restructure results

1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/2035 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/2035
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..728721e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/2035
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's read through it carefully.
+
+The user is reporting that their plugin exit callback isn't executing. They expected to see "Goodbye from plugin" but it didn't happen. They tried using `qemu_plugin_outs` without success.
+
+Looking at the steps they took, they set up QEMU with certain configurations and compiled both a test binary and a plugin. The issue arises when running the test; the exit callback doesn't fire unless the test binary is an infinite loop killed by Ctrl-C.
+
+The provided code includes a plugin that registers an exit callback using `qemu_plugin_register_atexit_cb`. So, this seems related to how plugins are handled, specifically their callbacks at exit.
+
+Looking at the categories: hypervisor, device, graphic, network, etc. The most relevant category here is 'plugin' or something related since it's about plugin behavior. However, the options given don't include a direct 'plugin' category. Wait, checking the list again, I see 'other' as an option.
+
+Wait, let me think again. The categories provided are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. So none of these directly relate to plugin callbacks except possibly 'hypervisor' if it's about the management of VMs or plugins within QEMU.
+
+But I'm not sure if that fits. Alternatively, since the issue is with plugin behavior, and there's no specific category for plugins, maybe it falls under 'other'. But wait, another thought: exit callbacks are part of the lifecycle of the process, possibly related to signals or termination handling, which might be more about the hypervisor layer.
+
+Alternatively, perhaps 'debug' since it relates to debugging plugin behavior, but I'm not certain. The user's problem is that their callback isn't being called at exit unless the process is killed with Ctrl-C. This suggests an issue with how QEMU handles normal vs forced exits, which could be related to signal handling in the hypervisor or kernel.
+
+Wait, considering the options again, maybe 'hypervisor' is the closest fit because plugins are part of the QEMU's user-mode execution (like TCG) and their exit callbacks might be managed at that level. Alternatively, if it's about the plugin API not working correctly, perhaps 'other' is more appropriate since it doesn't neatly fit into any other category.
+
+But I'm still unsure. Let me check: The categories are provided as part of the options, so looking for the most fitting one. Since the issue is with a plugin's exit callback not being called during normal shutdown but only when the process is killed, perhaps this relates to how QEMU handles process termination, which might be under 'hypervisor' or possibly 'kernel'.
+
+Alternatively, since it's about the plugin API and its callbacks, maybe it's classified as 'other'. But I'm not 100% confident. Wait, another thought: The exit callback registration is part of the plugin's functionality, so if that's not working correctly, perhaps it's a bug in how QEMU handles plugins, which might fall under 'hypervisor' since QEMU can be considered a hypervisor when running in user-mode with TCG.
+
+Alternatively, considering that the issue is about the exit callback not being executed during normal program termination but only when killed, this could be related to signal handling or process management within the hypervisor. Therefore, I think it's more appropriate to categorize this under 'hypervisor'.
+
+But wait, looking back at the user's setup: they're using --target-list=riscv32-linux-user,riscv64-linux-user and enabling plugins but disabling system emulation. So it's a user-mode QEMU (like with TCG), which is considered part of the hypervisor or the emulator's core functionality.
+
+So, given all that, I think the most appropriate category is 'hypervisor' because it relates to how plugins are managed within QEMU's execution environment.
+</think>
+
+The issue revolves around the exit callback not executing as expected when using a plugin in QEMU. The user observes that the callback only triggers when the test binary runs in an infinite loop and is killed, suggesting an issue with normal termination handling.
+
+Analyzing the categories provided:
+
+- **Hypervisor**: Since the problem pertains to how QEMU (acting as a hypervisor for user-mode emulation) handles plugin callbacks during process termination, this seems fitting.
+  
+Thus, the category is 'hypervisor'.
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file