add deepseek classification results: classifies into user and system mode

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1178 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1178
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..81dd2d6f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/1178
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to figure out whether the RISC-V64 `feq.s` instruction is only considering the lowest 32 bits, and then determine if this bug report is related to user-mode or system-mode in QEMU. 
+
+First, I remember that in RISC-V, instructions like `feq.s` are part of the floating-point unit. The `.s` suffix indicates single-precision floating point operations, which typically use 32 bits. However, since we're dealing with RISC-V64, which is a 64-bit architecture, I'm thinking about how this affects the instruction.
+
+If `feq.s` is only looking at the lower 32 bits, that might be correct because single-precision floats are 32 bits. But if there's an issue where it shouldn't be ignoring the upper bits in some context, maybe that's a problem. I'm not entirely sure, but perhaps the user is reporting a bug where QEMU isn't handling this correctly.
+
+Now, classifying the bug into user-mode or system-mode: User-mode issues usually involve application-level problems, like instructions not executing as expected without involving privileged operations. System-mode involves higher privilege levels, peripherals, devices, and OS interactions. Since `feq.s` is a regular instruction that doesn't require special privileges, this seems more like a user-mode issue.
+</think>
+
+The bug report relates to the execution of an instruction (`feq.s`) within user mode without involving system-level components.
+
+user
\ No newline at end of file