add results

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1178 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1178
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..972f1463
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/1178
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report related to QEMU and RISC-V64's `feq.s` instruction. The user is asking if `feq.s` only considers the lowest 32 bits.
+
+First, I know that in RISC-V, `feq.s` is a single-precision floating-point comparison instruction. It compares two single-precision values and returns true if they are equal. Since it's single-precision, it should work with 32-bit floats.
+
+Now, the user is mentioning RISC-V64, which typically deals with 64-bit registers. However, when using `feq.s`, even in a 64-bit environment, it operates on the lower 32 bits of the source registers. So any issue here would relate to how the instruction processes these bits.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: instruction, syscall, runtime. The problem described seems to be about how an instruction (`feq.s`) is handling data (the lowest 32 bits), which falls under an instruction-level bug. It's not related to system calls or runtime errors elsewhere in the program.
+
+So, I think this should be categorized as "instruction."
+</think>
+
+The issue pertains to how the `feq.s` instruction handles 32-bit values within a 64-bit architecture. This is an instruction-related bug.
+
+**Answer:** instruction
\ No newline at end of file