1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/peripherals/1914353 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/peripherals/1914353
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..816eee81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/peripherals/1914353
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let's see what the issue is.
+
+The problem is with the AArch64 GIC component in QEMU. The bug involves an out-of-bounds access via interrupt ID. Specifically, the SGIINTID field was treated as 10 bits when it should be only 4 bits according to the ARM spec. This caused a heap-buffer-overflow because the code was using a wrong mask, leading to accessing an incorrect part of the array.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is in the GIC code, which handles interrupts for ARM systems. Since this relates to how hardware components (like interrupt controllers) are emulated, it falls under the 'peripherals' category. The issue isn't about user-mode translations, assembly lowering, or network-related functions. It's a hardware emulation problem, specifically with peripherals.
+
+So, the correct classification is 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an out-of-bounds access in QEMU's GIC (Generic Interrupt Controller) component for AArch64 architectures. The issue arises due to incorrect handling of the interrupt ID, which should be 4 bits but was treated as 10 bits. This led to a heap buffer overflow and is classified under security vulnerabilities.
+
+The GIC is part of the hardware emulation in QEMU, specifically related to peripherals. Therefore, the correct category for this bug report is **peripherals**.
+
+Answer: peripherals
\ No newline at end of file