add results

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/2606 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/2606
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4d751e23
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/2606
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU's PowerPC host code breaking on Darwin. Let me go through the details step by step.
+
+The user reported that when they tried building QEMU on a Darwin PPC system, it failed to compile because the assembler syntax was incorrect and the ABI wasn't properly handled. They provided a patch they used earlier which fixed the build issues but caused the binary to crash upon launch. So now, the problem isn't just compiling; it's also about runtime behavior.
+
+Looking at the patches they applied, I can see changes in assembly files for both ppc and ppc64 architectures under safe-syscall.inc.S. The main modifications involve changing register usages from numbers like 30, 1 to r30, r1, which suggests that the previous code was using a different ABI or assembler syntax incompatible with Darwin's PowerPC setup.
+
+The crash on launch indicates that even though the build worked after applying these patches, there are runtime issues. This could mean that the modified assembly isn't fully compliant with the expected ABI for Darwin's PPC environment. Maybe some registers aren't being handled correctly, stack frames aren't properly restored, or function calls aren't following the required conventions.
+
+So, considering the categories: instruction, syscall, runtime. The problem started as a build issue (instruction) but after fixing that, it became a runtime crash, suggesting an issue during execution rather than just incorrect assembly code or system call handling. Therefore, the primary category here is runtime.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file