restructure results

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/files/117 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/files/117
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..dc710458
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/files/117
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "nested 9p filesystem with security_model=mapped-xattr". The possible categories are listed, and I have to choose one word from them.
+
+First, let's understand the bug. It mentions a nested 9P filesystem using the mapped-xattr security model. 9P is an older remote file access protocol used in QEMU for things like filesystems over networks or for virtual machines. The "security_model=mapped-xattr" part refers to how security attributes are handled, possibly mapping extended attributes (xattrs) to enforce certain security policies.
+
+Looking at the categories, I see options like 'file', 'permissions', etc. Since this is about a filesystem feature and specifically mentions security model, it might relate to permissions or file handling. However, 9P is more of an inter-process communication protocol for files, so maybe under 'files' category. Alternatively, since it's related to security attributes, perhaps 'permissions'.
+
+But wait, the bug is about nested 9P filesystems specifically using mapped-xattr. This could relate to how QEMU handles file operations and their associated permissions or security settings within nested virtualization environments.
+
+I'm a bit torn between 'files' and 'permissions'. The mention of 'security_model' suggests it's more about permissions, but the primary issue is with the 9P filesystem setup. So maybe 'files' is the broader category here.
+
+Alternatively, if the bug is about how security attributes are mapped, that could fall under 'permissions'. But I'm not certain. Let me think again: the report is about nested 9P with a specific security model, so it's likely related to how files are accessed and their permissions in this setup.
+
+Hmm, perhaps 'files' is more appropriate because it directly involves the filesystem structure and nesting, while the security part might be a subcategory under that. Or maybe it's under 'permissions' because it's about handling access control through xattrs.
+
+I'm leaning towards 'files' since the primary issue is with the 9P filesystem configuration and its nested setup. The security_model is an attribute of how files are handled within this structure, but the main bug is about the file system behavior.
+</think>
+
+The bug report relates to a nested 9P filesystem using a specific security model, which falls under the handling of file systems and their attributes. 
+
+files
\ No newline at end of file