diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1280961 | 28 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1569053 | 21 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1589153 | 40 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1686350 | 14 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1734810 | 17 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1777301 | 17 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1794950 | 19 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1829498 | 21 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1850751 | 14 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1863819 | 17 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1877052 | 23 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1879646 | 13 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/568445 | 17 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/642304 | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/809912 | 19 |
15 files changed, 0 insertions, 291 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1280961 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1280961 deleted file mode 100644 index 71cf7b7b..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1280961 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,28 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's read through the details carefully. - -The user is experiencing an issue with 9pfs when mounting a filesystem in a KVM guest. They mention that using vi editor and sysbench leads to an fsync failure. The error occurs during file editing, which suggests it's related to how files are being synced or accessed. - -Looking at the provided information, the user found that the problem is because the 9pfs implementation in their kernel (version 2.6.32) doesn't support the fsync function. They resolved it by backporting code from a higher version of the kernel. The relevant patch link points to an update in the Linux kernel's 9pfs driver. - -Now, considering the categories: - -- "mistranslation" relates to incorrect semantic mapping; this isn't about that. -- "assembly": no mention of assembly issues. -- "device": Could be related, but it's more specific. -- "graphic": Not relevant here. -- "socket": Doesn't seem related. -- "network": 9pfs is a network filesystem, but the issue is with fsync. -- "KVM": Yes, because it's a KVM guest. The problem occurs within the virtual machine environment. -- Other categories like boot, vnc, debug, etc., don't fit as well. - -The key point is that this is an issue within the KVM hypervisor's handling of filesystem operations in the guest. Since the fix was applied to the kernel and relates to 9pfs support, it falls under the hypervisor category because it's about how the virtual machine interacts with its environment provided by QEMU/KVM. - -Therefore, the correct category is "KVM." -</think> - -The bug report involves an issue within a KVM guest where using certain tools like vi editor and sysbench results in an fsync failure when mounting a filesystem via 9pfs. The problem was identified as a lack of fsync implementation in the 9pfs driver for the specific kernel version (2.6.32), which was resolved by backporting code from a newer kernel version. - -The classification is based on the fact that the issue occurs within a KVM guest environment, making it related to the hypervisor's handling of filesystem operations. - -**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1569053 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1569053 deleted file mode 100644 index 2a069de9..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1569053 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user is encountering an issue where QEMU crashes when starting a second VM. They provided the commands and the error log. - -Looking at the problem description, the user is using KVM with multiple VMs. Each VM has its own chardev socket for vhost-user networking. When the second VM starts, QEMU crashes immediately with a "KVM internal error" and some hex values in the logs. - -The key here is that it's happening when starting the second VM. The first one runs fine, but the second causes a crash. This suggests there might be an issue with how resources are being managed between multiple instances of KVM or perhaps a conflict in networking setup since each VM uses vhost-user sockets. - -I notice that both VMs use similar configurations except for the socket paths and MAC addresses. The user is asking if both VMS connect to the same switch, implying possible network configuration issues. - -Since the crash occurs within KVM when enabling the second VM, it points towards a problem related to the hypervisor or how QEMU/KVM handles multiple instances, possibly with resources like memory or I/O devices not being properly isolated or managed between the VMS. - -Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. The crash is specific to starting another VM after one is already running and occurs within KVM itself. This makes me think it's a hypervisor-level issue rather than something related to devices, graphics, or networking configuration alone. - -So, considering all this, the most fitting category would be "KVM" since the error message mentions "KVM internal error" and it's directly affecting the ability to run multiple VMs. -</think> - -The bug report involves QEMU crashing when starting a second VM. The issue is related to KVM, as indicated by the "KVM internal error." This suggests a problem within the hypervisor itself rather than specific device configurations or networking. - -**Answer:** - -KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1589153 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1589153 deleted file mode 100644 index c2738e5f..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1589153 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,40 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user mentioned that when they upgraded from Ubuntu 15.04 to 16.04, their QEMU-KVM setup started freezing during the Windows 7 installation. They provided a lot of details about the commands they're using and that it worked fine in older versions but not after updating. - -First, I need to look at the categories given: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. The task is to pick one category that best fits this bug. - -The user's issue occurs when using QEMU-KVM for virtualization. They're running a 64-bit version of QEMU and have specified several options like enabling KVM acceleration, setting up networking, VGA type as qxl, spice for remote access, etc. The problem is that during the Windows installation, it freezes after loading some files. - -I'm thinking about what could cause such an issue. Since they upgraded their Ubuntu version and this started happening, maybe there's a regression in QEMU-KVM itself or perhaps in how KVM interacts with newer versions of Ubuntu's kernel or other system components. - -Looking at the categories: - -- **mistranslation**: This relates to incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target. I don't think that's the case here because it's more about system hang rather than miscompilation. -- **assembly**: Assembly lowering issues are probably not relevant here since the issue is with a high-level process freezing, not low-level assembly code. -- **device**: This could be related if there's an issue with hardware devices or drivers. But they're using standard QEMU-KVM setup, so maybe. -- **graphic**: The user is using qxl for VGA and spice for remote access. If the graphical output isn't rendering correctly, it might cause issues, but in this case, it's freezing after loading files on the Windows side. -- **socket** or **network**: They have a -net nic and -net user option, so network setup is involved. But the freeze occurs during installation, which might be more related to device drivers or boot process rather than networking itself. -- **KVM**: This seems directly relevant because they're using QEMU with KVM acceleration. If there's an issue in how KVM handles certain operations in newer versions, it could cause the VM to hang. -- **boot**: Since the problem occurs during installation (which is part of the boot process), this is a possibility too. -- **vnc**, **debug**, etc.: These don't seem directly related. - -The user also mentioned that they had to pin QEMU at an older version (2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.22) to fix the issue, which suggests there was a regression in a newer version of QEMU-KVM. They linked it to a security update in qemu 2.5.0. - -I'm leaning towards "KVM" because the problem is specific to their virtualization setup with KVM acceleration. Alternatively, it could be a boot issue, but since KVM is central to their setup and they're using QEMU-KVM, the category under KVM seems more fitting. - -Wait, another thought: if the issue started after an update where QEMU's KVM component might have had changes in how it interacts with host devices or virtual devices. Alternatively, maybe the hypervisor itself (since KVM is a hypervisor) has issues in newer versions. - -So between "KVM" and "hypervisor". Since KVM is part of the hypervisor functionality under QEMU, perhaps "hypervisor" would be the more appropriate category because it's about how the virtual machine is being managed at that level. But I'm not entirely sure if "KVM" or "hypervisor" is the correct label. - -Alternatively, considering that the user is using QEMU with KVM acceleration, and the issue occurs during VM setup/boot, maybe "boot" is also a possible category. However, I think hypervisor is more about the management layer, while boot is about the guest OS's boot process. - -Wait, but in this case, the installation media is being used, so it's part of the guest's boot process. So if the VM isn't proceeding beyond that point, maybe "boot" is relevant. - -Hmm. I'm a bit torn between "KVM", "hypervisor", and "boot". Let me think again: the user provided command lines with -enable-kvm and -machine pc,accel=kvm, so it's definitely using KVM acceleration. The problem occurs during the Windows installation, which suggests that the VM is not proceeding past a certain point, possibly due to an issue in how QEMU-KVM handles some operation. - -If I have to choose one category, considering that the user had to revert to an older version of QEMU-KVM and it worked, the bug is likely in KVM itself. So "KVM" would be the appropriate category. -</think> - -The bug report involves a freeze during Windows 7 installation using QEMU-KVM after updating Ubuntu. The issue is tied to a newer QEMU version causing problems, necessitating reverting to an older version. Since this relates directly to how KVM handles virtualization and causes the VM to hang, the most fitting category is: - -**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1686350 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1686350 deleted file mode 100644 index 2ced2ac2..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1686350 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully. - -The user is reporting an issue with QEMU where the Skylake Server CPU model isn't available when using the '-cpu' option. They provided details about their environment and steps to reproduce the issue by running 'qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu help'. The output lists several CPUs but not the Skylake-Server. - -Looking at the categories, I see options like 'mistranslation', 'assembly', 'other', 'device', etc. Since this is related to KVM and CPU models, the most fitting category seems to be 'KVM' because it's about virtualization features in QEMU/KVM. The Skylake Server model was added in a previous release but isn't present in their current setup. - -I don't think it's 'mistranslation' or 'assembly' as those relate more to code generation, not CPU models. 'Device', 'graphic', etc., don't fit here either. So the best category is 'KVM'. -</think> - -The bug report is about the absence of a specific CPU model (Skylake Server) in QEMU's KVM mode. This relates directly to virtualization capabilities, so it falls under the 'KVM' category. - -**Answer:** -KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1734810 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1734810 deleted file mode 100644 index b044ddae..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1734810 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, I need to classify this bug report regarding QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem carefully. - -The user is experiencing abnormally slow performance when running Windows guests on their virtual machine using Gnome Boxes. They mentioned that they can't adjust the number of CPU cores allocated from the application's interface. This seems to be an issue with how resources are being managed or assigned in QEMU. - -Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. Since the problem is about slow performance and resource allocation, I should think about what could cause that. - -The user was instructed to provide the QEMU command-line parameters, which suggests it's related to how QEMU is being invoked. Issues with CPU cores might be linked to virtualization settings or hypervisor configuration. KVM is a key component for hardware-assisted virtualization in QEMU, so if it's not properly configured or if there's an issue with the number of vCPUs allocated, that could cause slowness. - -The user also mentioned that they couldn't adjust cores from the UI, which might indicate a configuration problem in Gnome Boxes. However, since QEMU is the underlying hypervisor, any misconfiguration there would affect performance. - -Since KVM directly relates to how virtual machines access CPU resources and virtualization, it's likely the category here. The user was also asked about KVM module loading, so that supports this thought. - -I don't think it's a translation issue or graphics/network-related because the problem is generalized slowness without specific symptoms pointing to those areas. It seems more related to resource allocation under the hypervisor. -</think> - -KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1777301 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1777301 deleted file mode 100644 index 3f63161f..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1777301 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, I'm looking at this bug report to classify it into one of the given categories. The user is reporting that after installing Checkpoint Pointsec FDE on a Windows 10 guest in CentOS 7 using KVM, the guest failed to boot with an error: "KVM internal error. Suberror: 1 emulation failure." - -First, I note that the issue occurs during the boot process of the virtual machine. The user mentioned that everything worked fine before installing Checkpoint's software, which suggests that the encryption might be interfering with KVM's functionality. - -The error message points to a KVM internal problem. Since this is related to KVM, it falls under the hypervisor category because KVM functions as a hypervisor for virtualization in Linux environments. The mention of "emulation failure" indicates an issue within QEMU/KVM's handling of hardware emulation or virtualization. - -Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc., the most fitting here is definitely "KVM." This is because the problem is occurring in the hypervisor layer, and the error message directly references KVM. Other categories like "boot" might be relevant, but since it's a KVM-related internal error, "KVM" is more specific. - -I should also consider if there are other possible categories, but given the information, none fit better than "KVM." The issue isn't related to network configuration, graphics drivers, or performance; it's about the hypervisor itself failing during guest boot. -</think> - -The bug report involves a failure in KVM, specifically an internal error when trying to boot after installing encryption software. This points directly to issues within the hypervisor. - -**Answer:** - -KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1794950 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1794950 deleted file mode 100644 index c51ce33d..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1794950 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. - -The user is reporting that QEMU hangs when their guest OS uses a Linux kernel version 4.16 or newer. They've been using older kernels without issues but upgraded and now experience hangs during fstests. The issue occurs across multiple physical machines with different OS distributions (openSUSE and xUbuntu), and it's consistent across various QEMU versions, including debug builds. - -Looking at the provided information, the user tried different QEMU versions (2.11.2, 2.12.1, 3.0.0) all showing the same problem. The hangs happen during specific tests in the fstests suite—specifically test generic/299 or 451. They've also provided a coredump and stack traces for analysis. - -The key here is that the issue arises when using newer Linux kernels as guests, leading to QEMU hanging. Since KVM is being used (as per the configure parameters), this points towards issues related to virtualization under KVM. The problem isn't with network settings because the network configuration seems correct (TUN/TAP interfaces, etc.), and it's not a VNC or serial issue since those are just part of the setup. - -The hanging could be due to how QEMU interacts with KVM when running newer kernels. Maybe there's a regression in how certain system calls or virtualization primitives are handled, leading to deadlocks or unresponsiveness. Since the problem is consistent across different guest OSes and hardware setups, it's likely an issue within QEMU itself rather than specific to the host or guest configurations. - -Looking at the categories again: KVM is one of them. The user is definitely using KVM as per their setup (enable-kvm in the command line). So this seems like a KVM-related bug. Other possibilities include network, but since they've set up networking correctly and it's not part of the issue description beyond being used, that's less likely. - -Therefore, I'd classify this bug under 'KVM' as it's related to the hypervisor component where the issue is occurring. -</think> - -The issue relates to QEMU hanging when using newer Linux kernels in guest OSes with KVM enabled. The problem occurs consistently across different setups and QEMU versions, pointing towards a potential regression or interaction specific to KVM usage. - -**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1829498 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1829498 deleted file mode 100644 index 9e38961c..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1829498 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Alright, I need to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user is experiencing issues where Windows 8 gets stuck during boot after a shutdown in QEMU. They mention that it's happening specifically when using TCG mode or with certain irqchip configurations. - -First, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. - -The problem involves an interrupt not being handled correctly. The user notes that when Windows sends EOI (End Of Interrupt), the IRQ line remains high because AHCI isn't accessed again. This leads to repeated interrupts and a stuck system. - -The issue occurs only in TCG mode or with "kernel-irqchip=off/split". With "kernel-irqchip=on", it works fine, implying that the problem is related to how QEMU handles IRQs, especially under certain configurations. - -Looking at the categories, 'KVM' and 'hypervisor' are relevant since KVM is a hypervisor. The user also mentions using '-enable-kvm', which enables KVM acceleration. However, the specific issue arises in TCG mode, which doesn't use KVM but emulates instructions directly. But the problem relates to how IRQs are managed, which ties into KVM's behavior or QEMU's irqchip implementation. - -Alternatively, 'kernel' could be a category since it involves the handling of interrupts by the host kernel. However, considering that the problem is more about how QEMU manages the_irq in TCG mode, especially with the specific options used, I think it falls under KVM-related issues because enabling KVM would typically handle irqchip differently. - -Wait, no—the issue occurs when using 'kernel-irqchip=off/split', which suggests it's a problem within QEMU's handling of the IRQ chip in certain modes. But since this is related to KVM configuration and the behavior changes between different irqchip settings, perhaps 'KVM' is still the right category. - -Alternatively, maybe 'peripherals' because it involves device emulation (AHCI), but the issue is more about how the interrupt is being handled rather than the peripheral itself. - -Considering all this, I think the most fitting category here is 'hypervisor' since KVM is a hypervisor and the problem relates to how the virtualization layer handles interrupts. -</think> - -KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1850751 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1850751 deleted file mode 100644 index 4443535b..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1850751 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Alright, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me start by reading through the bug report carefully to understand what's being discussed. - -The user mentioned that the kvm flag isn't exposed by default in QEMU. They pointed out that according to the source code, it should be exposed when using a X86CPU model. However, they have to explicitly add "kvm=on" in the custom CPU arguments. Additionally, libvirt can't expose the kvm flag because it assumes it's enabled by default, only allowing "kvm hidden='true'". - -Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. - -The issue here is related to the KVM flag not being exposed by default. Since this directly pertains to the KVM functionality and its configuration within QEMU, the most appropriate category would be "KVM". The user is dealing with how QEMU handles KVM flags, which falls under the KVM category. -</think> - -The bug report discusses issues related to the KVM flag exposure in QEMU. It's about whether the kvm flag is enabled by default and how it interacts with libvirt. Since this pertains directly to the KVM hypervisor feature, the appropriate category is "KVM". - -**Answer:** -KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1863819 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1863819 deleted file mode 100644 index e705f539..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1863819 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the details carefully. - -The user reports that when using GDB to repeatedly single-step a userspace process in a KVM guest, the guest application crashes with a 0x80000004 exception. They mention it's reproducible on Windows guests and possibly others. It also affects Ubuntu hosts with older kernels by causing hangs. - -They tried various QEMU versions (3.0, 4.2, master) and saw the same behavior. The user isn't sure if this is a KVM or QEMU issue but points out that newer kernels might have fixed it. They provided steps to reproduce the bug, involving compiling a specific program and using GDB with KVM and SMP. - -The key points here are that the problem occurs when using KVM for virtualization, specifically in single-stepping processes which leads to guest crashes or hangs. Since the issue is related to KVM's behavior under certain conditions and involves debugging tools like GDB interacting with the guest OS, it seems directly tied to how QEMU handles KVM operations. - -Looking at the categories provided: 'KVM' is one of them. This fits because the bug occurs when using KVM in QEMU, causing the guest application to crash during single-step operations. The mention of different host kernels and QEMU versions suggests that it's a deeper issue likely within how QEMU interfaces with KVM. - -Other categories like 'network', 'graphic', or 'socket' don't seem relevant here since the bug is about process debugging in the guest OS, which relates to virtualization handling rather than network traffic or graphical rendering. Similarly, 'hypervisor' could be considered, but since QEMU's hypervisor part (when using KVM) is closely tied to the KVM module, it might fall under the 'KVM' category. - -Therefore, the most appropriate classification for this bug report is 'KVM'. -</think> - -KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1877052 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1877052 deleted file mode 100644 index e7fc9e10..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1877052 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,23 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Alright, let's tackle this bug report classification step by step. The user is experiencing an issue where their KVM Win 10 guest VM pauses after a kernel upgrade on their host system. They mentioned that the problem started after upgrading from kernel version 5.4.0-28.33 to 5.4.0-29.34. Even after rebooting, the issue persists. - -First, I need to understand the key components involved here. The VM is running Windows 10 under KVM on a Linux host, specifically Ubuntu since they're using apt for upgrades. The kernel upgrade seems to be the trigger for the problem, which points towards changes in the host's hypervisor or related drivers. - -Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. - -The bug report mentions that after the kernel upgrade, the VM pauses. This suggests that the issue is related to how the host's new kernel interacts with the KVM environment. The user also notes that this started after a kernel update, which makes me think it's either a regression in the kernel or some interaction between the new kernel and QEMU/KVM. - -Additionally, the user points out that there were warnings about MSR settings, but they clarified these are red herrings. So the main issue isn't related to those warnings but rather the VM pausing after the kernel upgrade. - -Considering the categories: - -- **KVM** is directly relevant because it's the hypervisor being used. -- **kernel** is also a possibility since the problem started with a kernel upgrade. -- Other categories like network, device, or graphic don't seem to fit here as there's no mention of network issues or hardware problems. - -Since the VM pauses after a kernel update and KVM is the hypervisor in use, it's likely that the issue falls under **KVM**. However, since the problem is triggered by a kernel upgrade, **kernel** could also be a contender. But given that the primary environment here is KVM, I think the main category should be **KVM**. -</think> - -The bug report involves a Windows 10 VM pausing after a kernel upgrade on the host system, which is running QEMU/KVM. The issue likely relates to changes in the hypervisor or its interaction with the new kernel. - -Answer: KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1879646 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1879646 deleted file mode 100644 index 7c519077..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/1879646 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is talking about QEMU failing when setting a specific MSR (Model-Specific Register) value and an assertion failure occurring in the kvm.c file. They want to dump MSR features in a human-readable form to aid debugging. - -Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. - -The issue is related to QEMU's KVM module because the error message points to kvm.c. The user mentioned that the problem occurs when setting an MSR value, which relates to CPU features in virtualization. They also provided a link to a discussion where MSRs were being examined for debugging purposes. - -Since the bug report is about improving debugging by making MSR information more understandable and is directly tied to KVM's functionality, the most fitting category seems to be "KVM." The other categories like debug or performance don't capture the specific aspect of virtualization here. -</think> - -The issue pertains to debugging MSR features within QEMU's KVM module. Therefore, the category is: - -**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/568445 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/568445 deleted file mode 100644 index fea962da..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/568445 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through the report carefully and understand what it's about. - -The user is talking about KVM guests using LVM-backed drives experiencing high iowait times on the host system when there's moderate disk I/O. They mention that KVM defaults to writethrough caching, which causes poor performance. The suggestion is to explicitly disable caching for better performance. - -Looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. Since the issue is related to how KVM handles disk caching with LVM-backed drives, it's definitely about KVM behavior. It's not about graphics or networking; it's more about storage and I/O handling. - -The user references upstream discussions on qemu-devel and other mailing lists, indicating that this is a configuration or default behavior in QEMU/KVM. The problem lies in the caching mode for block devices, which affects performance but not data integrity as both writethrough and none are considered safe according to the manpage. - -So the bug report isn't about a crash or a specific feature request; it's more about adjusting defaults for better performance. However, the issue is tied to how KVM handles storage settings by default when using LVM, which falls under KVM's configuration and behavior. - -Therefore, the appropriate category for this bug is "KVM." -</think> - -The issue is related to the default caching mode in QEMU/KVM affecting performance with LVM-backed drives. Since it pertains to how KVM handles storage configurations by default, the correct classification is: - -**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/642304 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/642304 deleted file mode 100644 index 7eac342d..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/642304 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The possible options are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. - -Looking at the bug report, it's about Solaris/x86 v10 hanging under KVM. The user provided details that when they run QEMU with the -enable-kvm option, the guest OS hangs. Without this option, it runs fine. They mentioned using QEMU built with certain configure options, including --enable-kvm. - -The issue seems to be related directly to how KVM is handling the guest OS. Since the problem occurs only when KVM is enabled, it points towards a bug in the KVM hypervisor or its integration within QEMU. The user also mentioned that they're using the QEMU git tree, which implies that the issue might be in how QEMU interacts with KVM. - -I don't see any mention of assembly or translation issues, so mistranslation doesn't seem right. It's not related to graphics, sockets, or networking as described. The main component here is KVM itself. So, the category should be 'KVM'. -</think> - -KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/809912 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/809912 deleted file mode 100644 index 1b179fda..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/KVM/809912 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report in QEMU. The user is encountering an error when running a virtual machine with more than a certain amount of memory. Specifically, when they set "-m 4096", QEMU aborts with "Bad ram offset". However, using lower values like "-m 3500" works fine. - -First, I notice that the user is using KVM as the hypervisor since they mention the kvm_amd module and are running Linux kernels on both host and guest. The error message points to a problem with RAM addressing, which might be related to how QEMU handles memory mappings or allocations for larger amounts of RAM. - -The bug report mentions that this issue occurs in both older versions (0.14.1) and newer ones from the git repository around July 2011. The user also notes that after updating QEMU on their Ubuntu system, the problem persists until they reduce the guest's memory below 3500MB. - -Looking at possible categories: KVM is explicitly mentioned, so that's a strong clue. The issue seems related to memory management within the virtual machine, which would fall under hypervisor-specific problems rather than user-mode assembly or other areas. - -The error "Bad ram offset" suggests an invalid address being used for RAM in the guest, possibly due to incorrect mapping by QEMU when handling larger memory allocations. This points towards a problem with how QEMU's KVM module manages memory, which is part of the hypervisor layer. - -Other categories like device, graphic, socket, or network don't seem relevant here since the issue is about memory allocation and offsets. Similarly, it's not about booting, VNC, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, or others. - -So, putting it all together, this bug is related to KVM's handling of memory in the guest OS, which makes "KVM" the appropriate category. -</think> - -The issue relates to how QEMU's KVM module manages memory for the virtual machine. The error occurs when allocating a large amount of RAM, indicating a problem with KVM's memory handling. - -**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file |