restructure results

1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1633 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1633
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2df00051
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1633
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a detailed bug report regarding QEMU with RISC-V VMs not running when using the `-icount 1` option after a specific commit was merged. They also mentioned that reverting the commit fixes the issue.
+
+First, I'll look at the categories given: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug report mentions an issue with `icount`, which stands for instruction counter. In QEMU, `-icount` is used to enable counting of instructions, which can be useful for profiling or debugging. The error message says "qemu-system-riscv64: Bad icount read", indicating a problem related to how the instruction count is being handled.
+
+The commit that introduced this issue was merged into QEMU, and it's causing RISC-V VMs to fail when `-icount` is enabled. This suggests that there's an error in how the `icount` feature is implemented or integrated with the RISC-V machine. 
+
+Looking at the possible categories, "mistranslation" refers to issues where the translation from source architecture to IR/target is incorrect, but this seems more related to a runtime issue rather than a semantic mapping problem during compilation. "Performance" could be considered since `icount` affects how instructions are handled, potentially impacting performance metrics or resource usage. However, the error message points to a specific failure when reading the icount, which might not directly relate to overall performance.
+
+Alternatively, "other" is a category for issues that don't fit into the other more specific categories. Since the problem is with `icount`, which isn't explicitly listed in the main categories but relates to how QEMU handles certain runtime features, "other" seems appropriate. 
+
+But wait, looking again at the categories provided: there's also "kernel," which might relate if it's a kernel-level issue, but the error message doesn't indicate a kernel module problem. The issue is more about the QEMU machine's handling of the `icount` option.
+
+Another angle: `icount` is part of the virtualization features, so perhaps it's related to the hypervisor or how the VM is being managed. "hypervisor" could be a possible category if this is an issue with how the hypervisor (QEMU) interacts with the guest OS. However, the error message seems more about the functionality within QEMU itself rather than interaction between host and guest.
+
+Considering all options, the most fitting category might be "other" since it's not directly falling into specific categories like device, network, or kernel issues but is a runtime problem with a feature in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where enabling `icount` causes a failure. The error message points to a problem with reading the icount, suggesting a flaw in how the instruction count is handled within QEMU's RISC-V machine. This doesn't fit into specific categories like device or kernel issues but rather a runtime problem related to feature handling.
+
+**Category: other**
+
+other
\ No newline at end of file