add deepseek classification results: classifies into user and system mode

1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/2101 b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/2101
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..693644ec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/mode-deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/user/2101
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to figure out whether this QEMU issue is a user-mode or system-mode problem. Let's start by understanding what the user is describing.
+
+They're running `qemu-x86_64` on an AArch64 platform and executing an x86_64 version of `ls`. The command they use is:
+
+```
+qemu-x86_64 -L /tmp/ls-x86_64/root-x86_64-ls  /tmp/ls-x86_64/root-x86_64-ls/bin/ls  -l  /
+```
+
+The problem is that this command returns incorrect results. The user provided steps to reproduce, which involve copying the `ls` binary and its dependencies from an x86_64 system to aarch64 and then using QEMU to run it.
+
+First, I know that QEMU can emulate different architectures in both user-mode and system-mode. User-mode emulation runs individual executables without starting a full OS, while system-mode emulates the entire hardware, including booting an operating system.
+
+In this case, the user is executing `ls` directly via QEMU. The `-L` option specifies the location of the dynamic linker for user-mode emulation. This suggests that they're using QEMU in user mode because they're running a single executable without booting an OS.
+
+The issue arises when the x86_64 `ls` is run on AArch64 using QEMU-x86_64. The incorrect results imply there's an issue with how QEMU is emulating the environment for this binary. Since they're not running a full OS, it's more about the execution of the application and its dependencies.
+
+Potential issues could be related to library compatibility, file system handling under emulation, or incorrect CPU instruction translation in user mode. These are typically handled within user-mode settings rather than system-mode because they don't involve device emulation or kernel-level processes.
+
+Additionally, the fact that they're using `-L` points towards user-mode since this option is specific to how QEMU locates libraries for the binary being executed. System-mode would handle such things through a virtualized OS setup.
+
+So, putting it all together, the problem seems to be within the user-mode emulation because it's directly executing an x86_64 application on an AArch64 host without a full OS context.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to user-mode emulation because QEMU is being used to execute a single binary without booting an operating system. The `-L` option specifies the dynamic linker location, which is typical in user-mode setups.
+
+user
\ No newline at end of file