add results

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/2878 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/2878
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2d4dad2f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/instruction/2878
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report about AVX512 support in QEMU user space emulation. The categories given are instruction, syscall, and runtime. Let me think through each step carefully.
+
+First, what's AVX512? It's an extension of the x86 instruction set that allows for more vector operations, which can speed up certain computations. So if there's a bug related to AVX512 in QEMU, it probably has something to do with how these instructions are handled.
+
+Now, looking at the categories:
+
+- **Instruction**: This would involve issues with specific CPU instructions not working correctly. Since AVX512 adds new instructions, a problem here might fall under this category.
+  
+- **Syscall**: This relates to system calls between user space and kernel space. If the bug was about syscalls failing because of AVX512, it would fit here. But I don't think that's the case since AVX512 is more about instruction handling in the CPU emulation.
+
+- **Runtime**: These are errors that occur during execution but aren't necessarily tied to a specific instruction or syscall. If the bug was causing crashes or unexpected behavior without pointing to a specific instruction, it might be runtime.
+
+Given that the report mentions "support for AVX512", I'm guessing the issue is about implementing or correctly handling these new instructions within QEMU's user space emulation. That sounds like an instruction-level problem because it's about how QEMU emulates CPU instructions, specifically AVX512 ones.
+
+So, putting it all together, the bug report is likely about faulty instruction handling related to AVX512 support in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+instruction
\ No newline at end of file