restructure results

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1155 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1155
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..49684d25
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1155
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. So, the user is reporting an issue with QEMU related to RISC-V instruction fetch exceptions. The problem involves invalid combinations of 'tval' and 'epc', which are specific registers in RISC-V that handle exception contexts.
+
+Looking at the description, it mentions that when certain exceptions occur (like page faults), the values in 'tval' and 'epc' don't align as per the privileged spec. The examples given show significant differences between these two values, which isn't supposed to happen since RISC-V instructions are either 32-bit or 16-bit. Therefore, their difference should be minimal (0 or 2), but in the logs, it's much higher.
+
+The user points out that 'tval' is aligned to a page boundary, which seems incorrect because according to the spec, 'mtval' should point to the specific part of the instruction causing the fault, not necessarily a page boundary. This suggests that QEMU isn't correctly setting these registers during exceptions, leading to an incorrect state.
+
+The bug report also includes steps to reproduce, which involve running KVM inside QEMU and triggering page faults. The focus is on how 'tval' and 'epc' are set, implying this is a problem with the hypervisor or emulator's handling of these instructions and exceptions.
+
+Considering the categories provided: 'mistranslation' relates to incorrect mapping from source architecture to target, which could be relevant here if QEMU isn't correctly translating RISC-V instructions. However, since the issue is more about exception handling during instruction fetch rather than direct translation errors, I'm not sure it's mistranslation.
+
+Other categories like 'device', 'graphic', or 'socket' don't seem to apply. The problem is specific to the hypervisor (KVM) and how it's emulating RISC-V instructions and exceptions. 'hypervisor' seems like a possible category because KVM runs as a hypervisor in QEMU.
+
+Alternatively, since this is related to exception handling and instruction processing, 'kernel' could be another possibility if it's an issue with the OS kernel running inside the VM. However, the primary cause seems to stem from how QEMU (acting as a hypervisor) handles these exceptions.
+
+So, weighing the options, 'hypervisor' might be the most appropriate category because it directly relates to KVM and how it manages virtual machines, including their exception handling.
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file