add results

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/2775 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/2775
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..65f3efa3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/2775
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. So, the user provided a detailed crash log from QEMU when running an emulated NetBSD/sparc64 system. The error message points to an assertion failure in the SPARC64 code generation part of QEMU's source code.
+
+Looking at the description, it seems that while executing certain instructions, specifically involving sethi and branch operations, QEMU hits an internal assertion. The GDB backtrace shows that the crash occurs during instruction translation when trying to handle a specific instruction sequence.
+
+Now, I need to classify this bug into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. The instruction category would be for issues where a particular instruction is causing problems. Syscall relates to system calls not handling correctly. Runtime errors are broader and include other issues that happen during execution but aren't tied to specific instructions or syscalls.
+
+In this case, the crash happens during instruction translation, specifically in the sparc_tr_insn_start function. The error message indicates an unexpected code path was reached, which suggests a problem with how certain instructions are being handled by the translator. Since it's related to translating and executing specific SPARC64 instructions, this points towards an issue with handling those particular instructions.
+
+So, I think the category here should be 'instruction' because it's directly tied to processing certain assembly instructions leading to an assertion failure in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+instruction
\ No newline at end of file