add results

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2825 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2825
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2335b30d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/2825
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report as part of QEMU. The user mentioned that when using execveat with an empty filename and AT_EMPTY_PATH flag on different architectures like arm64, arm, riscv64, etc., it returns ENOENT (No such file or directory). However, for x86_64 and x86, it works fine.
+
+First, I need to understand what's happening here. execveat is a system call that allows executing a program from a file descriptor. The AT_EMPTY_PATH flag tells the kernel that the filename is empty, meaning the path comes from the file descriptor provided. On some architectures, this isn't working as expected.
+
+The user also mentioned using binfmt_misc which is used to register interpreters for different binary formats (like QEMU for running foreign binaries). When binfmt_misc is enabled, it allows these foreign binaries to run by translating them on-the-fly.
+
+Looking at the test cases:
+- For x86_64 and x86, everything works fine when using execveat with AT_EMPTY_PATH.
+- For other architectures (aarch64, riscv64), it fails with ENOENT when using AT_EMPTY_PATH but works if they use /proc/self/fd/%d as the pathname.
+
+The error seems to be happening in how the system call is handled for different architectures. Since execveat is a syscall and this behavior varies across architectures, especially when using QEMU's binfmt_misc setup, it points towards an issue with how the system handles foreign binaries or specific syscalls under QEMU.
+
+The possible categories given are instruction, syscall, runtime. The problem here isn't about faulty instructions in the code (so not 'instruction'). It also doesn't seem to be a general runtime error unrelated to system calls. Instead, it's specifically about the execveat system call failing under certain conditions when running different architectures with QEMU.
+
+Therefore, this bug falls under the 'syscall' category because it's related to how the execveat system call is being handled or emulated by QEMU for foreign architectures.
+</think>
+
+The issue arises from how the `execveat` system call is being processed for different architectures within QEMU. The error occurs specifically when using this syscall with an empty path and AT_EMPTY_PATH flag, which works for some arches but not others. This indicates a problem in handling syscalls across various architectures.
+
+**Answer:** syscall
\ No newline at end of file