diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/flags./1696353')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/flags./1696353 | 31 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 31 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/flags./1696353 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/flags./1696353 deleted file mode 100644 index 345e8e92..00000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/flags./1696353 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,31 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me go through the information step by step. - -The user reported that Golang binaries fail to start under linux-user in QEMU. They provided details about the error messages, which indicate issues with creating new OS threads and failed mmap operations. The discussion mentions patches applied on the Go side and references a specific bug in Go's repository (issue #20763). - -The main issue seems related to how clone() flags are handled when running Golang binaries under QEMU's user-mode emulation. Initially, the problem was with the CLONE_SYSVMEM flag not being passed, causing the runtime to fail. However, after applying a patch in Go, it started working. But then another error occurred with mmap, leading the user to suggest opening a new bug report. - -Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. - -The problem is related to how QEMU's emulation handles system calls like clone() and mmap(). These are low-level OS interactions, which in this case, fall under the operating system's user-mode runtime. Since the issue arises from the interaction between QEMU's user-mode emulation and the Go runtime, particularly when using pthread_create and clone(), it seems to be a problem with how the guest program is executed under QEMU. - -Considering that the issue isn't directly related to translation of assembly code or specific device/peripheral handling, but rather about system call handling and process creation in the user-mode environment. The categories 'mistranslation' might relate if there's an incorrect mapping from source to target architecture, but the problem here is more about how QEMU handles certain clone flags when emulating a guest OS. - -Another possible category could be 'other', as it doesn't neatly fit into the specific hardware-related or performance categories. However, since the issue pertains to the execution environment and process management, which is part of the kernel's responsibilities, 'kernel' might also be appropriate. - -But wait, in QEMU terminology, when dealing with user-mode emulation (like linux-user), it's handled by a subsystem that translates system calls on behalf of the guest. This isn't directly related to the hypervisor or device emulation but more about how the user-mode processes are managed. - -Given the options, 'other' might be too generic. Alternatively, since the issue is with the way QEMU handles certain clone flags and process creation, which is part of the system call handling in the user-mode translation layer, it doesn't fit neatly into any of the specific categories like device or network. Therefore, 'mistranslation' could apply because it's about how the guest's system calls (like clone) are translated or handled by QEMU. - -But I'm a bit uncertain. Another angle is that since this involves the runtime environment for user-mode processes, perhaps 'boot' might be relevant if it's about starting processes, but that doesn't seem precise either. - -Considering all this, I think 'mistranslation' is the closest fit because it deals with how the guest's system calls (like clone) are handled by QEMU's translation layer. Alternatively, since it's about process creation and system calls in user-mode, which might not have a specific category, but among the options given, 'mistranslation' or 'other' could be suitable. - -However, upon re-reading, the main issue was that the Go runtime wasn't passing CLONE_SYSVMEM, leading to failure. The fix was applied on the Go side, so perhaps the problem in QEMU is more about how it handles such flags when translating system calls. Therefore, 'mistranslation' might be the right category as it relates to how system calls are handled (translated) by QEMU's user-mode code. - -Wait, but I'm not entirely sure if this is mistranslation or something else. Alternatively, since it's about process creation and system call handling in user-mode emulation, maybe 'boot' could apply, but that seems more related to the initial booting of an OS rather than process management. - -I think I'll settle on 'mistranslation' because it's about how QEMU translates or handles certain system calls (like clone) when running a guest program. Alternatively, if none of the categories perfectly fit, 'other' might be safer, but given the options, 'mistranslation' seems closer. -</think> - -The issue is classified under **"mistranslation"** because it relates to how QEMU's user-mode emulation handles system calls like clone(), specifically regarding the translation and handling of certain flags. \ No newline at end of file |