diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/KVM/2925')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/KVM/2925 | 29 |
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/KVM/2925 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/KVM/2925 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3dbbd8cc --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/KVM/2925 @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user provided some categories, and I need to choose the right one based on the description. + +The problem is about not being able to execute certain QMP guest commands via a Unix socket. Specifically, when using `socat` to connect, commands like `guest-info` return an error saying the command isn't found. However, these same commands work when using Virsh through `qemu.guest_agent.0`. + +Looking at the steps to reproduce, it shows that connecting via the Unix socket works for initial QMP handshake but fails on specific guest commands. The user also mentions they've checked and modified `/etc/sysconfig/qemu-ga` by unmarking some blacklist functions, which didn't help. + +The possible categories include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, etc. I need to figure out which category best fits this issue. + +Hmm, the problem seems related to how QMP commands are being handled over the Unix socket versus Virsh. Since it's about command availability and execution via a specific channel (Unix socket), I'm thinking it might be a protocol or communication issue rather than something like a device or graphic bug. + +The mention of `qemu.guest_agent.0` working suggests that maybe the guest agent is configured correctly, but there's an issue when accessing through the Unix socket. Perhaps the commands aren't being properly routed or recognized in this context. + +Wait, could it be related to how QEMU handles different channels? Maybe the Unix socket isn't set up correctly to allow certain commands, whereas Virsh uses a different method that works fine. + +The error message about `guest-info` not being found points towards a command availability issue. This makes me think of permissions or capabilities in the guest agent setup. Since unmarking the blacklist didn't fix it, maybe there's another layer involved. + +Looking at the categories again, 'other' is an option but I want to be specific. Categories like 'network' or 'socket' might fit since it's a communication channel issue. But 'device' and others don't seem relevant here. + +I'm leaning towards 'KVM' because QEMU with KVM involves hypervisor aspects, and the guest agent commands are part of managing the VM through QMP. Alternatively, 'network' could be considered if it's a protocol problem over sockets, but I think 'other' is too vague. + +Wait, another angle: The issue is that some commands work via Virsh (which probably uses a different transport or setup) and not via the Unix socket. This might relate to how QEMU's QMP server handles different connections. Maybe certain capabilities are only enabled for specific transports, like Virtio vs raw sockets. + +But I'm still not sure if it fits into one of the more specific categories. Since the problem is about command execution over a particular communication channel (Unix socket) and not directly related to hardware devices, graphics, or networking in a traditional sense, maybe 'other' isn't right either. + +Wait, looking back at the categories provided: there's a 'hypervisor' category which might be relevant because QEMU acts as a hypervisor when using KVM. Since this involves guest agent commands and communication through QMP, which is part of managing the VM, 'hypervisor' seems appropriate. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file |