diff options
| author | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-06 16:43:19 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-06 16:43:19 +0000 |
| commit | 238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd (patch) | |
| tree | cd8a1b75ba7b3543eb7fe6857f408e7be4d9fd0b /results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1763 | |
| parent | 96049c939b1916d80532630d63c14e04d5244f1d (diff) | |
| download | emulator-bug-study-238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd.tar.gz emulator-bug-study-238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd.zip | |
add results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1763')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1763 | 25 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1763 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1763 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b14b8c08 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1763 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report about ldd failing when using qemu-aarch64 within Docker. The user provided some steps and an additional warning message. + +First, let me understand what's happening here. They ran a Docker container with arm64v8/ubuntu:16.04 and tried to run 'ldd /bin/ls'. But they got an error where ldd exited with code 139. The warning mentions that the image platform doesn't match the host, which is amd64, so Docker might be running in compatibility mode or something. + +The issue seems related to using qemu-user-static for cross-architecture execution. From what I know, qemu-user-static allows running binaries of different architectures on a host machine, like running ARM code on an x86_64 machine. So when they run the container with arm64v8 image on an amd64 host, Docker probably uses qemu to emulate the ARM environment. + +Now, ldd is a tool that shows the shared libraries required by a binary. In this case, it's failing inside the container. The error code 139 suggests a segmentation fault because in Unix-like systems, exit codes above 128 often indicate signals; specifically, 139 is 128 + 11 (SIGSEGV). So ldd is crashing with a segfault. + +Looking at the issue link provided, it's about multiarch/qemu-user-static. The problem might be that qemu isn't properly handling the execution of certain binaries or system calls in this context. + +Now, to classify this bug into one of the given categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. Let's break down each category. + +- **Instruction**: This would involve a faulty CPU instruction being executed. Maybe if there was an invalid opcode causing the crash. +- **Syscall**: An error related to system calls, like a syscall not being handled correctly by qemu or the host. +- **Runtime**: Other runtime errors that don't fall into instructions or syscalls. + +In this case, ldd is crashing with SIGSEGV. That could happen if there's an invalid memory access. Since we're dealing with cross-architecture emulation, perhaps qemu isn't correctly translating some memory operations, leading to a crash when running ldd. + +Looking deeper, the problem might be in how qemu handles certain instructions or memory accesses when emulating ARM64 on an x86_64 host. It could also involve system calls if the emulation of syscalls is causing issues, but I'm not sure yet. + +But given that it's a crash (segfault), and without more specific info about whether it's an instruction issue or a syscall problem, maybe it's safer to classify it under runtime since it's a general runtime error during execution, not specifically tied to an instruction or a system call. +</think> + +runtime \ No newline at end of file |