diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/017/risc-v/74545755')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/017/risc-v/74545755 | 403 |
1 files changed, 403 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/017/risc-v/74545755 b/results/classifier/017/risc-v/74545755 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b90df3ac --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/017/risc-v/74545755 @@ -0,0 +1,403 @@ +risc-v: 0.845 +user-level: 0.790 +operating system: 0.784 +register: 0.778 +permissions: 0.770 +mistranslation: 0.752 +debug: 0.740 +TCG: 0.722 +performance: 0.721 +device: 0.720 +semantic: 0.669 +virtual: 0.667 +arm: 0.662 +KVM: 0.661 +graphic: 0.660 +ppc: 0.659 +vnc: 0.650 +assembly: 0.648 +architecture: 0.636 +boot: 0.607 +VMM: 0.602 +files: 0.577 +peripherals: 0.566 +hypervisor: 0.563 +network: 0.550 +socket: 0.549 +x86: 0.545 +alpha: 0.508 +PID: 0.479 +kernel: 0.452 +i386: 0.376 +-------------------- +debug: 0.973 +virtual: 0.913 +hypervisor: 0.760 +operating system: 0.581 +kernel: 0.276 +x86: 0.136 +PID: 0.132 +files: 0.051 +register: 0.046 +VMM: 0.042 +TCG: 0.035 +user-level: 0.019 +KVM: 0.014 +performance: 0.009 +semantic: 0.009 +risc-v: 0.007 +assembly: 0.007 +device: 0.006 +ppc: 0.004 +alpha: 0.004 +network: 0.004 +socket: 0.002 +architecture: 0.001 +graphic: 0.001 +vnc: 0.001 +permissions: 0.001 +peripherals: 0.001 +boot: 0.001 +arm: 0.001 +i386: 0.001 +mistranslation: 0.000 + +[Bug Report][RFC PATCH 0/1] block: fix failing assert on paused VM migration + +There's a bug (failing assert) which is reproduced during migration of +a paused VM. I am able to reproduce it on a stand with 2 nodes and a common +NFS share, with VM's disk on that share. + +root@fedora40-1-vm:~# virsh domblklist alma8-vm + Target Source +------------------------------------------ + sda /mnt/shared/images/alma8.qcow2 + +root@fedora40-1-vm:~# df -Th /mnt/shared +Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on +127.0.0.1:/srv/nfsd nfs4 63G 16G 48G 25% /mnt/shared + +On the 1st node: + +root@fedora40-1-vm:~# virsh start alma8-vm ; virsh suspend alma8-vm +root@fedora40-1-vm:~# virsh migrate --compressed --p2p --persistent +--undefinesource --live alma8-vm qemu+ssh://fedora40-2-vm/system + +Then on the 2nd node: + +root@fedora40-2-vm:~# virsh migrate --compressed --p2p --persistent +--undefinesource --live alma8-vm qemu+ssh://fedora40-1-vm/system +error: operation failed: domain is not running + +root@fedora40-2-vm:~# tail -3 /var/log/libvirt/qemu/alma8-vm.log +2024-09-19 13:53:33.336+0000: initiating migration +qemu-system-x86_64: ../block.c:6976: int +bdrv_inactivate_recurse(BlockDriverState *): Assertion `!(bs->open_flags & +BDRV_O_INACTIVE)' failed. +2024-09-19 13:53:42.991+0000: shutting down, reason=crashed + +Backtrace: + +(gdb) bt +#0 0x00007f7eaa2f1664 in __pthread_kill_implementation () at /lib64/libc.so.6 +#1 0x00007f7eaa298c4e in raise () at /lib64/libc.so.6 +#2 0x00007f7eaa280902 in abort () at /lib64/libc.so.6 +#3 0x00007f7eaa28081e in __assert_fail_base.cold () at /lib64/libc.so.6 +#4 0x00007f7eaa290d87 in __assert_fail () at /lib64/libc.so.6 +#5 0x0000563c38b95eb8 in bdrv_inactivate_recurse (bs=0x563c3b6c60c0) at +../block.c:6976 +#6 0x0000563c38b95aeb in bdrv_inactivate_all () at ../block.c:7038 +#7 0x0000563c3884d354 in qemu_savevm_state_complete_precopy_non_iterable +(f=0x563c3b700c20, in_postcopy=false, inactivate_disks=true) + at ../migration/savevm.c:1571 +#8 0x0000563c3884dc1a in qemu_savevm_state_complete_precopy (f=0x563c3b700c20, +iterable_only=false, inactivate_disks=true) at ../migration/savevm.c:1631 +#9 0x0000563c3883a340 in migration_completion_precopy (s=0x563c3b4d51f0, +current_active_state=<optimized out>) at ../migration/migration.c:2780 +#10 migration_completion (s=0x563c3b4d51f0) at ../migration/migration.c:2844 +#11 migration_iteration_run (s=0x563c3b4d51f0) at ../migration/migration.c:3270 +#12 migration_thread (opaque=0x563c3b4d51f0) at ../migration/migration.c:3536 +#13 0x0000563c38dbcf14 in qemu_thread_start (args=0x563c3c2d5bf0) at +../util/qemu-thread-posix.c:541 +#14 0x00007f7eaa2ef6d7 in start_thread () at /lib64/libc.so.6 +#15 0x00007f7eaa373414 in clone () at /lib64/libc.so.6 + +What happens here is that after 1st migration BDS related to HDD remains +inactive as VM is still paused. Then when we initiate 2nd migration, +bdrv_inactivate_all() leads to the attempt to set BDRV_O_INACTIVE flag +on that node which is already set, thus assert fails. + +Attached patch which simply skips setting flag if it's already set is more +of a kludge than a clean solution. Should we use more sophisticated logic +which allows some of the nodes be in inactive state prior to the migration, +and takes them into account during bdrv_inactivate_all()? Comments would +be appreciated. + +Andrey + +Andrey Drobyshev (1): + block: do not fail when inactivating node which is inactive + + block.c | 10 +++++++++- + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) + +-- +2.39.3 + +Instead of throwing an assert let's just ignore that flag is already set +and return. We assume that it's going to be safe to ignore. Otherwise +this assert fails when migrating a paused VM back and forth. + +Ideally we'd like to have a more sophisticated solution, e.g. not even +scan the nodes which should be inactive at this point. + +Signed-off-by: Andrey Drobyshev <andrey.drobyshev@virtuozzo.com> +--- + block.c | 10 +++++++++- + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) + +diff --git a/block.c b/block.c +index 7d90007cae..c1dcf906d1 100644 +--- a/block.c ++++ b/block.c +@@ -6973,7 +6973,15 @@ static int GRAPH_RDLOCK +bdrv_inactivate_recurse(BlockDriverState *bs) + return 0; + } + +- assert(!(bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_INACTIVE)); ++ if (bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_INACTIVE) { ++ /* ++ * Return here instead of throwing assert as a workaround to ++ * prevent failure on migrating paused VM. ++ * Here we assume that if we're trying to inactivate BDS that's ++ * already inactive, it's safe to just ignore it. ++ */ ++ return 0; ++ } + + /* Inactivate this node */ + if (bs->drv->bdrv_inactivate) { +-- +2.39.3 + +[add migration maintainers] + +On 24.09.24 15:56, Andrey Drobyshev wrote: +Instead of throwing an assert let's just ignore that flag is already set +and return. We assume that it's going to be safe to ignore. Otherwise +this assert fails when migrating a paused VM back and forth. + +Ideally we'd like to have a more sophisticated solution, e.g. not even +scan the nodes which should be inactive at this point. + +Signed-off-by: Andrey Drobyshev <andrey.drobyshev@virtuozzo.com> +--- + block.c | 10 +++++++++- + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) + +diff --git a/block.c b/block.c +index 7d90007cae..c1dcf906d1 100644 +--- a/block.c ++++ b/block.c +@@ -6973,7 +6973,15 @@ static int GRAPH_RDLOCK +bdrv_inactivate_recurse(BlockDriverState *bs) + return 0; + } +- assert(!(bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_INACTIVE)); ++ if (bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_INACTIVE) { ++ /* ++ * Return here instead of throwing assert as a workaround to ++ * prevent failure on migrating paused VM. ++ * Here we assume that if we're trying to inactivate BDS that's ++ * already inactive, it's safe to just ignore it. ++ */ ++ return 0; ++ } +/* Inactivate this node */ +if (bs->drv->bdrv_inactivate) { +I doubt that this a correct way to go. + +As far as I understand, "inactive" actually means that "storage is not belong to +qemu, but to someone else (another qemu process for example), and may be changed +transparently". In turn this means that Qemu should do nothing with inactive disks. So the +problem is that nobody called bdrv_activate_all on target, and we shouldn't ignore that. + +Hmm, I see in process_incoming_migration_bh() we do call bdrv_activate_all(), +but only in some scenarios. May be, the condition should be less strict here. + +Why we need any condition here at all? Don't we want to activate block-layer on +target after migration anyway? + +-- +Best regards, +Vladimir + +On 9/30/24 12:25 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: +> +[add migration maintainers] +> +> +On 24.09.24 15:56, Andrey Drobyshev wrote: +> +> [...] +> +> +I doubt that this a correct way to go. +> +> +As far as I understand, "inactive" actually means that "storage is not +> +belong to qemu, but to someone else (another qemu process for example), +> +and may be changed transparently". In turn this means that Qemu should +> +do nothing with inactive disks. So the problem is that nobody called +> +bdrv_activate_all on target, and we shouldn't ignore that. +> +> +Hmm, I see in process_incoming_migration_bh() we do call +> +bdrv_activate_all(), but only in some scenarios. May be, the condition +> +should be less strict here. +> +> +Why we need any condition here at all? Don't we want to activate +> +block-layer on target after migration anyway? +> +Hmm I'm not sure about the unconditional activation, since we at least +have to honor LATE_BLOCK_ACTIVATE cap if it's set (and probably delay it +in such a case). In current libvirt upstream I see such code: + +> +/* Migration capabilities which should always be enabled as long as they +> +> +* are supported by QEMU. If the capability is supposed to be enabled on both +> +> +* sides of migration, it won't be enabled unless both sides support it. +> +> +*/ +> +> +static const qemuMigrationParamsAlwaysOnItem qemuMigrationParamsAlwaysOn[] = +> +{ +> +> +{QEMU_MIGRATION_CAP_PAUSE_BEFORE_SWITCHOVER, +> +> +QEMU_MIGRATION_SOURCE}, +> +> +> +> +{QEMU_MIGRATION_CAP_LATE_BLOCK_ACTIVATE, +> +> +QEMU_MIGRATION_DESTINATION}, +> +> +}; +which means that libvirt always wants LATE_BLOCK_ACTIVATE to be set. + +The code from process_incoming_migration_bh() you're referring to: + +> +/* If capability late_block_activate is set: +> +> +* Only fire up the block code now if we're going to restart the +> +> +* VM, else 'cont' will do it. +> +> +* This causes file locking to happen; so we don't want it to happen +> +> +* unless we really are starting the VM. +> +> +*/ +> +> +if (!migrate_late_block_activate() || +> +> +(autostart && (!global_state_received() || +> +> +runstate_is_live(global_state_get_runstate())))) { +> +> +/* Make sure all file formats throw away their mutable metadata. +> +> +> +* If we get an error here, just don't restart the VM yet. */ +> +> +bdrv_activate_all(&local_err); +> +> +if (local_err) { +> +> +error_report_err(local_err); +> +> +local_err = NULL; +> +> +autostart = false; +> +> +} +> +> +} +It states explicitly that we're either going to start VM right at this +point if (autostart == true), or we wait till "cont" command happens. +None of this is going to happen if we start another migration while +still being in PAUSED state. So I think it seems reasonable to take +such case into account. For instance, this patch does prevent the crash: + +> +diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c +> +index ae2be31557..3222f6745b 100644 +> +--- a/migration/migration.c +> ++++ b/migration/migration.c +> +@@ -733,7 +733,8 @@ static void process_incoming_migration_bh(void *opaque) +> +*/ +> +if (!migrate_late_block_activate() || +> +(autostart && (!global_state_received() || +> +- runstate_is_live(global_state_get_runstate())))) { +> ++ runstate_is_live(global_state_get_runstate()))) || +> ++ (!autostart && global_state_get_runstate() == RUN_STATE_PAUSED)) { +> +/* Make sure all file formats throw away their mutable metadata. +> +* If we get an error here, just don't restart the VM yet. */ +> +bdrv_activate_all(&local_err); +What are your thoughts on it? + +Andrey + |