add results

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1207896 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1207896
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..395538c2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1207896
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU and a patch related to binfmt wrapper handling. The user provided some context, mentioning that 99% of GNU/Linux distributions use QEMU with this patch because it's 100% needed. They've been waiting two years for the patch to be applied upstream.
+
+First, I need to understand what the bug is about. It seems related to how QEMU handles argv[0], which is the program name passed to a process. The patch probably fixes an issue where QEMU doesn't correctly set or handle this value when running as a binfmt wrapper.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: instruction, syscall, runtime. 
+
+- Instruction issues involve incorrect CPU instructions or assembly code.
+- Syscall errors are about problems with system calls in the OS.
+- Runtime errors are broader issues that occur while the program is running.
+
+This bug doesn't seem to be related to specific CPU instructions or system call handling. Instead, it's more about how QEMU interacts with the environment when executing programs, specifically how argv[0] is managed. This would fall under runtime because it's an issue encountered during execution rather than a problem with low-level operations.
+
+So, I think the category should be 'runtime'.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file