diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/peripherals/1875')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/peripherals/1875 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/peripherals/1875 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/peripherals/1875 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..30a90bd7 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/peripherals/1875 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, let me try to figure out the category for this bug report. The user is having an issue with QEMU where it's giving a warning about not finding a scancode for keysym 65483 when they try to bind F14 to another key. They mention that xmodmap works fine and xev shows the correct key press, but their Windows VM isn't recognizing the binding. + +First, I need to understand what's happening here. QEMU is a hypervisor used for running virtual machines. When it comes to handling input devices, especially keyboards, there might be some translation issues between the host system (in this case, presumably Linux) and the guest OS (Windows 10). + +The error message mentions "no scancode found for keysym 65483." A scancode is a hardware-level code representing a key press, while a keysym is part of the X Window System's way of representing keys. So, QEMU might be trying to map the keysym from the host to a scancode that the guest OS (Windows) can understand. + +The user tried using xmodmap to remap keycode 148 to F14 and other modifiers, which worked on the host side, but the VM isn't recognizing it. This suggests an issue with how QEMU handles keyboard events or translates them between the host and guest environments. + +Looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, etc. + +This seems related to input devices because it's about keybindings not working correctly in a VM. Since QEMU handles virtual devices, particularly the keyboard and mouse, this would fall under the "peripherals" category. The problem is with how the hypervisor (QEMU) translates or passes through certain keys to the guest OS. + +Another possible category could be "input," but that's not listed. However, since peripherals include input devices like keyboards, "peripherals" seems appropriate. +</think> + +The issue relates to keyboard mapping between the host and guest in QEMU, which falls under handling of input devices (peripherals). + +**peripherals** \ No newline at end of file |