1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/263 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/263
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..747d2740
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/263
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The bug report says: "readdir() returns NULL (errno=EOVERFLOW) for 32-bit user-static qemu on 64-bit host." 
+
+Let me break this down. The issue is with readdir() returning NULL and errno being EOVERFLOW. I'm not super familiar with all the categories, but I remember that EOVERFLOW usually relates to issues with file operations or handling data that's too large for the system to process correctly.
+
+The problem occurs when running a 32-bit QEMU on a 64-bit host. Since QEMU is an emulator and potentially deals with emulated filesystems or devices, maybe it's related to how it handles file I/O across different architectures.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+"Files" seems relevant because readdir is a file system function. The error is happening during a file operation, so it's likely related to how QEMU interacts with the host's filesystem when running in 32-bit mode on a 64-bit system.
+
+Other categories like network or socket don't fit here since the issue isn't about communication but rather file I/O. Graphics and peripherals are also not directly related to this problem. 
+
+So, putting it together, the bug is about a file operation failing due to an overflow error when using a 32-bit QEMU on a 64-bit host. Therefore, the most appropriate category is "files."
+</think>
+
+The issue involves a file system function (readdir()) returning an error during interaction between a 32-bit QEMU and a 64-bit host, indicating a problem with file handling.
+
+**files**
\ No newline at end of file