diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1062220')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1062220 | 32 |
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1062220 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1062220 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..543bf03c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1062220 @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report from QEMU. The user provided some possible categories like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, etc., and they want me to pick just one word as the category. + +First, let's read the bug report. It says that qemu-system-arm crashed with SIGABRT in cpu_abort(). They were using the kernel u-boot.bin. The system details mention Ubuntu 12.10, so it's a user-mode crash, not a kernel issue. The executable is /usr/bin/qemu-system-arm, and the command line was qemu-system-arm -M versatilepb -kernel u-boot.bin. + +Looking at the stack trace: raise() from libc, then abort(), followed by some ?? which probably means incomplete symbols. The title mentions SIGABRT in raise(). So it's a crash due to an assertion failure or error during runtime. + +Now, considering the categories: + +- Mistranslation and assembly lowering relate to code generation issues, possibly in user-mode when translating from source architecture to target. +- Device would be hardware device related. +- Graphic is about display issues. +- Socket and network are for connectivity problems. +- KVM is about kernel-based virtualization. +- Boot relates to the boot process. +- VNC is remote desktop access. +- Debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The crash happened in cpu Abort(), which suggests it's an error within QEMU itself. Since SIGABRT is typically triggered by a call to abort() due to some condition being violated (like a failed assertion). In the context of QEMU, this could be related to how it handles machine models or devices. + +The command line specifies -M versatilepb, which refers to a specific machine model in QEMU. If there's an issue with that machine model, perhaps during booting or device setup, it might cause such a crash. + +Looking at the possible categories, 'device' seems relevant because the machine model includes various devices (like CPUs, memory, etc.), and if something goes wrong during their initialization or configuration, it could lead to an abort. Alternatively, 'boot' is also a possibility since u-boot.bin is the kernel being loaded, but the crash happened in cpu_abort(), which might not be directly related to the boot process itself. + +But considering that the error occurs during the execution of the QEMU system and relates to how devices are handled (versatilepb is a specific board model with its own set of devices), 'device' seems more appropriate than 'boot'. +</think> + +The bug report indicates a crash in qemu-system-arm when using the versatilepb machine model. The issue arises from an assertion failure, likely during device initialization. + +**Answer:** + +device \ No newline at end of file |