or graphic issues because the report doesn't mention those areas. It's also not a performance issue since the problem is the absence of structure rather than speed. Permissions and files are less likely too. The hypervisor angle is possible since QEMU acts as one, but I'm leaning towards 'boot' because it's about the initial setup and BIOS behavior.
+
+So, putting it all together, this bug report is most likely related to the boot process, specifically how the BIOS handles SMP configurations.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/623852 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/623852
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e370a267
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/623852
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The issue is about PPC emulation looping when booting a FreeBSD kernel under QEMU.
+
+First, let's read through the details provided. The user is using QEMU on a Linux x86_64 host with a PPC guest. They can successfully run Linux/PPC and FreeBSD8.1-i386 but encounter problems with FreeBSD8.1-ppc. The kernel starts okay but loops after "Kernel entry at 0x100100...".
+
+The command they're using is standard for booting an ISO image, specifying the CD-ROM and hard drive. They obtained the kernel from a known FTP source.
+
+Now, looking at the categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem occurs during booting, specifically when the FreeBSD kernel is loaded. This suggests it's related to how QEMU handles the boot process for PPC guests. Since the user is using the latest QEMU from GIT as of a specific date, it might be an issue with the emulation or the way the kernel is handled.
+
+Possible categories could be 'boot' since it's about the booting process, or perhaps 'kernel' if it's related to how the guest OS kernel interacts with QEMU. However, the user mentions that the problem occurs after the kernel entry message, which indicates an issue during the initial stages of execution rather than a broader kernel interaction.
+
+Alternatively, considering that PPC emulation is involved and it's looping, this might be more about device emulation or perhaps hypervisor issues, but 'boot' seems more directly related to the process described.
+
+So, I think the best category here is 'boot' because the failure occurs during the boot sequence of the guest OS.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where the PPC emulation in QEMU causes a loop when attempting to boot a FreeBSD kernel. The user successfully runs other operating systems but encounters problems specifically with FreeBSD8.1-ppc. 
+
+The key point is that the problem occurs after the kernel entry message, which suggests it's happening during the initial stages of the guest OS's execution. This points towards an issue in how QEMU handles the boot process for PPC guests.
+
+Given the categories provided, 'boot' is the most appropriate classification because the failure is occurring during the booting sequence rather than other aspects like device handling or kernel interaction beyond initialization.
+
+**Answer:**
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/627 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/627
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9c2bd6f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/627
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the information carefully.
+
+The user mentioned that VI.EXE crashes on start under QEMU but works fine in BOCHS. The description says it hangs immediately upon startup. They provided steps to reproduce and attached the vi.exe file, noting it's an old program.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+I need to figure out which category best fits this issue. Since VI.EXE is crashing under QEMU but works in BOCHS, it's likely related to how QEMU emulates the environment compared to BOCHS. BOCHS and QEMU are both emulators, but they might handle certain aspects differently.
+
+VI.EXE is an old program, so perhaps there's a difference in how QEMU handles some DOS or legacy software compared to BOCHS. The crash happens immediately when starting VI.EXE, which suggests it might be related to the boot process or how certain system calls are emulated under QEMU.
+
+Considering the categories, 'boot' seems relevant because if the program isn't running correctly after startup, it could be an issue with the emulation during the boot phase. Alternatively, 'mistranslation' could be a possibility if there's incorrect mapping of source architecture to target IR, but without more specific details on that, I'm not sure.
+
+Other possibilities like 'network' or 'socket' don't seem directly related since VI.EXE is a text editor and doesn't require network sockets. Similarly, graphics issues would relate to display problems, which aren't mentioned here.
+
+So, the most likely category is 'boot' because it's about the program not starting correctly under QEMU, indicating an issue with how the system initializes or handles certain instructions during the boot process.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes VI.EXE crashing on startup in QEMU but working in BOCHS. Since VI.EXE hangs immediately upon startup, this suggests an issue during the program's initialization phase. Given that the crash occurs at startup, it is likely related to how the system emulates certain hardware or processes during the boot sequence. Among the provided categories, 'boot' best fits because the problem arises when the program starts running, which relates to the boot process in the emulator.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/627982 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/627982
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a205e328
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/627982
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report based on the given categories. Let's break it down.
+
+The user mentioned that when they run a specific Linux kernel (2.6.35) with QEMU using the command "-no-acpi", the system hangs during boot. The only output is "Booting the kernel". 
+
+First, I need to understand what each category means:
+
+- **mistranslation**: Issues where source code isn't correctly translated into IR or target code in user-mode.
+- **assembly**: Problems during assembly lowering.
+- **other**: Any bug that doesn't fit other categories.
+- **device**, **graphic**, **socket**, etc.: Specific areas like devices, graphics drivers, network issues, KVM (kernel-based virtual machine), boot processes, VNC, debug options, files/permissions, performance, kernel-related issues, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem here is that the system hangs at boot when using "-no-acpi". The key part is the hang during boot. Booting the kernel without ACPI might be causing an issue with how QEMU initializes or handles certain hardware emulations without ACPI support.
+
+ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) is crucial for modern OS boots, especially in virtualized environments. If the host doesn't properly emulate ACPI when it's disabled, the guest OS might not handle the boot correctly, leading to a hang.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems directly related since the issue occurs during the kernel's boot process. The fact that "-no-acpi" is involved suggests it's an initialization problem specific to how QEMU handles booting without ACPI support. This likely falls under the "boot" category because it's about the system not starting up correctly when a certain flag is used.
+
+I don't think it's related to mistranslation or assembly since those are more about code conversion and lower-level compilation steps, which don't seem relevant here. It's also not network-related unless ACPI somehow affects network drivers, but that seems less likely. The issue is more about the boot process itself failing when a specific option is used.
+
+So, the most appropriate category for this bug report would be "boot" because it's specifically about the system hanging during the kernel's initialization phase when ACPI is disabled.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/639651 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/639651
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0cb14b23
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/639651
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user mentioned booting Windows XP with a Synaptics driver installed and getting a BSOD with "DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL." They tried using KVM and encountered the issue after adding mass storage drivers via sysprep. It works on hardware and in VirtualBox, which suggests it's not a problem with other hypervisors.
+
+The possible categories include boot, device, driver issues might fall under device or maybe something else. The error message is related to driver IRQL, which points to a problem with how the driver interacts with the system during boot. Since this occurs when using KVM, and it's an issue after updating drivers via sysprep, I think it relates to hardware devices not being handled correctly in the virtual environment.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems relevant because it happens during the boot process. But since it's a driver issue, maybe "device" is more appropriate. The user mentioned that the same image works on hardware and VirtualBox, implying that KVM has some specific problem with how it emulates devices or handles drivers.
+
+Another angle: the error could be due to QEMU's PIIX3 controller not handling something correctly when the driver is loaded. So maybe it's a device issue related to the emulation in QEMU. Alternatively, since the user reconfigured mass storage drivers, perhaps it's an issue with how KVM initializes devices during boot.
+
+Considering all this, I'm leaning towards "boot" because the problem occurs at boot time, but also possibly "device" if it's a hardware driver interaction. However, the error message points more to a driver issue during the boot process, which is part of the system initializing hardware components.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a BSOD related to a driver issue during boot in KVM. The problem occurs after adding mass storage drivers and is specific to QEMU's PIIX3 controller. Since it relates to how the virtual machine initializes hardware devices during boot, the appropriate category is:
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/651 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/651
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1e3eb8e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/651
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a list of possible categories and wants only the name of the category as the response.
+
+The bug report is: "powerpc: Starting machine ref405ep fails with 'Could not load PowerPC BIOS 'ppc405_rom.bin'". 
+
+First, I need to understand what this error means. It's related to QEMU, specifically when starting a PowerPC machine called ref405ep. The issue is that it can't load the BIOS file 'ppc405_rom.bin'. 
+
+Looking at the possible categories: there are options like device, graphic, network, KVM, boot, etc. Since this error is about loading a BIOS file which is essential for the machine's boot process, it seems related to the boot category.
+
+Other possibilities might be device or files, but 'files' usually relates to filesystem issues rather than missing required binaries. 'Boot' directly deals with the initial startup process, including loading necessary firmware like BIOS.
+
+So, the most appropriate category here is 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/665 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/665
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7840fa99
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/665
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out the category for this bug report. The user is having trouble booting from an emulated NVMe disk with SeaBIOS in QEMU versions 6.0.0 and 6.1.0. They mention that it worked fine in version 5.1.0, which suggests a regression introduced after that.
+
+The problem occurs when using SeaBIOS; the NVMe entry doesn't show up in the boot menu. However, when using OVMF (which is UEFI-based), booting from NVMe works correctly across all versions tested. This indicates that the issue might be specific to how SeaBIOS interacts with the NVMe emulation in newer QEMU versions.
+
+The user provided a bisected commit that seems to be the first bad one: 7f0f1acedf159d00684d495d7a14d52220c1d16b. Looking at the commit message, it introduces support for multiple namespaces in NVMe by adding a new 'nvme-ns' device model. The commit changes how NVMe devices are created and connects them through a bus named from the device ID.
+
+In the steps to reproduce, the user tried using both '-device nvme' and '-device nvme-ns', but neither worked with SeaBIOS. Since OVMF works, it's likely that the issue is in how SeaBIOS detects or handles NVMe devices after this change. 
+
+Considering the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is related to booting from an emulated NVMe disk and affects SeaBIOS but not OVMF. Since the issue arises after a change in how NVMe devices are modeled (introducing 'nvme-ns'), it's likely that the device setup or detection has changed, affecting the BIOS's ability to recognize the NVMe drive.
+
+The categories I'm considering are 'device' and 'boot'. The problem is about booting, but since it's related to how the device (NVMe) is emulated and detected by SeaBIOS, which might be a firmware or device handling issue. 
+
+Alternatively, it could fall under 'peripherals' because NVMe is a type of storage peripheral. However, since the primary issue is during the boot process, 'boot' seems more directly related. But the root cause lies in how the device is emulated, so maybe 'device' is the better category.
+
+But wait, looking back at the categories, 'device' might be too broad. The bug report mentions that it's specific to SeaBIOS and affects booting from NVMe. Since SeaBIOS is a firmware that handles device enumeration during boot, the issue could be in how QEMU presents the NVMe devices to SeaBIOS.
+
+The commit modifies how NVMe devices are created and connected via a bus. Perhaps SeaBIOS doesn't correctly enumerate the new 'nvme-ns' devices or their buses, leading to the missing entry in the boot menu.
+
+Therefore, this issue is related to device handling during the boot process, specifically with how QEMU's emulation of NVMe devices interacts with SeaBIOS. So the most appropriate category would be 'boot', as it directly affects the booting process from a device.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where SeaBIOS fails to detect and boot from an emulated NVMe disk in newer versions of QEMU, specifically after a commit that introduced support for multiple namespaces via the 'nvme-ns' device. The problem is related to how the NVMe devices are modeled and connected, affecting their detection by SeaBIOS during the boot process.
+
+Considering the categories provided, this issue primarily affects the booting mechanism when using SeaBIOS with an NVMe disk. Therefore, it falls under the 'boot' category as the root cause lies in how QEMU presents the device to the firmware (SeaBIOS) during the initial stages of the boot process.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/670 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/670
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f512d71e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/670
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report related to QEMU. Let's see what information I have.
+
+The user mentioned that when they run QEMU x86_64 on Microsoft Windows and try to boot a Debian Live 11.1 ISO file, the program hangs. The issue occurs specifically in the Windows version of QEMU because older versions (5.1.0 and below) work fine on Windows but newer ones (like 5.2.0 and 6.0.0) don't. They also tested it on Linux with a newer version (6.1.0), where it worked without issues, so the problem seems isolated to the Windows build.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+The bug occurs during the boot process of a Linux ISO using QEMU on Windows. Since it's about booting an OS within QEMU, which emulates hardware, I'm thinking this might be related to how QEMU initializes or handles certain devices under Windows.
+
+Possible reasons could include issues with device emulation in the Windows environment, perhaps specific to how QEMU interacts with graphics drivers, network interfaces, or other peripherals. The user didn't mention any network configuration, but since they're using a Live ISO, maybe it's related to how input/output is handled during boot.
+
+The problem doesn't seem to be about translation (mistranslation) because that would typically affect the code conversion between architectures, which isn't mentioned here. It's not an assembly issue either. The boot process involves several components, so I'm leaning towards 'device' as the category since it's about hardware emulation failing during boot.
+
+Another thought: could it be a graphics-related issue? Since the display stops after the initial screen, maybe QEMU isn't correctly handling the video output on Windows for that specific ISO. But the user didn't specify any issues with other distributions, so it's more likely tied to the version of QEMU and the host OS.
+
+Alternatively, 'hypervisor' could be a category, but I think hypervisor bugs would affect virtualization in general, not just booting an ISO. Since the problem is specific to Windows builds of QEMU, maybe it's related to how certain device drivers or subsystems are handled under Windows versus Linux.
+
+Wait, but considering that older versions worked on Windows, and newer ones don't, it might be a regression introduced in the code when they updated something related to hardware emulation. That points more towards a 'device' issue because devices would include things like the virtual hard drive, CD-ROM (for the ISO), or other emulated hardware.
+
+So, putting it all together, I think the best category is 'boot', as it's directly related to the boot process failing within QEMU on Windows. The hang occurs during the boot sequence of the Debian Live image, which suggests an issue in how QEMU initializes or interacts with the virtual devices necessary for the boot process.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where QEMU hangs when attempting to boot a Debian Live ISO under Microsoft Windows. The problem is specific to newer versions of QEMU on Windows and does not occur when using older versions or running the same setup on Linux. 
+
+Given that the issue occurs during the boot process, it likely relates to how QEMU initializes or handles certain hardware emulations. Since the problem is isolated to Windows, it's possible that there's a regression in the device emulation code affecting the boot process.
+
+The most appropriate category for this bug is 'boot' as the issue directly impacts the ability of the virtual machine to successfully start and proceed past the initial stages of the Debian Live ISO installation.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/673 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/673
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..461a4f36
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/673
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report in QEMU. The user mentioned that they can no longer boot using the -kernel and -initrd options because the kernel is refusing to mount the initramfs and causing a panic. They didn't have this issue until after an update.
+
+First, let me recall the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem seems to be related to booting. The user is using -kernel and -initrd options, which are directly related to the boot process in QEMU. They're encountering a panic during boot because the initramfs isn't being mounted properly. Since this started after an update, it might be a regression or a change in how QEMU handles these parameters.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems the most fitting. The issue is occurring during the boot phase when trying to load the kernel and initial ramdisk. Other possibilities like "kernel" could also be considered because the problem involves the kernel refusing to mount something, but since it's about the boot process itself—how QEMU handles starting up—the primary category would likely be "boot."
+
+I don't think it's related to graphics or sockets because there's no mention of graphical issues or networking problems. It's specifically about the initramfs and kernel panic during boot. So I'm pretty confident the correct classification is "boot."
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/679 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/679
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0f269fd7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/679
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided that it's part of QEMU, and they've given several categories to choose from. The bug report says, "powerpc/e500: QEMU freeze without any output when kernel size is a bit big."
+
+First, I need to understand what each category means. Looking at the list:
+
+- **mistranslation**: This would be issues with how source architecture code is translated into IR or target code in user-mode.
+- **assembly**: Problems during assembly lowering.
+- **other**: Any bugs that don't fit other categories.
+- **device**, **graphic**, **socket**, **network**, etc., are all specific areas like hardware devices, graphics handling, sockets for networking, and so on.
+
+The bug report mentions QEMU freezing when the kernel size is a bit big. So, it's about QEMU's behavior under certain conditions. Since it's related to the powerpc/e500 architecture, which is a CPU type, but more specifically, I'm thinking about how QEMU handles larger kernels.
+
+Freezing suggests that QEMU isn't handling something correctly when the kernel size increases beyond a certain point. It could be a performance issue where QEMU can't process the larger kernel quickly enough, leading to a hang without output. Alternatively, it might be a problem in how the kernel is loaded or processed during boot.
+
+Looking at the categories again, "performance" seems like a possible fit because if the kernel size is too big, maybe QEMU's processing of that kernel causes it to slow down or stall, hence freezing. However, another category could be "boot" since it relates to the kernel being loaded during the boot process. But I need to choose one.
+
+Wait, but "performance" is more about the speed or resource usage, whereas "boot" is specifically about the startup process. The bug occurs when the kernel size is a bit big, which might cause QEMU to use too much memory or take longer than expected, leading to a freeze. Alternatively, it could be an issue in how the kernel is being loaded into memory during boot.
+
+But since freezing without output sounds like a critical issue that's preventing further execution, it's more about the boot process failing rather than general performance issues elsewhere. So maybe "boot" is more accurate.
+
+However, sometimes freezes can also relate to the hypervisor or KVM's handling of larger kernels. But in this case, since it's specifically mentioned under the powerpc/e500 section and not within a specific feature like network or device, I think either "performance" or "boot" could fit.
+
+But looking back at the categories, "boot" is an explicit category, so if the issue occurs during boot when starting up QEMU with a large kernel, that would make sense. So maybe "boot" is the right category here.
+
+Wait, but another angle: if the kernel is too big, perhaps it's causing some memory issues or not fitting into certain areas of the emulated hardware, leading to a hang. That might still fall under boot because the machine isn't starting up properly.
+
+Alternatively, could it be related to how QEMU handles device initialization when the kernel is large? Maybe, but I'm not sure. Given that, I think "boot" is more directly relevant here.
+</think>
+
+The bug report mentions a freeze during QEMU's operation when the kernel size is large. This likely relates to issues during the boot process as the kernel is being loaded or executed. Therefore, the most fitting category is **boot**.
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/697 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/697
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8e49c9e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/697
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "linux-user create default CPU type before parsing the ELF header for specific CPU type." The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about the order in which the default CPU type is created relative to parsing the ELF header. This sounds like a problem with how the program initializes components before it has all necessary information. Since the bug relates to the sequence of operations during startup or configuration, it's not related directly to translation, assembly, devices, graphics, etc.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'boot' seems relevant because it's about the initialization process when starting up the system or a component like the CPU. The default CPU type being set before parsing might affect boot-related functions or configurations.
+
+I don't think it fits into other categories like KVM (which is more about virtualization) or hypervisor (same area but perhaps not directly). 'Kernel' could be related, but this seems more about the boot process rather than kernel operations themselves. Therefore, 'boot' is the most appropriate category here.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses an issue where the default CPU type is created before parsing the ELF header for a specific CPU type. This suggests that there's a problem with the initialization order of components during runtime. Since the issue relates to how the system initializes and configures components at startup, it falls under the category related to the boot process.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/723460 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/723460
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4ead8d8d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/723460
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user is having trouble booting Windows XP via QEMU on Linux. They mentioned they can only boot from USB and that their system has a dual-boot setup with several virtual drives in Windows. They created a 30GB image and ran the following command:
+
+sudo qemu-system-x86_64 -localtime -usbdevice -hda /dev/sdb -m 384 -boot d winxp.img
+
+The error they received was:
+
+"qemu-system-x86_64: -boot d: drive with bus=0, unit=0 (index=0) exists"
+
+They also set up the USB stick in fstab with a specific UUID command.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue seems to be related to booting from USB in QEMU. The error message mentions a drive with bus=0, unit=0 existing. This sounds like a problem with how the virtual machine is handling the boot device, specifically the USB device they're trying to use. 
+
+In QEMU, when you specify -boot d, it's supposed to boot from the first IDE drive. But in this case, there might be an issue where the USB device isn't being recognized correctly, or perhaps the way the drives are set up is conflicting.
+
+The user also mentioned modifying the fstab file for the USB stick, which relates to how devices are mounted in the host system, but since QEMU is a hypervisor, this might not directly affect the VM's boot process unless there's an issue with device pass-through or shared directories.
+
+Considering the categories, "boot" seems most relevant because the problem occurs during the boot process of the virtual machine. The error message specifically points to an issue with the drive specified in the -boot parameter. It could be related to how QEMU is mapping the USB device as a bootable drive.
+
+Another possibility is "device," but since it's about booting, "boot" seems more precise. I don't see any elements pointing towards issues like translation errors (mistranslation), performance, or network problems here.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/740 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/740
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8d79b8b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/740
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The user reports that qemu-system-sparc hangs on a single-core Raspberry Pi after reaching "ttya initialized". They suspect it's a race condition because they haven't reproduced it on x86, even when using taskset to limit cores. The issue occurs frequently in QEMU 5.2 and always in 6.1.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce: they're using a Raspberry Pi (probably single-core), running a specific BIOS image with nographic mode. It hangs around 5 seconds after start, not proceeding further.
+
+The categories provided include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, etc. 
+
+Since the issue is about QEMU hanging during the BIOS startup, which is part of the boot process, I'm leaning towards 'boot' as the category. It doesn't seem to be a translation or performance issue specifically; rather, it's related to how the system initializes and proceeds through the boot steps.
+
+I don't see any mention of device-specific problems, graphics issues, networking, or KVM in the report. The problem is occurring during the early stages when the BIOS is probing memory banks, which is part of the boot sequence.
+
+So, I think 'boot' is the most appropriate category here.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/745 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/745
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c3e3011b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/745
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's start by understanding what the problem is.
+
+The user reported that NVRAM variables aren't persistent across coldboots when there's no attached r/w FAT32 hard drive. They mentioned that without a hard drive, after editing NVRAM variables and doing a cold reboot, the changes are lost. But with a hard drive attached, it works fine because the NvVars file is modified and persists.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce: When there's no hard drive, they edit an NVRAM variable, shutdown, restart, and the changes revert. With a hard drive, the variables do persist because the filesystem saves them.
+
+So the issue seems related to how QEMU handles NVRAM persistence without a persistent storage device. Since NVRAM relies on some form of storage to retain data between reboots, the lack of it causes the problem.
+
+Now, looking at the categories: The options include things like "boot," "files," "permissions," and others. This bug is about variables not persisting across cold boots without a hard drive. That sounds related to how QEMU handles storage devices and their filesystems during the boot process.
+
+The key here is that NVRAM persistence relies on having a writable file, which in this case is only present when a hard drive is attached. So without it, the changes are lost after a cold reboot. This affects the EFI shell's ability to retain settings across reboots.
+
+I think the problem relates more to how QEMU initializes or handles storage during the boot process, specifically regarding NVRAM variables. Since the issue occurs when no hard drive is attached, it points to a missing or incorrect handling of the default storage for NVRAM persistence.
+
+Looking at the categories again: "boot" seems relevant because it's about the VM's boot process not retaining certain settings without a hard drive. Alternatively, "files" might be applicable if it's related to how files are persisted across reboots.
+
+But considering that NVRAM is part of the firmware and its persistence depends on having a filesystem (like FAT32) attached, the issue could be under "boot" as it affects the boot process and initialization. Alternatively, it might fall under "files" if it's about how files are managed in QEMU.
+
+Wait, the user mentioned that without the hard drive, even though warm reboots (like via reset) retain changes, cold boots do not. That suggests it's more about the boot process's handling of NVRAM variables when no persistent storage is attached. So perhaps "boot" is the right category because it's related to how QEMU initializes and persists NVRAM during the boot sequence.
+
+Alternatively, since NVRAM uses a file (NvVars) on the filesystem for persistence, maybe it's more about "files." But I think the primary issue is that without a hard drive attached, QEMU isn't persisting NVRAM variables across cold reboots. This seems like a boot-time initialization problem where the necessary storage isn't present.
+
+So after considering, I think "boot" is the appropriate category because it's about how the VM initializes and handles persistence during the boot process without an attached hard drive.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/756 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/756
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..531e04c0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/756
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The report says: "qemu-system-m68k -M q800 -bios /dev/null segfaults". Let me break it down.
+
+First, I know that QEMU is an emulator and a debugger for various machine architectures. It can emulate different CPUs and devices, run operating systems on them, etc. The bug report involves the M68K architecture because the command starts with "qemu-system-m68k".
+
+The "-M q800" option specifies the machine type. I'm not exactly sure what Q800 is, but maybe it's a specific board or configuration in QEMU for M68K.
+
+Then there's "-bios /dev/null". Usually, "-bios" would point to a BIOS file needed by the emulated hardware. But here, it's pointing to /dev/null, which is a special file that discards data and has no content. So I think this might be intentional; perhaps they're trying to run without a BIOS or maybe testing how QEMU handles missing/broken BIOS files.
+
+The system segfaults, meaning it crashes with a segmentation fault. Segfaults are often due to invalid memory accesses, null pointers, or other runtime errors in the program.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+I need to figure out which category this falls into. The bug occurs when running QEMU with a specific machine type and without a BIOS. So it's related to the emulation of hardware or how QEMU initializes components like BIOS.
+
+The problem isn't in user-mode translation (mistranslation) because that would be about incorrect mapping from source to target code, but this is more about system initialization. It's not directly an assembly lowering issue either.
+
+It could be a boot issue since it's failing when starting the emulation. The machine type Q800 might require certain peripherals or specific handling of BIOS, and without a proper bios file, maybe some part isn't initialized correctly, leading to a segfault during startup.
+
+Alternatively, it's possible that not providing a BIOS is causing an error in the boot process, which falls under 'boot' category. But since QEMU might be expecting certain hardware configurations that aren't properly set up without a BIOS, it could also relate to devices or peripherals.
+
+Wait, but the crash happens when starting the system, so maybe during the initialization phase of the emulated machine. The machine type Q800 might rely on specific device setups, and not providing a BIOS could cause some part of that setup to fail, leading to a segfault in the hypervisor or kernel part.
+
+Alternatively, if it's about how the BIOS is loaded or missing, maybe it's a 'boot' issue because without a BIOS, the machine can't boot properly. Or perhaps it's an initialization problem with devices or peripherals not being set up correctly, leading to a crash.
+
+Hmm, but the categories don't have a direct 'initialization' category. So looking at possible causes: if the segfault is due to missing device setup, it might be under 'device'. If it's about the hypervisor layer crashing because of improper initialization, maybe that's 'hypervisor'.
+
+But I think in this case, since it's during system boot and without a BIOS, the most fitting category would be 'boot' because the issue is occurring when trying to start the emulation process. However, another angle is that not providing a BIOS file might cause QEMU to fail early on in hardware setup, which could tie into device or peripherals.
+
+Wait, but let me think again: The command is using -bios /dev/null. So it's intentionally omitting the BIOS. Maybe the M68K machine type requires a BIOS for proper initialization, and without it, the emulated system crashes during boot. Therefore, this would be a 'boot' issue because it's failing to start up correctly.
+
+Alternatively, if it's about how QEMU handles the absence of a BIOS file (maybe treating /dev/null as an invalid path or improperly handling it), that could fall under 'files' category, but I'm not sure. Or maybe it's a 'permissions' issue, but in this case, since it's using /dev/null, which is a special file, the problem isn't with permissions.
+
+Wait, no—the issue is that without a BIOS, QEMU can't proceed correctly, leading to a segfault during boot. So I think the correct category here is 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+The bug occurs when running QEMU with an M68K machine type and without a BIOS file, causing it to crash. The most fitting category based on this behavior is:
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/760956 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/760956
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c3f79700
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/760956
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU not booting OpenSolaris 2009. Let's see what the problem is.
+
+The user says that when they run the latest git version of QEMU with a specific commit, it fails to boot an OpenSolaris image from a particular ISO file. They provided the exact command they used and the error messages they received. The errors mention "File not found," "Not a bootable ELF image," and "No valid state has been set by load or init_program." 
+
+Looking at their setup, they're using QEMU with SPARC architecture, specifying the CD-ROM drive correctly, and setting up some redirection for port 2232. The host system is Linux x86_64 with GCC 4.5, and they've configured QEMU with options like --enable-linux-aio, --enable-io-thread, and --enable-kvm.
+
+Now, the possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue here is that QEMU isn't booting the ISO. The error messages suggest it's not finding a valid bootable image. So, this relates to the boot process in QEMU. Since it's failing during the initial boot attempt from CD-ROM and can't find a suitable image format (ELF or a.out), it might be an issue with how QEMU handles SPARC images or CDROM booting.
+
+I don't see anything related to translation issues, so mistranslation is probably not it. Assembly lowering is about converting code to assembly, which doesn't seem relevant here. Other categories like graphic or network aren't mentioned either. KVM is enabled, but the issue isn't necessarily with virtualization; it's more about booting.
+
+The problem is specifically during the boot process of the guest OS, so 'boot' seems to be the most appropriate category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report indicates an issue where QEMU fails to boot an OpenSolaris image. The errors are related to the boot process and suggest that the ISO isn't recognized correctly. Therefore, the classification is:
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/818647 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/818647
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..68894617
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/818647
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user is encountering a segmentation fault when trying to boot FreeBSD using QEMU's SPARC64 emulator. Let me go through the details step by step.
+
+First, they provided the commit hash and system info, which shows they're using an older version of QEMU (0.15.50) on Linux. They tried running a FreeBSD ISO image with specific parameters. The output includes some BIOS messages, attempts to load the kernel, and eventually hits an error where it can't access certain memory addresses, leading to a segmentation fault.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. The issue occurs during the boot process, so 'boot' seems relevant. However, the problem arises when accessing memory, which might relate to how QEMU handles kernel or device drivers.
+
+The user mentions that after pressing CTRL+C, they tried debugging commands in the monitor but couldn't access certain addresses, resulting in a segmentation fault. This suggests an issue with how QEMU is emulating the hardware, particularly around memory management during the boot process.
+
+Considering the possible categories, 'boot' fits because it's about the system startup. But since the crash happens due to memory access issues, it might also relate to device emulation or kernel handling. However, the primary action here is the booting process failing, so 'boot' seems the most appropriate category.
+</think>
+
+The bug occurs during the boot process of FreeBSD using QEMU's SPARC64 emulator. The issue arises when accessing certain memory addresses after attempting to load the kernel, leading to a segmentation fault. This points towards an error in the boot sequence or how the emulated hardware handles memory, fitting under the 'boot' category.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/825776 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/825776
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..45434b90
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/825776
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. Let me read through the details again carefully. The user is reporting an issue where using the `-hda //./PhysicalDrive1` option in QEMU doesn't work when the drive is a USB flash drive. Instead of booting properly, it just opens a blank window without any BIOS messages. They mentioned that this works fine with older versions or if they use a raw image file instead. 
+
+Hmm, so the problem seems to be specific to using a physical USB drive as the boot device in QEMU. The user is running QEMU on Windows 7 x64, which might have some implications regarding how QEMU handles hardware devices.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: boot, device, graphic, network, etc. I need to figure out where this issue fits. Since the problem occurs during the boot process and involves a USB drive not being recognized properly, it's likely related to how QEMU interacts with hardware devices.
+
+The fact that using a raw image works suggests that the issue isn't with the image itself but rather with how QEMU accesses the physical drive. So maybe this is an issue with device handling or perhaps the hypervisor component if it's related to KVM, but I'm not sure.
+
+Wait, QEMU under Windows might use different mechanisms for accessing hardware. USB drives are devices, so perhaps there's a problem in how QEMU interfaces with the host's USB devices when using physical disks versus image files. This could fall under the 'device' category because it's about handling specific hardware devices during boot.
+
+Alternatively, since the primary issue is that the system isn't booting correctly when using a USB drive, maybe it's more of a boot problem. The user didn't get any BIOS messages, which might indicate that QEMU isn't initializing the device properly during the boot process. That makes me think 'boot' could be the category.
+
+But considering that the issue is specifically with a physical USB drive and not with image files or virtual disks, it's more about how QEMU interacts with hardware devices. So 'device' might be more accurate because it pertains to the interaction between QEMU and the actual hardware device being used as storage.
+
+I'm a bit torn between 'boot' and 'device'. The primary action here is during boot, but the root cause seems to be related to device handling. Therefore, I think classifying this under 'device' makes more sense because it's about the USB drive not being recognized correctly.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/830833 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/830833
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a70965d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/830833
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report. The user provided a description of an issue with QEMU where the SPARC emulators fail to boot. Let me read through the details again.
+
+The problem occurs in the latest GIT version, and it affects both Linux and NetBSD kernels. The error message includes something about an "Unhandled Exception 0x0000002a" during the welcome screen from OpenBIOS. It also mentions that QEMU is using a configuration device id with machine id 32.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, and several others like device, graphic, socket, etc. I need to figure out which category this bug fits into.
+
+The error seems related to the boot process because it's failing when trying to boot the kernels. The exception is occurring during the initial stages after OpenBIOS starts up. Since the issue is happening in QEMU's emulator for SPARC architecture, and it's about booting, I should consider categories related to booting.
+
+The category "boot" directly relates to issues with the system not starting properly. This seems to be a problem during the boot process rather than something like an incorrect translation or graphics issues. There's no mention of device-specific hardware problems, so "device" might not fit unless it's a specific piece of hardware causing it, which isn't indicated here.
+
+The error message points to an unhandled exception, but without more details on what part of the code is failing (like whether it's in translation or during execution), it's hard to say if it's mistranslation. However, since the issue is about booting, I think "boot" is the most appropriate category.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes a failure when attempting to boot SPARC emulators in QEMU. The error occurs during the initial stages of the boot process, with an unhandled exception being thrown by OpenBIOS. This indicates that the problem lies within the booting mechanism rather than other areas like translation or specific hardware components.
+
+**Step-by-Step Explanation:**
+
+1. **Identify the Bug Symptom:** The issue is that SPARC emulators fail to boot Linux and NetBSD kernels.
+2. **Analyze the Error Message:** The error occurs after OpenBIOS starts, with an unhandled exception (0x0000002a) being thrown, leading to a halt in execution.
+3. **Determine the Affected Component:** Since the failure is during the boot process and involves QEMU's configuration device and OpenBIOS, it relates to how the emulator initializes and runs the target system.
+4. **Map to Possible Categories:**
+   - "Boot" category directly corresponds to issues related to the system initialization and startup process.
+   - Other categories like "device" or "network" are less likely as they don't pertain to the boot sequence itself.
+
+**Answer:** boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/833658 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/833658
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..dbd977de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/833658
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, the user is having trouble booting Debian 3.1r8 on QEMU PPC. They tried different versions and got various hangs or crashes. The main issue seems to be with the boot process not completing properly.
+
+The problem occurs when using -boot d and specifying the ISO image. The system hangs at "Loading ramdisk" and sometimes crashes with an assertion error in memory.c. In older QEMU versions, it proceeds a bit further but still fails, showing console issues or stopping after "returning 0x01400000 from prom_init".
+
+The categories related to booting are 'boot' and possibly 'hypervisor', but since the issue is about the guest OS not starting correctly, 'boot' seems more fitting. It's not a translation error (mistranslation) or graphics/network related. The crash message points towards memory management, which could be part of the hypervisor, but the primary symptom is boot failure.
+
+So, the most appropriate category is 'boot'.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/855 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/855
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..92c5a401
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/855
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out what category this bug report falls into. The user mentioned that a precompiled seabios vgabios-stdvga binary is causing FreeBSD 10.0 to panic on boot after a specific commit. They noticed that compiling the binary themselves sometimes works and sometimes doesn't, depending on the environment. 
+
+Hmm, they suspect it's related to the linker version from binutils. Their local system uses binutils 2.37, but when using an older version (2.35.2) in a Docker container, it works fine. So the issue seems tied to how the binary is built, specifically the tools used during compilation.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation relates to incorrect semantic mapping in user-mode, which doesn't seem relevant here. Assembly lowering is about converting code from assembly to IR, also not matching. 
+
+The problem occurs during boot and involves a kernel panic related to VESA module load. The key issue is with the precompiled binary causing problems, possibly due to how it's linked or built. Since this affects the hypervisor (QEMU) when running FreeBSD as a guest, the category should be something related to the system's startup process.
+
+The categories include 'boot', which seems appropriate because the panic happens on boot. Alternatively, since it's about hardware or device initialization, but I think 'boot' is more precise here.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/893 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/893
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..41eed24b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/893
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The user provided a list including things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, etc., and others like KVM, boot, vnc, etc. 
+
+The bug report says: "Cannot boot and set rhel7 or 8 s390x on Redhat 8(Host OS) using qemu-system-s390x". So the main issue here is that the user can't boot RHEL7 or 8 for s390x when running QEMU on a Red Hat 8 host. 
+
+Looking at the categories, I need to find which one fits best. The problem seems related to the boot process because it's about not being able to boot an OS. So "boot" is one of the categories listed. 
+
+I don't think it's a mistranslation or assembly issue since those relate more to lower-level code transformations. It doesn't seem to be a device, graphic, or network problem either because the user isn't reporting hardware issues but rather the boot process failing. 
+
+KVM is related to virtualization, and QEMU does use KVM for acceleration, but the main action here is about booting an OS, not necessarily how the hypervisor is performing. So "boot" seems more accurate.
+
+Other categories like vnc or debug don't fit because the issue isn't about remote access or debugging tools. Permissions could be a factor if there were access issues, but that's not mentioned. Performance isn't indicated either.
+
+Therefore, the most appropriate category for this bug report is "boot".
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/902 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/902
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1a25659b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/902
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report: "BootLinuxS390X test failing due to a TCG bug." Let me break it down step by step.
+
+First, the user provided a list of possible categories. The main task is to determine which category best fits the given bug report. I need to understand each category and then see which one matches the issue described.
+
+The categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, it mentions "BootLinuxS390X test failing due to a TCG bug." So, the key points here are:
+
+1. **Boot**: The issue is related to the boot process of Linux on S390x architecture.
+2. **TCG Bug**: TCG stands for Translation Control Gathering or sometimes refers to the Transistor Clock Gating, but in this context, it's likely referring to QEMU's Translation Cache or something similar. However, I'm more familiar with TCG being part of QEMU's translation process.
+
+Since the test is failing during boot and it's a TCG issue, which relates to how QEMU translates code for the target architecture, but in this case, since it's affecting the boot process, it might not be mistranslation or assembly lowering. 
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- **boot** seems directly related because the test is failing during the boot process.
+- The mention of TCG suggests it could be a translation issue, which might fall under 'mistranslation', but the primary impact is on the boot.
+
+So, between 'boot' and 'other', I think 'boot' is more specific. Therefore, the category should be **boot**.
+</think>
+
+The bug report mentions a failure in the BootLinuxS390X test due to a TCG issue, which directly impacts the boot process. The most fitting category is:
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/906 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/906
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..42d0f818
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/906
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report: "Cannot IPL this ISO image." The user mentioned it's part of QEMU, so I know that QEMU is an emulator and hypervisor. Let me break down the possible categories they provided.
+
+First, "IPL" usually stands for Initial Program Load or Installation Program Loader, which refers to the process of booting an operating system from a medium like an ISO image. The issue here is that the user can't IPL this particular ISO image in QEMU.
+
+Looking at the categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others like mistranslation or assembly lowering.
+
+"IPL" is directly related to the booting process. So "boot" seems like a strong candidate here because it's about failing to start an OS from an ISO in QEMU.
+
+Other possibilities: Maybe device? But that would be more about hardware devices not working, whereas this is specifically about loading the ISO during boot. Graphic or network issues wouldn't apply unless the ISO image was related to those aspects, which isn't indicated here.
+
+So I think "boot" is the right category for this bug.
+</think>
+
+The issue relates to the booting process of an ISO image in QEMU, so it's categorized under:
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/966316 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/966316
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..38cc9f92
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/966316
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The user mentioned they can't load an Android VBOX image or a Linux test image. The error message says "PC system firmware (pflash) must be a multiple of 0x1000". From my knowledge, pflash refers to the firmware in QEMU's PC system, which is part of the emulated hardware setup.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'boot' relates to issues during the boot process. The error occurs when trying to load an image, which is a boot-time issue. Also, the user mentioned that it worked before adding the pc_sysfw.c file, implying changes in how firmware is handled.
+
+Other possible categories: It's not about translation (mistranslation) or assembly lowering (assembly). It doesn't directly relate to networking, graphics, sockets, or performance issues. Since it's related to hardware initialization during boot, 'boot' seems the most appropriate category.
+</think>
+
+The error message indicates a problem with loading the firmware image for the PC system in QEMU. This is likely due to changes in how the firmware (pflash) is handled, which would fall under the 'boot' category as it's related to the initial boot process of the virtual machine.
+
+**Step-by-step Explanation:**
+
+1. **Identify the Error:** The error message mentions that the pflash must be a multiple of 0x1000.
+2. **Understand Context:** This relates to the PC system firmware, which is part of QEMU's hardware emulation.
+3. **Determine Impact:** The issue prevents loading test images, affecting the boot process.
+4. **Map to Categories:** 'Boot' is the category that fits because it's about initializing the virtual machine.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/992 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/992
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7f686250
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/992
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report for QEMU where it says that some ROM regions are overlapping when the memory is set to 16. The user tried running with -m 16 and got an error about overlapping regions. But when they increased the memory to 17, it worked fine.
+
+Hmm, the problem seems related to how QEMU is handling the initial setup of the machine's memory. When you specify a certain amount of RAM, QEMU has to allocate different parts of this memory for various components like the firmware (like OpenSBI), the device tree (fdt), and maybe other things.
+
+In this case, when the memory is 16MB, both the OpenSBI binary and the fdt are being placed at the same starting address. That can't be right because they can't occupy the same space in memory. So QEMU detects that overlap and throws an error to prevent crashes or data corruption.
+
+The fact that it works with 17MB suggests that there's a specific threshold where this issue occurs. Maybe when the RAM is exactly 16MB, the way regions are allocated changes, causing these two components to collide. Increasing it by just one MB adjusts how the memory is partitioned, avoiding the overlap.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. The issue here isn't related to hardware devices or graphics; it's more about how QEMU manages memory regions during boot. So 'boot' seems like the most fitting category because it's happening at startup when setting up the machine's initial state.
+
+I think 'boot' is the right classification here because the problem occurs during the system initialization phase, specifically related to memory allocation for firmware and device trees.
+</think>
+
+The issue arises during the boot process due to overlapping memory regions assigned by QEMU. This falls under the category of problems encountered when initializing or setting up the virtual machine.
+
+**boot**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/994 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/994
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6da3b9e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/boot/994
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is reporting that QEMU 7.0.0-rc4 doesn't launch on Windows and immediately exits without any output. 
+
+First, I'll look at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is that QEMU isn't starting at all on Windows. Since it's exiting immediately without any version info or output, this suggests a problem during the initial launch phase. I'm thinking about what could cause QEMU not to start. It might be an issue with how QEMU is handling Windows-specific initialization.
+
+Looking through the categories, "boot" seems relevant because it refers to issues related to starting up the program. If there's a problem during the boot process of QEMU on Windows, that would explain why it exits immediately without any output. 
+
+Other possibilities could be related to permissions or files if QEMU can't access certain resources, but since the user didn't mention any specific error messages or file issues, "boot" seems more likely. It might also be a problem with how QEMU is handling Windows-specific code or initialization steps, which falls under the boot category.
+
+So, I think the appropriate classification here is "boot."
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file