diff options
| author | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-03 19:39:53 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-03 19:39:53 +0200 |
| commit | dee4dcba78baf712cab403d47d9db319ab7f95d6 (patch) | |
| tree | 418478faf06786701a56268672f73d6b0b4eb239 /results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/450 | |
| parent | 4d9e26c0333abd39bdbd039dcdb30ed429c475ba (diff) | |
| download | emulator-bug-study-dee4dcba78baf712cab403d47d9db319ab7f95d6.tar.gz emulator-bug-study-dee4dcba78baf712cab403d47d9db319ab7f95d6.zip | |
restructure results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/450')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/450 | 15 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/450 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/450 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..10f10e98 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/device/450 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I have to classify this bug report. The message is "sdhci: Assertion wpnum < sd->wpgrps_size failed". Hmm, first, I need to understand what each part means. + +"sdhci" stands for Secure Digital Host Controller Interface. It's related to handling SD cards in QEMU. So it's probably a hardware emulation issue because QEMU emulates devices like SD card controllers. + +The error message mentions an assertion failure where "wpnum" is not less than "sd->wpgrps_size". I think wpnum refers to the write protect number or group, and sd->wpgrps_size might be the size of the write protection groups. So this is about how QEMU handles SD card features related to write protection. + +Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The bug is related to the sdhci device and its handling of write protection groups. That points towards a device-related issue because it's about how QEMU emulates hardware devices. So "device" seems like the right category. + +Other options don't fit as well. It's not about graphics or networking. KVM would be for hypervisor-specific issues, but this is more about the device emulation within QEMU. Peripheral could also be a possibility since sdhci is a peripheral controller, but I think device is more precise here. +</think> + +device \ No newline at end of file |