1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1787754 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1787754
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0a7ecbbd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1787754
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that when running the command `./qemu-sparc64 -cpu help`, the output isn't accurate. They provided a sample output and compared it to what they expected based on source code.
+
+Looking at the categories given: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. 
+
+The issue here is about incorrect CPU information being displayed when using the `-cpu help` option in QEMU for Sparc architectures. This seems to be a problem with how the CPU types are enumerated or their features are described. It's not related to user-mode translations or assembly code lowering directly.
+
+The bug isn't about device hardware, graphics, networking, KVM hypervisor specifics, booting issues, VNC, debug functions, file handling, permissions, performance metrics, kernel interactions, or peripherals. Instead, it's more about the correctness of the information presented when listing CPU models and their features.
+
+Since the problem is specific to the output of a help command related to CPU types and their features, and none of the other categories precisely fit this scenario, the most appropriate classification would be 'other'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves incorrect CPU information display in QEMU's `-cpu help` output for Sparc architectures. Since it doesn't fall into any specific category like device or network issues but relates to how CPU models are presented, it is classified under 'other'.
+
+**Answer:** other
\ No newline at end of file