add new results

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/885 b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/885
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7285c89d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/qwen3:32b/reasoning/syscall/885
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. The user is reporting an issue with `getsockopt` on `SO_RCVTIMEO_NEW` and `SO_SNDTIMEO_NEW` where it writes an unexpected `int`. The question is to classify this bug into one of the categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime.
+
+First, I need to understand what these categories mean. The instruction category is for faulty instructions described in the bug report. That might be like incorrect assembly instructions or something related to CPU instructions. The syscall category is for errors with system calls. Since `getsockopt` is a system call, that's probably related. The runtime category is for other runtime errors not covered by the other two.
+
+The problem here is that `getsockopt` is a system call used to retrieve options on a socket. The specific options `SO_RCVTIMEO_NEW` and `SO_SNDTIMEO_NEW` are for getting the receive and send timeout settings. The user says that when using `getsockopt` with these options, it writes an unexpected `int`. This suggests that the system call is returning an integer when perhaps it should be returning a structure, or vice versa. 
+
+In Linux, socket options can have different data types. For example, some options might require a `struct timeval` for timeout values. If the code is expecting an `int` but the system call is returning a `struct timeval` (or something else), that would cause a type mismatch. Alternatively, maybe the code is passing a buffer of incorrect size. 
+
+Since `getsockopt` is a system call, any error in how it's being used or how it's implemented would fall under the syscall category. The issue here seems to be about the system call's behavior, specifically how it handles these options. The problem isn't with the CPU instructions themselves but rather with the system call interface and its usage. 
+
+Therefore, the correct classification should be "syscall".
+</think>
+
+syscall
\ No newline at end of file