1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/108/other/1885 b/results/classifier/108/other/1885
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..32452859
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/108/other/1885
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+graphic: 0.874
+device: 0.852
+boot: 0.816
+PID: 0.787
+performance: 0.756
+files: 0.653
+permissions: 0.609
+network: 0.600
+socket: 0.576
+other: 0.570
+semantic: 0.543
+vnc: 0.537
+debug: 0.527
+KVM: 0.154
+
+mipsel malta machine is broken in avocado console tests
+Description of problem:
+As noted in #1884 we see failures of the boot_linux_console.py test. Unlikely other avocado failures, these ones are consistent and reproduce locally with 100% success
+
+```
+./configure --target-list=mipsel-softmmu
+make -j 20
+cd build
+./pyvenv/bin/python3 -B -m avocado --show=app run --job-results-dir=./tests/results -t arch:mipsel --failfast tests/avocado/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_mips_malta32el_nanomips_4k
+```
+
+This test will reliably fail with a timeout waiting for console output.
+
+Attempting to run the QEMU command manually
+
+```
+$ ./qemu-system-mipsel -display none -vga none -machine malta -chardev stdio,id=console -serial chardev:console -cpu I7200 -no-reboot -kernel /home/berrange/src/virt/qemu/build/tests/results/job-2023-09-13T17.14-77de093/test-results/tmp_dir520smana/1-tests_avocado_boot_linux_console.py_BootLinuxConsole.test_mips_malta32el_nanomips_4kkernel -append 'printk.time=0 mem=256m@@0x0 console=ttyS0'
+```
+
+results in no serial console output at all.
+
+IMHO either the MIPS malta machine has had a regression, or the kernel we're downloading for testing has had a regression.
+Additional information:
+