restructure results

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1556 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1556
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5454b919
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1556
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem and see what's going on.
+
+The user mentioned an issue with CSR writes/reads of SATP and HGATP in QEMU related to RISC-V. They provided code snippets from `csr.c`. The main points are:
+
+1. **SATP Handling**: There's a potential problem where certain illegal writes might not be caught because the TVM check is inside an if-statement that only runs when both `vm` and `mask` are true. The user suggests moving this check outside, but they couldn't replicate the issue yet.
+
+2. **HGATP Handling**: The function `write_hgatp` directly writes the value to `env->hgatp` without any validation. According to the spec, writes should be WARL (Write Any Read Lockdown), meaning if certain fields are invalid, they should cause an exception. Also, there's a restriction on the PPN field where bits 1 and 0 must be zero, which isn't enforced here.
+
+3. **Read Handling**: When reading `hgatp`, the TVM flag is ignored entirely, but according to the spec, it shouldn't be if certain conditions are met.
+
+So, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+The issue is related to how QEMU handles specific CSRs (Control and Status Registers) in RISC-V. This isn't about user-mode translation or assembly lowering but rather about correctly implementing hardware-specific register behavior, which falls under the hypervisor's responsibility because it involves virtualization and handling of system registers that affect the guest OS.
+
+The problem lies in how QEMU enforces constraints on these CSRs, ensuring they adhere to the RISC-V specification. Since this is related to virtualization features (like SATP and HGATP which are part of the MMU and hypervisor interface), it's under the hypervisor category.
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file