add results

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/280 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/280
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d45f8998
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/280
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU and Debian Bullseye having issues running Chrome and loading HTML. The user wants me to classify it into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime.
+
+First, I need to understand each category. "Instruction" refers to a problem with the CPU instructions, maybe something not being supported. "Syscall" is about system calls going wrong, perhaps permissions or compatibility issues there. "Runtime" covers other runtime errors that don't fall into the first two categories.
+
+Now, Chrome isn't running and HTML isn't loading in this setup. I know Chrome uses a lot of modern web technologies like WebGL and WebAssembly. If QEMU is involved, especially with ARM64 emulation on x86_64, there might be performance issues or compatibility problems with these technologies.
+
+I'm thinking that the issue might not be a specific instruction fault but more about how the environment handles runtime operations. Maybe the rendering isn't working because of missing graphical drivers in QEMU or compatibility layers not handling certain OpenGL calls properly. That doesn't sound like a syscall error since it's more about how Chrome interacts with the graphics stack rather than system calls.
+
+So, putting it together, this seems like a runtime issue because it's about how the application runs within the emulated environment, possibly related to graphical rendering or resource management rather than specific instructions or syscalls.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file