add results

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/514 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/514
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0b730fbd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/runtime/514
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report as part of QEMU. The user provided some details about an issue they encountered when using Clang to compile code for ARMv8 with memory tagging enabled. They mentioned that using SP-based store instructions caused a tag check fault exception, which shouldn't happen according to the ARM specifications.
+
+First, I need to understand what's happening here. The bug report talks about specific assembly instructions generated by Clang: stp and str operations using the SP register with offsets. When these instructions are executed in QEMU, they result in exceptions. However, the ARM spec says that such operations should generate a Tag Unchecked access instead of causing an exception.
+
+So, this seems to be related to how QEMU handles certain ARMv8 instructions, specifically those involving the SP register and memory tagging. The issue arises during runtime when these instructions are executed, leading to unexpected exceptions. 
+
+Looking at the categories provided: instruction, syscall, runtime. Since the problem occurs during the execution of specific ARM instructions in the emulator (QEMU), it's not a syscall error or an issue with how the program is built. Instead, it's about QEMU incorrectly handling these instructions by generating exceptions when they should be treated as Tag Unchecked accesses.
+
+Therefore, this bug falls under the "runtime" category because it happens during the execution of code within QEMU.
+</think>
+
+runtime
\ No newline at end of file