add results

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1836078 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1836078
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c112f41c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/1836078
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break down the information provided.
+
+The user is reporting regressions when running GCC tests on the arm-linux-gnueabihf target using a recent version of QEMU (master branch). They mention that all tests used to pass but now cause QEMU to crash after applying a specific fix. The tests involve binaries, shared libraries, and a script.
+
+The possible categories are:
+
+1. **Instruction**: This would be if the issue is related to how certain CPU instructions are handled.
+2. **Syscall**: If the problem involves system calls not working as expected.
+3. **Runtime**: Any other runtime issues that don't fall into the above two categories.
+
+Given the context, the user isn't pointing out a specific instruction or syscall failure but rather general crashes when running tests. This suggests it's a broader runtime issue affecting how QEMU handles these test cases after the fix. Therefore, the category is likely **runtime**.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves general runtime issues causing QEMU to crash during GCC tests, not specifically tied to instructions or syscalls.
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file