restructure results

1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/2193 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/2193
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..44aa7480
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/performance/2193
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The user is reporting that qemu-system-mips64el runs 70 times slower than other targets like ppc64, riscv64, and s390x. They mention compiling a single source file within the VM and comparing the time it takes. The performance hit is significant—2214 times slower compared to the host.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- Mistranslation relates to incorrect mapping between source and target architectures, which could affect performance.
+- Assembly lowering might be about optimizing assembly code for better performance.
+- Other is a catch-all category.
+- Device, graphic, socket, network relate more to specific hardware or I/O issues.
+- KVM is about virtualization, but this seems broader than just the hypervisor's role.
+- Boot and vnc are startup and display-related, not directly relevant here.
+- Debug, files, permissions aren't related to performance issues.
+- Performance is a direct match since the user is complaining about slowness.
+
+The problem isn't tied to a specific component like networking or devices; it's about overall execution speed. Mistranslation could be a factor, but the primary issue seems to be underperformance rather than incorrect translation. Since the user is experiencing significantly slower performance across multiple operations, the most fitting category is 'performance'.
+</think>
+
+performance
\ No newline at end of file