add results

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1368 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1368
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ceac1ba5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1368
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report related to QEMU. Let's break down what's happening step by step.
+
+First, looking at the problem description, the user is experiencing an unexpected value in the RAX register after executing two specific instructions: "mov -0x8(%rbp), %rax" and "movq 0xb8000, (%rax)". They expected RAX to be 0x7fedf but it's actually 0x7fefe, which is one less. 
+
+They provided several steps in the process:
+
+1. The first instruction moves a value from memory (-0x8(%rbp)) into RAX. According to their GDB output, this memory address contains 0x000000000007fedf. So after executing this instruction, RAX should be 0x7fedf.
+
+2. They then execute "movq $0xb8000, (%rax)", which writes the value 0xb8000 into the memory location pointed to by RAX. 
+
+However, they noticed that after this second instruction, RAX changes from 0x7fedf to 0x7fede. That's a decrease of one, which is unexpected.
+
+Then, they observed something odd: when checking the next instruction in GDB, the address changed from 0x2206 to 0x2207, and the instruction itself changed from "movq" to "movl". This suggests that perhaps there was a misfetch or an issue with how the instructions were being read.
+
+In step 5, they noticed that after executing "movl $0xb8000, (%rax)", RAX becomes 0x7fede. The change from movq to movl might indicate an instruction length mismatch—movq is a 64-bit move, while movl is 32-bit. If the processor misaligns or misfetches instructions, it could lead to incorrect behavior.
+
+Considering QEMU's role here, this seems like an issue with how the emulator handles certain instructions or memory accesses. The unexpected change in RAX suggests either a bug in the instruction decoding or execution within QEMU, possibly related to handling of 32-bit vs. 64-bit operations or instruction alignment.
+
+Since the problem occurs during runtime and involves incorrect behavior of registers after specific instructions, it's likely an issue with how the emulator is executing the code rather than a problem with system calls or faulty hardware. Therefore, this bug report falls under the "runtime" category.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file