summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/235
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/235')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/23515
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/235 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/235
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9ed309fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/assembly/235
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "atomic failure linking with --enable-sanitizers on 32-bit Linux hosts". The categories available are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, let's break down the bug report. It mentions "atomic failure linking" which suggests a problem during the linking stage of compilation. The issue occurs when using --enable-sanitizers on 32-bit Linux systems.
+
+Atomic operations are typically handled at a low level, possibly involving assembly or specific compiler optimizations. Sanitizers (like AddressSanitizer) can sometimes cause issues with such low-level code because they add additional checks which might interfere with how the program is linked or runs.
+
+Looking at the categories: 'assembly' seems relevant here because it's about linking and possibly incorrect assembly instructions. However, if the problem isn't in the translation but rather in the build process, maybe it's a performance issue? But I'm not sure.
+
+Wait, --enable-sanitizers might affect how libraries or object files are linked. If the linker is failing to link correctly when sanitizers are enabled on 32-bit systems, this could be related to the way QEMU handles certain optimizations or code paths that differ between 64-bit and 32-bit builds.
+
+Considering all options, 'assembly' seems more fitting because it's about linking with specific flags that might change how assembly is handled during compilation. Alternatively, if it's a build-time issue, maybe 'other', but I think the link to assembly operations makes 'assembly' a better fit.
+</think>
+
+assembly
\ No newline at end of file